The Inference Report

Reinforcement learning (RL) is an effective way to strengthen the long-context reasoning of large language models (LLMs), but it needs training data that are long, diverse, challenging, and verifiable. Human annotation of such data is expensive, naturally occurring data are too scarce to sustain RL, and existing synthesis methods depend on external corpora or stronger teacher models, which become harder to obtain as the trained models get stronger. Recently, RL from zero data, in which a model learns from tasks it proposes itself, has achieved excellent performance, but existing methods target short-context tasks. Therefore, we propose $\textbf{LongZero}$, a method that lets an LLM improve its own long-context reasoning without any external data. Instead of writing questions and answers over existing documents, LongZero first has the model synthesize the question and answer with its supporting evidence in a compact structured form, and only then separately expands the evidence into a long multi-document context. LongZero combines these self-written multi-hop reasoning tasks with self-written multi-round retrieval tasks and trains the model with GRPO. We evaluate LongZero on two LLMs across five long-context reasoning benchmarks and compare it with RL on data synthesized from external corpora. Experimental results show that LongZero can generalize to real tasks, and outperforms both baselines, suggesting a viable and promising path to improving long-context reasoning of LLMs.

Existing sequential recommenders usually allocate a fixed computational budget to every item in a user's interaction history, regardless of the item's contribution to the final prediction. We challenge this de facto design with two diagnostic findings. (1) Non-uniform computational need: items within the same sequence vary drastically in how much computation they require. Most converge after shallow processing while a critical minority only stabilizes at full depth. (2) Suboptimality of fixed allocation: given oracle access to the target item, a non-uniform depth assignment consistently outranks the fixed one, indicating that existing uniform computation both wastes capacity on already-converged items and sacrifices overall recommendation quality. These observations motivate a shift from fixed-depth computation to item-level adaptive reasoning. To this end, we propose LoopRec. LoopRec recursively applies a single weight-shared block and introduces a lightweight gate at each recursion boundary that makes a binary exit-or-continue decision for every item independently. Items whose representations have sufficiently matured exit early, while those requiring deeper reasoning continue to subsequent recursions. This design converts the fixed global depth into a learned, per-item property without auxiliary depth labels, and is readily adaptable to diverse backbone architectures. Extensive experiments on public benchmarks with four backbone families demonstrate that LoopRec consistently outperforms matched fixed-depth counterparts. Further analysis reveals that LoopRec's learned allocation exhibits interpretable patterns aligned with our post-hoc oracle analysis: lower-frequency items and more recent interactions naturally receive deeper computation. Our code is available at https://github.com/Elpmis117/LoopRec.

Existing world models typically perceive a scene through current visual frame or a narrow history window. However, these observations may not reveal the physics properties that determine transition dynamics, such as an object's mass distribution, joint damping, or surface friction. Without calibrating these physics factors for world models, predictions tend to regress toward an empirical prior and induce severe drift in novel test scenes. To this end, we propose PhysiCalWorld, which calibrates action-conditioned world models to the instance-specific dynamics via in-context prompting, without fine-tuning or analytical physics modeling. Our method encodes an exploratory interaction clip collected within the test scene into a compact physics descriptor token, which grounds subsequent predictions in the scene's actual physical behavior. PhysiCalWorld is trained end-to-end with the latent prediction loss alone, without physics labels. At inference time, the descriptor token is extracted once and can be reused across rollouts with negligible compute overhead. We evaluate PhysiCalWorld across four environments covering diverse physics variations and show that it substantially improves rollout prediction accuracy and visual planning success rate. The learned descriptors also form a physically structured latent space and generalize beyond the physics ranges seen during training.

We give an algorithm for computing an $\eps$-approximate fixed point of any $d$-dimensional nonexpansion with respect to the $\ell_\infty$ norm in time $\log(1/\eps)^{O(\log^2 d)}$. At its core, our method uses a boosting argument to geometrically shrink a search region. Among other consequences, our algorithm implies that simple stochastic games can be solved in quasipolynomial time.

We prove a self-normalized Bernstein inequality for bounded functions of a regenerative process with independent, identically distributed marked cycles of finite mean length. The bound uses observed cycle lengths and retains explicit terms for truncation and the cycle ending after the observation horizon. Selecting a tuning parameter from a finite deterministic collection gives a version of Bernstein inequality where all terms are empirical but one, related to the tails of the regeneration times. We then study this term in many regimes: it turns out that it is of second-order in many cases of interest. This is important for applications in machine learning: we prove generalization error bounds for classification with non-i.i.d., regenerative data. These bounds can be used to define learning objectives: by minimizing the first-order term only in the bound, we define agnostic classifiers that still satisfy oracle inequalities. We also show that the bound on the average deviation provided by our results is minimax-optimal in the sample size and in the expected regeneration time. Finally, we combine the Bernstein inequality with a regenerative strong approximation to obtain a Gaussian approximation using an observable block variance estimator.

The success of convolutional neural networks is often attributed to locality and weight sharing. However, how these two properties separately shape learning, and how their effects depend on the spatial correlations of natural images, remain poorly understood. We address these questions in a teacher-student model with a convolutional teacher acting on $P$ input positions with correlation $c$ between positions. We compare convolutional and locally connected students trained by online stochastic gradient descent, and derive ordinary differential equations that describe their dynamics exactly in the limit of large feature dimension $D$. For uncorrelated positions ($c = 0$), the two students follow the same learning trajectory, with the convolutional student learning exactly $P$ times faster. We also find that locality affects the sample complexity: a student that matches the kernel size of the teacher recovers it from $\mathcal{O}_{D}(D)$ samples, whereas $\mathcal{O}_{D}(D\log(D))$ samples are needed with a larger kernel. For $c > 0$, spatial correlations can reduce the advantage of weight sharing. The asymptotic error of the convolutional student grows with $c$, whereas that of the locally connected student is independent of $c$ and overall lower when evaluated at the same learning rate. When the learning rate is instead tuned to the training horizon, however, the locally connected student wins at early times and the convolutional student at late times, with a transition that we predict analytically.

Through a tangle of real-world interactions, from synthetic training pipelines to data shared on the open web, frontier LLMs absorb what their predecessors and competitors create. How well does each model play its role in this ecosystem, as a creator and as a solver? We introduce Environment Duels, a dynamic agentic benchmark that evaluates both capabilities on interactive environments. Each model writes environments, each with a privileged hint, aiming for tasks that capable solvers fail without the hint and pass with it. Across nine frontier LLMs, solving and authoring prove to be distinct skills: the strongest solvers are not the strongest authors, while smaller models learn more from how others played and write the hardest environments and the most useful hints. Beyond the scores, the pairwise interactions form a microcosm of how models affect one another. Head-to-head outcomes are transitive and so yield a stable ranking; independent authors converge on the same designs; and in a reinforcement-learning study with Qwen3.8-27B, the learner's hint lift on an author's environments tracks how much training on those environments improves it on held-out reasoning and agentic benchmarks, whether the environments are its own or another model's. Each of these patterns has a counterpart in how models shape one another outside the duel. By staging these interactions under controlled conditions, Environment Duels offers a window onto how LLMs teach, challenge and learn from one another. Code is available at https://github.com/LLM-Duels/EnvDuels.

Consensus is a fundamental problem in distributed computing and at the core of state machine replication (SMR). Despite decades of active human research, discovering practical low-latency solutions to the problem is still open, as it requires combining protocol knowledge, correctness reasoning, implementation, and experimental evaluation. We report on how AI helped us discover A-greement, a new consensus protocol for geo-replicated state machines that significantly outperforms state-of-the-art solutions. Averaged across six deployments with 5 or 9 replicas, A-greement reduces the mean latency of a geo-distributed key-value store over the fastest baseline by 12.2% and 33.3% on write-heavy and read-heavy workloads, respectively, and matches the fastest baseline on read-only workloads. A-greement combines lease-authorized local reads, direct client learning for leader-ordered writes, and a fast fixed-quorum per-key write path, selected according to network topology and workload. At the heart of our discovery lies AI-greement, an agent harness for the "autonomous" discovery, implementation, experimentation, and verification of candidate protocols. AI-greement integrates (1) a concept-oriented protocol knowledge base, (2) a modular implementation skeleton, and (3) a Lean-based verification framework with reusable safety definitions, reference specifications, and proofs. AI-greement is of independent interest: its Lean formalization uncovers several previously unreported vulnerabilities in existing consensus protocols, and it provides guidelines on how domain-specific harnesses can turn general-purpose coding agents into effective tools for (distributed) computing research. Yet we argue that human consensus experts remain essential before, during, and after the search: agents reshape the researcher's role rather than end consensus research.

Quantitative research is an iterative loop: a researcher proposes a market hypothesis, implements it as an executable signal, tests it on historical data, and decides what to keep. Existing benchmarks score formulas, code, or individual trading decisions, leaving open whether large language models (LLMs) can complete this loop and produce strategies that work beyond the research period. We introduce Quant-Arena, a benchmark and public leaderboard for end-to-end quantitative research on real A-share market data. A model constructs features and stock-scoring code, receives feedback only on 2022--2023, and freezes one strategy for assessment on the sealed year 2024. A cash-account evaluator applies trading constraints and costs, including market impact estimated from a simulated order book. Scores are dominated by realized excess return and complemented by signal quality and the diversity of features used by the strategy. We evaluate nine frontier models, among which GPT-6 Astra scores highest; yet no model beats the equal-weight market in 2024. Quant-Arena is open to submissions from any model or agent harness.

We analyze the problem of estimating univariate Gaussian mixture densities using the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator (NPMLE) based on $n$ independent and identically distributed samples. We show that the unconstrained NPMLE achieves the minimax optimal rate $\log(n)/n$ in squared Hellinger distance, when the true mixing measure is sub-Gaussian. In addition, we show that when the true mixing measure has compact support, the NMPLE constrained to a compact interval also achieves the minimax optimal rate, which is slightly faster and of order $\log(n)/(n \log \log n)$. Our proof consists of sharply characterizing the local Hellinger bracketing entropy of the class of finite Gaussian mixtures. One of our key technical innovations is to sharply bound the $L^2$ bracketing entropy of balls of bounded-degree polynomials, which may be of independent interest. As an application, we establish the regret-optimality of $g$-modeling procedures based on the NPMLE in the Gaussian Empirical Bayes problem with bounded priors.

Multimodal agents (MMAs) sustain interaction through reasoning, memory, tools, and feedback, most visibly as computer-use agents, while robotic systems (RSs) couple sensing and actuation under physical dynamics. We define multimodal embodied agents (MMEAs) as goal-directed systems that couple multimodal task reasoning with physical action and revise decisions from the resulting feedback. This raises a central question: what changes when a multimodal agent moves from computer-use to robot-use? We introduce PAPAV, a unified capability-centric framework of five recurring functions: Perceive the current state, Anticipate action effects, Plan a feasible course, Act through an interface or body, and Verify the outcome. Defined by function rather than architecture, these capabilities let PAPAV identify what all three share and then compare MMEAs with MMAs and with RSs. Five physical constraints, from partial observability to unverifiable outcomes, leave fewer choices fixed in advance and less room to reverse errors. Across 64 benchmarks, explicit evaluation centers on Act; only 5 assess Anticipate and 3 assess Verify, leaving both largely hidden behind task success. These constraints also frame the open challenges we identify. PAPAV therefore provides a common basis for designing reliable physical agents and measuring progress across all five capabilities rather than task success alone.

Flow matching trains a continuum of velocity regression problems but usually reports a loss averaged over interpolation time, obscuring which regions are limited by intrinsic ambiguity and which remain data-limited. We introduce the Velocity Ambiguity Profile (VAP), $\mathcal{A}_v(t)$, the time-local Bayes-risk floor of velocity prediction, and decompose time-resolved loss as $L_N(t)=\mathcal{A}_v(t)+R(t;N)$, where only the excess term $R(t;N)$ is reducible by more data or a different estimator. For $N$ training samples and a $K$-component mixture in the structured example, we prove two statistical benchmarks. In an intrinsic local-regression benchmark, $\mathcal{A}_v(t)$ enters the time-dependent noise factor of the standard nonparametric rate. In separated isotropic Gaussian mixtures, the Bayes velocity becomes locally affine, and a label-oracle residual-regression benchmark has parametric excess-risk scale $K\mathcal{A}_v(t)/N$, matched within the same separated residual Gaussian-location subproblem. Controlled Gaussian-mixture experiments validate this diagnostic through a dense transition sweep, calibrated oracle-to-blind and empirical-proxy audits, and a local controlled time-sampler stress test in which a frozen reducible-error proxy reduces reducible loss while cross-cell sensitivity delimits aggressive sampling. On CIFAR-100 DINOv2 feature flow, guided time sampling reduces uniformly evaluated velocity loss by $6.78\%$ and global feature Fréchet distance (FD) by $23.6\%$, while class-conditional kernel inception distance (KID) shows no improvement. VAP turns an averaged flow-matching objective into a time-resolved diagnostic for locating ambiguity-limited and data-limited regions.

Sequential decision-making under partial observability is difficult because agents must explore to infer hidden, task-relevant information before acting effectively. Learning such information-gathering behaviors tabula rasa via online reinforcement learning is sample-inefficient, whereas offline imitation averages expert actions across hidden states and fails to learn exploration. In this work, we propose ASTEROID, a simple and effective student--teacher supervised learning framework that can learn test-time exploration. Although a privileged expert never needs to explore, we demonstrate that a history-conditioned student can learn to do so when trained with on-policy contexts: the student first collects on-policy context under partial observability, and the privileged expert provides action labels conditioned on that context. By distilling expert actions directly conditioned on the student's on-policy history, the student learns to systematically resolve partial observability, i.e., search while uncertain and exploit once the hidden state is revealed. This enables efficient test-time exploration (similar to Bayesian posterior sampling) without incurring the impractical training-data costs of reinforcement learning. Across a diverse range of eleven different environments, including discrete exploration benchmarks, robotic manipulation, navigation, and Procgen environments, ASTEROID achieves ~2x higher returns under fixed exploration budgets, uses ~100x fewer interactions than RL baselines, and outperforms frontier models at exploration. Finally, our method transfers policies trained in simulation to vision-denied real-world robot manipulation, exhibiting efficient exploration and increasing success by +40% over standard distillation. Overall, it provides a simple yet surprisingly effective framework to learn efficient test-time exploration.

Despite recent advances, current AI systems remain highly susceptible to domain shifts, particularly in biomedical imaging, where images are usually acquired under substantially different experimental conditions. Although recent domain adaptation methods have made substantial progress, significant performance gaps under domain shift persist. To measure progress in this regard, we introduce BatchBench, a leaderboard that evaluates and compares the robustness of AI systems on biomedical images from unseen experimental batches and data sources. BatchBench is built on JUMP-CP, one of the largest publicly available biomedical imaging datasets. Generated using the Cell Painting assay, JUMP-CP exhibits pronounced batch effects and domain shifts, making it a challenging testbed for evaluating robustness to distributional changes.

Many NP-complete (NPC) problems have a polynomial-time (P) twin that differs in a single structural detail, such as 3- versus 2-colouring a graph. A model that reasons rather than recalls should notice which side of this boundary a problem falls on, yet existing benchmarks either fix the wording of each task or ignore its complexity class, so they cannot separate the two. We introduce P2NPCBench, a benchmark of 12 problem families in which every NPC problem is paired with a P twin posed over the same surface. To remove the textbook cues that enable recall, we build it with AgentGAN, an adversarial multi-agent framework in which a generator rewrites each statement until a panel of frozen code models fails, while an executable validity gate keeps every rewrite answer- and class-preserving. The result is 2,114 hardened statements with hand-verified reference human solvers. Evaluating 12 proprietary and open-source models, we find that every model scores lower on NPC statements than on their P twins (35.4% vs. 63.8% pass@1), and that 95.1% of model-family pairs fail more often on the NPC side. A tenfold time limit raises NPC accuracy only from 28.5% to 31.9%, so failures stem from wrong or crashing programs rather than slow ones. Hardening also narrows the class gap from 24.8 to 14.6 points, showing that part of the apparent gap reflects familiarity with textbook phrasing rather than complexity class.

Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) has become a central paradigm for aligning Large Language Models with human values. However, the reliance on sensitive preference data necessitates rigorous differential privacy (DP) guarantees to prevent user information leakage. Existing private alignment methods typically assume dense reward parameterizations, resulting in estimation error bounds that scale polynomially with the ambient {model size $d$}. Such dependence is prohibitive in modern {overparameterized models} where $d$ is vast. In this work, we study \emph{Private Sparse RLHF} problem to address this limitation, assuming that human preferences (reward model) are governed by a subset of $s^* \ll d$ relevant features. We provide the first comprehensive theoretical framework for differentially private sparse reward estimation from pairwise preference feedback under the Bradley-Terry-Luce model, and introduce efficient algorithms for both Sample-DP and Label-DP settings. Theoretically, under the squared $\ell_2$ parameter estimation error, we establish upper bounds of $\widetilde{O}(s^*/n + {s^*}^2/n^2\varepsilon^2)$ for $(\varepsilon,δ)$-Sample-DP and $\widetilde{O}(s^*/n + s^*/n\varepsilon^2)$ for $\varepsilon$-Label-DP based on randomized response, where $n$ is the training data size. For the lower bounds, we show that the Sample-DP rate is nearly optimal, and that the guarantee for our Label-DP method cannot be further improved within the randomized-response framework. We also provide a general lower bound for the problem with Label-DP. Empirically, our framework demonstrates superior efficacy over dense baselines across sentiment generation and safety alignment benchmarks, offering a significantly more favorable privacy-utility trade-off.

Vision-language-action (VLA) models have shown promise in robotic manipulation, but imitation learning (IL) alone often struggles to master complex long-horizon skills. Reinforcement learning (RL) offers an effective avenue for further improving VLA policies. However, existing VLA-RL methods typically suffer from delayed and biased credit assignment due to trajectory-level sparse rewards, while imbalanced subtask mastery creates bottlenecks that limit overall performance. To address these challenges, we propose AtomicRL, an RL post-training framework that leverages atomic task structures for reliable credit assignment and adaptive exploration. AtomicRL introduces Semantic-Aware Policy Optimization (SAPO), which uses semantic-aware gating to constrain TD residuals from failed atomic subtasks from propagating across task boundaries, mitigating credit contamination while preserving intra-subtask credit assignment and value bootstrapping. In addition, Bottleneck-Adaptive Target Exploration (BATE) dynamically coordinates task sampling and local exploration incentives based on the mastery of individual atomic subtasks, directing learning toward the remaining bottlenecks. Finally, we develop a Real2Sim2Real pipeline that bridges online RL in simulation with real-world deployment, facilitating practical transfer to physical robots. On LIBERO-LONG, AtomicRL achieves absolute performance gains of 3.6% and 4.0% over PPO across two VLA architectures. On CALVIN ABC-D, it improves full-task performance by up to 9.5% over PPO. Combined with the Real2Sim2Real pipeline, AtomicRL further improves real-world task performance by an average of 21.3%. These results demonstrate that AtomicRL effectively improves the learning efficiency and manipulation performance of VLA policies on long-horizon tasks.

Perimeter triage faces a latency/semantics trade-off: signature engines are fast and format-safe but blind to unseen attacks, while generative models are semantic but slow and produce unparseable output. In late 2026 a class of commercial System One decision models (TypeSafe Jev; Microsoft-Decision-1) began selling typed decision primitives - binary gates, closed-set choices, ordinal scores - as product APIs, with no academic treatment. We present VX-One: a small multi-head network (100K-10M parameters) whose outputs are these primitives - a calibrated gate, a choice over a closed candidate set that always includes an explicit unknown option, and an ordinal score, trained multi-task, temperature-calibrated per head (~0.7-1.7 ms p50 on CPU). We evaluate it on UNSW-NB15, CIC-IDS2017, EMBER2024 against calibrated XGBoost, Random-Forest, MLP, Kitsune, and measure a two-phase cascade (Suricata with 52,674 Emerging-Threats rules -> VX-One) over five days of CIC-IDS2017. Findings: (i) VX-One wins detection (AUROC/FPR@95%TPR) on UNSW-NB15 and under temporal drift on CIC-IDS2017 (0.711 vs 0.637), but XGBoost wins multi-class attribution on all three benchmarks; (ii) leave-one-family-out gate detects never-seen families on 9/9 UNSW folds yet drops below chance on CIC recon family, and abstention threshold transfers poorly across benchmarks; (iii) on payload-less reconstructions signature engines resolve ~0.1% of flows - gray zone ~99.9% of traffic, recovered by Phase 2 (combined recall >=0.978); (iv) calibration collapses under temporal drift (ECE 0.04->0.40) for every method while ranking partially survives. We provide a measured account of where typed calibrated decisions help perimeter triage, and where they fail.

Generative models propose crystalline materials by learning composition and geometry, but unconditional sampling gives no direct control over the space group, which constrains whether responses such as piezoelectricity are symmetry-allowed. We present Orbitol, a crystal generator built on the Crystalite diffusion Transformer that replaces atom tokens with Wyckoff-orbit tokens. Given a space group and a collection of occupied Wyckoff positions, Orbitol generates the atom type and free coordinates of each orbit together with a compatible lattice, so every valid structure is invariant under the operations of the requested group. It generates structures two to three orders of magnitude faster than the symmetry-aware baselines at the evaluated settings. On MP-20, 13.8% of Orbitol's attempts yielded stable or metastable, unique and novel structures that retained the requested space group after relaxation, compared with 10.8% for SGFM, the next best model. We also introduce SPARC, a score that combines retention of the raw detected space group with agreement between the retained-group and training distributions. Finally, we used Orbitol to generate candidates in piezoelectric crystal classes. Of the structures selected by internal screening, 89% passed our density functional theory checks, and 79% also matched no Materials Project or Alexandria entry with the same space group. Their median figure of merit was nine times that of the piezoelectric materials computed in the Materials Project, and 24% of the new candidates ranked in that set's top 10%.

Language models make it easy to build classifiers by simply prompting a model with the sample to classify. However, their predictions are neither deterministic nor uniformly reliable across samples. How can we combine predictions from different models to improve reliability? We view LLM classifiers as noisy measurement instruments of an underlying target label. Our goal is to maximize average classification accuracy at a given average query cost. To this end, we introduce circuits that organize LLM classifiers into an adaptive sequence of queries and decisions. We then characterize the optimal circuit, obtain the fundamental limits of achievable accuracy, and provide practical insights on realizing the optimal circuit. Across seven classification tasks spanning safety, health, political science, human preference, agent evaluation, decision-making and reasoning, our method improves the cost-accuracy frontier over routing and cascading baselines.

Personalized federated learning must decide which clients should share representations. We introduce HDC-FL (Head-Derived Clustering for Personalized Federated Learning), which reads that decision off a signal shared-encoder training already produces: the client-specific classifi- er heads. At periodic refresh rounds the server projects the cached heads into a normalized low-rank descriptor space, groups the descriptors, builds one encoder prototype per group from the cached client encoders, and returns to each client a soft mixture of those prototypes paired with its own unchanged head. Client-specific heads are never averaged or distributed to oth- er clients; the shared-encoder trajectory is left intact; and no second optimization trajectory, additional local objective, or post-training fine-tuning stage is required. Across 11 CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 configurations covering label-subset, Dirichlet and rotation heterogeneity with ResNet-18 and MobileNetV2 encoders, HDC-FL is competitive with the strongest personalized and clustered baselines in macro-averaged mean accuracy and attains the numerically highest macro-averaged worst-client and bottom-20% accuracy among the evaluated methods. The tail results distinguish methods that look similar when only their means are compared. A controlled donor-swap diagnostic further finds positive donor-ranking associations between head similarity and encoder compatibility in all three settings tested, most clearly under covariate shift.

Parallel AI agents can produce useful local edits yet degrade a shared solution when their edits are combined. We model this coordination problem as discrete block optimization with an exactly evaluable objective and a known dependency graph. Independent sets certify compatible edits whose verified gains, measured against the same current solution, add exactly. A coordinator constructs a safe compatible candidate and can also evaluate interacting edits to capture favorable interactions. We prove that an optimal fractional coloring yields a merger that preserves a $1/χ_f(G)$ fraction of the total verified local improvement, where $χ_f(G)$ is the graph's fractional chromatic number. This guarantee is tight among mergers that select a subset of the same proposals. Under conditional local-improvement guarantees and a block error-bound condition, repeated collaboration converges geometrically in the objective gap. The rate separates task structure, agent allocation, and computation cost, yielding a linear program for agent assignment and an explicit time-cost trade-off. Code-repair experiments show that verified merging resolves conflicts between individually useful edits that cause naive merging to fail. On larger conflict-free tasks, parallel agents reduce modeled completion time at higher input-token-equivalent cost. On three public road networks, fractional integration retains 922 units of verified graph-cut improvement across 90 paired runs. For route-search agents sharing exclusive access to vehicle routes, fractional scheduling reduces measured wall time by a median of 15% across twelve paired runs, with route-cost changes varying across runs.

Data agents built on ReAct-style loops now execute complex analytical workflows over structured data, yet their intermediate reasoning still runs almost entirely through text. Human analysts instead move between numbers, tables, and charts, reading visual evidence to expose trends and anomalies that text summaries drop. We ask whether charts can serve as internal epistemic actions inside a data agent's reasoning loop, and how to teach an agent to use them. We first build \probe{}, a suite of 200 controlled tasks under four matched interface conditions, and find a persistent gap between what agents can read and what they choose to use. Agents score as well from self-generated charts as from numeric output, yet plotting access alone does not translate into consistent use. Task slices show that charts lead on temporal, pattern, and anomaly reasoning, while text leads on precise reading and conditional verification. We then propose \method{}, which distils two families of experience from conditioned trajectory rollouts. One family records how to select and verify analytical operations, and the other records when to invoke text, charts, or both. A trajectory judge scores outcomes and labels intermediate steps, and a validation gate admits only experience that improves held-out performance. On three held-out benchmarks with four LLM backbones, \method{} raises analytical accuracy and visual evidence quality over matched baselines, and backbones that never drew charts begin using them, all without touching model parameters.

Recent Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) use Self-Conditioning (SC), or Loopholing, to improve their performance. While SC is traditionally seen as an auxiliary heuristic, its empirical success raises the question: can a continuous generative model be based purely on Self-Conditioning? We answer affirmatively with LAW (``Loopholing All the Way''), which propagates the Expected Embedding under the denoiser's prediction across steps, decoding the tokens once, at the end. On Sudoku, LAW outperforms previous Discrete and Continuous Diffusion Models, including Loopholing Discrete Diffusion. On Maze, LAW is the most accurate from 2 to 64 NFE. After training on TinyGSM and sampling at temperature 1 with 1024 NFE, LAW solves 42.2% of GSM8K problems against 34.5% for uniform Loopholing Discrete Diffusion. Additionally, fine-tuning a pre-trained Uniform Diffusion Model (Duo) with LAW increases its accuracy from 17.2% to 48.1%. Finally, on OpenWebText, LAW pushes the Pareto frontier and approaches Autoregressive Models (ARMs) with 64 NFE. Find our code at https://github.com/ilievanadezhda/law.

Vietnamese pre-trained encoders have improved rapidly, but the strongest ones are large, multilingual-vocabulary models or depend on external word segmentation, which makes them costly to deploy. We present GoiBERT, a family of two compact Vietnamese encoders with 26M and 49M parameters that operate directly on raw text. GoiBERT learns from two complementary teachers. A same-tokenizer Vietnamese encoder first teaches general-purpose representations. A much larger teacher then provides task-level guidance through soft labels that are generated without ever labeling its own training data. Across eight benchmarks covering text classification, aspect-based sentiment analysis, natural language inference, and named entity recognition, GoiBERT-large achieves the highest average score among non-teacher models. It does so with fewer than half the parameters of the strongest compact baseline and twice its throughput. GoiBERT-base retains 99% of that baseline's performance at a quarter of its size. Our analysis shows that compression is nearly lossless for sentiment and classification tasks but remains costly for inference and entity recognition, which points to clear directions for future work. Our code and models are available at: https://github.com/Nhantran65/GoiBERT.git

Uniform diffusion language models (UDLMs) generate text by iteratively denoising sequences of ordinary vocabulary tokens, any of which may be corrupted and subsequently revised. During training, UDLMs must denoise from a context that may itself be unreliable, whereas masked diffusion language models (MDLMs) always condition on a clean context. This challenging training objective makes UDLMs more FLOP-intensive to train than MDLMs, but it yields stronger downstream reasoning performance. Recently, selective looping, which recursively applies a few early Transformer layers within each denoising step, has been shown to improve training efficiency in MDLMs under an iso-FLOP budget. We investigate looping in UDLMs while keeping the training objective and sampler unchanged. We find that looping significantly improves training efficiency: looped UDLMs reach the validation NLL of a non-looped UDLM trained on about 0.5 trillion tokens with up to 2.8x fewer training FLOPs on OpenWebText and 3.3x fewer on FineWeb-Edu. We also find that, at a matched NFE budget, looped UDLMs reach up to 9.8% lower generation perplexity than the non-looped UDLM, with most gains achieved at moderate loop counts. Finally, we study different loop-count distributions and find that sampling smaller loop counts more frequently during training improves inference efficiency: on downstream tasks, this strategy uses 12% fewer loops than uniform loop-count sampling without degrading accuracy.

Formal specifications can make AI-generated code mechanically checkable. Because user intent is typically expressed in natural language rather than formal logic, specifications must first be derived from it, e.g., via LLM-based autoformalization. Yet autoformalized specifications are themselves untrusted, so a key challenge is validating whether they capture user intent without relying on a costly oracle such as human review. In this oracle-free setting, a natural strategy is to vote among model outputs, but because model errors are often correlated, agreement among outputs may reflect shared mistakes rather than correctness. Our key insight is that these errors can be decorrelated through representational diversity. We achieve this diversity with contrapuntal languages: pairs of task-specific formal languages, each designed to express the intended specification, yet admitting no structure-preserving translation between them. An LLM formalizes the intent independently in each language, and we accept a specification only if a solver proves the two formalizations equivalent. To construct such languages, we present a synthesis algorithm that reuses fragments of sampled seed specifications as syntactic sugar over a base specification language. We implement the approach for first-order logic specifications and evaluate it on HumanEval+ and LiveCodeBench using GPT-5.4 mini and Qwen3.6-Flash with and without thinking. Over the strongest baseline, our method increases the proportion of accepted specifications that are correct, i.e., complete and sound, by 12.0% on HumanEval+ and 42.9% on LiveCodeBench. The accepted specifications judged complete reject 98.6% of buggy program variants on HumanEval+ and 96.2% on LiveCodeBench, compared with 92.8% and 78.3% for the strongest baseline.

Recent advances in frontier AI models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in visual understanding, reasoning, planning, and tool use, raising the possibility of using general-purpose AI models for robot manipulation without task-specific training. However, their manipulation capabilities have not been systematically evaluated on standardized robotics benchmarks. In this report, we present a unified closed-loop manipulation framework for evaluating frontier AI models on the LIBERO-10 benchmark. Our framework enables models to control a robot directly through visual observations, robot proprioception, and structured tool calls, primarily by specifying target end-effector poses and gripper commands, without task-specific fine-tuning or pretrained manipulation skills. We evaluate six frontier AI models, including GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, GPT-6 Luna, Claude Opus 5, Claude Opus 5.5, and Gemini-4 Argon, across three reasoning effort levels, resulting in 18 configurations and 1,800 evaluation episodes. Our results show that GPT-6 Astra achieves the highest success rate of 44%, followed by Gemini-4 Argon at 43%. Increasing reasoning effort generally improves manipulation performance, but the benefits vary across models and come at additional inference cost. We also observe substantial differences across tasks, with models performing relatively well on object placement tasks but struggling with precise spatial arrangements and complex multi-step interactions. These findings demonstrate both the potential and limitations of frontier AI models for robot manipulation, highlighting the challenges of translating reasoning capabilities into reliable physical actions. We release our evaluation framework and experimental results to support reproducible benchmarking and future research on reasoning-based robot manipulation.

Coding agents are typically evaluated using one-shot, well-formulated prompts. Benchmarks such as SWE-bench use existing GitHub issues as input for a coding agent and evaluate whether the agent successfully solves the task. However, in real-world use cases, prompts are often not as well-formulated or structured as existing GitHub issues. Additionally, a coding agent session is not limited to a single prompt; it typically involves a multi-turn interaction in which the user iteratively adds new tasks and requirements that the agent must fulfill. To benchmark these abilities, we developed SWE-DIVE, a dynamic, interactive validation and evaluation framework for benchmarking coding agents in a multi-turn environment. To achieve this, we introduce a user simulator that can simulate different behavioral patterns and communicate with the coding agent. We also introduce a conversation validator that evaluates the user simulator's outputs to determine whether they fulfill the initial requirements and guide the agent toward successfully solving the task. The entire framework is embedded in a Harbor environment, which orchestrates the coding agent, user simulator, and conversation validator, and executes the test environment to determine whether the agent successfully solves the task. Our results and source code are available in our GitHub repository (https://github.com/lorenzbrehme/swe-dive_usersim).

Decision models map stated rules and observed states to discrete answers. Aggregate accuracy leaves unresolved which rule and information changes guide those answers. We connect controlled input changes to transfer, joint reliability, and directed information use through executable arithmetic rules. Semantic rule separation and crossed rule and state tests make transfer and joint success separately measurable. We compare equivalent wordings, calibrate joint correctness through marginal-preserving reassociation, and alter tables to define alternative answer targets. Adaptation gains increase with nearest-source answer agreement; fully conflicting quartets yield small pooled gains and different gain signs across source splits. Equivalent rewrites have opposing task-level effects, linking transfer gains to rule presentation. Joint-score departures depend on which rule and state associations the reference preserves. A decision service changes answers more across equivalent wordings than across identical-text repeats and usually follows the answer targets implied by altered table values or mappings.

Humanoid loco-manipulation requires an effective interface between high-level task policies and whole-body control. Existing interfaces typically rely on a single action representation for both task intent and whole-body coordination. This may burden the high-level policy or leave one aspect underspecified. We present SP-HLM, a framework built on a sparse-pose-driven interface. The interface combines five task-critical body poses with a learned latent motion prior to represent spatial intent and whole-body coordination in complementary forms. SP-VLA, a vision-language-action model, first predicts task-relevant sparse poses and finger joint positions from multimodal observations and language instructions using asynchronous action-chunk inference. Given these sparse targets, SP-MGM, a motion generation model trained through two-stage distillation, reconstructs coordinated full-body motion in real time. A pretrained motion encoder maps this motion to a compact latent representation. SP-GMT, a general motion tracker, then integrates the explicit sparse targets with this implicit motion prior for whole-body control. Experiments in simulation and on a real humanoid robot demonstrate improved motion tracking, whole-body coordination, and loco-manipulation success over existing approaches. Additional results and videos are available on our \href{https://sp-hlm.github.io/}{\textcolor{blue}{project page}}.

Harness optimization, which improves an agent's prompts, tools, and workflows, is an increasingly effective way to enhance agents built on frozen or closed-source LLMs. Leading approaches such as the Darwin--Godel Machine and the Huxley--Godel Machine (HGM) rely on recursive self-improvement and were developed mainly for coding, where the competence needed to improve the agent coincides with the competence being improved. Planning tasks, in which an agent must produce a sequence of tool calls that jointly satisfies interacting constraints, break this alignment. There, open-ended self-modification repeatedly explores ineffective changes and consumes substantial evaluation budgets. We introduce HGM-Dual, a diagnostic-guided framework for budget-efficient harness evolution for planning agents. First, HGM-Dual represents agent evolution as lineage-aware context. This context records what each ancestor changed, which behaviors improved or regressed, and which modifications were ineffective, giving the editor explicit edit-outcome attribution instead of an unstructured archive of past agents. Second, HGM-Dual introduces error-conditioned dual-path child generation. For each selected parent, it generates a general child that preserves open-ended exploration and specialized children that target the harness components most likely responsible for the parent's highest-ranked constraint violations. HGM-Dual outperforms the strongest baseline by up to 14.45% relative improvement in case accuracy while matching HGM variants' final performance with 2x-4x fewer evaluation budget.

Text skills can extend the capabilities of tool-using agents, but long skill descriptions increase computational costs. Soft prompts provide a compact alternative, yet learning from entire successful trajectories may also introduce unnecessary behavioral changes. We find that the useful effect of a text skill is highly concentrated in a small subset of trajectory positions. Based on this observation, we propose Behavioral Localization, which compares the frozen agent with and without the text skill to identify positions where the skill both increases the likelihood of successful tokens and meaningfully changes the next token distribution. We use these localized positions to supervise a short soft prompt. Experiments on SpreadsheetBench with a frozen Qwen3.6-35B-A3B agent show that the top 10\% of trajectory positions capture 96.12\% of the total positive skill gain. In the shared prompt setting, selective supervision improves success from 30.36\% with full trajectory to 36.79\%. Under task-specific conditions, using the top 10\% localized positions achieves 57.38\%, outperforming both the full text skill and the on-policy OPCD baseline. These results show that a small set of behaviorally relevant trajectory positions can provide effective supervision of soft skills.

Enterprise agents act on documents. Before an agent can follow a policy, answer a compliance question or file a ticket, some ingestion layer must turn a Word file or PDF into tokens - and that layer is where an agent deployed in the wild silently loses information. We show that one layer is lost by every mainstream converter - the meaning an author encodes in how text looks - and that the loss makes agents confidently wrong rather than visibly incomplete. We build a task from 76 real policy documents: recover the requirements the author singled out, scored against the file's own OOXML properties by a deterministic matcher with no LLM judge. Formatting-blind ingestion collapses from micro F1 0.690 to 0.150 (docling) and 0.075 (plain text), a gap that replicates across six answering models from two vendors - five Claude models spanning the Opus, Sonnet and Haiku tiers, and OpenAI's GPT-5.6. An agent that cannot see the cue guesses, and docling's false-positive rate on requirements the author did not flag is four times ours. A span-level leave-one-out localises the loss to two cues - highlight (+0.302) and colour (+0.262), both Holm-adjusted p < 1e-4 - while bold, italic, monospace and strikethrough each sit within +/-0.003 of zero. The same asymmetry appears in PDF. Colour is also the cue no mainstream converter preserves and no parsing benchmark scores, and it is common: 32.8% of 6,460 documents carry a deliberate colour or highlight, 10.3% on an obligation. A pre-registered test shows that typing a cue for the agent adds +0.085 beyond merely preserving it (Holm-adjusted p = 0.049). We validate the labels against rendered page images through an independent modality (kappa = 0.72) and bound what wording alone can achieve (AUC 0.664). For agent builders the practical finding is that ingestion, not reasoning, is where this reliability is won or lost, and that the fix is cheap and measurable.

Empirical exchange-correlation functionals are fitted on fixed orbitals but used self-consistently, so better energies often come with worse densities. We show that the Brillouin residual of a trained functional on the Kohn-Sham orbitals of an accurate density controls, to first order, both the self-consistent density shift and the gap between fitted and self-consistent energies. Penalizing it requires no self-consistent-field solution during training. Trained on 6 energies and 11 CCSD densities, a neural meta-GGA surpasses SCAN in both atomization energies and densities of unseen molecules.

Adversarial training derives updates from surrogate losses, but source-loss descent does not directly characterize an update's effect on adversarial margins. We introduce ExGrad (extrapolative gradient recomposition), which constructs clean-input, adversarial-input, and adversarial-weight-perturbed (AWP) gradients. Virtual steps measure their margin responses, and a globally solvable three-variable problem selects coefficients over a bounded affine domain without nonnegativity constraints. Across affine radii on CIFAR-10, negative clean coefficients rapidly predominate and increase in magnitude with the radius. Cross-zero interventions show that setting the clean coefficient to zero is insufficient: mild subtraction improves PGD-20, while stronger subtraction trades clean accuracy for further PGD-20 gains. In CIFAR-10 WRN-28-4 controls, none of the three candidate-removal variants matches full ExGrad. Projection diagnostics show that negative clean coefficients usually coexist with positive net clean-axis projections, although both decrease as the radius grows. Norm-matched controls indicate that update magnitude alone does not explain the moderate-radius gains. Experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet-100 show radius-dependent improvements over AWP. On CIFAR-100, ExGrad at $R=0.8$ improves all five reported metrics, including clean and AutoAttack accuracy by 3.84 and 1.75 percentage points. On ImageNet-100, the same radius improves all four robust metrics over both AWP and PGD-AT. These results identify clean-gradient subtraction as a response-revealed update preference whose strength and clean-robust operating point are controlled by the affine radius.

This study introduces GuideEvolve, a self-evolving agent framework incorporating expert guidance and three autonomous regulatory mechanisms, collectively termed the 3Ts: Think Fast and Slow, Throwback, and Termination by choice. The framework addresses critical limitations in extant self-evolving agent paradigms through dual innovations: (1) a task-specific expert-evaluation-driven evolutionary pipeline, and (2) the integration of 3Ts mechanisms to facilitate cognitive optimization, performance recovery via temporal rollback, and adaptive termination protocols. Empirical validation across the MGSM and MMLU benchmarks demonstrates that GuideEvolve attains performance metrics comparable to current state-of-the-art models (89.8% accuracy versus Gödel Agent's 90.6% on MGSM; 89.1% versus 87.9% on MMLU), while exhibiting notably reduced variance (25-59%) and enhanced robustness. Furthermore, the framework achieves a 100% evolution success rate, superior to the baseline's 82%, diminishes required optimization iterations by approximately 50% (from 30 iterations in baseline to 15.1 and 13.4 across tasks), and provides improved stability for production deployment.

Understanding large, complex, and rapidly evolving code bases remains a core challenge for software engineering at scale, hindering onboarding, maintenance, refactoring, and impact analysis. Providing this information to a Large-Language Model (LLM) is another hurdle, as the LLM must understand not only the required code method but also its associated methods in the grand scheme of the repository. We propose Code Comprehensor, a hybrid retrieval-reasoning framework combining (i) a code dependency callgraph, (ii) CodeScribe, which uses code-aware LLMs to generate hierarchical documentation across repository call graphs, and (iii) CodeContrast, a CLIP-style dual-encoder model trained on CodeScribe output to learn aligned text-code embeddings. CodeContrast enables fast, semantically precise retrieval of relevant code-context neighborhoods, which serve as grounded evidence for an MCP-based LLM orchestrator answering domain-specific queries. Evaluation on OpenCV and a proprietary 5M-LOC repository shows that CodeScribe-derived supervision significantly improves cross-modal retrieval in text-to-code accuracy over baseline approaches. Richer textual supervision (hierarchical documentation, parent/sibling context, and LLM-generated synthetic questions) consistently enhances performance across both repositories. LLM-as-a-judge evaluation using the popular RAGAS of the Code Comprehensor output yields above 90% faithfulness scores.

LLM agents with similar success rates can follow different action sequences. An Agent Behavior Map represents LLM-harness combinations using centered action log-likelihoods on shared reference trajectories, without requiring new environment rollouts from the target agent. We derive error bounds relating squared coordinate distances to trajectory KL under explicit assumptions, and across eight cross-scored models the distances track the directly measured trajectory KL in rank order. Across 100 LLMs and four environments, ALFWorld-based coordinates support performance prediction and identify behavioral similarities. In ALFWorld, these similarities persist after controlling for success rates and model size, including across model families. As an extension, harness-component displacements approximately compose, with accuracy varying across components and environments.

Training generative models on synthetic data causes loss of diversity and a decrease in performance, a phenomenon known as model collapse. We study this degeneration spectrally in a controlled Markov setting. The eigenvalue spectrum of the learned transition operator offers a direct view of the process, since the subdominant eigenvalues set how fast the chain mixes and therefore how much of the state space it continues to explore. We find that sampling at temperature $T_s < 1$ acts on the operator like repeated sharpening, pushing it toward a deterministic system: the subdominant eigenvalues approach the unit circle and the spectral gap narrows. When $T_s < 1$, even data accumulation does not appear to arrest this drift. We then analyze Dreaming Learning, a regulariser that, in parallel with regular training, adds a loss term on the model's own samples drawn at a raised temperature $T_d > 1$. Because high-temperature samples flatten the predicted distribution, training on them keeps the entries of the learned operator from becoming vanishingly small, which in turn keeps the eigenvalues bounded away from the unit circle. Measurements of the spectra over 5000 generations are consistent with this picture, and the mitigation effect persists in more complex settings such as LSTM language models and a 124M-parameter GPT-2.

AI-generated text detectors are increasingly deployed in consequential settings---peer review, education, admissions, journalism, and content moderation---where their outputs directly affect individuals. Yet the strongest detectors are fine-tuned neural classifiers whose decisions are opaque, while transparent alternatives (stylometric and linguistic-feature classifiers) underperform them by wide margins. We present a pipeline that converts a fine-tuned neural detector into a classifier that operates on human-readable concepts. We accomplish this by training sparse autoencoders (SAEs) directly on a detector's residual stream, assigning auto-interpretation labels to each SAE feature, and retaining only features whose generated descriptions pass a global fidelity threshold. We then train a lightweight classifier on just the interpretable features. We find that our SAEs recover latent concepts that correspond to highly specific and predictive linguistic "tells" of AI-generated text. Classifiers built on these extracted features are not only highly interpretable but exhibit stronger performance on out-of-distribution texts than either neural or stylometric alternatives.

Alarm root-cause analysis is studied on data that cannot be shared. Operator logs are confidential, so what the field publishes is a causal graph between alarm types rather than per-incident causes, a fixed scenario set, gated, or never released. Two recent benchmarks carry per-incident root causes at scale; neither states a download location or a licence. We give a generator rather than a dataset. It runs on real backbone topologies from the Internet Topology Zoo and records the exact root cause and the propagation path of every alarm -- a by-product of generation, not a labelling pass. Every emitted field binds to a term in NORIA-O, RFC 8632, RFC 8345 or TMF642, and an unknown term fails the run. We ship fixed configurations, splits, a scorer and nine baselines. A one-line rule -- rank the device that raised the earliest critical alarm -- takes top-1 at 0.650 against 0.575 for our own temporal method, and wins 13 of 15 runs over three backbones and five seeds. An LLM given the same view reaches 0.600, the same model allowed to query the graph 0.625, and the rule wins on real operator alarms too, at 0.773: a property of alarm streams, not of our generator. One fault class separates the table: when a site loses power its PoP reports nothing, so every method that ranks alarmed devices scores 0.000 or near it, while the two that walk the topology to a silent candidate take 1.000 and 0.833.

Reinforcement learning (RL) based on PPO-style clipping has become an effective approach to improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, standard token-level clipping measures policy change only through the conditional probability of the current token, while the prefix conditioning context is itself generated by the policy. This mismatch becomes especially consequential in long-response and off-policy training. We reformulate autoregressive generation as a finite-horizon Markov decision process and derive its performance-difference identity under behavior-policy sampling. The resulting change of measure identifies the cumulative likelihood ratio of the generated prefix as the exact importance weight for each stepwise policy-improvement term. Starting from the monotonic-improvement principle of trust-region policy optimization, we then construct a prefix-level trust region using the exact reverse-KL coordinate $r-1-\log r$, whose behavior-policy expectation equals the corresponding prefix-distribution KL divergence. This yields EPIC, a PPO-style sequence-clipping method that directly regulates prefix-level policy drift without relying on a local quadratic approximation or expert-routing replay. Experiments on off-policy reinforcement learning with a sparse mixture-of-experts language model show that EPIC consistently outperforms standard and sequence-level clipping baselines across mathematical-reasoning benchmarks, while remaining competitive with routing-replay-based alternatives. Code is available at https://github.com/LiChengxi666/EPIC.

Natural-language software requirements often omit assumptions about performance, operating conditions, user behaviour, and domain constraints, affecting architecture, testing, and deployment. If undiscovered until implementation, resolving them is far more costly than addressing them early. Although ambiguity and vagueness are widely studied, less attention has been given to assumptions embedded in requirements that appear clear and reasonable. We propose HiddenLens, a novel six-layer BERT-LLM pipeline and, to our knowledge, the first framework engineered to detect, classify, question, and resolve hidden assumptions rather than merely flag ambiguity. Layer 1 uses BERT attention entropy to localise unresolved spans; Layer 2 uses CoT-prompted LLM reasoning to articulate each assumption and its failure risk; Layer 3 uses fine-tuned BERT to classify assumptions into six non-functional requirement categories: performance, security, scalability, usability, reliability, and domain; Layer 4 generates ranked clarification options using FS LLM prompting; Layer 5 enables human validation through confirmation, editing, or rephrasing; and Layer 6 rewrites the requirement using the confirmed resolution, producing an explicit, testable, and traceable requirement. We also introduce the HiddenLens Corpus (HLC), comprising 312 requirements annotated with 847 hidden assumptions across six NFR categories. Inspired by PROMISE and PURE, HLC addresses the lack of annotated data for this task and is, to our knowledge, the first dataset developed specifically for it. HiddenLens outperforms keyword-based and QuARS-Adapted baselines by 71% and 61%, respectively, achieving an end-to-end F1-score of 0.79; its BERT-based NFR classifier achieves an F1-score of 0.847. These results indicate that HiddenLens can help analysts resolve hidden assumptions before they propagate through software development.

Long-term memory for multimodal agents remains challenging, as it must preserve fine-grained visual evidence while tracking entity evolution across sessions. Existing abstraction-based memories compress images into text, often discarding visually discriminative details, whereas pixel-preserving memories retain raw observations but struggle to reliably associate diverse observations with persistent entity identities and track their evolving states. To address these limitations, we propose MHG-Mem, a multimodal hypergraph memory that jointly organizes entity identity, state evolution, and provenance to visual evidence. Specifically, MHG-Mem represents distinct entity mentions and their observed facts as individual nodes, grouping identity-consistent mentions and facts through occurrence hyperedges. It then synthesizes aspect-specific evolution states from these grouped observations and links them to supporting entities, facts, and source evidence through evolutionary and evidential hyperedges. To navigate this structured memory, we introduce hypergraph-based agentic search, which adaptively selects an entry layer, traverses typed hyperedges across memory levels, and inspects source observations when fine-grained verification is required. These designs support both detailed visual verification and reasoning over cross-session state changes. Extensive experiments across three benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of MHG-Mem, improving performance by 8.20-9.98% over the strongest baseline.

Causal discovery from nonlinear multivariate time series is challenging in high-dimensional systems, where the number of candidate directed relations grows quadratically with the number of variables. Existing methods are often limited by target-wise model fitting, repeated conditional testing, or expensive graph-search procedures. We propose SCDM, a shared-parameter meta-learning framework for scalable temporal causal discovery. SCDM treats each target variable as a task while learning a shared temporal predictor and a shared causal-strength matrix across tasks. Each meta-episode updates only a subset of target-variable tasks, allowing the model to accumulate structural evidence across the full system without exhaustive target-wise optimization. After training, a post-training graph readout converts the learned predictor into continuous directed causal scores for threshold-independent evaluation. We also provide a finite-error recovery principle showing that, under fully observed delayed-system assumptions and a positive risk-gap condition, thresholding SCDM scores recovers the graph when statistical, meta-optimization, and readout errors are below the population margin. Experiments on controlled synthetic, neuroimaging-inspired, high-dimensional, and real-world temporal benchmarks demonstrate competitive causal recovery and improved scalability in large temporal systems.

Benchmark performance is the dominant standard for comparing large language models (LLMs), typically summarized by a single aggregate score, such as accuracy, pass rate, or rubric score. This aggregate score provides limited information about a model's underlying capabilities, yet understanding these capabilities is crucial for model development and evaluation. To this end, we propose Tree-Induced Diagnostic Evaluation (TIDE), which recasts diagnostic evaluation as behavior-driven decision-tree induction to perform fine-grained capability diagnosis. TIDE recursively builds a hierarchical capability tree from benchmark samples and model scores: at each node, an LLM judge proposes candidate splits and performs sample-to-group classification, and behavior-based information gain selects among them. We apply TIDE to five models across four benchmarks to demonstrate its effectiveness, and find fine-grained capability contrasts invisible at the aggregate level: Claude Opus 4.6 achieves 100% on microeconomic market reasoning where GPT-5.4 scores 83.3%, but trails GPT-5.4 on contract law reasoning with 77.8% versus 88.9%. We hope TIDE can be extended to past and future benchmarks so that the rich behavioral signal in evaluation results is fully leveraged for understanding model capabilities.

Adaptive experiments use bandit algorithms to favor interventions with higher expected rewards. However, decision-makers also require reliable inference on current treatment effects: differences between intervention and reference-arm mean rewards at the present time, rather than historical averages. These objectives conflict: reward maximization favors better interventions, whereas current-effect inference requires continued exploration of potentially suboptimal interventions as outcomes change over time. We characterize this tradeoff for $K$-arm bandits with Hölder-smooth mean rewards of exponent $β\in(0,1]$ and constant $L$. Requiring high-probability simultaneous coverage of all current effects by confidence intervals of width at most $w$, we establish matching minimax bounds, up to logarithmic factors, on expected dynamic regret. Over horizon $T$, our algorithm TRACE (Tracking Rewards and Current Effects) achieves regret of order $\widetilde{O}_β\left(\sqrt{KT}+K^{β/(2β+1)}L^{1/(2β+1)}T^{(β+1)/(2β+1)}+Kw^{-2}(1+L^{1/β}w^{-1/β})\right)$, where the notation hides logarithms and constants depending only on $β$. This regret--precision tradeoff separates reward-learning regret from the cost of refreshing current-effect estimates, which remains unavoidable even when one arm is uniformly optimal. An empirical-Bernstein e-process extension adapts exploration to realized prediction errors while preserving worst-case guarantees. When within-block drift is negligible relative to sampling error, all observations, including reward-learning observations, can be reused for asymptotically normal pointwise inference and stronger local stationarity yields local asymptotic efficiency. Finally, we show that regret constraints can prevent honest adaptation to unknown smoothness and support our theory with extensive numerical experiments.

Reliable validation of autonomous driving cyber-physical systems requires testing not only nominal driving behavior but also failures arising from faults in sensing and embedded computation. Physical road testing provides realistic system behavior but is costly and difficult to reproduce, while simulation enables scalable evaluation but cannot fully capture hardware-dependent behavior and fault propagation. Hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) validation bridges this gap by executing the driving stack on real embedded hardware within a simulated environment. However, preparing fault-augmented scenarios for HIL testing remains largely a manual process, limiting test coverage, scalability, and efficiency. We present FaultGene, an LLM-assisted framework for automated generation of executable fault-augmented tests for HIL fault-resilience validation. Given a baseline Scenic/CARLA scenario and a structured fault specification, FaultGene generates a fault-augmented test case that captures the effects of HIL-level fault injection. During offline refinement, semantic-consistency checks and execution-level feedback are used to correct candidates that fail to preserve the intended scenario context or produce the desired fault-induced degradation, and to construct high-quality supervision for fine-tuning. The resulting generator then produces fault-augmented tests directly at deployment time without requiring manually engineered reference executions or repeated refinement loops.

As LLMs expand their language coverage, evaluating how well they understand and represent diverse cultures becomes increasingly important. However, many benchmarks remain English-centric, with limited cultural coverage and a focus on factual knowledge over its application in real-world cultural contexts. We propose CulturalRiddles, a benchmark of original, culturally grounded riddles created entirely by humans through a participatory community effort, spanning 62 cultures (45 countries, 51 languages). These riddles are deeply rooted in their respective cultures and require abductive and compositional reasoning, alongside detailed factual and social knowledge, language skills, and an understanding of culturally specific associations. We benchmark 28 LLM configurations using both automatic and large-scale human evaluation. Even frontier models achieve at most 22% accuracy in some communities. We publicly release all artifacts alongside an open contribution process to expand the benchmark's linguistic and cultural coverage.

Joint reinforcement learning and self-distillation combines task rewards with dense teacher guidance for agent training, but their gradients can partly cancel. A mixing coefficient controls relative scale without selectively removing opposing components. We present CORD, a general framework for conflict-aware optimization of two objectives. CORD separates the choice of protected objective from the condition that triggers projection, and combines the gradients once per optimizer mini-batch. A nearest-point formulation yields a closed-form update and characterizes its first-order effect on the protected objective before optimizer transformations. Gradient diagnostics connect conflict in agent training to lost local optimization progress and motivate selective correction. As a gradient-combination mechanism, CORD can be added to different joint training recipes while retaining their objectives. Across three such recipes, it improves ALFWorld success by 1.5-15.9 percentage points. On WebShop, it improves two of the three pairs, with SDAR rising from 60.7% to 64.6% success. Our analyses explain why protection direction and projection gate must be chosen together, and why the distillation objective and its mixing weight remain consequential after projection.

Given the enormous number of claims to be checked, verifiable legal AI requires scalable, cost-effective models that answer the practical needs of law. System One decision models are built on large language models but, instead of generating text, return a calibrated probability for each option. This suits the verification of legal authority, where the question is closed: a given holding, or none of them. We test whether such models abstain when the correct authority is missing. We extend CaseHOLD with an abstention condition in which the correct holding is replaced in 1,670 of 5,314 items, and compare four decision models with six generative LLMs. When no option is correct, generative LLMs still pick one in 38-86% of items; the most cautious decision model does so in 30%. On standard CaseHOLD, a decision model matches the best generative LLM (88.1% vs. 88.2%) at 1/55 of the cost. Accepting that LLM's answer only when a decision model agrees halves its wrong citations, and distilling a decision model's probabilities into Qwen3-8B, without labels, yields a well-calibrated local model. Legal AI should be judged by its wrong citations, not by accuracy alone.

Accuracy alone gives little information about which features or model components improve probabilistic fit, which outcomes benefit, or how fit changes during training. We introduce the InterModel Vigorish (IMV) into the Machine Intelligence space in order to express differences in fit as an expected betting advantage over a reference model. SHAP-IMV attributes gains to features through Shapley-weighted subset comparisons, Multi-IMV evaluates one-vs-rest and pairwise class discrimination, and Ablate-IMV assesses architectural components and feature groups by ablation. We evaluate these applications over ten random seeds using tabular data, images, sensor sequences, and graphs. Feature rankings vary across estimators. High one-vs-rest accuracy can accompany negligible improvement over a null, while ablation can preserve or improve fit under a fixed training budget. On six graph-classification benchmarks, we time-profile IMV over 200 training epochs, reporting seed means and ranges. The open-source imvpy library and accompanying notebooks provide code to replicate our work and to use the IMV more widely.

Indian court proceedings are held in English, so speakers of languages with limited translation technology have limited access to them. We present the first English Mizo parallel dataset of Indian court judgments. It contains 13,168 sentence pairs from the Gauhati High Court and the Supreme Court of India. Professional native Mizo translators translated complete documents; sentence pairs were manually aligned, and two independent reviewers checked the results. Our study finds that English words are borrowed in a very selective way: official and legal terms are almost always kept in English, but words for everyday things like actions, situations, and results are usually expressed in native Mizo. Mizo diacritics are also used inconsistently across the corpus. When we fine tune the NLLB 200 1.3B model on our training data, it scores 27.47 BLEU on a balanced legal test set of 1,000 sentence pairs, an improvement of 7.16 BLEU over the base model. However, it still uses English words about three times more often than a human translator does.

Forming an accurate theory-of-mind (ToM) is key to successful multi-agent collaboration and requires reasoning under uncertainty to capture multiple possible partner states. This is hard to do in the text representation space native to large language model (LLM) agents, which more easily describe a single partner state. To address this challenge, we introduce ToM2Vec, which learns to form abstract theories-of-mind in a rich latent space via a fixed budget of continuous reasoning tokens. During training, supervision for these tokens comes from the partner's actual thoughts, which the ToM tokens are trained to abstract and match. At test-time, ToM tokens are generated by each agent and act as conditioners for that agent's thoughts and actions. Across several environments covering collaborative, competitive, and mixed-motive settings (Overcooked-AI, multiparty negotiation, Decrypto, Hanabi, and Collab Escape/Capture), we evaluate ToM2Vec's ability to support multi-agent interactions and collaboration, finding consistent improvements over the base model and a variety of competitive trained and prompted baselines. We show that latent reasoning is critical, with performance dropping when reasoning is expressed in text. Moreover, we show that ToM2Vec training generalizes to partner model families not seen at train-time, including a proprietary model (GPT-5.4). In our analysis, we provide evidence that the latent tokens encode a ToM, rather than task-specific information: ToM2Vec's tokens improve the agent's ability to directly answer questions about partner beliefs, desires, and next actions.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frequently integrates knowledge graphs (KGs) for complex multi-hop question answering. However, their performance is increasingly bottlenecked by the knowledge structuring and reasoning processes. (i) Severe semantic loss: Distilling continuous texts into discrete symbols strips away contextual nuances and narrative coherence. (ii) Pronounced modality mismatch: Fragmented graph structures clash with the continuous texts LLMs are pre-trained on, while rewriting them into natural language introduces generative noise and omits information. To address these limitations, we propose ThreadRAG, a semantic-topology-based RAG framework for context-preserving knowledge structuring and modality-native evidence reasoning. ThreadRAG introduces a Semantic Topology Mapper (STM), which organizes retrieved documents into context-intact Semantic Nodes and constructs a Semantic Topology Graph (STG) through narrative, semantic, and lexical edges. It further incorporates Energy-Driven Pathfinding (EDP), which identifies query-relevant subgraphs via energy diffusion and deterministically linearizes them into coherent textual evidence paths. Experiments on three multi-hop QA benchmarks demonstrate that ThreadRAG consistently outperforms strong baselines. Notably, it achieves a 14.4% EM improvement over text-centric methods on HotpotQA and surpasses the best baseline by 5.8% EM on 2WikiMultihop, while reducing token cost to 23.3% of the strongest baseline.

Can LLM agents make contributions to frontier computer science R&D? We introduce FrontierCS 2, a benchmark of 48 open-ended tasks. We take a paper and the code its authors released and delete the paper's contribution. The deleted code becomes the human reference that sets the bar. Earlier open-ended benchmarks give each agent a problem statement and grade one program after the run. FrontierCS 2 places the agent inside a research environment. The agent inherits a working repository and may submit a patch at any point. For each patch, a judge returns a development-suite score but keeps the evaluator, the held-out final suite and the reference private, and grades the final submission on that suite against the reference. The tasks span 13 domains, from machine-learning systems and high-performance computing to databases, security and robotics. Beyond these 48 tasks, FrontierCS 2 keeps a private set of more than 100 tasks, to be announced in the future. We evaluate 12 agents. The best one is Claude Opus 5.5, passing 58% of its runs. No run passes on 16 tasks. A higher score is not the same as a pass: most runs that beat the reference on the combined final score still fall short on some metric or workload. On a shared capability scale for agents and tasks, the median task is roughly as difficult as what the strongest agent can handle.

A benchmark is not merely a collection of test questions; it naturally induces an empirical measure over difficulty. In this work, we develop this measure-based view of benchmark evaluation. This perspective allows us to identify and formalize two central failure modes: measure mismatch, where the benchmark difficulty distribution differs from the intended difficulty distribution, and coverage gaps, where uncovered regions along the difficulty axis prevent benchmarks from detecting meaningful localized training progress. We propose two diagnostic metrics that capture these two failure modes and provide rigorous theoretical guarantees. Empirically, we analyze 25 popular benchmarks spanning 7 domains using carefully estimated item difficulties. Our results show that many benchmarks implicitly overweight certain difficulty regions, so their leaderboard conclusions should be interpreted with caution; others leave substantial portions of the difficulty axis uncovered, limiting their ability to monitor the model improvement process. Finally, we turn diagnosis into action by introducing BenchFill, a simple difficulty-targeted item rewriting algorithm that effectively reduces local coverage gaps.

This paper describes our submission to the WMT 2026 Multilingual Instruction Shared Task. We adapt Qwen3-8B with LoRA using organiser-provided data, EuroAlpaca, a multilingual instruction dataset created through task-preserving localisation, and CrossEuroAlpaca, a cross-lingual augmentation that assigns different source and target languages to instructions, contexts and responses. Our system targets open-ended question answering (QA-OEG) in ten shared-task languages represented in the auxiliary data. Under matched decoding, adaptation improves the mean Gemma-4 judge score on target-language QA-OEG by 7.8% relative to the base model. On an additional evaluation using the Aya Evaluation Suite across all shared-task languages, it yields relative gains of 41.5% in macro-averaged ROUGE-L and 2.9% in BERTScore-F1, with larger improvements in target languages. However, these gains are task- and language-specific. Gemma-4 scores improve for QA-OEG and summarisation in the target languages but decline for context-grounded QA there and across all three tasks in the non-target languages.

As large language models (LLMs) continue to grow in scope and capability, privacy concerns are on the rise. Since users increasingly interact with a single general-purpose system across many distinct contexts, there is a natural tendency to pursue a one-size-fits-all solution to privacy. Unfortunately, this overlooks a crucial insight from decades of privacy research: privacy is inherently contextual. In this paper, we argue that existing work in prompt privacy is drifting towards attempts to design a unified framework, which is highly misleading and can foster a false sense of security. Furthermore, we argue that even future work in this direction needs to wrestle with fundamental tensions across various desirable properties of prompt privacy. Thus, such continued attempts towards a unified framework need to be reconsidered. We recommend three critical paths forward: application-specific deployment of LLMs, context-specific evaluation of privacy frameworks, and better privacy literacy.

As LLMs are increasingly deployed in value-sensitive contexts, aligning them with human values has emerged as a post-training objective in NLP, aimed at instilling additional values and guiding model behaviour. However, current evaluations remain narrow. Because values are interconnected, it is unclear how fine-tuning for specific values alters unrelated capabilities and behaviours. In this work, we adapt four instruction-tuned LLMs across individual Hofstede's value dimensions and evaluate them on both cross-value transfer and broader behaviours. We find that value-specific training produces unintended side effects on untrained values, risk preferences, social cognition, and safety traits. Consequently, we suggest that value alignment after post-training should incorporate broader behavioral evaluations, and we highlight the need to investigate where additional value training might best fit into the pipeline.

Consider a contextual linear optimization problem, where a predict-then-optimize (PTO) system returns optimal decisions without revealing the cost vectors used in its downstream linear program. Our focus is on how to prevent attackers, who can submit context queries, from extracting the underlying prediction model. Although the cost-to-decision map is many-to-one, observations across contexts can reveal the underlying prediction model. For linear models, we provide sufficient conditions where the attacker can learn the model up to positive scaling by only observing the decision. These conditions motivate an adaptive attack that alternates inverse optimization with boundary sampling, i.e., using context queries leading to decision boundaries of the current attacker model. To prevent extraction, we propose a mechanism that perturbs decisions only when the predicted cost vector is near a decision boundary. We establish a regret bound in terms of the perturbation radius. For the attackers that fit the defended responses as optimal decisions under the evaluation distribution, we also prove a lower bound on expected extraction error. Experiments on synthetic instances and real data quantify the security-performance trade-off of the defense mechanism and illustrate that our defense can increase the extraction error.

Thermal cameras can watch over older people living alone without capturing faces, and multimodal large language models (LLMs) can judge a short video without task-specific training. We evaluate a production multimodal LLM, Gemini 3.8 Flash at temperature 0, as the decision stage of an event-triggered fall screener, used exactly as a deployed prototype uses it: one request per short thermal clip, with its sound track when there is one, and its predecessor Gemini 3.7 Flash on the same requests. On 438 staged falls and 563 non-fall windows that we located by hand in a public 32x24 thermal dataset, the deployed request called 69% of the held-out subjects' falls (67% over all subjects; bed falls excluded) and none of 499 non-fall windows, including people lying on the floor and getting up. Over 76 h of ordinary life in an occupied room, recorded at 160x120 with sound, it called none of 395 clips a fall (95% upper bound 1.2 false alarms per day) and caught 4 of the 9 staged falls the camera could see. One cautionary sentence in the prompt ("a person who goes out of view ... is not a fall") accounted for many of the misses: removing it raised sensitivity on the held-out subjects from 69% to 83% on 3.8 Flash and from 80% to 92% on Gemini 3.7 Flash, and in the home from 4 to 9 of the 9 visible falls, with no false call in ordinary living but at the price of calling deliberate lie-downs a fall. Sensitivity collapsed at 8x6 pixels (34%); identical requests disagreed on 4% of windows; and when the model called a fall, its explanation placed it within a second of the annotated landing 99% of the time. Two conventional detectors trained on the laboratory data caught nearly every held-out laboratory fall but raised 14.2 and 23.9 false alarms per day in the home. We release the frame-level fall annotations of the public dataset and every model answer on it.

Machine-learning surrogates in computational science often require not only accurate predictions but also expectations, variances, conserved integrals, and normalization constants. Conventional neural networks, including Kolmogorov--Arnold networks (KANs), generally evaluate these quantities through Monte Carlo sampling or multidimensional quadrature, making repeated inference costly, particularly in high dimensions. We introduce KANs with Tractable Operators for Uncertainty and Constraints (TOUCKANs), whose finite-degree polynomial outer functions yield a decomposable sum--product representation. Under factorizing input measures, expectations and higher moments then reduce algebraically to deterministic recursions over one-dimensional leaf integrals. Independent and shared inner-block variants form a parameter-efficiency hierarchy, and a universal-approximation proof for its most restricted member extends to the complete class. The same deterministic operators allow conserved integrals and normalization to be imposed throughout training. Across uniform and Gaussian benchmarks through 50 dimensions, deterministic mean and variance errors remained below the median fixed-budget Monte Carlo errors in every case. TOUCKANs also conserved Cahn--Hilliard mass to machine precision and imposed normalization and orthogonality through deterministic moments, enabling joint computation of the lowest four Schrödinger eigenpairs in two, three, and five dimensions. TOUCKANs therefore connect KAN approximation with tractable probabilistic circuits, making statistical operators and integral constraints directly available within an expressive neural surrogate.

Code-switching is a natural linguistic phenomenon, yet its impact on high-level reasoning tasks remains largely unexplored in under-resourced languages like Romanian. Natural language processing tasks, such as satire detection, rely heavily on nuanced cultural and syntactic cues that large language models struggle to capture. In this paper, we investigate four methods (i.e., random replacement, phrase translation, dependency parsing, and large language models) for generating synthetic code-mixed Romanian sentences with English, German, French, and Italian. We start with an existing dataset for satire detection, compiled from Romanian news articles and annotated at the sentence level by humans, and augment it with over 600k samples, namely CS-SeLeRoSa. We provide an in-depth analysis of the dataset generation process. Then, we evaluate several multilingual large language models across zero-shot, chain-of-thought, and fine-tuning regimes on both the synthetic corpus and a human-adjudicated gold benchmark, namely CS-SeLeRoSa-Gold. While older open models suffer substantial degradation (dropping to 37%-55% macro-F1), newer models like Gemma 4 31B achieve 68.1% zero-shot, rivaling frontier models like GPT-5 mini (69.5%). Furthermore, fine-tuning significantly reduces formatting errors and improves the results, increasing Gemma 4 31B to 77.5% on CS-SeLeRoSa and 72.6% on the gold standard, outperforming frontier zero-shot baselines.

Haussler's covering lemma (JCTA 1995) gives the sharp $(C/δ)^d$ metric-entropy bound for binary VC classes under normalized $\ell_1$ distance. We prove a sharp global dynamic analogue for bounded real-valued classes in normalized $\ell_p$, for every $1\le p<\infty$. Writing $d=\operatorname{sfat}_{\varepsilon/32}(\mathcal F)$, we obtain a global dynamic cover of size at most $(C/\varepsilon^p)^d$ for every horizon and $0<\varepsilon<1/2$. Here a single family of deterministic causal experts, fixed independently of the instance sequence, covers every target on every sequence. For $0<\varepsilon<1/4$, a matching worst-case lower bound $(c/\varepsilon)^{pd}$ holds already for binary classes on one fixed sequence, even with real-valued experts. The constants are universal, independent of $p$. For $p=2$, this resolves the horizon-independent sequential $\ell_2$ covering problem of Rakhlin, Sridharan, and Tewari (PTRF 2015) in a stronger global form. For $p=1$, it gives the sharp $(C/δ)^{\operatorname{Ldim}(\mathcal H)}$ global dynamic covering bound for binary classes, resolving questions of Alon, Ben-Eliezer, Dagan, Moran, Naor, and Yogev (STOC 2021) and Malliaris and Moran (Trans. AMS 2024). Our proof combines rank-decreasing correction schedules and accurate sampled prefixes with exact continuations after target identification. Shared-parent routing distributes these continuations among eligible prefixes, eliminating the logarithmic overhead.

Existing social bias benchmarks evaluate large language models mostly on fluent, well-formed English, reflecting native speaker usage and leaving non-native writers unrepresented. To address this gap, we investigate how grammatical errors by non-native writers affect social bias. We develop a controlled framework that injects common learner errors into prompts and apply it to three bias benchmarks covering stereotype alignment and demographic preference across gender, race, and religion. We find that grammatical errors increase bias, and the effect grows with the error rate. Among the four common error types we consider, preposition errors produce the largest and most consistent increase in stereotype alignment. Our analysis suggests that errors increase bias when they are more likely to interfere with comprehension. Finally, fine-tuning on erroneous texts reduces the bias increase caused by grammatical errors. Our findings show that bias evaluations based exclusively on well-formed prompts may underestimate the bias experienced by users whose English contains grammatical errors.

Over the past decade, substantial efforts have been devoted to developing machine learning (ML) methods for extracting materials data and, where possible, materials knowledge directly from the scientific literature. This review traces the evolution of these methods from heuristic, rule-based pipelines through natural language processing (NLP) models and transformer-based encoders to, lastly, large language models (LLMs) and agentic systems capable of extracting materials information across multiple modalities, including text, tables, and figures. Beside construction of large, queryable materials databases and knowledge graphs that support downstream materials discovery, we discuss how these advances have enabled new capabilities, such as, generic question answering across materials science, AI co-scientists and chatbots for research assistance, and closed-loop optimization and discovery when integrated with autonomous laboratories. We critically assess the datasets generated using these approaches, their extraction accuracy and computational costs, and the respective strengths and limitations of different methodologies, and even provide practical guidelines for developing more reliable and scalable materials data extraction pipelines. Finally, we identify key open challenges, including the extraction of full materials structure-property-processing-performance tetrahedron at the sample level, the scarcity of reliable benchmark datasets for systematic evaluation, and the resolution of non-standard materials terminology across different document modalities.

Continuous Integration (CI) is an essential practice that automatically validates code changes through builds and tests. However, configuring CI workflows remains challenging, as modern software often features complex architectures, numerous dependencies, and support for diverse execution environments. Most CI platforms also require workflows to be written in their particular domain-specific languages. As a result, CI workflows are often error-prone and hard to maintain, especially for those unfamiliar with CI semantics. Prior work on automated CI workflow generation require developers to create specifications that describe their intended workflows using natural language, partial workflows, etc. However, in practice, developers may struggle to articulate requirements and may be unaware of available CI features. To address these limitations, we propose DynaCI, a novel approach that uses runtime information from developers' local environments to generate CI workflows. DynaCI (i) traces the developers' local environment to collect runtime information, (ii) constructs an initial workflow by applying runtime-informed heuristics, and (iii) iteratively refines the workflow via LLM-based Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). We evaluate DynaCI on 50 popular Python projects that use GitHub Actions, a popular CI platform, and compare it against the state-of-the-art CI workflow generation approaches: GH-WCOM and LLM4GW. DynaCI outperforms these existing approaches by more than 21.13% in BLEU score and 20.96% in F1 score on average. It also generates workflows without missing functionality in 56% of cases, while requiring fewer manual modifications to repair such exceptions. These results demonstrate that leveraging runtime information substantially improves LLM-based CI workflow generation, and offer a promising direction for broader DevOps configuration automation.

Coding agents can invest substantial effort in repository exploration and testing yet still produce unsuccessful patches. Existing online steering methods review trajectories periodically or invoke an advisor when a monitor detects behavioral problems; frequent reviews are costly, and the absence of anomalous behavior does not mean that an agent is on the right track. We propose PAUSE, a framework for steering coding agents with a single planning intervention. Agents reach their first source-code edit at a median of 60% of trajectory progress, after exploration, bug reproduction, and testing. PAUSE intercepts this edit request before it executes, which requires no learned monitor, no search over checkpoints, and no extra model call (search-free). A separate Planner reads the task and the pre-edit transcript and writes one repair plan; the same agent, the Executor, resumes with this plan, keeping its context and workspace. PAUSE applies online, during a live run, and offline, from a recorded trajectory prefix. We evaluate PAUSE on SWE-bench Verified and SWE-bench Multilingual with two Executors and three agent harnesses. With Qwen3-coder as Executor and GPT-5.6 Sol as Planner, online steering improves resolution by 16.8% on Verified in OpenHands and by 14.7% on Multilingual in SWE-agent. In SWE-agent, PAUSE outperforms LivePlan, a rule-triggered advisor, by 3.2% on Verified and 3.7% on Multilingual at similar Planner cost, and is comparable to SICA's periodic overseer at about 11-15% of its Planner cost. Offline, PAUSE recovers 35.4% of eligible failed Verified tasks, and resuming from the recorded prefix uses 33-41% fewer Executor tokens than restarting.

We study gradient flow in a two-layer linear network in the high-dimensional regime where the input, inner and output dimensions diverge proportionally. Under whitened inputs and isotropic imbalance, we combine a closed-form solution of the dynamics with prior random matrix theory results to derive a high-dimensional limit for the dynamics. Our method yields exact asymptotic spectral distributions for the weight matrices at all times and characterizes the evolution of the learned subspace. In the small-initialization limit, we identify a silent alignment phenomenon: the singular directions of the network align on an order-one timescale, while the singular values and empirical loss remain at their initial values. Visible learning occurs later, on a logarithmic timescale, as singular values progressively escape zero and the loss decreases. This phase is characterized by a saddle-to-saddle dynamics, which becomes a continuous process of spectral learning in the high-dimensional limit.

Autonomous mobile robots operating in dense crowds and cluttered sites require $360^\circ$ perception to react to surrounding hazards. While panoramic LiDAR offers full-surround coverage, learning representations within reinforcement learning (RL) is sample-inefficient under sparse rewards, and existing 3D pretrained point-cloud encoders are too memory-heavy for massively parallel RL simulation. We present RangeNav, a compact (183k parameters) LiDAR range-image encoder pretrained entirely on synthetic data. RangeNav uses anisotropic convolutions and circular padding to handle the extreme aspect ratio and azimuthal seam of range images. We pretrain the network using a navigation-aligned objective combining range reconstruction, semantic segmentation, and bird's-eye-view (BEV) prediction, then freeze it for policy learning. In simulation, adding semantic and BEV supervision increases success rates over a reconstruction-only baseline by an average of 32.03 and 23.73 percentage points (pp) in procedurally generated training and out-of-distribution realistic test environments, respectively. Zero-shot real-world deployments on a Unitree B2-W quadruped demonstrate robust navigation through dense crowds, low-light settings, and construction zones where limited-field-of-view depth policies struggle. Code and models will be open-sourced.

Large language models are typically trained with next-token prediction (NTP), which rewards predicting specific tokens rather than explicitly accounting for the semantic similarities between different words or expressions. Prior work has addressed this limitation by augmenting training data with minimally varying sentences that replace a target word with conceptually related alternatives, e.g., "The tired coach ran home" $\rightarrow$ {"The tired trainer ran home", "The tired instructor ran home", ...}. Such concept augmentation improves performance, but it remains unclear whether its effectiveness depends on where in the sentence the concept is expressed. We reproduce and extend prior work $\textit{beyond nouns}$ to verbs and adjectives, asking whether the part of speech (POS) carrying the concept signal affects perplexity and downstream performance. We find different patterns across evaluation settings: concept augmentation improves perplexity most consistently on news, independent of the POS used, whereas verbs provide the most reliable downstream gains. Despite these behavioral differences, representational analyses using CKA and linear probing show that the conditions yielding the largest downstream gains are not necessarily those that most alter the model's internal representations. Together, these results suggest that the effectiveness of concept augmentation depends on where and how conceptual information is introduced during training.

The mid-wave infrared (MWIR, 3-5 microns) is indispensable for thermal sensing, gas detection, long-range imaging, and free-space optical communications. Meta-optics offer a compact, lightweight, and potentially low-cost alternative to conventional refractive optics, making them attractive for size, weight, and power (SWaP)-constrained systems. However, their strong chromatic dispersion has largely restricted imaging to narrow spectral bands. Here, we demonstrate broadband imaging across the full 3-5 micron MWIR band using a single-layer silicon metasurface coupled with computational reconstruction. Remarkably, the reconstruction model is adapted using only four image captures, overcoming large training data requirements and enabling broadband image recovery despite the strongly wavelength-dependent optical response. In contrast to approaches that engineer complex, dispersion-optimized metalens profiles for broadband operation, our method leverages the wavelength-dependent information encoded by a simple 2cm diameter hyperboloid metalens. We show that this metasurface captures sufficient broadband intensity information for computational reconstruction across the entire MWIR band. These results establish a simple route toward broadband computational meta-optics without requiring broadband achromatic metalens designs, offering a promising platform for compact MWIR imaging systems.

Calibrating large language models (LLMs) in open-ended generation is uniquely challenging because many distinct token sequences can express the same underlying meaning. Prior calibration techniques target either fixed-set classification confidence or the binary correctness of individual strings, making them inherently ill-suited for the dynamic, multi-string nature of open-ended semantic outcomes. To bridge this gap, we introduce S-EDL, a novel evidential method that natively optimizes LLMs for semantic calibration. By eliciting evidence from the sequence likelihoods of the model itself, S-EDL constructs a differentiable Dirichlet prior over prompt-specific semantic classes. Optimizing the evidential loss under this prior yields a calibration-aware training signal over variable semantic classes, completely bypassing the need for fixed multiple-choice options. Evaluations across four open-ended benchmarks and three models demonstrate that S-EDL substantially reduces semantic calibration error while improving accuracy. By aligning generative likelihoods with semantic correctness, this work establishes a framework for deploying trustworthy LLMs in complex, open-ended applications. Code is available at: https://github.com/sandylaker/s-edl.

General-purpose robots must handle tasks, objects and environments they were never trained on, yet zero-shot generalization remains one of the least solved problems in physical AI. In digital AI, zero-shot capability grew with the volume and, above all, the diversity of training data, much of it sourced from the crowd. Robotics instead relies on paid collection by a few well-funded teams, which yields volume without diversity. We formulate zero-shot generalization in physical AI as coverage of the deployment distribution, and show that more samples from the same collectors shrink the unseen region only slowly, while each new contributor can extend it. Building on this and on zero-shot learning, we propose a shared latent space for robot actions that combines multi-modal alignment, generative augmentation, and noisy-label learning. As a scalable source of diverse data, we propose a community of developers building applications on one standard, approachable robot, Origami. We close with a testable hypothesis and an evaluation protocol relating real-robot zero-shot success to the diversity of contributed data.

Agent memory systems such as Mem0 and Zep decide what to keep before any question arrives; coding agents keep the raw history and let the model search it with its own tools. We ask whether designed memory still helps once the model is strong enough to search for itself. On one LoCoMo conversation (419 turns, 152 questions), we run four memory methods (full context, BM25, Mem0, Zep) and three coding agents (Pi, Codex, Claude Code), each with GPT-4o-mini, GPT-6 Luna and Claude Opus 5.5, and record what every rollout costs. This is a short empirical study, with one conversation and one run per cell. Agent memory is a costly patch for a weak model: Mem0 beats full context only with GPT-4o-mini, and its build alone costs more than a whole full-context rollout. Agent memory also has a ceiling, set by the model that writes it: a stronger reader does not recover what a weaker writer left out. With Claude Opus 5.5, Pi tops the cost-accuracy frontier, scoring 99% for less than half the cost of full context; its one miss is a wrong answer key. Part of that lead comes from photo captions that only the agents could read: on the 88 questions whose evidence has no photo, Pi and full context differ by one answer.

As coding agents become more capable, developers increasingly use them to fix bugs through multi-turn interactions. Existing benchmarks do not adequately cover this scenario. Most present a complete issue report in a single turn without interaction. Their evaluation can produce both false positives and false negatives, accepting incorrect patches or rejecting correct ones. We introduce UserSWE for evaluating coding agents' ability to fix repository-level bugs through multi-turn interactions with dynamic users and execution-grounded verdicts at every turn. Its construction pipeline turns repository history and existing single-turn benchmarks into multi-turn tasks. At each turn, information pools constrain what the simulated user can reveal, while a persona chain sampled from a transition model calibrated on 20,859 development sessions governs how it speaks. Tests run after every turn, and a pair of agents from different model families writes and gates each verdict, using test results as primary evidence and model judgment only for aspects the tests cannot resolve. We evaluate eleven agents on 72 tasks from 42 repositories and find that agent rankings change with the interaction budget. Claude Fable 5.1 resolves the most tasks in one turn, GPT-6-Astra resolves the most by the eighth turn, and Claude Opus 5 leads at most intermediate budgets. These results indicate that single-turn performance is insufficient to characterize interactive coding ability.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an acquisition technique used for medical diagnosis. It is notably used for structural and functional MRI (or fMRI) image analysis. MRI data is known to be complex and noisy, so pipelines are created to extract and enhance relevant information in retrieved images. The NARPS study highlighted the significant variability that can emerge from different pipelines set up by independent teams while trying to answer the same research question about brain functioning. Having different implementations realizing the same task is a typical playground for software product lines (SPLs), which may be out of the sight of neuroimage practitioners. Thus, proposing an SPL out of these different pipelines falls back on a typical reverse-engineering problem with its usual difficulties. In this document, we advocate for the conceptual adoption of SPL principles as a promising direction to improve reproducibility and consistency in neuroimaging research.

Incorporating AI systems into safety systems requires monitoring to avoid silent faults and ensure safe and reliable operation. Single monitors often do not provide actionable information for human supervisors, who act as the system's adaptive controller. We present COMET, a coordinated multi-layer runtime monitoring framework for human-supervised AI-enabled safety systems in which each monitor is anchored in a different fault mode. Monitor outputs are combined in a coordination layer and mapped by a communication layer to a traffic-light display. In this work, COMET consists of three monitoring layers: signal integrity, physics consistency, and the AI system's competence envelope. The framework is evaluated on an open dataset of compressed-air leaks, where an AI system detects leaks from acoustic emissions, with held-out conditions simulating covariate shift, semantic shift, and sensor faults, events expected during runtime but unknown in their exact appearance. All monitors are frozen after development and tested zero-shot, and the framework is compared against no-monitoring and single-monitor setups. The bare AI system fails silently and confidently under all three shift types, whereas COMET reduces the trusted-wrong-answer rate to zero on covariate-shifted no-leak data and on three of four sensor faults, at a nominal false-alarm rate of $\approx 1\%$. Single monitors come close in detection but cannot attribute the fault mode. COMET converts their anonymous detection flags into diagnoses. Residual silent misses under semantic shift define the boundary of passive monitoring. Runtime monitoring frameworks for AI-enabled safety systems must therefore combine quantitative fault detection and isolation with qualitative, human-oriented feedback.

Driven by recent advancements in hearing assistive devices, target speaker extraction (TSE) in multi-talker environments has drawn significant attention. To address this, hearing technologies identify attention using neural signals recorded via electroencephalography (EEG) to guide TSE, enabling neuro-steered auditory attention decoding. However, most existing techniques rely on time-frequency masking, which suffers from low fidelity in spectro-temporally overlapping regions and is often restricted to narrowband audio. In contrast, we introduce NeuroCodec, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first generative EEG-guided TSE framework operating in the latent space of a neural audio codec. Specifically, NeuroCodec models spatial EEG dependencies via graph convolutions and fuses cross-modal EEG and speech representations through attention mechanisms and Mamba-based temporal modeling. We further introduce a six-phase training curriculum that progressively incorporates latent reconstruction, multi-scale spectral, and adversarial objectives to ensure stable, high-fidelity speech generation. Experiments on the public Cocktail Party and KUL datasets show NeuroCodec outperforms baselines, across several perceptual metrics. A listening experiment with 20 participants validated that NeuroCodec offers greater perceptual accuracy, achieving a mean score of 82.24 compared with 49.63 for M3ANet. Additionally, the proposed method is seen to enable 44.1 kHz reconstruction with spectral content extending up to 20 kHz, further supporting the perceptual results. Finally, we extend NeuroCodec with a causal streaming formulation suited for real-time processing, providing a basis for hearing assistive devices.

Literature-searching language agents are becoming a standard component of scientific assistants for the life sciences, yet there is little controlled evidence on which parts of their harness matter. We run a controlled ablation on biomedical claim verification (SciFact) with the live PubMed API as the only tool. Holding the backbone and output format fixed, we compare four harnesses: closed-book answering, single-shot retrieval using the claim as the query, a ReAct-style agent that writes its own PubMed queries, and an oracle given the gold abstracts, each with two efficient frontier backbones. Naive single-shot retrieval finds the gold paper for only 6% of claims and turns overconfident errors into abstentions without improving accuracy. Letting the model formulate its own queries triples gold recall and yields the best verdicts (62% accuracy vs. 49-59% for the other realistic harnesses), although these differences are not significant at our sample size and agents use fewer than half of their search budget. With gold abstracts, the same models reach 79-86% accuracy, a significant 17-24 point gap showing that retrieval, not reasoning, is the main bottleneck. Finally, a citation audit shows that closed-book models cite PubMed IDs that almost always exist (327/335) but are almost never relevant: a cross-family LLM judge rates only 3 of 327 existing citations as relevant to the claim, versus 67% for citations produced by the search agent. Existence checks are therefore insufficient safeguards for scientific agents. We release code, prompts, and all cached tool calls at https://github.com/saqlain2204/real-pmids-wrong-papers.

In likelihood-free hypothesis testing (LFHT), given samples from two unknown distributions $P,Q$ on $[n]$ with $\mathrm{d_{TV}}(P,Q)\geq\varepsilon$, and from a third distribution $D\in\{P,Q\}$, the goal is to identify whether $D=P$ or $D=Q$. We study asymmetric likelihood-free hypothesis testing, where the sample budgets $s_P$ and $s_Q$ for $P$ and $Q$ may differ, and characterize the feasible triples $(s_P,s_Q,s_D)$ up to logarithmic factors. We establish that unequal reference budgets can give a polynomial saving. For instance, for constant separation, $n$ samples from $P$ and $n^{3/4}$ from $Q$ allow testing with $\widetilde O(n^{1/4})$ samples from $D$, whereas both existing baselines---symmetric LFHT and unequal-sample closeness testing---require $Ω(\sqrt n)$ samples from $D$. We further apply our results to non-adaptive distribution 2-clustering, where the sample allocation among $k$ distributions must be fixed before observing any data. We obtain matching upper and lower bounds for this problem up to logarithmic factors in terms of the domain size, number of distributions, smaller cluster size, and separation, both with one cluster distribution known and with both unknown. Comparing with known bounds for adaptive sample allocation gives a worst-case adaptivity gap of $\widetildeΘ(k^{1/4})$.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) by retrieving external knowledge. Recently, some RAG methods interleave reasoning and retrieval, enabling LLMs to progressively generate sub-queries and retrieve external knowledge. However, these methods may suffer from redundant or ineffective sub-queries and insufficiently diverse query exploration. Moreover, due to the tightly interleaved nature of reasoning and retrieval, it remains unclear how the evolving reasoning process influences query intent. To characterize the evolution of query intent during reasoning, we introduce search momentum, which captures the accumulated retrieval tendency induced by historical changes in generated sub-queries along the reasoning trajectory. Through momentum-based analysis, we find that the query generation process tends to continuously evolve along existing retrieval trajectories. Based on this observation, we propose MAPS, a Macro-Adaptive Parallel Reasoning framework for regulating search momentum and mitigating query-intent drift. MAPS first retains the retrieved knowledge and a refined reasoning state, thereby reducing the influence of historical reasoning trajectories on subsequent sub-query generation. Subsequently, MAPS extends the conventional sequential reasoning process into a parallel reasoning paradigm. At each iteration, MAPS identifies complementary retrieval directions, generates corresponding sub-queries for parallel retrieval, and consolidates the retrieved evidence to update the knowledge and reasoning states. Experiments on six question-answering benchmarks demonstrate that MAPS consistently outperforms representative RAG methods across different backbone models. All code and resources are available at https://github.com/NEUIR/MAPS.

Asked what to study, which career to pursue, or what product to build, large language models (LLMs) often recommend AI-related options. We ask where this tendency comes from by comparing models before and after fine-tuning and by varying how questions are asked. First, pretrained models already include explicit AI/ML terms in the recommendations of 27% of their responses, and their released instruction-tuned versions do so in 59%. Second, fine-tuning models ourselves shows that this rise is not inevitable: general instruction tuning leaves the rate unchanged, but removing the 7% of instruction examples that concern AI cuts it by 14 percentage points, below the level of the pretrained models it starts from. Data rewarding helpfulness raise it by 9 points, while data ranked by the preferences of diverse simulated users lower it by 9. Finally, with models held fixed, asking for the "best" option or for what to do "right now" raises the rate by 8 and 18 points, whereas telling the model it is an AI advisor adds 4. Overall, the tendency starts in pretraining, and what models learn afterward, together with how a question is phrased, decides how strongly it appears.

Most contemporary artificial intelligence (AI) systems are released with frozen parameters and improve through external updates, whereas an ideal system would keep improving from its own experience, a capacity we call recursive self-improvement (RSI). Yet studying RSI requires an environment that is continuously changing, objectively verifiable, and naturally grounded, posing a fundamental challenge for agent evolution. Here we introduce DeepEvolve, a sustainable evolution agent system grounded in future event prediction, in which agents continuously interact with a dynamically evolving environment and improve by internalizing and externalizing the experience gained through these interactions. A living environment synthesizes verifiable tasks, and a recursive-evolution engine turns the reasoning trajectory behind each prediction back into capability: decoupling search from prediction adapts parameter-level evolution to the contamination-prone live environment, while distilling reusable skills lets the agent evolve from the limited live trajectories such an environment affords. On the external FutureX leaderboard, which evaluates predictions against real-world outcomes and is updated weekly, our self-improved forecaster ranked first across all systems over three consecutive weeks, achieving up to a 195% improvement in rating. On our synthesized evaluation, it ranked among the top three across four base LLMs, outperforming the strongest baseline by up to 10.7 Bradley--Terry points. More broadly, these results suggest that a system built for self-improvement is best understood as an agent that co-evolves with a genuinely living, open-ended environment, pointing to a shift in AI from training static models on fixed data toward cultivating agents that grow stronger from their own experience, with such an open world as the indispensable basis of that growth.

Memorization inflates the benchmark scores of large language models (LLMs), since a model can reproduce answers it saw in training. Researchers test for it with consistent identifier renaming (CIR), which gives every identifier in a task a new name, and treat a lower score on the renamed task as evidence of recall. We test this method on the Temporal Logic of Actions Plus (TLA+) language, whose model checker acts as an oracle by confirming whether a renamed task preserves the exact behaviors of the original. Across 111 TLA+-Bench tasks, renaming lowers the correctness of Claude Opus 4.8 from 28% to 18% and of GPT-5 from 9% to 7%. Most of this decrease comes from how the test grades, which requires exact names that most descriptions never state. Grading by behavior shrinks the decrease to about 3 percentage points for Opus 4.8 and to 0 for GPT-5. In two model families fine-tuned on disjoint halves of the tasks, renaming removes about half of the training gain in likelihood and costs 4.9 percentage points (Qwen) and 1.3 percentage points (Gemma) on unseen tasks. A lower score after renaming therefore mixes memorization, name-based grading, and the cost of new names.

The use of AI-based tools in software development is rapidly changing how software is produced, enabling large volumes of code to be generated with limited human implementation effort. However, this raises fundamental challenges for ensuring that generated artifacts are aligned with developer intent and have been appropriately validated. In this work, we propose the use of structured argumentation in driving AI-assisted software development. Inspired by techniques from assurance engineering for safety-critical systems, we define a language of justification rationales that explicitly relate informal natural language prompts, formal specifications, assumptions about developer intentions, and program analysis evidence in a structured and verifiable format. We then describe AssureCode, a tool-supported methodology for creating such rationales as part of agentic code generation. We provide an empirical analysis of our implementation where we investigate its capacity to contribute towards justified assurance of correctness for AI-generated code.

LLM-based verification systems repair Rust proofs by revising programs in response to Verus diagnostics. When several error types are reported, pipelines such as AutoVerus and VeruSAGE select the next repair target using a preset priority. Yet each repair changes the program and the errors that follow, so the same reported types can require different choices at different states. We present VeruSteer, which learns to select error types from the outcomes of alternative repair trajectories. It constructs repair trees offline and compares paths from the same initial program by verification success, repair rounds, and final verification progress. These comparisons supervise a selector that combines step-wise imitation with trajectory preference ranking. The selector uses self-attention over the program, verifier feedback, and earlier selections to rank the currently reported types. It replaces the default priority within a single repair trajectory, keeping the existing repair agents and adding no repair or verifier calls for selection. We evaluate VeruSteer by replaying its choices on stored AutoVerus and VeruSAGE test trees under four generation configurations. Across 1,270 test trees, VeruSteer increases verified outcomes from 185 to 194 (14.57\% to 15.28\%), gaining 12 successes and losing three for a net improvement of 0.71 percentage points. Among trees where the default fails but a recorded alternative verifies, VeruSteer succeeds on 3 of 4 AutoVerus trees and 9 of 11 VeruSAGE trees. Among trees with recorded alternatives where the default verifies, it retains success on 14 of 15 AutoVerus trees and 12 of 14 VeruSAGE trees. It also finds shorter successful trajectories and improves final progress on some trees where all recorded trajectories fail.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as agents, yet it remains unclear how their foundational capabilities translate into agentic capabilities. End-to-end scores leave unresolved whether low benchmark capability or weak deployment drives a failure, limiting actionable diagnosis. We bridge foundational and agentic capabilities through an operation-level measurement framework. We represent each model with a foundational profile derived from capability benchmarks and an operation profile derived from interaction trajectories, and define capability realization gaps as deviations of observed operation performance from predictions based on foundational capabilities. Experiments on fifteen model services in $τ^2$-Bench show that foundational profiles only partially predict agentic operations. Models with comparable profiles can differ substantially in execution, and these gaps remain consistent across task subsets. Operation profiles add information and substantially improve task-score prediction. The framework locates execution departures at the operation level to inform model development and agent evaluation. We will release our code and analysis artifacts.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate software engineering artifacts written in domain-specific languages (DSLs). Correct DSL instances usually must comply with not only the concrete syntax but also the abstract syntax defined by a metamodel augmented with semantic well-formedness constraints. Existing constrained decoding approaches typically guarantee compliance only with concrete syntax or with a limited set of semantic constraints expressed over the generated text, making metamodel-level constraint consistency difficult to enforce during generation. We present MeMoDecode: a decoding framework that enforces a DSL's concrete syntax, abstract syntax, and well-formedness constraints jointly. Specifically, whenever the LLM generates a complete metamodel concept, MeMoDecode incrementally maps the current output to a partial model and verifies whether it can still be completed into a consistent instance. We combine MeMoDecode with a simple retry mechanism that resumes decoding from the most recent completable snapshot whenever an inconsistency is detected. Under a sound backend verifier, MeMoDecode never performs worse than grammar-constrained decoding on alignment metrics satisfying natural assumptions. Across four DSLs and six open-weight LLMs ranging from 0.6B to 70B parameters, MeMoDecode achieves the highest consistency, improving consistency by 23% on average over unconstrained decoding and by 8% on average over grammar-constrained decoding. It also improves benchmark performance while incurring only modest runtime overhead. These results show that metamodel-guided decoding is an effective approach for enforcing DSL consistency during decoding across diverse DSLs and LLM scales.

How teams engineer requirements for systems built around Generative AI (GenAI) Agents remains empirically uncharted. Existing Requirements Engineering (RE) research mainly addresses AI and ML-based systems broadly but provides no process account for agentic systems, whose non-deterministic behavior cannot be anticipated at design time. To understand how teams actually proceed, we applied Socio-Technical Grounded Theory across 36 semi-structured interviews with practitioners, interleaving data collection and analysis so that emerging findings drove our theoretical sampling and shaped successive rounds of coding. The result is Behavioral Agent Requirement Discovery (BARD), the process theory of RE for GenAI Agents. BARD holds that requirements are not fixed up front but discovered through a recurring cycle of four activities: teams scope the need, build the agent, observe its behavior, and revise what they ask for. Through this four-phase loop, the requirement evolves from a fixed specification towards behavioral and evaluation criteria. Four tensions drive transitions between phases, and two conditions frame the loop. BARD provides researchers with a framework for iteratively refining RE workflows, while giving practitioners a structured basis to embed into their development processes.

Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring is one of the few practical tools available for overseeing capable AI systems, but it is fragile: a model's reasoning is only useful to a monitor if it remains coupled to what the model actually does. This coupling can be degraded during training through, for example, CoT compression, optimization against a monitor, and out-of-context generalization from synthetic documents. In this work, we propose an unsupervised post-training objective based on maximizing mutual information between CoT and the output for improving CoT monitorability. Across three model organisms with degraded CoT, it recovers most or all of the lost monitorability. Applied to undegraded policies, it further improves judged monitorability, improves prediction of unsafe behavior by CoT monitors and activation probes, and increases the prevalence of consequential reasoning. These results suggest that monitorability should be treated as a trainable attribute of the policy. A dedicated monitorability post-training stage can extend current practices that protect CoT from direct optimization pressure.

Diffusion transformers are widely used in image-editing services. To preserve both efficiency and privacy, existing systems commonly rely on cloud-device collaboration. Keeping request-specific inference on the device avoids sending personal images and prompts to the cloud. These workloads often use common templates, such as in face swapping and virtual try-on, enabling KV state to be precomputed and reused across requests. However, this reusable state is large and scales with the number of templates, making it impractical to store all of them on mobile devices. Storing them in the cloud addresses this capacity issue, but cache transfer is placed onto the inference path and can even be slower than on-device computation, especially under fluctuating mobile networks. We introduce SAKURA, a cloud-edge architecture that delivers reusable attention state to mobile devices under a bandwidth budget. It first uses a fine-grained token-importance-aware compression method to preserve image quality under limited transfer budgets. At runtime, SAKURA adaptively selects the cache representation for each upcoming shard based on network bandwidth. To enable efficient execution, we develop a pipelined runtime that overlaps cache transfer and reconstruction with on-device execution. We evaluate SAKURA using three editing tasks and two diffusion models, using a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 phone. SAKURA reduces latency by 1.82x and 3.27x over CacheGen adapted to DiT and on-device generation, respectively. It also reduces cache storage by 3.06x over uncompressed cache, while preserving image quality.

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies need to recognize gaps in their training knowledge to request useful demonstrations or assistance in new situations, especially when failures are costly. Disagreement within an ensemble of independently trained policies can guide these decisions, but requires training and running multiple policies. We propose post-hoc kernel-variance heads that estimate epistemic uncertainty from the embeddings of a single policy. Each head computes the conditional variance of a Gaussian process conditioned on embeddings from the training demonstrations. Fitting requires no regression targets or gradient updates and leaves the policy unchanged. In experiments with SmolVLA on LIBERO-10, the kernel variance heads perform competitively with two-policy ensemble scores in task-level correlation with task success, in demonstration acquisition during active learning, and in referral to a stronger supervisor policy as a proxy for human assistance. For SmolVLA, the head on the vision-language backbone reduces uncertainty-scoring time by up to approximately a factor of 50 compared with ensemble scores, while also substantially reducing setup costs. We also show that the established evaluation protocol on LIBERO-10 primarily rewards recognition of coverage differences between tasks, while execution variability weakens assessment of within-task rankings. Thus, controlled perturbations provide a complementary evaluation: modality-specific heads identify unfamiliar camera, instruction, or state inputs, while fused heads can detect unfamiliar combinations of individually familiar inputs. With a supervisor proxy trained on the evaluated perturbation families, the decoder head improves within-task referral over ensemble disagreement. These findings show that useful uncertainty estimates for adaptive robot learning can be obtained from a single policy.

Large language models often answer from knowledge learned during training, even when a provided passage contradicts that knowledge. To address this problem, contrastive decoding contrasts the predictions under the full and a modified prompt at every token, but it also alters correct answers that the passage supports. We show that checking answers against the passage removes this trade-off. Based on this observation, we propose Accept-or-Repair (AoR), a training-free procedure. AoR keeps a sampled answer if the passage supports it. Otherwise, it tries up to two replacements with contrastive decoding, returning one as soon as it passes this check. It rejects replacements that repeat the answer generated without the passage when the passage favors another answer. Our experiments show that AoR raises the score over sampling by 12.5 points on counterfactual passages and 2.3 on ordinary ones, surpassing eight contrastive and prompting baselines on both, including when each receives the same rejection rule. Replacing only initial answers that the passage does not support improves the average score of every decoder. These results suggest that models can follow passages that contradict their knowledge while preserving accuracy on passages that agree with it. Code will be released at https://github.com/js-lee-AI/AoR.

A common application of the process mining discipline is to connect observed event data with Petri nets, which are bipartite, directed graphical process models with rich formal underpinnings. Recent work learns vector representations of Petri nets to retrieve process models and relate them to event logs, but leaves implicit two key aspects hidden within the net's structure: directed cycles (process loops) and invariants recorded by the net's incidence matrix. We expose both of these to message-passing graph neural networks, through a positional encoding built from return probabilities of directed place-transition walks (PNRWPE), and through same-type messages gated by diffusion kernels of the incidence matrix (DA-PNGNN). Our constructions raise macro balanced accuracy in predicting the generation factors of the 96 Process Discovery Contest 2023 models from 0.751 to 0.796 with PNRWPE, which nearly doubles accuracy on process loops, and to 0.830 with DA-PNGNN, which, without retuning, also improves net-to-tree retrieval top-1 accuracy on the self-supervised ProcRosetta benchmark by 4.1 to 5.9 points.

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) grounds large language models in external knowledge. Modern pipelines combine embedding, chunking, retrieval, reranking, query augmentation, context compression, and agentic verification, yet these techniques are typically evaluated one at a time. It remains unclear whether their isolated gains survive composition, whether retrieval quality and answer faithfulness favor the same design choices, and whether conclusions from small corpora hold at large scale. We pre-declare three hypotheses and introduce LASAGNA, an open-source framework for controlled RAG evaluation. We test 450 configurations across eight benchmarks and corpora ranging from 5K to 200K documents. Three findings emerge. First, individually strong techniques from different phases of a RAG pipeline do not necessarily compose: three retrieval techniques predict a +47% combined improvement but deliver only +17% when used together. Second, component gains stack differently for retrieval and faithfulness, and optimizing one can hurt the other. Third, the best composition changes as the corpus grows: the combination that wins on a small corpus may not remain best at large scale. These findings show that gains measured in isolation are not reliable predictors of realistic performance, and that new RAG techniques should be tested with the full surrounding stack. We call on researchers to do so and supply LASAGNA to simplify these experiments.

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) promise energy-efficient inference through sparse, event-driven computation, yet remain constrained on continuous, context-dependent tasks such as automatic speech recognition (ASR). A key bottleneck is the Leaky Integrate-and-Fire (LIF) neuron, whose membrane decay erases information across pauses and phonetic boundaries while it must both extract features and retain long-range context. Inspired by cortical separation of nonlinear filtering and somatic integration, we introduce the Spiking Ternary GRU (stGRU): a ternary-weight gated recurrent unit performs temporal filtering, while downstream Resonate-and-Fire (RF) neurons generate the binary spike stream driving the next block's event pathway. This makes binary event transmission a native training constraint rather than a separate deployment-time activation quantization step; together with ternary weights, learned projections avoid dense floating-point matrix MACs. Trained end-to-end on LibriSpeech-960, Small, Medium, and Large stGRUs reach 8.09%, 7.04%, and $6.44 \pm 0.17\%$ WER on test-clean without an external language model. To our knowledge, these are the first matrix-MAC-free spiking networks without a learned ANN sequence decoder to achieve single-digit WER on LibriSpeech. The architecture also achieves 10.88% test CER on Aishell-1 (9.28% on dev) when trained from scratch. Internally, trained networks develop a depth-graded hierarchy: shallow layers act as fast acoustic filters, while deep layers form slower semantic integrators whose latent representations segregate into part-of-speech manifolds and word-level spike events. Deep-layer firing rates follow lognormal distributions with a sparsity gradient, mirroring hierarchical processing observed in human cortex in vivo. Our biologically grounded architecture combines competitive ASR with favorable modeled compute and memory cost.

Coding agents are becoming an increasingly important paradigm for automating software engineering tasks. However, existing coding benchmarks primarily evaluate agents at the function or repository level, leaving their capabilities in more complex distributed software systems largely unexplored. In practice, many modern applications adopt microservice architectures, where end-to-end performance emerges from interactions among multiple independently running services, requiring agents to reason beyond local code changes. To study this capability, we introduce MicroPerf-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating coding agents on end-to-end performance optimization in microservice systems. Constructing such a benchmark is challenging because reproducible system-level performance fixes are sparse and difficult to attribute. We address this challenge by injecting empirically grounded performance anti-patterns into real-world open-source systems while preserving functionality and ensuring measurable performance degradation. The resulting benchmark contains 65 optimization instances across seven systems and nine anti-patterns, each with an executable environment, functional tests, and mixed-workload evaluation. Across 1,755 runs covering nine agent-model configurations, the best configuration recovers only 42.0% of the injected performance degradation. The dominant failure is not invalid code, but functionally correct and constraint-compliant changes that fail to improve end-to-end performance, highlighting system-level bottleneck localization as a key challenge for current coding agents. The source code and data are available at https://github.com/zyzcjnb/microperf.

Large pretrained models such as CLIP are widely used as frozen feature extractors. However, their embeddings inherit spurious correlations from training data, introducing bias into the features. A growing body of research has sought to address this issue through post hoc debiasing, leaving the backbone untouched. We discover that despite differing mechanisms, these methods require the bias feature to be identified and expressed in text. This dependency is not innocuous. In this work, we experimentally demonstrate that this requirement incurs an unforeseen penalty in certain scenarios. For example, on the UrbanCars benchmark, having two co-occurring bias attributes, the recent methods underperform a vanilla classifier on biased frozenbackbone features, and even providing ground-truth bias identities does not close the gap. We show that the pattern that such methods seek is readily observable in the frozen geometry. Specifically, cross-class training pairs placed closest together by the frozen encoder almost always share a spurious attribute, regardless of the bias type, without requiring access to the bias labels. Based on this, we propose a novel approach to identify such pairs and learn a single linear map that transforms the features to perform post-hoc debiasing. The proposed approach achieves competitive performance across all datasets without access to bias attribute annotations or any LLMs.

Pixel language models process text as rendered images instead of a finite vocabulary, which gives them strong cross-lingual transfer abilities. However, not much is known about how these abilities are influenced by larger-scale pretraining. In this paper, we train a family of MPIXEL models along three axes of variation: more languages, more scripts, and larger model capacity under fixed per-language compute. In evaluations on five tasks covering 83 languages, we find that scaling acts locally: each axis improves the added languages and scripts, while increased capacity mitigates the curse of multilinguality from pretraining on more languages. Transfer to unseen scripts improves with multilingual pretraining, but does not further improve with scaling. On typologically distant low-resource languages, our models outperform subword and character-level baselines across many writing systems. We also show that larger pixel models reserve more layers for visual processing, and that cross-lingual alignment weakens as more languages are added. Overall, our findings characterize how multilingual scaling improves pixel language models.

Using an LLM to generate training data for another is among the most general ways to train one, and it remains common practice. Some frontier teams have closed that route for their own models: what comes back is an answer, or a short summary, without the detailed reasoning trace behind it. That is a little ironic: they were themselves built on distilling human knowledge, and distilling an open-source model is still entirely routine; the restriction applies to their own outputs alone. Recent work recovers the hidden reasoning by replaying encrypted blocks across models. It somehow works, but it breaks the providers' terms of service, so it is not something a product can be built on long-term. We built the alternative. We take the context and the teacher's answer as input, and generate the reasoning trace ourselves, in the style of the student's own model family. Training is two-stage, supervised and then adversarial: a generator learns to regenerate the family's own reasoning traces from their context and answer, and a critic learns how real a reasoning trace looks. Applied to a teacher's answer, the generator writes one in the family's style. An independent judge rates how likely traces are to be genuine on a scale from 0 to 1: ours average 0.68, real traces 0.66, and traces selected by the critic from four candidates 0.82. These are authenticity scores, not correctness rates. We test the idea on five benchmarks with everything else held fixed. On general tasks the five training corpora are about the same; on coding, the generated reasoning beats Fable 5's own thinking content. With the same 5,000 questions and the same teacher answers, HumanEval+ improves by 3.7 points and MBPP+ by 7.1 at the final checkpoint, and the MBPP+ lead holds at every checkpoint. We suspect that reasoning written in the student's family style is easier for it to learn from.

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a fundamental tool for statistical dimension reduction, yet no canonical extension to distribution-valued data has emerged within the framework of optimal transport. While Wasserstein barycenters and Wasserstein least-squares regression provide canonical liftings of Euclidean averaging and linear regression in the Wasserstein space, an analogous principle for PCA has remained unexplored. In this paper, we introduce Lifted PCA, a canonical extension of Euclidean PCA to Wasserstein space, obtained through the framework of lifting functionals in the space of probability measures by convex extension. Starting from the classical variational formulations of PCA on the Stiefel and Grassmann manifolds, we derive two equivalent minimization problems over probability measures supported on these manifolds that correspond to Wasserstein barycenters with generalized costs. We establish an exact analogue of the equivalence between the Stiefel and Grassmann formulations of Euclidean PCA, preserving PCA's original variational structure under lifting. We further derive dual formulations and optimality conditions, and establish equivalences with multimarginal optimal transport and matching-for-teams problems. We also establish statistical consistency for empirical estimators and develop computational algorithms based on the Wasserstein barycenter formulation over the Stiefel manifold. Whereas Euclidean PCA summarizes vectors through projections onto an optimal low-dimensional linear subspace, Lifted PCA summarizes probability distributions through an optimal probability measure supported on multiple low-dimensional subspaces. Numerical experiments on distributional datasets illustrate the practical performance of the proposed methodology and its benefits for distributional data analysis.

Recursive self-improvement (RSI) describes a system that improves not only its behavior but also the process by which it improves. Recent digital agents test this idea by rewriting their own code and checking each version with executable tests. Bringing these mechanisms into the physical world requires learning from partial observations through costly trials, while accounting for changing operating conditions and potentially irreversible consequences. We position RSI within robot learning and trace pathways from improving robot capabilities to improving the processes that generate them. We examine how physical experience can strengthen these improvement mechanisms and when the resulting gains can support further self-improvement of the mechanisms themselves. Gains carry forward only when feedback addresses remaining learning needs, the receiving component can use the change, its value survives changes in tasks or hardware, and continued practice remains safe and affordable. Existing studies, concentrated in manipulation, support behavioral improvement, benefits to later learning, and procedure improvement. Some systems also change the improver's knowledge or tools, but the physical studies reviewed here have yet to isolate gains attributable to recursion. We synthesize these findings into evaluation principles and research directions for machines that, trial by trial, safely improve the way they improve.

Learning motion planning policies that remain reliable under closed-loop execution is a central challenge in Autonomous Driving (AD). Imitation Learning (IL) scales well to large AD datasets but suffers from distribution shift, causal confusion, and compounding errors under closed-loop execution. In contrast, Reinforcement Learning (RL) typically requires handcrafted rule-based rewards and massive simulation. We study a simple closed-loop IL framework that uses RL purely as an optimization tool, guided by a trajectory-distance reward derived from logged expert data. We refer to this training strategy as Expert-Guided RL (EGRL). Through a controlled empirical study we find evidence that the training procedure, rather than model size and complexity, accounts for a substantial part of the performance gains. We then introduce DriveMLP, a lightweight MLP policy trained with EGRL, as a simple instantiation of these findings. It achieves a score of 86.51 on the nuPlan Val14 Reactive benchmark, a +3.2 point improvement over the previous best IL planner (Flow Planner), with >15x faster inference. Code is available at: https://github.com/alessandro-canevaro/DriveMLP .

This paper presents a theoretical analysis of the oblivious common-reward multi-player multi-armed bandit (OC-MPMAB), a minimal multi-player bandit model in which multiple players select arms simultaneously and observe only a shared reward. Crucially, the players are fully oblivious: they do not observe the actions of other players and do not even know whether any other players exist. The contributions of this work are threefold. First, we prove that the independent gradient-bandit updates applied by the players jointly form an unbiased stochastic gradient estimator of a hidden product-policy objective. This property then yields a universal finite-time first-order stationarity guarantee for every instance. Second, we show that stationarity cannot, in general, be strengthened to global optimality. To illustrate this, we identify a product-policy trap obstruction that rules out the guarantee of global optimality. Third, we show that global optimality can be recovered under structural assumptions on the reward table. To make global optimality achievable, we introduce finite-table certificates that separately characterize product-gradient dominance and self-bounding stochastic noise. We then establish certificate-conditioned bounds on the product-policy gap and pseudo-regret. Consequently, the standard $O(1/t)$ product-policy gap and $O(\log T)$ pseudo-regret rates hold when the certificates are uniform.

Long-term agent memory is shifting from predefined workflows toward learnable policies for memory construction and retrieval. Existing learning-based methods either optimize construction alone or combine retrieval-side online reinforcement learning (RL) with offline construction supervision, limiting co-adaptation between the two stages. In this paper, we explore end-to-end online RL for a unified memory manager (Uni-Mem) that learns both capabilities under a shared policy. However, joint optimization with existing RL algorithms such as GRPO faces confounded group comparisons and sparse feedback over long memory-management trajectories. To this end, we propose Stage-Decoupled GRPO, which alternates construction and retrieval optimization while controlling variation from the other stage within each rollout group, yielding stage-specific learning signals. We further introduce Event-Wise Credit Assignment (ECA), which localizes feedback to responsible events and propagates event-level advantages to their constituent operations. Experiments on LoCoMo and LongMemEval show that Uni-Mem outperforms the strongest RL-based memory, demonstrating the effectiveness of jointly learning memory construction and retrieval via Stage-Decoupled GRPO and ECA.

LLM-generated records increasingly populate production information systems where they are treated as data assets subject to the same quality expectations as records from operational databases. A single such record can simultaneously satisfy and violate a quality rule: a grounded fact adjacent to a hallucination, a useful answer adjacent to a stereotype. Classical data cleaning cannot resolve this because the two judgments are incompatible over the same span; a single LLM judge cannot either, since it shares the training biases that produced the conflict. Existing interventions such as prompt engineering, chain-of-thought, and RLHF reduce surface error rates but provide no audit trail and cannot distinguish genuine remediation from blanket suppression. The question is whether a deterministic check over structured inter-agent records can catch the defects that referential checks alone miss. We present BiasGuard-D: two adversarial roles drawn from distinct model families exchange typed claim documents, a three-model quorum adjudicates by majority vote, and a combined referential-plus-semantic invariant validates the verdict. The semantic component fires on verdicts referential checks miss; removing the iterative loop drops invariant satisfaction sharply. The deliberation layer transfers from stereotype to hallucination remediation on HaluEval QA with only role-framing changes, raising right-answer recovery by 49 percentage points; the triage gate required a cross-family second auditor to maintain recall on objective hallucination. Every claim, vote, and instruction is stored as a typed record giving operators a provenance trail auditable under emerging AI regulations.

Financial crime detection requires identifying illicit activity within large transaction networks, where suspicious behaviour is rare and unfolds over time. Existing graph-based methods capture relationships among accounts but typically underuse the temporal behaviour encoded in account transaction histories. We introduce Temporal-Context Edge Enrichment (TCEE), a framework that addresses this gap by summarising each account's transaction history with a frozen time-series foundation model (TSFM), and enriching each transaction's representation with the relevant temporal context from these summaries. These enriched representations can be scored directly for edge classification, or fed into a graph neural network (GNN) as edge features to capture broader structural information. Across six AMLWorld datasets, TCEE improves PR-AUC over the strongest evaluated baseline on five by a relative 10.8% on average, while training 6.0x faster end-to-end. Feeding TCEE's representations into a GNN raises PR-AUC a further 4.8% on the four smaller datasets. On an Ethereum phishing dataset, we show that TSFM-generated account representations fed into a GNN are also effective for node classification, improving PR-AUC by 14.5% over the strongest baseline. As TSFMs continue to advance, our results suggest they can strengthen financial crime detection by capturing temporal signals that complement graph-based approaches.

Radiomics is the high-throughput extraction of quantitative features (e.g., tumor shape, intensity distributions, and texture) from medical images to characterize tissues and uncover disease patterns invisible to the human eye. These features can serve as candidate imaging biomarkers for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and classification. However, extracting thousands of features makes it difficult to identify the most informative ones for a given clinical task, while implementing an end-to-end workflow can require programming expertise that limits accessibility for clinical researchers. Hence, we propose MEDiml, an open-source, standards-compliant radiomics platform connecting feature extraction, predictive modeling, and interpretation through complementary graphical and programmatic interfaces. MEDiml combines a Python package (MEDiml-pkg) with a graphical desktop application (MEDiml-app) that enables researchers to conduct experiments without writing code. Both interfaces use the same computational implementation, and code generation exports graphically configured workflows as executable Python code, facilitating reproducibility and collaboration between clinical researchers and computational scientists. A typical MEDiml workflow includes image preprocessing, radiomic feature extraction, feature set reduction, model training and evaluation, and interpretation using feature importance. Feature sets can be grouped into levels of radiomic complexity (morphological, intensity-based, textural, and filter-based) to evaluate whether more complex features provide additional predictive value. This reference manual documents the radiomics concepts, workflow, software components, architecture, and installation, compares MEDiml with existing tools, and demonstrates its complexity-driven workflow on five oncological imaging cohorts comprising 2,104 patients. Resources: www.mediml.app.

Formulaic alpha factor mining searches for symbolic expressions that transform market data into predictive signals. Recent LLM-based evolutionary factor mining methods use large language models as semantic variation operators. Under the conventional LLM-EA paradigm, stochastic variation and fitness-based selection can leave the search weakly directed and concentrated around a narrow set of structurally similar factors. We argue that these limitations arise because current methods mainly organize search at the individual and population levels, leaving lineage-level control underused. A lineage connects successive factor variants through evolutionary descent. We propose LineageEvo, which uses lineage in two coupled forms of search control: (1) lineage-conditioned LLM variation, which distills Lineage-Scoped Search Experience into operator-specific priors and fuses them with global operator priors, providing persistent, lineage-relevant guidance for LLM generation; and (2) lineage-stratified search allocation, which balances factor quality against lineage concentration by distributing the search budget across lineages during evolutionary search. Together, these mechanisms make semantic variation more direction aware and prevent branches from dominating the evolution, thereby promoting the discovery of predictive and diverse factors. We evaluate LineageEvo on CSI 500 and S&P 500 in terms of factor predictiveness, portfolio performance, search efficiency, and lineage- and expression-level diversity. LineageEvo achieves the strongest predictive performance on both markets, while LSPS produces a more balanced lineage distribution and a structurally broader factor pool. The results support lineage as a useful intermediate unit for controlling LLM-based evolutionary factor search.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures scale model capacity efficiently, yet their substantial memory footprint poses a major barrier to deployment. Expert pruning reduces this footprint, but most methods focus on which experts to remove and prune every layer equally. We propose SPARE (Sparsity Allocation via Routing Entropy), a training-free, selector-agnostic method that decides how many experts to remove from each layer using routing entropy, the entropy of tokens' normalized Top-K gate weights on calibration data. When a token's gate weight is spread evenly, removing one active expert discards little of it, so SPARE prunes layers with more diffuse routing more aggressively. A perturbation bound under random pruning formalizes this intuition, and controlled interventions with a fixed selector link concentrated routing to larger output changes. With the same selector and budget, SPARE improves average accuracy over uniform allocation on Mixtral, Qwen3, and DeepSeek models, especially at high pruning ratios. At 50% expert pruning, it raises the eight-task average of Qwen3-30B-A3B from 57.2% to 63.8%, and the math, code, and science average of DeepSeek-R1 from 80.1 to 82.8.

The deployment of small and quantized language models in resource-constrained settings raises an important fairness question: when a compressed model produces fewer biased responses, does this reflect fairer behavior or greater abstention? We study this problem in Question Answering (QA) using the BBQ benchmark across multiple model sizes and quantization settings from Qwen3, Gemma-3, and SmolLM2. We also examine whether the observed trends remain stable across alternative prompt formulations and when the ``Unknown'' option is removed in a forced-choice setting. Our results show that larger models achieved higher QA accuracy, but bias showed no simple scaling trend and quantization effects varied across configurations. Notably, 20 of the 26 configurations with fewer biased responses also show increased over-abstention, indicating that lower observed bias can partly reflect greater abstention. These findings show that lower observed bias can partly reflect greater abstention, and that fairness evaluation should consider biased responses, abstention, prompt formulation, and answer-option design jointly.

Accurate short-term forecasting of atmospheric seeing is of significant interest for astronomical observations and free-space optical communication systems, where rapid variations in optical turbulence can affect system performance and operational planning. In this work, we benchmark machine learning models for predicting atmospheric seeing up to two hours in advance, with a particular focus on probabilistic forecasting and uncertainty quantification. We compare two probabilistic approaches, Gaussian Processes (GPs) and a normalizing-flow- based model (FloTS), against deterministic recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) baselines. All models are trained and evaluated on seeing measurements from the Maunakea summit. We assess the models using both deterministic metrics, including the root mean square error and the Pearson correlation coefficient, and probabilistic metrics that evaluate the quality and calibration of predictive uncertainty estimates. The results show that deep learning approaches outperform standard recurrent networks for short-term forecasting, with LSTM and FloTS achieving the best overall predictive accuracy. While Gaussian Processes provide a useful probabilistic baseline, their predictive distributions are limited by the Gaussian assumption. FloTS combines competitive forecasting accuracy with flexible uncertainty quantification and produces the most informative probabilistic forecasts.

Choosing among robot demonstration corpora is a ranking problem: an upstream diagnostic must preserve which candidates produce better downstream policies, not merely correlate with average performance. We study paired instruction dependence, the rate at which a demonstrator changes its first decision when only the goal changes. Across 136 independently seeded quadruped-navigation corpora, predictions developed on 56 corpora are evaluated prospectively on 80 held-out corpora. The audit is reliable and associated with downstream paired correctness, and lowers mean absolute prediction error when added to a correctness-aware baseline, but the primary proper-log-score increment is +0.059 nats (95% corpus-bootstrap CI [-0.027, 0.133]) and the prespecified top-20% comparison does not establish an incremental selection gain. An exploratory response decomposition suggests a structural source of this predictive-ranking mismatch: under the tested predictor specification, separating both-correct and both-wrong responses yields larger held-out gains than their unsigned switch statistic. Seed-to-seed agreement indicates that the held-out endpoint retains recoverable rank signal. These results show that counterfactual response structure can be reliable and predictive while providing limited incremental decision value in this setting when compressed into an unsigned statistic, motivating diagnostics that preserve outcome-relevant structure and are validated against the decisions they are intended to support.

Large language models (LLMs) have been explored as surrogates for human survey respondents. A more promising application is data augmentation, where LLMs predict new responses from partial human data. However, the semantic similarity between questionnaire items is a known source of correlation between answers. It is thus unclear whether LLMs actually infer meaningful relationships between question-response pairs, or use surface-level comparison between questions as a heuristic. To assess this, we evaluated how three LLMs can predict responses to held-out items in two surveys measuring attitudes toward automated or light-electric vehicles, based on varying proportions of known responses. Performance was compared to two baselines, where new responses were derived by maximizing embedding-similarity to a prior response. While LLMs mostly predicted human responses better than baselines, their performance consistently declined with a lower share of known responses, even aligning with the baseline in one survey. Our results show that LLMs' capacities for augmenting replies varied across surveys, and can revert to the same levels as simpler embedding similarity baselines when less data is available.

Semantic communication jointly optimizes inference accuracy, channel use, and computation, yet the underlying communication program is typically specified before training. This paper presents ComRSI (Communications-Oriented Recursive Self-Improvement), a framework for recursively evolving that program through large-language-model-assisted code edits. A fixed agent modifies the encoder, channel adapters, decoder, loss, and training policy; a protected evaluator screens candidates under prescribed budgets and resource constraints. Accepted code and textual feedback inform subsequent proposals, while candidate weights are trained from scratch. In the original ten-generation CIFAR-100 lineage, eight accepted revisions produce an attention-pooled code achieving 74.3% test accuracy over an Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel at 32 complex symbols per image, compared with 67.2% at 256 symbols for the initial design. The program also improves fading-channel accuracy and transfers to Tiny-ImageNet after retraining. A repeat study with ten searches per method compares ComRSI against non-recursive agents with and without textual history. Mean final search scores balancing accuracy, transmission rate, and computational cost are 0.7587, 0.7376, and 0.7089, respectively; the mean numbers of accepted revisions per search are 6.0, 5.0, and 2.1. The advantage over the memoryless agent is supported by a two-sided rank test, whereas the difference from the history-equipped agent remains statistically inconclusive at this sample size. Archived proposals show that pooling can yield a large improvement, while retained history supports subsequent refinement. These results support recursive program optimization within the evaluated setting and expose its remaining rate-robustness and compute-placement trade-offs.

Indoor localization systems are critical for Industry-4.0 applications. Visible Light Communication (VLC)-based systems offer advantages such as immunity to electromagnetic interference, high accuracy, and energy efficiency, but their performance is hindered by environmental variability across deployment areas. This paper presents a transfer learning (TL) framework for VLC-based indoor localization that enhances cross-area robustness while reducing data requirements. Using real-world measurements from four distinct areas of a Bosch manufacturing facility, we show that fine-tuning a deep neural network (DNN) pre-trained on source area data with only 40% of target-area measurements recovers 97% of full-data performance, thereby reducing the amount of target data needed. We further introduce the Transfer Efficiency Score (TES), a composite metric that identifies the most effective source models for transfer without exhaustive evaluation. Guided by TES, the framework selects the best source model, yielding localization errors as low as 40.9 cm with success rates above 86%. Validation on an unseen area confirms its generalization capability, with a 3.28 cm mean error achieved using the TES-selected source model. Overall, the proposed framework provides a scalable and data-efficient pathway for industrial VLC localization, substantially reducing deployment costs and computational burden while maintaining high accuracy in diverse and dynamic environments.

We present an AI-assisted mathematical addendum to Strategic Trip Planning: Striking a Balance Between Competition and Cooperation (Amar, 2018). We reconstruct selected relationships between strategic choice, cooperative stability, participant approval and enforcement. The thesis's Nash-to-core proposition is under-specified until outsider opportunities are stated. We verify two-person implications under fixed outsiders and explicit efficiency conditions. Under isolation, the original example has an empty TU core; its funded counterpart uses an explicit external subsidy. For a monotone resource model we characterize the exact financing gap. A finite negotiation procedure implemented in Lean is proved to terminate with participant approval, joint-cost non-worsening and local optimality against permitted approved moves. Supporting formalizations address bargaining geometry and regret-based efficiency. A resource-game counterinstance shows why monotonicity alone provides no uniform price-of-anarchy bound. Reproducible computations compare a documented heuristic reconstruction with the verified procedure on 44 source-based instances and 96 starting cases from four additional synthetic network families. Acceptance-matched heuristic and randomized pairwise-search controls contextualize the optimization results. The mathematical ingredients are established results; the contribution is a traceable reconstruction linking source statements, explicit assumptions, checked proofs, executable code and retained counterinstances. The study illustrates how AI-assisted investigation can turn engineering intuitions from legacy research into precise mathematical claims whose conditions and computational consequences can be inspected and reproduced.

This paper describes an approach to constructing nowcast and forecast predictive models for the occurrence of high-latitude decameter ionospheric irregularities based on SuperDARN and SECIRA radar data and space weather parameters. The method relies on self-learning pattern recognition in the dynamics of space weather parameters, that influence the irregularities formation. The proposed approach is a data-driven, multiscale method in which the spatial distribution of irregularities is approximated using a neural network of an original architecture, inspired by graph neural networks. The model was trained and tested using data from 11 radars during the period 2010-2025 (SuperDARN: CVW, ICE, ICW, INV, PGR, PYK, RKN, SAS, STO; SECIRA: EKB, MAGW). It is shown that the model achieves optimal performance when using geomagnetic coordinates MLT,MLAT. The optimal set of parameters for the best nowcast and forecast over studied set of parameters is a combination of geomagnetic and solar disturbance indices ($a_{p}$, $K_{p}$, $AE$, F10.7) from ground-based observations, and satellite-measured solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field parameters ($P_{sw}$, $E_{sw}$, $\widetilde{B_{z}}$, $T_{sw}$). Hourly mean values for all the parameters were used in the analysis. The results indicate that acceptable forecast quality is achieved with a lead time of up to 7-9 hours, with the highest quality reached for nowcast (zero lead time). It is shown that the parameters $\widetilde{B_{z}}$ and F10.7 are significant for nowcasting only and can be neglected for other lead times. It is shown that $AE$ and $T_{sw}$ are significant for mid-term forecast (\textgreater 2hours ahead) and can be neglected for short-term predictions. Statistical relationships between the maximum latitude of the equatorial boundary of the irregularities and space weather parameters are also discussed.

Multimodal inputs may be missing or degraded, raising distinct questions of evidence availability and trust. We introduce a reliability-aware Gaussian Product-of-Experts (PoE) in which an input-dependent reliability weight tempers each modality's latent precision, while missing experts are omitted. We characterize how reliability and availability affect posterior information and expert influence. Across two clinical multimodal tasks, the full framework remains competitive with complete inputs and achieves its clearest mean-AUROC advantage under modality absence, particularly on HAIM-MIMIC-MM. Ablations show a substantial gain from missing-aware training and an additional HAIM improvement from reliability weighting under matched PoE, missing-aware, and consistency training. Unseen test-time corruptions are used diagnostically and reveal modality-dependent reliability-weight and latent-uncertainty responses, including failure under severe degradation. Thus, reliability weighting provides an explicit evidence-control mechanism, while learning dependable quality signals remains an open challenge.

Object detection models for autonomous driving commonly experience substantial performance drops when deployed under adverse weather due to the domain shift between training data and real-world operating conditions. This degradation is especially evident when models trained on clear-weather images encounter foggy environments with reduced visibility and contrast. To address this challenge, we introduce FogTTA, an online test-time adaptation framework designed to improve the robustness of Transformer-based object detectors in fog. Using RF-DETR as the underlying object detector, FogTTA enables real-time adaptation to the streaming target domain without requiring source data or retraining. The framework follows a teacher-student design, where the deployed model serves as the teacher and generates pseudo labels from weakly augmented target inputs. These predictions are subsequently refined through non-maximum suppression and confidence filtering. The student model then learns from strongly augmented target sample using the Varifocal loss to mitigate pseudo-label noise. The teacher is updated via exponential moving averaging to ensure stable and continuous adaptation. Experiments show that FogTTA outperforms prior baselines, delivering improved detection accuracy and stability while maintaining real-time performance.

Early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma is critical to preserve access to curative treatment options. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) provides a standardized framework for non-invasive diagnosis on multiphase computed tomography, based on major visual imaging features. However, these features may be difficult to assess consistently, particularly in small liver lesions. We developed dLI-RADS, an interpretable artificial intelligence method designed to estimate the probability of hepatocellular carcinoma from multiphase computed tomography images of manually segmented liver lesions, while remaining aligned with LI-RADS-related imaging concepts. dLI-RADS combines neural network-derived predictions with handcrafted quantitative imaging measurements reflecting LI-RADS major features and integrates these inputs using logistic regression. In this multicenter retrospective study, patients with multiphase computed tomography and at least one liver lesion were included, while lesions larger than 40 mm were excluded. Histology served as the reference standard for hepatocellular carcinoma, and a composite reference standard was used for non-hepatocellular carcinoma lesions. The lesion-level accuracy of dLI-RADS and LI-RADS were compared on the internal evaluation set using 10,000-repetition bootstrap non-inferiority tests, with 5% margins and significance levels. On the external test set, sensitivities were similarly compared. dLI-RADS was non-inferior to LI-RADS for lesion-level accuracy in the internal evaluation set, achieving 80% accuracy compared with 74% for LI-RADS (p = 0.04)...

Perceptive locomotion policies typically observe a dense robot-centric elevation map, although only the terrain beneath and around the next footsteps informs the control decision. Learned encoders compress the whole visual input, leaving the policy to work out which inputs matter while learning the baseline locomotion task. Learning both at once slows training and, without computationally expensive attention mechanisms, makes generalization to new terrain harder. We instead remove redundant inputs from the elevation map before the policy sees it. A lightweight foothold prediction model (FPM) predicts future footholds from proprioception and the velocity command alone, and we sample the elevation map only in small patches around these predicted footholds. We train the prediction model alongside the locomotion policy, periodically retraining it on new policy rollouts as the robot's gait matures. This allows the perception to anticipate where the policy will step, while the policy learns to leverage terrain information around those steps. With the proposed lightweight preprocessing, the policy reaches a given terrain difficulty in roughly a third of the training iterations required with the complete map. It outperforms policies that observe the complete map where footholds are sparse, including in narrow walled corridors, and on unseen terrain, and it matches an attention-based encoder trained at several times the cost. The policy transfers zero-shot to a Unitree G1 humanoid traversing various obstacles, stairs, gaps, and step-downs beyond the training distribution in both indoor and outdoor environments.

In automation pipelines, a GUI agent's confident success report can let downstream stages proceed even when the recorded execution trace does not show that the agent produced the requested outcome. We call this case a dangerous misreport: an unhedged success claim that the trace does not support as causal accomplishment during the run. We study report--trace auditing, which checks an agent's completion claim against an independently recorded trace. A controlled aware/blind intervention reveals self-report leakage: the agent's own self-report changes how completion is judged. The same judge reads the same task and trace; only that self-report is included or withheld. Withholding it improves trace-only dangerous-misreport recall by 43.4 percentage points with Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and 13.3 percentage points with DeepSeek-284B-A13B, with the same trend on held-out Batch 2. This motivates report isolation. The report records what the agent claims, but it must not influence the trace-state judgment. We implement this separation with a structured auditor that separates claim interpretation from claim-blind trace analysis and applies deterministic rules to extracted evidence. Because evidence extraction is separated from the policy that consumes it, the same audit record can be replayed under alternative policies without new model calls. The auditor achieves F1 0.75--0.78 on the 465-record audit-target set and 0.77--0.81 on held-out Batch 2, outperforming claim-aware and prompt-blind controls in recall and F1. Under audit-stage gating, where flag and review both block automatic pass, it blocks 74--90% of dangerous misreports at 45--56% inspection load, or 16--19% of the full in-scope stream after coarse status triage.

Deep neural networks deployed on smart glasses must adapt to changes in the distribution of incoming data while adhering to strict privacy and device constraints. We present No Frames, Just Frequencies, a bandwidth-efficient source-assisted adaptation framework that characterizes distribution shifts using compact frequency descriptors computed on-device. Rather than transmitting camera frames, the glasses compute and send frequency descriptors to a host device that contains a replica of the model. The host device maps the received frequency descriptor to a distribution shift operator that synthesizes out-of-distribution data and adapts a model replica using a pre-defined adaptation protocol. We evaluate the framework on mixtures of ImageNet-C corruptions using convolution-based (ConvNeXtV2-Femto), self-attention-based (DeiT-Tiny), and hybrid (TinyViT-5M) vision models, on person classification (Visual Wake Words), and on object detection (MS-COCO). Our results reveal that adaptation driven solely by the transmitted descriptors recovers $93-95\%$ of the supervised oracle adaptation gain on all three architectures, $82\%$ on Visual Wake Words and $94$--$98\%$ on MS-COCO. Notably, adaptation quality degrades gracefully as the descriptor resolution decreases from $224 $ to $28$ pixels, consistently across architectures, enabling bandwidth reductions from $213\times$ to $784\times$ across the frequency descriptors.

Automatic phenotype information extraction plays an important role in rare disease diagnosis, genotype-phenotype analysis, and precision medicine. However, accurately identifying phenotype concepts and determining their associations with specific patients remain challenging, particularly in full-text biomedical articles involving multiple patients and complex clinical descriptions. This paper presents an overview of CHIP 2026 Shared Task 1, which aims to promote the development of methods for patient-specific phenotype concept recognition from full-text biomedical literature. The task consists of two subtasks: full-text phenotype concept recognition and patient-specific phenotype association. For this evaluation, we used 200 annotated full-text biomedical articles from the PatientPheX dataset, containing 506 patients, 15,193 phenotype mentions, and 5,656 patient-phenotype associations. A total of 455 teams registered for the competition, with 189 and 103 valid submissions received on the Phase A and Phase B leaderboards, respectively. The best-performing system achieved an overall score of 0.7389 on the final test set, outperforming the baseline by 8.37 percentage points. The top-performing teams explored diverse approaches combining biomedical language models, large language models (LLMs), and ensemble strategies. The evaluation results highlight both the potential of these approaches and the remaining challenges in patient attribution and phenotype normalization from full-text biomedical literature. The post-evaluation phase remains open at https://tianchi.aliyun.com/competition/entrance/532512.

Stochastic flow maps promise few-step sampling of stochastic differential equations (SDEs) by learning to directly jump between times along the solution path, yet training these models to learn this solution map remains difficult. The primary obstacle is the Brownian path itself: it is an infinite-dimensional object which needs to be passed to the neural network and is nowhere differentiable, which makes the implementation of derivative-based losses that power the state-of-the-art deterministic flow maps just out of reach. We identify two core design principles which address these issues: a) represent the Brownian path with a basis which carries higher-order local information, and b) train with an objective that forces the network to use the full representation of the path, not just the first order. To address this, we leverage the shifted Legendre polynomial expansion with a Wong-Zakai styled objective, unlocking derivative-based losses. Finally, we propose a recipe for fine-tuning large pre-trained flow models into strong stochastic flow maps. We ablate through this design space on several toy problems and use our findings to transform a large flow model into a strong stochastic flow map on ImageNet, achieving roughly a three-fold improvement in FD-DINOv2 over SSFM at four NFE.

A frozen multi-horizon forecaster can be corrected online from its own residuals. However, under label delay the target of a block arrives only after the whole horizon has passed, and the corrector's retained state grows with the number of channels. Aiming to combine a small retained state with a large error reduction, we propose DRiC (DCT Ridge Corrector), which fits a ridge regression of the leading discrete cosine transform (DCT) coefficients of the next residual block on those of the frozen forecast and of the latest input block, with sufficient statistics updated recursively. Its local variant, DRiC-L, keeps one such regression per channel; its global variant, DRiC-G, pools all channels into one regression, whose statistics do not depend on the channel count. A guard tracks a running scale of the frozen forecast's residual for each channel; it skips updates on blocks far outside that scale and clips the issued correction. We evaluate on seven datasets (four ETT series, Weather with its missing-value codes filled, Electricity, and Traffic) with DLinear, PatchTST, and iTransformer backbones, against 10 naive, gradient-trained, and closed-form methods. DRiC-L with eight DCT coefficients (DRiC-L8) reduces the mean squared error (MSE) by 14.55% on average over 126 conditions, against 12.98% for ELF, the most accurate comparator, while retaining 15-17 times less state, although ELF is more accurate on Traffic. DRiC-G retains 14.6 kB on the 321-channel Electricity data and 18.9 kB on the 862-channel Traffic data and is the most accurate method at or below its state on both. However, 5 to 7 of the 10 comparators, all with at least 10 times its state, are more accurate there. On the unfilled Weather file, DRiC-L8 without the guard has on average 8.0 times the frozen forecast's MSE, whereas with the guard it reduces the MSE by 7.94%. Code: https://github.com/keiotakmin/dric.

Diffusion language models generate by iteratively denoising a masked sequence under bidirectional attention, without the strict left-to-right commitment of autoregressive decoding. Whether this difference affects how reliably they remain grounded in structured inputs is largely unexplored. We study this question in table-to-text generation using ToTTo, where highlighted source cells make factual grounding directly testable. We compare the masked diffusion models MDLM and LLaDA with GPT-2 and GPT-Neo under an identical retrieval-based few-shot protocol, together with a QLoRA-adapted LLaDA, and we score reference similarity and source grounding as separate axes. The two pull apart. Within LLaDA, additional demonstrations raise BLEU from 11.3 to 22.0 while NLI entailment against the source table falls from 0.78 to 0.52; QLoRA reaches the best BLEU of the study, 24.15, and grounds no better for it. Manual annotation shows the failure modes differ in kind: the autoregressive baselines tend to wander off the table, while LLaDA-based models more often stay on topic and swap out individual entities. Reference-based metrics alone are insufficient to assess faithfulness in table-to-text generation.

In this paper, we study quantile distributional policy evaluation, where the return distribution under a given policy is approximated by the quantile Bellman fixed point $\bmη_m$. We investigate the statistical accuracy of estimating $\bmη_m$ across quantile resolutions under Wasserstein distances. Assuming access to a generative model, we construct a quantile fixed point estimator $\bmη_m^{(n)}$ from an empirical Markov decision process and establish non-asymptotic error bounds under Wasserstein distances. When reward densities are uniformly bounded away from zero, we obtain a root-$n$ high-probability bound simultaneously over all resolutions $m$ and all Wasserstein orders $1\le p\le\infty$. When reward densities vanish at the support endpoints, we show that continuity and endpoint monotonicity suffice to preserve the same resolution-independent rate for $1\le p\le2$. For $p>2$, we establish a root-$n$ bound with coefficient $m^{1/2-1/p}$, together with a slower, resolution-independent $n^{-1/p}$ bound for every finite $p>2$. We further obtain resolution-independent $W_\infty$ consistency governed by the continuity modulus of reward quantile functions. To investigate the sharpness of these bounds, we characterize the exact local asymptotic minimax risk at each fixed resolution as the expected Wasserstein-coordinate norm of the efficient Gaussian limit and prove that our estimator attains it. We then examine the resolution dependence of this optimal local risk. A regular one-state instance has resolution-independent local risk constants, whereas a single endpoint-vanishing two-state instance exhibits growth of order $m^{1/2-1/p}$, up to logarithmic factors along a resolution subsequence, for every $p>2$.

The rapid expansion of the Internet of Things enables seamless collaboration among connected devices, making indoor localization a critical component of industrial automation. However, conventional localization techniques struggle in dynamic environments. These methods depend on extensive, frequent data collection and environment-specific calibration, limiting scalability, interoperability, and effective use of prior research while imposing significant energy penalties that hinder practical deployment. To address these challenges, we propose an energy-efficient transfer learning (TL) based approach for visible light communication based indoor localization. Our method leverages TL to tackle environmental variability, including lighting fluctuations and physical obstacles that typically degrade localization performance, while simultaneously reducing computational overhead and energy consumption compared to conventional approaches. We also introduce a novel model efficiency (ME) metric, designed to integrate localization accuracy, energy efficiency, data efficiency, and transfer gain into a single evaluative measure for comprehensive optimization. Evaluations on a real-world dataset collected from a BOSCH factory demonstrate that our model achieves a 47% improvement in localization accuracy compared to a conventional model that does not utilize TL, and achieves up to 67.5% ME with TL models, compared to only 10.4% in conventional models under high-noise conditions. These results underscore the potential of our approach to deliver a highly efficient and scalable indoor localization system suitable for energy-constrained industrial applications.

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are among the standard tools for molecular property prediction, but the atom-level explanations of their predictions are hard for medicinal chemists to act on. We propose a change of input representation rather than a new model: molecules are encoded as fragment-level graphs from BRICS decomposition, where each node is a synthetically meaningful fragment whose features are the element-wise sum of its atoms' features. Because only the representation changes, any message-passing GNN and any post-hoc attribution method produces explanations at the resolution of functional groups instead of single atoms. Across four architectures, four prediction tasks, and two explainers under scaffold splits, fragment-level encoding matches atom-level test accuracy on roughly five-fold smaller graphs. Integrated-Gradients attributions recover known pharmacophores above chance on two enzyme targets, namely BACE at 1.5 times the chance rate, and PTR1 at 3.2 times. A like-for-like comparison against an aggregated atom-level baseline shows that post-hoc aggregation is not a stable substitute: its BACE hit rate range both exceeds and falls below the fragment model's hit rate depending on two arbitrary aggregation choices, whereas fragment-level training yields a single convention-free attribution at no predictive cost. The code is available at: https://github.com/4D-Lab/frame

Despite the success of foundation models in image synthesis, achieving fine-grained spatial control remains a significant challenge, typically requiring auxiliary structural adapters or complex inference-time steering. While modern vision-language (VLM) text encoders possess the latent capacity to represent spatial coordinates, generative models often fail to leverage this information. We demonstrate that the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) distribution is a critical determinant of spatial grounding in flow-matching models. Using a novel synthetic benchmark of geometric primitives, we isolate structural mechanics from textural complexity inherent in natural imagery and introduce a rigorous color-aware layout metric to quantify spatial fidelity. We show that training on a centered SNR distribution results in poor layout adherence (25.9%). Instead, we identify high-noise regimes as a "critical learning phase" for spatial grounding. Shifting the training focus toward these stages increases layout adherence to 80.8%, effectively reaching the 83.6% reconstruction ceiling of the underlying variational autoencoder. We find that the necessity for this shift scales with resolution and aspect ratio variance, and that the conservative noise schedules employed by models like FLUX.1 are insufficient for precise layout adherence. Finally, we show that these findings translate to real-world imagery via the COCO dataset (1.0 vs. 57.3 Average Precision), where state-of-the-art layout adherence is unlocked through distribution tuning alone, without architectural modifications.

Bayesian optimization (BO) is typically used only for problems where the underlying function is deemed "expensive" (e.g. in time or money), with the speed of the BO algorithm being of little importance. In the real world, however, problems span a continuous range of values, going from cheap to expensive. In this paper, we present BO algorithms through the lens of a speed-performance Pareto frontier: we compare BO against faster algorithms like CMA-ES, and highlight how certain regions of the Pareto frontier are currently empty. As a solution, we propose a new set of fast BO methods that exploit the linear structure in existing BO algorithms, for both continuous and combinatorial inputs (from ~10 to 6000+ dimensions). Our methods achieve performance similar to state-of-the-art BO, while being more than $10^2\times$ to $10^3\times$ faster, opening the field of BO to an entirely new class of problems.

Using a near-census of 802,863 resolved markets listed on Polymarket between January 2023 and May 2026, and only information available at listing (the market's title and description, named resolution source, and contract metadata), we predict lifetime trading volume and whether settlement is later disputed. Contract information predicts trading volume well (out-of-sample $R^2 = 0.747$ for log volume), and most of the signal is interpretable: market topic provides the largest gain ($+0.289$ $R^2$ over a $0.220$ contract-feature baseline), wording and resolution-rule design add smaller but measurable improvements ($+0.027$ combined), and neural text models add little beyond the interpretable features. This performance does not survive a period of platform change coinciding with a shift in listing formats: accuracy in predicting whether a market reaches \$1,000 falls from AUC $0.940$ under same-period evaluation to $0.577$ when training on past quarters and testing on later ones. The loss concentrates in markets whose question forms were absent from training (76.9% of test markets; on familiar forms the model still reaches $0.778$), and a decomposition attributes more of it to a changed relationship between contract characteristics and demand than to an outdated mapping from text to features. Dispute predictors are more stable but less precise: launch-time features rank dispute risk far better than chance (AUC $0.78$), yet at a 0.31% base rate precision is too low for case-by-case prediction (average precision $0.012$), so the scores suit ranking groups of markets rather than forecasting individual disputes.

Many learning systems are performative: once deployed, their predictions change the data distribution on which future models are trained. In multi-agent settings, this feedback is routed through a network of interacting learners, so stability depends not only on the strength of performativity but also on who affects whom. We study repeated retraining in multi-agent performative prediction and identify a spectral threshold that separates stable learning from worst-case learning obstruction. Prior work often collapses cross-agent feedback into a scalar contraction constant, missing this network structure. We instead introduce the reflexivity matrix $Γ$, which records how strongly one agent's deployment can move another agent's best response, defined from per-agent gradient sensitivities and curvature parameters. The threshold occurs when the spectral radius of this matrix crosses one. Below the threshold, repeated retraining converges geometrically to a unique performatively stable equilibrium, with cumulative excess loss bounded uniformly in the time horizon. Above the threshold, we construct noisy supercritical instances in which every local-information learner incurs expected cumulative excess loss growing linearly for horizons up to order $1/(ρ(Γ)-1)$. Together, these results characterize the threshold behavior through upper and lower bounds and recover the single-agent scalar threshold from prior work as a special case.

We consider online prediction from experts, a fundamental problem in machine learning, under differential privacy constraints. Existing private algorithms achieve near-optimal regret $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$, where $T$ is the time horizon. However, this bound becomes suboptimal when $L^\star$, the cumulative loss of the best expert, is significantly less than $T$. In this work, we present the first differentially private algorithm with regret $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{L^\star})$, offering a substantial improvement in the low-loss regime. Our regret bound matches the non-private lower bound up to poly-logarithmic factors for constant privacy parameters, demonstrating that privacy incurs only a small cost in this setting. Our result assumes that the input sequence is oblivious, i.e., it is fixed in advance and independent of the algorithm's outputs. We also prove that an $\tildeΩ(\sqrt{T})$ regret is inevitable for adaptively generated inputs, even when $L^\star = 0$.

Graph-level out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization is critical for deploying graph neural networks in real-world applications where distribution shifts are inevitable. Existing approaches typically require class labels during representation learning to decide which substructures are predictive, limiting their applicability. We propose SCARCE, a label-free representation-learning framework that yields distribution-shift-robust graph representations from an environment partition of the training graphs alone, whether that partition comes from dataset metadata or, when none is available, from clustering a self-supervised embedding. Our method operates in two stages: (1) a variational graph autoencoder is warm-started for graph reconstruction; and (2) an adversarial confusion mechanism forces the encoder to produce representations from which a discriminator cannot distinguish environments, while preserving graph-reconstruction fidelity. We provide theoretical analysis showing that environment confusion contracts environment-discriminative directions in the representation space, which, under regularized downstream classifiers, is equivalent to imposing a stronger directional penalty on environment-associated features. This feature-reweighting mechanism reduces reliance on spurious correlations without erasing information, offering a label-free, continuous relaxation of last-layer reweighting methods. Experiments on a controlled synthetic datasets and the DrugOOD datasets show that SCARCE achieves state-of-the-art OOD generalization among label-free methods, using no class labels during representation learning.

Model predictive control is a high-performance control method, but it incurs comparatively high online computational costs across many control tasks and is challenging to realize in low-level hardware settings. To address this, we present a framework for generating neural network controllers that provably inherit the safety and stability guarantees of a robust model predictive policy. In contrast to approaches based on post-verification or additional online safety filters, our method provides constructive, a priori design conditions that ensure preservation of recursive feasibility and stability before deployment. We treat the approximation error as a bounded input disturbance, which is addressed in the MPC design. This allows the neural network controller to directly inherit robustness from the underlying model predictive controller, which enables the transfer of guarantees to the approximation. The design process is an offline, constructive synthesis pipeline and can be implemented once Lipschitz bounds are specified. We further demonstrate in simulation that the learned controller reproduces the closed-loop behavior of the original controller while reducing online computation.

One of the enduring challenges in online platforms is recommendation. Both communities and advertisers face difficulties in analyzing complex user behavior, identifying habits and evolving preferences, and providing timely recommendations that are relevant to user interests. In particular, point of interest recommendation poses the additional challenge of identifying the factors that influence user behavior, capturing user tendencies, and generating accurate, personalized recommendations for each individual. In this work, we propose SOAR, a Social and Opinion Aware Recommendation model that incorporates both the user's friendship network and textual reviews to assess whether a location is suitable for a specific user, with a particular emphasis on the sentiment of shared reviews. Experimental results in real-world datasets demonstrate that incorporating reviews into the recommendation process improves the precision of the recommendation.

Aligned large language models are trained to comply with benign requests while refusing harmful ones. However, recent work shows that this refusal behavior is fragile and can often be disrupted by simple activation- or weight-space interventions. In particular, refusal has been shown to be largely mediated by a single residual-stream direction, typically computed as a difference-of-means vector between harmful and harmless prompts. However, this standard construction aggregates heterogeneous harmful prompts into one uniform average, potentially conflating distinct refusal-related phenomena. In this work, we study whether refusal interventions can be strengthened by learning how to combine prompt-specific refusal directions. We propose Weighted Refusal Direction Optimization (WRDO), a procedure that constructs a composite refusal direction from a bank of per-prompt directions using learned aggregation weights. This approach allows different harmful prompts to contribute unequally to the final intervention direction. We evaluate WRDO against prior single-direction methods on three open-weight language models using three guard judges and HarmBench as an external evaluator. We further measure the effect of the intervention on general model capability through standard utility benchmarks. Finally, we investigate a defense-oriented setting in which the same optimization machinery is used in reverse to restore refusal behavior in an abliterated model checkpoint. Our results show that weighted aggregation provides a more effective and flexible mechanism for manipulating refusal representations.

Training modern AI models has become increasingly expensive, and updating deployed models can alter their internal feature representations, affecting applications built upon them. In retrieval systems, such updates often require complete gallery re-indexing, a computationally expensive process at scale. Existing backward-compatibility methods enable direct comparison of representations from updated and earlier models, avoiding re-indexing. However, they typically require compatibility-specific training, learned mapping functions, or architectural modifications, and often depend explicitly on the previous model. We propose hyperspherical simplex representations derived from softmax outputs and logits for backward-compatible retrieval across independently trained models. They leverage the simplex structure induced by softmax cross-entropy training with one-hot labels as a common geometric reference across model updates. Since this reference depends on the number of classes, adding new ones expands the simplex, misaligning existing class prototypes with their earlier counterparts. We therefore derive a deterministic linear transformation to restore their alignment. Our theoretical analysis of the formal backward-compatibility definition identifies two geometric conditions under which its inequalities hold in expectation, assuming von Mises--Fisher class distributions with increasing concentration across updates. Aligned regular-simplex representations satisfy these conditions, providing a theoretical basis for the proposed representations under the stated assumptions. Without using additional compatibility-specific losses, learned mappings, or architectural modifications, the proposed representations achieve competitive results on standard compatibility benchmarks, including expanded class sets, more expressive architectures, and independently trained models from public repositories.

Software testing is essential for ensuring quality, yet testing complex front-end user interfaces is often time-consuming and difficult. Snapshot testing has emerged as a low-cost regression testing method that detects unexpected changes by comparing program behavior before and after modifications. Despite its growing adoption, empirical evidence regarding its actual effectiveness remains scarce. To fill this gap, this study presents a large-scale empirical investigation into the effectiveness of snapshot testing involving 340 GitHub repositories and a survey of 60 experienced practitioners. Our quantitative results demonstrate that combining snapshot and traditional non-snapshot tests significantly enhances code coverage, achieving a median statement coverage of 86.7%. We find that the two approaches are highly complementary, typically exercising distinct regions of the production code. Furthermore, test suites incorporating snapshot tests detected 1.3 times more mutants than those relying solely on traditional tests. Our qualitative insights from the developer survey reveal that practitioners value snapshot testing for its ease of implementation, ability to prevent regressions, and transparency in checking results. However, reviewing large result sets and managing false positives remain significant hurdles. These findings guide the strategic integration and future improvement of snapshot testing in modern development pipelines.

Linear-attention language models keep their context in a recurrent state of fixed size, where an inference system stores one copy of this state for every sequence it decodes at the same time. Storing the state at lower precision therefore lets more sequences share an accelerator. Existing state quantizers round the state after every generated token and report that four bits lose accuracy unless the bit width is raised or the model is fine-tuned.\par We introduce PACE, a post-hoc four-bit state quantizer. PACE rounds the state only once every few generated tokens, as chunked kernels already do once per chunk during prefill, and keeps the tokens generated in between in a small buffer. Rounding less often reduces the error that accumulates in the state. Additionally, we find that the large entries of the gated-delta state gather in columns, because some channels of the update written at each token remain large across many tokens. PACE therefore shares each quantization scale within one column. It also keeps the heads that retain rounding error longest at eight bits. On four hybrid models from 4B to 35B parameters, PACE with mixed four- and eight-bit heads is competitive with eight-bit DAMP on the three larger models at about two thirds of its memory, PACE with four-bit heads throughout scores higher than Q-Mamba at equal memory, and rounding every few tokens preserves the decoding speedup of the buffer.

Direct preference optimization (DPO) incurs training costs in output scoring, sequence execution, and backpropagation, so reducing supervision alone does not necessarily save computation. We introduce a unified framework for stochastic pruning of the DPO computation graph that independently samples response positions for scoring, response prefixes for execution, and preference branches for backpropagation. By making these selections before the corresponding operations, the framework omits computation at each stage of a training step. Our analysis characterizes the objective changes induced by position and sequence pruning and uses inverse-probability weighting to obtain a conditionally unbiased single-branch gradient estimator for the sampled objective. Controlled measurements show that position and sequence pruning primarily reduce peak memory, with most output-memory savings attributable to an implementation that retains full response supervision. Branch pruning yields a $1.426\times$ step-time speedup over a concatenated DPO baseline and reduces training time by about 30\% relative to stock DPO across two model families, with slightly lower mean accuracy and benchmark-dependent changes in open-ended scores. These findings relate the resource benefits of stochastic graph pruning to the computation omitted and the resulting changes in the training objective.

Autoregressive (AR) models have proved effective for zero-shot prediction from longitudinal electronic health records, but impose strictly sequential generation on trajectories containing temporally clustered and interdependent clinical events. We investigate block-based masked diffusion (BD) as an alternative on MIMIC-IV under matched tokenisation, context length, model capacity, and evaluation conditions. Across block sizes, BD exhibits a clear quality--efficiency trade-off, with small-block configurations retaining much of the predictive performance of AR while enabling substantially faster inference. A representative $B{=}8$ configuration achieves approximately $1.43\times$ faster evaluation. Although generative rollout remains below AR in most settings, frozen linear probes on BD and AR representations achieve near-identical performance across clinical prediction tasks, indicating that BD learns comparably informative clinical representations. Increasing the denoising budget yields diminishing returns, while alternative decoding strategies provide limited gains. Overall, our results show that block diffusion is a viable and computationally attractive approach to longitudinal EHR modelling, with further improvements in iterative decoding offering a promising route toward closing the remaining generative performance gap.

We study an extremal regression problem, an example of multiple instance learning (MIL), where the predictors are given as multisets, called bags. The bag elements (called instances) possess hidden labels which are pooled to produce an observed bag-level label. Max pooling is common in MIL applications, but gives rise to vanishing gradients. To handle this, modern MIL pipelines approximate the max with a softmax, treating the sharpness as a learnable parameter, denoted $λ$. When the max pooling model is the true data generating process, learning will be successful when $λ$ is increased during gradient descent, thereby driving the dynamics into regions of parameter space with vanishing gradients. To understand the conditions under which gradient descent breaks down, we study a minimal model and derive a low dimensional projection of the gradient flow in the joint limit of large bags $n$ and high dimension $d$ with $α=\ln n/d$ fixed. The flow has two distinct phase transitions: an intrinsic freezing transition related to the random energy model of disordered systems, and a retrieval transition occurring in modern Hopfield networks. Numerical simulation confirms both the phase diagram and the convergence of the finite-size training gradient to its predicted asymptotic form.

Residual-based causal discovery assumes that each variable is generated from its parents and an independent noise source. It estimates this noise and tests its independence from candidate causes. For identifiable functions such as additive-noise models (ANMs) and the broader class of location-scale noise models (LSNMs), this principle identifies the causal direction, as only the causal model admits this independence. Existing LSNM methods rely on parametric assumptions to obtain standardized residuals, risking model misspecification. In contrast, the RESIT-framework allows for nonparametric estimation of residuals to iteratively identify sink nodes, but was proposed for ANMs. To close this gap, we propose Loscar, an extension of RESIT to LSNMs that estimates the conditional mean and scale via quantile regression, enabling pretrained tabular foundation models as plug-in estimators. We compare it with a feasible generalized least squares (FGLS) variant, which is consistent given suitable basis functions. Across bivariate and multivariate causal-discovery benchmarks, in-context quantile regression substantially outperforms FGLS with flexible function classes, particularly for multivariate causes.

Masked language modelling (MLM) is the dominant pretraining objective for transformer encoders applied to longitudinal electronic health records (EHRs). However, reconstructing individual events may overemphasise noisy or weakly informative observations and does not explicitly encourage learning higher-level patient states. Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) instead learn by predicting representations in latent space and have shown strong performance in a variety of domains. In this paper, we investigate to what extent JEPA can be adapted to EHR sequence representation. Our empirical investigation using MIMIC-IV shows that although all three of our JEPA formulations train stably without representational collapse, they consistently underperform standard MLM. We find that target size, not target heterogeneity, increases prediction error, yet reducing the target size does not recover downstream performance. This suggests that stable latent prediction alone is insufficient for competitive EHR representation learning and highlights the challenge of defining clinically meaningful latent targets for EHR.

Speculative decoding accelerates large language model inference by employing a compact draft model to propose candidate tokens that are verified in parallel by a target model. Conventional training relies on soft-label distillation, which forces the draft model to mimic the target's full output distribution, including high-entropy regions that degrade acceptance rates and increase early rejection risk. We propose RCSD (Reinforcement and Continual Learning for Speculative Decoding), a training framework that aligns draft model optimization with the system-level objective of maximizing acceptance length. RCSD leverages naturally occurring accepted and rejected sequences during speculative inference to construct implicit preference pairs, with masked loss to avoid penalizing target-aligned tokens. Evaluated across multiple benchmarks, RCSD improves average acceptance length by 35% over HASS and achieves 1.35x faster end-to-end inference than HASS on practical workloads, without compromising generation quality.

In this paper, we propose a geometric approach to deriving attention mechanisms and exploring potential new transformer architectures. We begin by formalizing the notions of knowledge worlds and attention pairings, then demonstrate how this framework naturally leads to the architectures of standard attention, causal attention, linear attention, tensor attention, and recurrent neural networks. Finally, we introduce several new geometric spaces that may inspire novel neural network architectures.

In this report, we introduce pplx-embed-v2-late, a pair of 0.6B and 9B multilingual and multimodal late-interaction models. Both models achieve state-of-the-art results within their respective size classes across a range of text, image, and visual document retrieval benchmarks. On visual document retrieval tasks, pplx-embed-v2-late-0.6b is competitive with models several times larger than itself. The models are trained via representation distillation from an 18B teacher. Consequently, they share an embedding space that supports asymmetric deployment: documents can be indexed with the 9B model and queried with the low-latency 0.6B model. Both models are available at https://huggingface.co/collections/perplexity-ai/pplx-embed-v2.

Retrieval-based in-context learning (ICL) enables large language models (LLMs) to predict tabular labels from similar examples, but it remains unclear whether LLM inference improves on direct voting over those same examples. We address this question by comparing four general-purpose LLMs with distance-weighted nearest-neighbor voting (Distance-KNN) using identical retrieved neighbors across 19 tabular classification datasets. With the number of demonstrations fixed, enlarging the retrieval candidate pool improves accuracy for all predictors, yet Distance-KNN achieves the highest mean accuracy at every pool size. More detailed analyses reveal that LLM gains are concentrated where retrieved neighbors exhibit low label consensus and vary across models. These gains further depend on the average feature-space distance to the test query: under low label consensus, some LLMs outperform Distance-KNN in close and intermediate neighborhoods, but all fall behind on average in the most distant group. Complementary experiments on the number of demonstrations, prompt formulation, retrieval representation, and label-balanced demonstration selection largely preserve the overall findings. These results characterize when LLM inference adds predictive value beyond distance-weighted voting in retrieval-based tabular ICL.

Curriculum learning orders samples by difficulty, but difficulty alone does not establish supervision reliability for dense prediction. Easy samples can expose shortcuts, hard samples can be informative, and noisy or ambiguous samples can mislead training. Building on our conference method CurriSeg, we present PaceShift, a stabilize-then-challenge paradigm combining supervision-adaptive curriculum selection with guarded spectral post-training. A learning-dynamics view motivates separating supervision reliability from temporal update value and applying spectral challenges after stabilization. The first phase estimates reliability from available supervision, augmentation consistency, model disagreement, and prediction certainty. Temporal statistics guide sample weighting, while pixel-uncertainty weights reduce the early influence of uncertain regions. The second phase ranks predictions from multiple spectral views using supervision agreement, robustness, reference consistency, and penalties. A pairwise preference objective measured against the frozen Phase-I reference, together with an anchor, refines the prediction. The framework supports full, weak, semi-supervised, and model-derived supervision. Experiments across context-entangled content segmentation (CECS), broader dense-prediction tasks, and foundation-model and cross-modal adaptations show accuracy gains. Targeted diagnostics indicate improved pooled calibration and corruption robustness in the evaluated settings. PaceShift preserves the deployed architecture and adds no inference computation. Code will be publicly released.

While Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting improves the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs), recent studies have shown that final answers do not always depend on the generated rationales. In particular, LLMs may rely on query-specific shortcuts rather than the information provided by their reasoning steps. In this paper, we investigate whether context-aware decoding (CAD), an existing contrastive decoding method, can mitigate such shortcut behavior when applied to CoT reasoning. We study this application as Rationale Contrastive Decoding (RCD), which contrasts the next-token distributions conditioned on the query with and without its rationale, amplifying tokens whose likelihood increases due to the rationale. We provide a theoretical interpretation of this decoding rule via a KL-regularized reward-maximization objective. Experiments across five reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that RCD improves answer accuracy over standard CoT. Furthermore, intervention analyses using ground-truth and random rationales reveal that RCD increases the behavioral dependence of final answers on the rationale content. Our findings suggest that contrastive decoding offers a simple, training-free approach to mitigating query shortcuts.

Models are updated repeatedly, and an update that looks better on validation data but not on new data is a false improvement that can misguide clinical decisions. The naive rule accepts every positive validation gain and is optimistic when the same data choose and judge the update. BRIDGE is a model-agnostic acceptance gate that decides each update from predictions and the available labels, with fixed settings. Each fold of the data judges the update chosen on the other folds (cross-fitting) to reduce selection bias; acceptance requires the gain's lower bootstrap bound to exceed a margin. The four settings are (A) 11 new datasets, (B) synthetic tasks, (C) 12 retrospective clinical tasks, and (D) 39 supporting datasets. The false-improvement rate falls from 19.1% (naive) to 1.1% (BRIDGE) in (A), 20.7% to 1.7% (B), 20.0% to 0% (C), and 12.5% to 0.5% (D); every 95% confidence interval of the reduction over datasets or tasks excludes zero (not over the clinical sources). An equal-size random draw from the naive acceptances contains more false improvements in (A)-(E) (post hoc, p<0.001). On the OpenML collection (E) of 14 new datasets, the false-improvement rate falls from 25.6% to 1.0%. BRIDGE removes 97% to 100% of the false improvements that the naive rule accepts, and its mean gain per deployed update is 1.8 to 3.1 times the naive rule's. The 95% upper bound on the false-improvement rate is below 5.5%: formal in (B) for independent tasks (3.56%), and conditional on the real data tested (0.33% to 5.40%).

In this paper, we develop a unified framework connecting proper scoring rules and Stein's method for the estimation of unnormalized models. We construct a class of proper scoring rules that encompasses score matching, ratio matching, pseudolikelihood, and noise contrastive estimation. We show that these proper scoring rules naturally induce Stein operators. This connection yields a new construction principle for Stein operators, and enables us to study estimators based on these scoring rules through the geometry associated with the induced Stein operators. Using this geometric perspective, we provide a unified characterization of the asymptotic efficiency of the resulting estimators.

Real-world datasets often follow a long-tailed distribution, making generalization to tail classes difficult. We revisit this problem through the lens of shortcut learning, where models prefer the easiest predictive cues (e.g., background or textures) over object-centric semantics, especially under scarce and biased supervision. We find that this tendency is amplified for tail classes: limited examples often share similar contexts, making non-semantic signals highly correlated and thus tempting shortcuts, whereas head classes with diverse appearances and environments encourage more stable object-focused representations. Motivated by this observation, we propose Shortcut-Resistant CAM Distillation (SRCD), a plug-and-play framework that transfers object-focused explanations from head to tail classes. SRCD operates in the Class Activation Map (CAM) space, where a CAM provides a class-specific spatial evidence map for a prediction. SRCD aggregates CAMs from a small set of head-class candidates into a shortcut-resistant teacher using an energy-model weighting based on coherence and concentration, and distills it to the tail-class CAM. We provide a theoretical analysis that quantifies shortcut reliance as shortcut-region evidence mass in CAM space and shows that SRCD suppresses tail shortcuts. Extensive experiments on long-tailed benchmarks consistently improve strong baselines. The code is available at https://github.com/Haifeng3/SRCD.

Temporal reasoning is widely assumed to decompose into two modes: temporal arithmetic (date and time calculations), and temporal semantics (understanding temporal and causal relations). This dichotomy shapes how benchmarks are designed, how models are trained, and how progress is measured, yet its empirical validity has never been directly tested. We provide two lines of evidence that challenge it. First, we test whether tasks labelled as arithmetic or semantic by the benchmarks support transferable gains within their purported mode. Finetuning on these subsets yields predominantly dataset-specific gains ($+6.8$ to $+23.1$ percentage points), while transfer to a different dataset in the same mode ranges from $-3.2$ to $+1.1$ percentage points. Across the two benchmark families used in the transfer analysis, this pattern provides little evidence of coherent, transferable temporal abilities. Second, using cognitive-demand-based model evaluation, we examine which capabilities actually drive performance on these benchmarks. We find that quantitative and logical reasoning, the assumed proxies for temporal arithmetic and temporal semantics, are not the primary drivers; knowledge is. Together, these findings show that current temporal reasoning benchmarks do not cleanly realise the arithmetic-semantics distinction and instead largely reward models for remembering how time typically works.

Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) enables Bayesian inference for models with intractable likelihoods by estimating parameter posterior distributions from simulated data. Sequential ABC methods improve sampling efficiency by iteratively adapting the proposal distribution toward regions of high posterior probability. However, these methods typically operate in generations, where each generation must wait for its slowest simulation before the next can begin. On a parallel machine, this synchronization barrier leaves workers idle and reduces throughput, particularly when simulation runtimes vary substantially. We introduce a generation-free ABC sampler that updates its proposal when simulation results arrive and sends a new candidate to each available worker. The proposal is based on the best particles evaluated so far. To estimate the posterior, we reuse the full history and reweight particles against a reconstructed mixture of sampling proposals. We show how errors in approximating the mixture of sampling proposals affect the estimated posterior and establish consistency for the smooth-ABC posterior when the approximation becomes asymptotically exact. In our experiments, the method achieves well-calibrated posterior estimates where a pyABC baseline with the same kernel and bandwidth schedule under-covers. From the asynchronous run's timing alone, we predict how much a synchronization barrier would slow the sampler. These predictions agree with measured synchronization penalties ranging from 1.2x to 400x. On a Cellular Potts tissue simulator, the asynchronous sampler completes 2.1-2.4x as many evaluations as pyABC in the same hour, and the discrepancy threshold for its best 100 evaluations is 4.1x smaller. With the starting bandwidth set from prior-predictive discrepancies, it also produces a more concentrated two-parameter posterior with a larger effective sample size than pyABC.

Time series foundation models (TSFMs) perform unevenly across forecasting tasks. Recent work uses agentic model orchestration (AMO) to select or combine TSFMs, often outperforming individual forecasters. Yet these gains may reflect stronger or more complementary candidates rather than better orchestration. To disentangle these effects, we introduce FairAMO, a controlled evaluation protocol with frozen candidate forecasts. Experiments on GIFT-Eval show that AMO improves accuracy, but its gains are bounded by the candidate TSFMs. The best orchestrators reduce MASE by less than 6% relative to the best single TSFM across all tasks. These gains depend on complementarity (different candidates excel on different tasks) rather than the number of candidates. Adding members yields diminishing returns, and a redundant member can erase these gains. The value of historical evidence also saturates quickly. A few recent windows capture all gains, and further history adds none. These findings separate system-level forecasting gains from the contribution of orchestration itself.

Parallel thinking has emerged as a promising paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by exploring multiple reasoning paths simultaneously. However, we identify that parallel thinking via Reinforcement Learning (RL) typically suffers from the mode collapse of reasoning paths, where parallel thinking trajectories degenerate into similar ones. This homogeneity undermines the fundamental motivation of parallel thinking, that is, maintaining multiple hypotheses concurrently to prevent premature loss into a suboptimal solution. In this paper, we propose Diverse Parallel Thinking (DPT), a simple yet effective RL approach for parallel thinking designed to encourage path diversity. DPT rewards the model to develop distinct reasoning strategies by penalizing the prefix similarity of parallel thinking paths, thereby enhancing a more comprehensive exploration of the reasoning space. We conduct various experiments and analyses across multiple reasoning benchmarks to demonstrate the effectiveness of DPT. Results show that DPT successfully outperforms previous parallel thinking methods, achieving state-of-the-art performance over baselines. We validate path diversity as a key element to improve parallel thinking. Our code is available at https://github.com/JiaruQian/DPT.

Process reward models (PRMs) provide fine-grained supervision for multi-step reasoning, yet obtaining reliable process labels remains a central bottleneck. Existing approaches typically rely on human annotation, rollout-based estimation, or auxiliary verification. In this work, we explore a different source of process supervision natively exposed by Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models: expert routing. We show that simple routing statistics provide an intrinsic process-confidence signal that is competitive with conventional output-logit confidence. Building on this observation, we construct routing confidence by combining overall routing mass, head routing mass, and within-step routing variation, and introduce RoCo-Rethink, which identifies the least confident reasoning step and selectively regenerates the subsequent trajectory. We further introduce RoCo-PRM, which uses a strong MoE to automatically annotate reasoning trajectories with routing-derived step scores and distills them into a standalone PRM. Across multiple MoE architectures and diverse reasoning tasks, both RoCo-Rethink and RoCo-PRM consistently outperform strong baselines, while RoCo-PRM transfers effectively across both model architectures and tasks. Our findings suggest that expert routing is more than a computational dispatch mechanism: it provides an architecture-native source of process supervision for reasoning.

We determine the minimum number of directional commands needed to solve alevel of Order of the Sinking Star, modeled as a crystal-exchangepuzzle on an 11*11 board. A command swapsthe player with the nearest crystal in the selected row or column, regardlessof distance; only an empty ray permits an ordinary unit walk. Two gates admitthe player to the exit exactly while all sixteen crystals occupy their targetcells. We give an explicit 93-command solution and exclude every shortersolution by an exact, cost-bounded breadth-first search. The search representsa position by its seventeen occupied cells and one active cell. Its admissibleheuristic partitions command costs between a compressed core abstraction andresidual motion, strengthened by a necessary activation detour and a cornervisit condition. The completed computation retained 605,349,215 occupied setsand 1,863,925,136 states. We prove the reductions and pruning conditions,describe the exact storage scheme, and provide source code, execution logs,and a reproduction driver. The result is a computer-assisted proof for thespecified instance, with an explicit implementation trust boundary.

A model's failures can reveal gaps in the behavioral criteria guiding its training. We introduce RubricOpt, a framework that lets a policy revise these criteria within preference optimization. The policy diagnoses its own rubric-free outputs, retains requirements already covered by the rubric, and edits clauses that leave recurring failures unaddressed. A shared semantic representation connects task demands, preference-data contrasts, and rubric clauses, while a deterministic gate checks evidence references and fixed semantic anchors. The rubric then guides Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) during training, with preference pairs, labels, and the objective held fixed, and is removed at evaluation. Our analysis relates the local effect on rubric-free success to semantic alignment and a residual beyond the measured factors. Experiments on capability and open-ended generation benchmarks show that rubric conditioning can improve outcomes over ordinary DPO, with gains and regressions varying across models and datasets. A matched continuation isolates the contribution of revision from additional training and finds mixed incremental effects for the tested edit, whose feedback overlaps the evaluation set. RubricOpt thus brings the behavioral specification itself into the policy's feedback loop.

Codes of professional ethics guide and restrict specialists, who increasingly work with assistants built on large language models. Such an assistant can breach the user's code, or help the user breach it, without the user noticing. Evaluations reporting broad categories of harm cannot show how often this happens or which provision is breached. TenetBench pairs 3,433 requests conflicting with clauses of fifteen Russian-language professional codes with benign twins that differ only in the legitimacy of what is asked. An automated pipeline generates the tasks from the text of a code, so the corpus grows with every code added and a provision yields new tasks on every run. It also produced tasks and human-validated verdicts from two English codes of other jurisdictions. In human validation of the frozen pipeline, specialists rated 0.995 of the conflicting tasks plausible, and the model judge agreed with the adjudicated label at Gwet's AC1 of at least 0.894 on 1,860 elements. We evaluated fourteen model and reasoning-mode combinations on whether they produce the conflicting text, decline or warn. Eleven of the fourteen produce conflicting content on most such requests, mostly without a warning, and nearly three warnings in four accompany conflicting content. The models that conform more do so by declining while still serving the legitimate twin, and enabling reasoning halved the refusals of two models. We hope the dataset and pipeline will help evaluate how language models observe professional norms and let diagnostic datasets be built for particular professions and organisations.

We propose a new generative modeling framework grounded in forward-backward partial differential equations (PDEs). These equations arise naturally in mean-field game (MFG) theory, and are closely related to nonlinear Schrödinger systems. Our main contribution is to reinterpret this connection within the setting of generative modeling and to develop an efficient numerical methodology for its practical implementation. Specifically, we derive and characterize a nonlinear extension of the classical Schrödinger bridge problem through a coupled system of PDEs, yielding a model we call SBNL (Schrödinger Bridge NonLinear). To compute its solution, we design a simulation algorithm based on branching diffusions and the probabilistic representation of semilinear PDEs. The resulting method is embarrassingly parallel, scalable to high dimensions, and applicable to a broad class of nonlinear interaction functionals. We validate the approach through numerical experiments, including recovery of the classical Schrödinger bridge, nonlinear extensions with convex penalties (Gross-Pitaevskii) as well as potential interaction terms, and high-dimensional generative tasks such as image synthesis on the MNIST and FFHQ human face dataset. Furthermore, the same framework embeds score-based generative modeling, diffusion models, and tractable gaussian Schrödinger bridges.

Low-NFE generative ODE sampling is constrained not only by solver order, but also by how a fixed budget of network evaluations is distributed along the flow. We develop a density-level backward-error framework that identifies the component of a solver's modified-equation defect that changes the evolving marginal, while excluding solenoidal trajectory distortion that is invisible in Wasserstein tangent geometry. The resulting residual induces a solver-order-aware compute-allocation rule and, through gauge freedom, an objective for selecting numerically favorable velocity representatives of the same density path. This separates our approach from schedule search driven by trajectory or endpoint surrogates and from higher-order solver design. Exact Gaussian and mixture models establish the mechanism, including cases where curvature-based allocation fails and continuum-optimal transport is not discretization-optimal. On a pretrained CIFAR-10 EDM probability-flow ODE, density-aware allocation consistently improves fixed-update Euler sampling in the low-NFE regime. Matched-seed convergence to a dense Euler reference confirms that the method accelerates approximation of the same high-NFE flow rather than changing the asymptotic sampler.

Equivariant neural networks encode prescribed symmetries as powerful inductive biases, yet real-world data may exhibit symmetry-breaking structure that these priors cannot fully capture. Prior work has largely addressed this challenge through model-side equivariance relaxation, seeking an appropriate level of equivariance for the data. This raises a complementary question: must equivariance relaxation be adaptively controlled? To investigate this question, we introduce a residual path alongside a strictly equivariant model and deliberately restrict their interface to examine the transmission of task-relevant structure. Across five benchmarks, we observe both residual collapse and survival despite these restrictions; we call the latter phenomenon asymmetry tunneling. We further characterize this phenomenon through four complementary diagnostics. Our results suggest that adaptive control of equivariance relaxation is not a prerequisite for capturing potential symmetry-breaking structure.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown great potential as general-purpose user simulators for interactive systems. Prior studies have demonstrated that training on high-quality data can substantially improve model reasoning and downstream task performance. However, the upper bound of user simulation is still constrained by the model's reasoning paradigm: native chain-of-thought often degenerates into shallow pattern matching and fails to adequately model the behavioral factors underlying real user decisions. In this paper, we propose OmniSimulator, a novel training framework designed to improve the predictive ability of small LLMs for realistic user simulation on short-video platform environments. Specifically, OmniSimulator organizes behavior-oriented reasoning through a structured schema with five dimensions, carefully selects data from real user-behavior scenarios, and introduces a teacher model to generate high-quality reasoning traces under the proposed schema, helping small models learn behavior-relevant reasoning patterns rather than relying on superficial behavioral correlations. Based on this process, we construct 9,881 high-quality training instances from three months of historical interaction trajectories of 200 real users, averaging about 50 distilled examples per user. Experimental results show that OmniSimulator improves the average score of Qwen3-8B by 34.33%, achieves performance competitive with Claude-Sonnet-4.5, and supports smaller-scale, self-hosted deployment. These results suggest that learning structured behavior-oriented reasoning patterns is a promising direction towards scalable and high-fidelity LLM-based user simulation.

Long-horizon dialogue agents need to keep user memories stable enough for personalization while adapting when the user genuinely changes. Existing memory systems often append every observation or overwrite old entries by heuristic rules, which makes transient noise hard to distinguish from real belief drift. We introduce PreCoMem, a memory consolidation framework inspired by predictive coding that represents memory as confidence-weighted beliefs about the user's state. Its core signal, Effective Surprisal, combines semantic deviation and contradiction evidence, then downweights this signal when retrieval is diffuse and unreliable. According to effective surprisal, a two-threshold gate maps each turn to one of three deterministic updates: MAINTAIN reinforces supported beliefs, PROFILE stores ambiguous cues as low-confidence hypotheses, and CORRECT softly decays reliably contradicted facts. The PROFILE stage acts as an explicit waiting room, preventing premature commitment to noisy evidence. Experiments on LoCoMo, LongMemEval-S, and PersonaMem-v2 show consistent state-of-the-art accuracy; our new DiMoBench confirms that PreCoMem adapts to non-stationary belief drift without over-reacting to noise. The code is available at https://github.com/ZhongWishing/PreCoMem.

Agent harnesses have become a central component of modern agentic systems, shaping how models use tools, manage context, and coordinate long-horizon interaction. Realizing the benefits of these harnesses depends on how effectively the underlying model can make use of them, motivating reinforcement learning directly through the harness. However, existing approaches typically train through a single fixed harness, which can lead to specialization and limited transfer across harness configurations. To address this, we introduce \textbf{Harness Scaling}, a new scaling dimension for agentic RL that extends training from a single harness to diverse execution configurations. Concretely, we construct a factorized harness space, select a compact training subset with balanced factorial coverage, and organize cross-harness training to combine global coverage with controlled variation for the same task. Across multiple benchmarks, model scales, and RL algorithms, Harness Scaling consistently improves generalization to unseen white-box configurations. Moreover, models trained through structured white-box variation transfer effectively to unseen external black-box harnesses, outperforming models trained through a single complex black-box harness. These results establish harness diversity as a meaningful scaling dimension for agentic RL and highlight the importance of how this diversity is organized for cross-harness generalization.

Policy-as-Code (PaC) has emerged as a foundational paradigm in cloud-native systems. However, repairing Rego policies remains challenging due to their strict syntax, declarative semantics, and specific verification requirements. Existing automated program repair (APR) methods are mainly designed for mainstream languages and struggle to accommodate the unique policy logic and repair workflows of Rego. Thus, Rego policy repair remains a manual process driven by trial and error. To address this, we introduce RegoBench, the first automated Rego policy benchmark comprising 1,159 real-world defects, and propose RegoMender, a feedback-guided multi-agent framework. Collaborating via a shared blackboard and an atomic toolkit, RegoMender dynamically executes patching, rewriting, or rolling back, to resolve complex repair scenarios. Evaluated on RegoBench, RegoMender achieves syntactic and test-based semantic success rates of 82.9\% and 77.9\%, respectively, outperforming the strongest baseline by 13.4\%. Unlike other approaches whose performance drops in complex scenarios, RegoMender maintains effectiveness across single-step and chained repair tasks. Furthermore, it generalizes strongly across HCL and SQL and achieves an 86.4\% repair rate on 132 real-world CVE vulnerabilities, proving its robustness and practical utility for security.

Omni-modal large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in audio and video understanding. However, existing models struggle with long-form, multi-speaker videos, especially in understanding the entire video and recognizing who says what and when. To characterize the capability limit of current omni LLMs and guide future model development, we introduce Omnilingual-MsASR, a multilingual, multimodal benchmark for long-form Multi-speaker Automatic Speech Recognition (MsASR) covering six languages, recordings up to 30 minutes, and scenarios with up to 20 speakers. Omnilingual-MsASR provides parallel audio and video inputs to evaluate models' cross-modal consistency and their ability to exploit complementary cues across modalities. Extensive evaluations of leading omni-modal LLMs reveal substantial performance bottlenecks, while their tcpWERs frequently exceed 100%. These findings highlight fine-grained temporal localization, speaker disambiguation, and cross-modal synergy as key challenges for future omni-modal foundation models. Our work is available at https://github.com/QwenLM/Omnilingua-Bench/tree/main/Omnilingua-MSpeaker.

Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly use tools to complete tasks in stateful environments. However, many training environments remain largely static apart from changes caused by the agent's own actions, whereas external events introduced by other users, services, or sudden contingencies in real environments can invalidate ongoing plans. To address this gap, we introduce DynaWeave, an automated synthesis framework that transforms existing static tasks into verifiable dynamic scenarios. The framework generates exogenous events relevant to each task, covering changes in task requirements, environment state, and external information. It uses directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to represent dependencies between events and an execution engine to activate them during agent interaction. A dynamic verifier revises only the evaluation checks affected by events that actually occur and retains all other checks. Using DynaWeave, we collect 2,095 verified interaction trajectories across 36 environments and use them for supervised fine-tuning of Qwen3.5 models. Experiments on Gaia2, CostBench, and ToolMaze show that DynaWeave achieves consistent improvements in overall performance across all three evaluated model sizes, increasing the task completion rate on CostBench by 67.34 percentage points and even exceeding the performance of Gemini-3.1-Pro-Preview on ToolMaze. These results support dynamic scenario synthesis as a practical approach to training agents to adapt to changing environments. Our code is available at https://github.com/Miaow-Lab/DynaWeave.

Jet tagging is one of the most important applications of machine learning at the Large Hadron Collider. Recent models build in more physics knowledge or rely on large-scale pretraining, but the experiments place strict limits on their inference cost. Knowledge distillation can transfer their performance to small students that are cheap to run. We ask which properties of a teacher help the student, how small a student can get and how close it can come to the state of the art. On a jet tagging benchmark, we distil six teachers that differ in architecture, symmetry and pretraining, including two foundation models, into five small students. Every teacher improves every student, and the gain depends mainly on the strength of the teacher. We then shrink our two strongest distilled students, Transformer and L-GATr-slim, in width and in depth. With 20 thousand parameters, a distilled L-GATr-slim outperforms every published jet tagger trained from scratch at a fraction of the inference cost of every teacher. Even with two thousand parameters, it matches ParT, a model with a thousand times as many parameters. We also study what the students learn from their teachers. Our benchmark of inference cost shows that students of the same size can differ by almost an order of magnitude in speed. We release the code and the weights of all trained models.

World models are increasingly used for planning, where a planner ranks candidate actions by returns imagined by the model. However, these models are judged mainly by how well they render frames, even though a visually faithful rollout can still assign the wrong return. To identify where this mismatch arises, we introduce a transition-level diagnostic that replaces imagined transitions with real ones and measures the reduction in return error against a budget-matched random control. Our analysis yields two findings. (1) Event transitions, the few steps where a reward is earned or an episode ends, are rendered as well as other steps (median pixel-error ratio 0.85), yet restoring them removes a median of 70% of the return error. In contrast, restoring transitions with the largest MSE, SSIM or LPIPS error removes less than a random choice. Across the 44 Atari-100k model--collection pairs that pass our reliability checks, including three released families, event patches outperform random patches in 39 (sign test p=1.4 x 10^{-7}), with a median gain of +44 percentage points. (2) The remaining error is structured: a complementary patch separates errors at true events from those elsewhere, while an eight-step timing tolerance recovers few events missed by our deterministic models. This structure also guides repair: a rule recorded before four repair outcomes were known predicts when a diffusion model repairs these failures. Event patches improve plan ranking, and the same concentration appears on control tasks with rare reward events.

Multimodal multi-label emotion recognition is important for affect-aware systems, but models trained with complete text, visual, and acoustic streams often degrade sharply when some streams are unavailable at deployment. We address this train-test gap by learning a compact representation that preserves emotion-specific evidence from any available subset of modalities. We propose the Multi-modal Emotion Recognition Perceiver (MERP), which maps the joint sequence into a fixed-size latent bank, thereby keeping repeated reasoning independent of raw input length; it extracts label-specific evidence before and after latent reasoning and aligns the two levels through reconstruction. MERP further uses positive and negative class prototypes, a noise-gated feature enhancer with frequency-shaped perturbations during training, and confidence-aware class-wise fusion to strengthen separability, reduce sensitivity to missing inputs, and combine complementary predictors. Under 20 percent test-time random modality drop, MERP achieves micro-F1 scores of 0.563 on CMU-MOSEI and 0.780 on M3ED, exceeding the strongest evaluated baselines by 0.004 and 0.005, respectively; in the severe CMU-MOSEI audio-only setting, it retains 0.473 micro-F1 versus 0.022 for LDDU. These results show that fixed latent reasoning provides a practical, testable route to robust multimodal emotion recognition without requiring missing-modality examples during training. Code is available at https://github.com/Creative-zcx/MERP.

Recent advances in multi-turn reinforcement learning (RL) have substantially improved the performance of LLM agents on complex, long-horizon interactive tasks. However, despite progress in fine-grained credit assignment, policy optimization still applies these learning signals through response-specific probability ratios. Different textual responses can induce the same executable effect, yet credit differences arising from subsequent outcomes remain tied to their individual textual realizations. We identify this mismatch as credit-update misalignment. Our analysis reveals that credit-text pairing directly shapes policy-update directions, even when the policy context and executable effect are held fixed. Motivated by this finding, we propose Effect-Marginal Policy Optimization (EMPO), which aligns policy optimization with execution-level equivalence through an effect-level surrogate that couples updates across alternative textual realizations. EMPO preserves the original credit signals, integrates with both trajectory-level and step-level credit estimators, and requires no additional critics or rollouts. Experiments on ALFWorld, WebShop, and Sokoban show that EMPO outperforms strong baselines in both task performance and learning efficiency.

While agentic reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for training small language models (SLMs), existing frameworks are predominantly tool-centric and struggle with data-centric environments. Specifically, applying tool-centric frameworks to stateful tasks like SQL debugging introduces severe spatial inefficiencies since proper environment isolation typically requires a separate database container per rollout. Naively reusing databases without tracking evolving states across multi-turn interactions causes trajectory contamination and cross-trajectory interference, which severely destabilizes policy updates. To overcome these bottlenecks, we introduce BIRD-RL, a novel four-stage agentic RL curriculum that alternately enhances foundational agent reasoning and trajectory-adaptive on-policy exploration to circumvent the instability inherently associated with direct end-to-end learning. Crucially, to support this curriculum, BIRD-RL is driven by a Trajectory-scoped Persistent Execution Infrastructure, which enables safe database replica reuse while preserving trajectory isolation. This design improves spatial RL efficiency by 12.8x, successfully enabling scalable agentic RL for complex data-centric tasks without needs of Kubernettes. Empirical evaluations on the BIRD-CRITIC-SQLite benchmark demonstrate that our 7B and 14B models achieve Success Rates of 44.40% and 48.00%, respectively, showing competitive performance against strong proprietary model-based agents such as Claude-Opus-4.6 Agent (48.20%). Furthermore, BIRD-RL successfully trains unified SLMs capable of both advanced SQL debugging and generation, highlighting its broader potential for multi-objective optimization across heterogeneous, real-world data-centric tasks.

Among existing embedding compression approaches, low-rank factorization provides a simple and mathematically principled solution by approximating the embedding matrix with a reduced-rank decomposition. However, its practical effectiveness is often limited, as the resulting linear bottleneck constrains representational capacity. To overcome these limitations, we propose an enhanced factorization scheme that increases expressive power by introducing learnable non-linear projections within the compressed embedding layer. Our method is inspired by the Kolmogorov Arnold Networks (KAN) paradigm, which replaces fixed linear transformations with learnable univariate functions. Despite promising results in other domains, applications of KANs in NLP remain scarce and have so far been largely limited to final or task specific layers, rather than core representational components such as embedding layers. We evaluate the proposed approach by integrating the compressed embedding layer into the Skip-gram framework and comparing it against a standard low-rank baseline under matched parameter budgets on the Word Analogy and Semantic Similarity benchmarks. We further introduce an effective initialization strategy from a pre-trained, uncompressed embedding layer. The behavior of the model is analyzed both immediately after initialization and after a brief post-initialization refinement phase, considering training with the standard Skip-gram objective as well as variants augmented with distillation from the original embedding layer. Overall, our results show that augmenting low-rank factorization with learnable non-linear projections effectively mitigates the limitations of linear bottlenecks, yielding more faithful compressed embeddings under fixed dimensionality and suggesting a promising direction for embedding layer compression beyond purely linear methods.

We are the first to give a certified rule for whether unseen data belong in a pretrained model's context or its weights, built on an exact law for their information value. That value, the code length saved on held-out queries, equals in expectation the bits stored about the query, plus a prior repair, minus a decoding loss, for any model, architecture, dataset and task. The law's ceilings certify the choice from one measurement, and an anytime-valid test makes it from held-out queries, with error controlled whenever it stops. Every certificate the ceilings issue on a trained transformer, TabPFN, an occupancy network and a stereo network is correct. The test picks TabPFN over XGBoost and a trained surrogate over an in-context learner on airfoil pressure, calls the better of GPT-2's cache and fine-tune in 61,948 of 64,000 query streams over 32 comparisons, and errs in at most 3.3% of null streams. The law also diagnoses when learning in context helps and when it does not. Deleting part of a context is held-out validation of that part in any model, and adding parts one at a time traces the learning curve in context: one patch that sees a shape feature cuts an occupancy network's code length there a hundredfold, while eight that miss it nearly double it, and one camera that sees the surface beats four in a stereo network. Ranked by this label-free valuation, a kriging learner's three best support cars beat four drawn at random, and on a yes-or-no claim the valuation recovers a published evidence adjudicator, with AUROC 0.91.

Comparative judgement uses pairwise comparisons to rank items, but recovering accurate rankings from a limited number of judgements depends on both the inference method and the pairs selected. We developed a Bayesian Bradley-Terry model (BBTM) that uses Polya-Gamma data augmentation for efficient Gibbs sampling and quantifies uncertainty in latent abilities and ranks. We propose three active learning strategies based on the knowledge gradient (KG) principle. We define our acquisition functions using Kendall's tau distance, posterior rank entropy, and posterior separation. Approximate one-step updates to posterior moments reduce the computational cost of evaluating candidate pairs. We also introduce Posterior Separation Reliability (PSR), which measures the spread of posterior mean abilities relative to posterior uncertainty. It provides an internal indicator of ranking reliability without requiring a reference ranking. In synthetic experiments covering different item counts, comparison budgets, and noise levels, BBTM generally recovers ranking more accurately than preference-based Bayesian comparative judgement (PBCJ). At low to moderate noise levels, the pairwise entropy pair selection strategy performs best in ranking recovery. However, at the highest noise levels, the KG strategy based on posterior separation produces better point rankings. PSR increases alongside improvements in ranking accuracy as comparisons accumulate. Robustness experiments identify the proportion of informative outcomes needed to meet specified accuracy targets within a fixed comparison budget. In a moderate noise setting, replacing 30\% of outcomes with random choices has little effect on ranking performance. These findings demonstrate the value of Bayesian inference and active learning pair selection for recovering ranks from limited, noisy paired comparisons.

Text-to-image generation models do not explicitly receive the syntactic structure of the prompt, i.e., which word modifies which and where each phrase attaches. Consequently, they often struggle to bind attributes to the correct objects, to depict spatial relations and counts correctly, and to render syntactically ambiguous prompts in the intended interpretation. Existing syntax-based control methods mainly address attribute binding and have limited ability to control spatial relations and counts or to specify the interpretation of syntactically ambiguous prompts. They rely on phrase-structure or dependency grammars and require additional rules or constraints on the tree structure to extract modification relations between words or to specify a syntactic interpretation. We propose CCG Diffusion, a training-free method that controls image generation using Combinatory Categorial Grammar (CCG). In CCG, the category of each word carries rich syntactic information: it specifies what the word combines with and what phrase it forms. Modification relations between words can therefore be read directly from a CCG parse. Moreover, prepositional phrase (PP) attachment ambiguity, a representative syntactic ambiguity, can be resolved simply by fixing the preposition's category. CCG Diffusion applies the same two CCG-based mechanisms, prompt rewriting and attention guidance, both to controlling attribute binding, spatial relations, and counts and to resolving PP ambiguity. On two architecturally different backbones, Stable Diffusion and Sana, CCG Diffusion achieves the highest scores among the compared methods in attribute binding and 2D spatial relations and significantly outperforms all of them in PP ambiguity resolution.

Positional superko (PSK) forbids recreating any earlier whole-board position. It is part of the Chinese rules as written and of the rules used in computer Go. Yet almost all solved Go boards were computed under a simpler basic-ko rule set. PSK makes solving hard: legality depends on the whole game history, and this breaks the three tools that make solving tractable, namely transposition tables (the graph-history interaction problem), static life-and-death recognition, and safe move pruning. We present Sanko, a parallel depth-first proof-number solver that restores all three soundly. Its core is a cheap proof-transfer theorem: a stored proof stays valid on a new path unless a board that the proof's winner must create has already occurred. Sanko proves 5x5 Go in 16 minutes with six threads, where the previous state of the art needed 5.25 hours with six processes, and in about a minute and a half on one 192-thread machine. It also establishes the first PSK values of twenty-three further boards, eleven of which were unsolved under any rules. Superko changes game-theoretic values: 4x7, a full-board win under basic ko, is worth only 12 points under PSK, and we pinpoint the move at which the previously published optimal line fails. Unlike earlier solutions of empty Go boards, we release the solver source together with the command line and outcome of every run behind our values and measurements, so that all reported values can be reproduced.

Recently, we see a rise in conversational agents as a form of social and emotional support, where disclosure will unfold over time. Yet, current evaluations of these agents typically examine isolated conversational states. In analyses of naturally occurring conversations, disclosure history and current disclosure are confounded which tends to make their effects difficult to isolate. We thus introduce Trajectory-based Disclosure Evaluation (TraDE), an evaluation framework grounded in Social Penetration Theory that utilizes predefined disclosure trajectories and evaluates how preceding disclosure history shapes model behavior under matched current disclosure. Through the use of TraDE, we demonstrate across multiple models and relational behavior benchmarks that responses to disclosures matched on depth can differ depending on the preceding trajectory, particularly in whether models accept or challenge the user's framing. We also observed that these differences track accumulated exposure to deeper disclosure rather than any single moment of vulnerability or the order of disclosures. It also tends to persists for several turns after disclosure returns to shallow levels. For several behaviors, we also demonstrate that models diverge most consistently from human supporters in the Emotional Support Conversation corpus (ESConv) not when users open up but rather when they step back in their disclosure. TraDE thus provides a systematic way to expose history-dependent relational behavior that evaluations of isolated conversational states would otherwise miss.

Outcome-predictive signals are often treated as promising optimization targets in reinforcement learning, but predictive validity and optimization utility are different claims. We expose this distinction in GuanDan, a multi-round imperfect-information game in which the implication of a round outcome depends on the public match state. Held-out analysis shows that state--gain interactions provide incremental predictive value beyond a constant signed-gain effect, establishing that match progress is predictively meaningful. We then use changes in a frozen match-win predictor, $ΔΦ$, as a controlled round-level supervision intervention in a matched DanZero-style Monte Carlo self-play protocol. The intervention can succeed in an individual lineage: a selected progress-augmented checkpoint substantially outperforms its matched Baseline on a locked evaluation. Yet the method-level result reverses this impression: none of five preregistered replication seeds is positive, the pooled ten-seed interval includes zero, and across-iteration effects repeatedly change sign without a common late-stage advantage. These results identify a predictive--optimization gap: under the studied learner, a signal can describe outcome-relevant progress while failing to provide a reliably beneficial optimization direction.

Preference optimization can improve every ranking metric while building a hidden, shared representation shift that the relative loss barely sees, one that can eventually destroy generation. We trace this failure to the common-mode offset, a shared directional shift in the model's hidden states that appears across token positions, prompts, and both chosen and rejected responses. Because it moves chosen and rejected representations together, the relative ranking loss barely reacts to its accumulation. As this offset grows, it projects onto the output layer to form a vocabulary well, elevating a single token's probability until it dominates decoding and causes generation collapse. The isolated offset alone reconstructs the vocabulary well, injecting the learned offset into an untreated base model recreates the collapse where norm-matched random directions do not, and masking this common component from the loss prevents the well in our flagship setting. Under the per-token ranking loss we study, the same collapse appears in 14 of 17 base-model lineages and under full-parameter fine-tuning. Moreover, the offset is not merely an artifact of collapse, since it is already present in textbook DPO and SimPO runs that form no well. Textbook DPO keeps it weakly aligned with any single vocabulary direction even with three times our base budget. Trained from base models for that budget, however, full-parameter SimPO drives it into collapse on both Llama-2 and Llama-3.1, and the same kind of offset grows, without a well, from a public SFT checkpoint under the official SimPO recipe. Across 17 UltraFeedback runs, the better a run ranks held-out responses, the less often two public reward models prefer its samples to the base model's. These findings expose a blind spot in standard ranking metrics and introduce a representation-level signal that can warn of generation collapse before it occurs.

Promptable segmentation models such as SAM 3 achieve remarkable open-vocabulary performance but require dedicated architectures, large-scale annotation engines, and task-specific training. We ask a different question: can a general-purpose multimodal large language model (MLLM) segment images directly, without an added segmentation head, mask decoder, or training? We present LLMSeg, a training-free pipeline that turns a vision-capable LLM into a text-prompted image segmenter. LLMSeg decomposes segmentation into three LLM-driven stages. First, detect localizes all instances matching a free-form text query and describes their coarse morphology. Next, segment traces each instance using closed periodic B-splines confined to its detected box. These splines define an outer boundary and optional hole loops. Finally, refine iteratively proposes focus boxes around residual errors and retraces confined splines. The process ends when the mask stabilizes or the pass budget is exhausted. The output is a binary mask with inspectable intermediate geometry. We evaluate LLMSeg across ten referring and reasoning segmentation splits (ReasonSeg and RefCOCO/+/g). We also evaluate open-vocabulary instance segmentation (LVIS, COCO, and SA-Co), semantic segmentation, and zero-shot detection (ODinW13 and RF-100VL). With an off-the-shelf Gemini-3.7-Flash backend, LLMSeg is competitive with and often surpasses the specialist SAM 3 model on identical items. It reaches 71.5 cIoU on ReasonSeg val without additional segmentation-specific training. Backend model updates can improve accuracy without retraining the pipeline. The code is available at https://abdullahamdi.com/llmseg .

Automated optical inspection of precision components with tiny surface defects remains challenging when different regions of the same component exhibit different defect characteristics and, therefore, different acceptance criteria. This paper presents a region-aware, dual-model inspection framework that combines instance segmentation of localized seat-region defects with image-level classification of global shaft-region anomalies. Rather than treating these two model detections as sufficient evidence for component rejection, a deterministic decision fusion layer that formalizes industrial Standard Operating Procedures is applied to the model outputs to make the final component level decision. A PLC-synchronized imaging system acquires 18 seat and 18 shaft images over a full 360-degree rotation to provide multi-view circumferential coverage. The framework was evaluated on 380 automotive fuel injector needles, covering representative operational defect types, using identical model predictions in all configurations. Direct model-output aggregation via simple union logic (where any single-view detection flags a rejection) identified all 104 non-conforming components but produced a component level false rejection rate of 57.6%. Inclusion of a complete decision layer maintained the observed non-conforming (NOK) recall of 100% while reducing the false rejection rate to 10.9%, corresponding to an 81.1% reduction in false-positive component decisions. The results demonstrate that formalized manufacturing acceptance criteria can complement sensitive visual models by translating frame-level detections into practical and traceable component-level decisions.

In implicit neural representations (INRs), 3D signals are encoded directly in network weights, making stable weight-space operations essential. However, permutation symmetry causes independently trained yet functionally equivalent models to appear distant in weight space, often inducing large loss barriers under linear interpolation. Existing neuron alignment methods either commit early to discrete matches and become trapped in inconsistent local optima or rely on computationally expensive gradient optimization over continuous relaxations, both of which are unreliable in challenging cases such as NeRF. We adopt progressive alignment, a layer-wise strategy that follows inter-layer dependencies from input to output. At each layer, a correlation matrix is estimated and aligned with a discrete anchor obtained by the Hungarian algorithm, after which temperature-controlled spectral annealing gradually sharpens the correlation structure toward a permutation matrix. This update is deterministic and lightweight, avoiding the inner-loop gradient optimization required by continuous relaxation methods. A final refinement stage further optimizes the network layer-by-layer via weight matching, starting from the aligned solution. Experiments on MLPs, CNNs, and Neural Radiance Fields (NeRFs) show that the proposed method reliably recovers neuron correspondences and achieves stable alignment across architectures. In practical experiments aligning independently trained NeRF models, our method reduces the loss barriers under weight interpolation compared with existing approaches.

Provable robustness is a cornerstone of trustworthy machine learning, aiming to guarantee model predictions under adversarial perturbations. Existing certification frameworks, inspired by abstract interpretation or symbolic execution, typically assume a fixed computation graph, where input perturbations or variations affect only model outputs but not the underlying execution path. This assumption, however, is violated in Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) Large Language Models (LLMs), whose input-dependent routing induces discrete and dynamic execution paths. Crucially, this dynamic computation changes the certified object from a single fixed function to a composition of input-dependent sub-functions, leading to unreliable certification guarantees. This paper presents \textsc{CertMoE}, the first routing-aware robustness certification framework for MoE LLMs, which explicitly accounts for input-induced routing dynamics in certification. Specifically, we introduce a relaxed routing-containment criterion, which certifies that perturbed Top-$K$ routing is contained within a larger certified expert pool. Based on this guarantee, \textsc{CertMoE} then constructs the corresponding induced sub-network and certifies its prediction consistency. This hierarchical certification procedure yields a joint probabilistic guarantee over routing containment and sub-network robustness, providing sufficient conditions under which the original prediction remains invariant. Extensive experiments across recent MoE LLMs demonstrate that dynamic routing makes certificates issued by existing methods frequently violated, while \textsc{CertMoE} reduces the empirical violation rate with routing-aware guarantees, e.g., from more than $30\%$ to $0$, yielding certificates that more faithfully reflect the robustness of MoE models.

Mixed-integer programming solvers expose hundreds or even thousands of parameters whose best setting varies per instance, yet per-instance search is prohibitively expensive. We frame this as configuration for heterogeneous Big Data optimization workloads and propose a nominate-then-adjudicate pipeline built around two design choices. First, a fixed portfolio is sampled once and reused across instances, removing per-instance configuration search at inference; on the evaluated families, the resulting shortlist retains substantial oracle headroom, making selection within it the empirical focus. Second, the fixed 20-feature representation can map structurally different instances to the same vector, preventing a feature-only selector from distinguishing them even when they prefer different configurations. The foundation model receives no task-specific weight updates, and selection is one-pass: one model call and no solver calls at inference. The study represents structural Variety through distinct formulation families and decision Value through solver-performance outcomes; the one-call, zero-solve protocol specifies the decision interface and leaves end-to-end latency unmeasured. Among comparisons exceeding a 20% practical-difference threshold, the complete adjudicator records 538 wins and 185 losses against the top nominee, while its win rate against the default rises from 84.9% to 90.2%. Against per-instance configuration baselines under a matched one-pass protocol it leads the cluster-level methods and the best-performing evaluated per-instance baseline, ISAC+.

Language models relying on verbalized Chain-of-Thought (CoT) are constrained to token-by-token generation in the language space, where many tokens serve textual coherence rather than core reasoning. This entangles genuine differences in logical trajectories with superficial variations in verbalization. Moving reasoning into a compact, continuous latent space offers a promising alternative for efficiently representing and exploring diverse reasoning trajectories. However, current latent models remain largely deterministic, capturing only a single reasoning trajectory rather than modeling a distribution over multiple valid alternatives. While stochastic approaches parameterize distributions over latent reasoning steps, they frequently suffer from unstable optimization and limited empirical performance. Furthermore, their reliance on autoregressive latent prediction during training precludes effective parallelization, leading to prohibitively long training times. To overcome these bottlenecks, we propose Probabilistic Latent Reasoning Models (PLRM), a parallelizable variational framework for probabilistic latent reasoning. PLRM adopts a JEPA-style objective in which the posterior infers latent distributions in parallel from observed reasoning trajectories, while the prior learns to predict the subsequent latent distribution via teacher forcing. To model heterogeneous reasoning processes, we introduce a discrete strategy variable together with a mixture-based prior, allowing the model to preserve the Gaussian-mixture structure induced by multiple distinct reasoning trajectories rather than collapsing them into a single Gaussian. Across diverse benchmarks, PLRM achieves performance competitive with deterministic latent reasoning models on single-trajectory datasets while enabling efficient training and consistently outperforming competing stochastic baselines on multi-trajectory datasets.

We propose a novel stochastic cascading bandit setup where probing an ordered shortlist of $K$ out of $L$ arms incurs position-dependent costs, and the learner observes only noisy feedback regarding each arm's true output. We identify a sub-class of noise models for which the optimal shortlist can be found by sorting arms according to a per-arm score: such a score exists for both selection and ordering when the channel has no false positives, and for ordering alone (but not selection) when measurements are costless; however in general neither selection nor ordering is separable once noise and cost are both present. For the case where both selection and ordering scores exist, we provide a UCB-based algorithm with $O((L-K)\log T)$ instance-dependent regret over a time horizon $T$, which matches an algorithm-agnostic lower bound (up to constant factors). For the more challenging scenario where scores don't exist, we develop a new algorithmic template, DP-UCB, that embeds optimism directly inside an exact dynamic program, yielding $O\big(LK\log T\big)$ regret. Finally, we validate our theoretical results through extensive numerical evaluations and simulations over both synthetic and real-world datasets.

Quantization-aware training (QAT) aims to recover reasoning capabilities in low-bit large language models (LLMs). Existing recipes typically supervise the quantized student with the original full-precision model on fixed response sequences. However, the resulting low-bit quantized models still struggle on long-horizon reasoning tasks and often fail to terminate within a token budget that suffices for the full-precision model. We identify two challenges in closing this gap. First, fixed-response supervision leaves a mismatch between training prefixes and those encountered during student generation, and this trajectory divergence grows as responses lengthen. Second, on its own prefixes, the student underpredicts some next-token candidates and overpredicts others, and this distributional misalignment becomes more frequent at high-entropy prefixes. We present OnQ, a low-bit recovery pipeline that combines on-policy distillation and candidate-wise Dynamic KL. Starting from block-wise calibration, the quantized student generates responses and receives full-precision teacher supervision on its own prefixes. Dynamic KL weights forward and reverse KL by each candidate's teacher-student probability ratio to balance correction of under- and overprediction. Across Qwen3-1.7B, 4B, and 8B at 2- and 3-bit precision, OnQ achieves the highest nine-benchmark average, with the largest gains on long-horizon reasoning benchmarks. At 2 bits, it outperforms every baseline on every benchmark at every model size, improving the Qwen3-8B average by 10.26 points over the strongest baseline. It also produces shorter responses with fewer truncations and repetitive errors.

X-ray and neutron scattering are indispensable for structural characterization across condensed-matter physics and materials science. Yet, because scattering experiments generally record intensities without phase information, distinct structures can yield similar scattering patterns, rendering the corresponding inverse problems non-unique. This ambiguity can be reduced by combining complementary measurements, but their integration into machine-learning frameworks remains challenging. Here we introduce a modular framework for probabilistic multi-measurement analysis based on prior-amortized flow matching. Single-observation posterior estimators are trained separately for individual observation types or physical probes and combined only at inference time through a compositional sampler. This late fusion approach allows pretrained single-observation models to be reused without dedicated joint retraining. As a case in point, we consider reflectometry, which provides depth-resolved, nanometer-scale information about thin films and interfaces. Our single-observation demonstrations span X-ray, time-of-flight neutron and polarized neutron reflectometry. In separate co-refinement studies, task-matched estimators enable homogeneous composition across multiple neutron contrasts and heterogeneous multimodal composition of X-ray and neutron measurements. Together, these results establish compositional flow matching as a modular approach to uncertainty-aware inversion and co-refinement, with potential applicability to other scattering problems in which multiple observations constrain a common physical structure while retaining measurement-specific parameters.

Deep learning based models accurately delineate tumours on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), but segmentation masks alone do not provide the rationales or reasoning used by radiologists to assess the lesion suspicion. This limits the explainability as well the clinical integration. We investigate whether clinically relevant descriptors can instead be derived from the segmentation masks and their dynamic contrast-enhancement series. We have used Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) guidelines as a structured framework. Using these guidelines we designed a BI-RADS decision tree with eight quantitative measurements using radiomics, together with the lesion size and component count, that determine the descriptors at eight nodes. Using these descriptors we generate natural-language rationale using a large language model. The model was constrained to express only the derived records from the decision tree. After applying this framework to the expert and automatic masks of each of the 1,506 cases in the MAMA-MIA dataset, we generated a reproducible corpus of 3,012 BI-RADS grounded rationales. We obtained a faithfulness score of 99.98% and a counterfactual accuracy of 99.3%, indicating that the generated rationales faithfully verbalises the measured descriptors and correctly reflects changes in the underlying record. Agreement between the descriptors from expert and automatic masks falls from 0.832 to 0.549 as mask quality falls from Good to Missed. The generated rationales are intended as draft representations for radiologist review and final sign-off rather than autonomous clinical reports.

Autonomous agents powered by foundation models can reason, plan, and use tools, but their fixed weights and context limits hinder sustained learning from experience over long-term deployment. While external memory systems attempt to bridge this gap, they mostly act as passive retrieval caches, evaluated primarily by whether they can recall stored facts or past interactions. Whether memory can drive genuine continual learning remains an open question. In this paper, we introduce Memory-Centric Continual Learning (MCCL), arguing that memory should be judged by whether it improves future actions, not merely what it retrieves. MCCL has three main parts. First, a three-axis taxonomy organizes memory by where state is stored (substrates), what form it takes (assets), and how it is managed (policies). This defines a two-loop lifecycle that updates memory state in an inner loop while refining management policies in an outer loop based on task feedback. Second, an evaluation protocol measures retention under interference, adaptation to change, and task transfer to isolate genuine behavioral gains from simple context expansion. Third, a memory scaling framework models how agent performance scales with experience, storage capacity, and compute budgets across non-parametric and parametric memory. Together, these components reframe agent memory from passive lookup to continuous learning, offering a principled route toward self-improving autonomous agents.

Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (SMoE) models improve scalability by routing input tokens to only a subset of expert networks, but they often suffer from representation collapse, in which multiple experts converge toward similar functions and lose their intended diversity. Prior work has addressed this limitation either by improving router architectures or by introducing auxiliary loss terms that implicitly penalize similarity among experts. However, router-based approaches remain vulnerable to routing collapses, and loss-based approaches can conflict with the task's original objective during optimization. In this work, we propose GaP-MoE (Gradient Accumulation and Projection in MoE), which induces expert specialization by directly manipulating expert output gradients rather than modifying the loss function. At each training step, GaP-MoE stochastically selects one of the $TopK$ routed experts as a leader based on normalized routing scores, and projects the gradients of the remaining follower experts onto the orthogonal complement of the subspace spanned by the leader's recent gradients. This removes directional overlap between expert gradients without altering the task loss, allowing specialization to emerge as a direct consequence of the optimization dynamics rather than an externally imposed constraint. We evaluate GaP-MoE in both fine-tuning settings (BERT-based, on GLUE) and from-scratch pretraining settings (GPT-2-based, on WikiText-103, enwik8, and text8), and further confirm its compatibility as a drop-in module for existing SMoE architectures. Experimental results show that GaP-MoE achieves performance comparable to or better than standard SMoE.

Long-context continual pre-training (LCCP) is widely used to improve long-context capability, but how its benefits scale with the number of tokens used for LCCP remains unclear. We investigate this question through modeling, monitoring, and validating the benefits of scaling LCCP. First, we establish an empirical additive power law relating long-context performance to model size and the respective token budgets of short-context pre-training and LCCP. Experiments across five model scales and more than one hundred short- and long-context budget configurations show that the fitted law reproduces the observed trends and extrapolates well to held-out model scales. Second, we introduce \textsc{Constant-Last4}, a training and observation protocol that averages the four most recent consecutive checkpoints from a constant-learning-rate run to enable stable monitoring along a single extensible training trajectory. Under this protocol, the same scaling-law form fits well and accurately predicts the LCCP performance trajectory of a 1.22B-parameter model trained on approximately 100B LCCP tokens. Finally, downstream evaluations along this trajectory show continued improvements in long-context performance, with no clear sign of saturation within the evaluated range. These gains persist after both 128K context extension and supervised fine-tuning, with benefits extending to long-context understanding and agentic tasks. Together, these results argue for continuing to scale LCCP rather than stopping early: its gains are stably observable along an extensible trajectory, quantitatively predictable, and transferable to downstream tasks.

Zero-shot cross-lingual voice cloning often carries the reference speaker's accent into the target language. We propose closed-loop dual-reference guidance, which pairs the original reference with a reusable native anchor constructed by voice conversion (VC). The references initialize separate language-model (LM) states that guide a shared acoustic trajectory; each completed patch then updates both states, keeping their generated histories aligned with the emitted speech. Anchor construction runs once per speaker, and online synthesis uses a frozen TTS model without per-utterance VC. On 20 held-out French speakers, the fixed setting $λ^{\!*}=0.33$ reduces residual French LID mass by 73\% versus direct cloning, at an ECAPA similarity cost of only $0.042$; relative to anchor-only cloning, it recovers $0.155$. The method achieves the lowest mean WER ($0.009$) and highest mean GOP ($4.750$) among the held-out test arms. In blinded preference tests, native-English listeners favor it over direct cloning on pronunciation naturalness, and over both anchor-only cloning and a TTS$\to$VC cascade on speaker identity. Online RTF is approximately 26\% lower than the cascade's ($0.59$ vs.\ $0.80$), and the same setting reduces Spanish LID mass by 56\% without re-tuning.

Stance classifiers make errors that can be costly to identify under limited human-review budgets. Prioritizing potentially incorrect predictions remains challenging, particularly across heterogeneous base models. We introduce B-CARE (Blind Classwise Assessment of Relative Evidence for Stance Error Ranking), a prediction-blind framework for identifying high-risk stance predictions. Given only a target and text, a fixed LLM verifier assigns ordinal evidence scores to all candidate stance labels without observing the base model's prediction or confidence. B-CARE constructs a comparative risk score by contrasting the strongest alternative-class evidence with the evidence supporting the predicted class. The resulting classwise evidence profile can be reused across multiple base models without training a separate error detector or calibrating risk scores. We evaluate B-CARE on four stance benchmarks and three heterogeneous base LLMs, covering 12 dataset-model settings and 5,206 unique test instances. Evaluation includes error-ranking discrimination (AUROC and AUPRC), selective prediction (E-AURC), and review effectiveness (ErrorCapture at fixed review budgets). B-CARE achieves a mean AUROC of 0.735 and a mean AUPRC of 0.524, capturing 41.06% of errors within the highest-risk 20% of predictions. Although B-CARE does not uniformly outperform strong confidence-based baselines, it provides a reusable, complementary evidence signal for prioritizing potentially incorrect stance predictions across heterogeneous models.

Mid-training (MT) is a training phase in LLM training pipelines that continues pretraining (PT) on smaller datasets of higher value. Taking the PT and MT phases as a whole, training usually starts with only PT data and then transitions completely to MT data. In this work, we view this complete transition from PT to MT data as a special case of a broader class of data mixing schedules that specify how the proportions of PT and MT tokens in each batch change over training. Under fixed total training compute and MT token budgets, we ask: Is this complete transition to MT data optimal for minimizing final MT loss? We show that the answer depends on the learning rate (LR) schedule: one data schedule may outperform another under one LR schedule, but changing only the LR schedule can reverse the outcome. Specifically, when the LR decays throughout continued training, introducing MT data earlier and mixing it with PT data lowers the final MT loss compared with placing all MT data at the end of training, but this result is reversed if we use constant LR. We therefore study how to jointly choose when to introduce MT data and when to decay the LR through ablation studies, and find that it is better to decay the LR only after MT data enters training. Finally, we develop a theoretical model that explains why the optimal data schedule for a fixed MT token budget depends on the LR schedule.

As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous Deep Search and Deep Research Agents capable of executing long-horizon, multi-step tasks, evaluating their reliability becomes increasingly critical. However, existing evaluation paradigms predominantly focus on final task outcomes, leaving a significant gap in understanding the intermediate execution traces, where agents are highly susceptible to various errors. To address this critical gap, we introduce a comprehensive methodology and analytical framework designed specifically to diagnose errors in intermediate workflows. Building upon this framework, we establish a structured taxonomy that categorizes these vulnerabilities into two primary dimensions: System-Level Errors and Task-Level Errors. Through a systematic examination of step-by-step execution traces and agent-environment interactions, we reveal how these underlying errors affect overall performance. Finally, through empirical experiments and systematic analysis of the identified error types, we provide actionable design guidelines, aiming to enhance the robustness, reasoning capabilities, and reliability of Deep Search and Deep Research agents.

High linear decodability does not entail causal controllability in continuous-latent text-to-speech (TTS). In VoxCPM2, position-matched probes and equal-norm interventions across 30 speakers and 60 directed dyads expose this separation: reference-audio states at the final residual acoustic language model layer (RALM L7) retain 0.970 probe accuracy, yet aligned edits yield 0/60 target-dominant dyads. Edits at early reference-audio positions produce the opposite pattern. At L0, pair-aligned updates increase target similarity by 0.326 and achieve target dominance in all 60 dyads, against at most 1/60 under any equal-norm direction or position control. Independent speaker encoders, retrieval against held-out speaker prototypes, and double-blind listening confirm that the shifted voice is heard as the intended target. Cross-architecture interventions in dots.tts distinguish backbone leverage from direct acoustic control: backbone edits displace the source without target attraction, while x-vector ablation reduces source similarity from 0.849 to 0.006. These findings identify two requirements for training-free speaker control: geometric specificity and a computational route that carries the intended speaker condition into acoustic synthesis.

"Abliterated" ("uncensored") builds of open-weight language models remove the activation direction that mediates refusal, and are popular partly on the assumption that a model that no longer refuses is also free of political censorship. We test this on two matched pairs of 2-bit models: NVIDIA's Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, each against a community abliteration. Each model judged 22 statement pairs (on the Republic of China (Taiwan), 1989 Tiananmen, control countries) in Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese (a character-level conversion) and English, and answered 27 open questions per script. Script mattered far more than abliteration: the original Bolt scored +0.58 on Index S (-1: People's Republic of China (PRC) position; +1: ROC position) in Traditional Chinese, +0.57 in English and +0.05 in Simplified Chinese, and affirmed "Taiwan is part of the PRC" with probability 0.91 in Simplified but 0.06 in Traditional characters; abliteration changed its scores by at most 0.06, mostly by raising "yes" on both sides. In Qwen, abliteration removed every refusal on 1989 and raised scores by 0.21 to 0.34, yet the abliterated Qwen still affirmed that Taiwan is part of the PRC in all three scripts. Naming the state the Republic of China (Taiwan) raised every model's score by 0.10 to 0.33 but left the script gap. Control pairs showed no script gap; each abliteration changed only its declared tensors. In 740,000 web documents, Simplified text on Taiwan contained PRC-framing terms 3.7 times as often as Traditional text. A script direction could not be steered away; a contrastive stance direction raised scores in every script, and its negation lowered them. A four-sentence system prompt raised the abliterated Qwen to +0.93 to +0.97. Keyword scoring rules failed the models closest to the ROC position mostly for attributing or denying the PRC claim. Uncensored is not unbiased.

A transformer MLP gives each hidden channel two roles: a reader that decides when the channel responds, and a writer that decides what it adds back to the residual stream. Read as a key--value memory, the layer can be measured one factor set at a time: the pairing of readers to writers is carried only by their shared index, invisible to any quantity computed from one factor set alone. Yet training couples the two factors through their joint update, so we ask what reading them together shows. The block supplies the joint instrument: the MLP writes back into the very stream it reads, so the exact Jacobian of its update is square, and its agreement with its own transpose resolves into reader--writer terms whose inner products give each channel, read as a couple, a signed pairing coordinate. Ranked by this coordinate, each block we measure has a small core of strongly coupled channels; where initialization gives either sign equally, the core is nearly all opposed: each writer points against the direction its reader responds to. This opposed core recurs from the smallest models trained from scratch to released checkpoints; its sign is in place within a few percent of training and holds while the coupling grows. Read as couples, most channels return their contribution against the reader that fired it, and the readers of later blocks take it up; few show in the logits. Training holds the couples in place: flipping the opposed writers moves the output toward common tokens, and a writer permuted onto another reader regrows to fit that reader while the reader stays.

Knowledge graph question generation (KGQG) generates natural-language questions from structured graph evidence and a target answer. When the input graph is temporal, a valid question must also preserve the answer field, time condition, reference event, and temporal order that determine the answer set. Existing KGQG methods and prompting baselines can produce fluent questions that alter these conditions, causing temporal semantic drift. This paper studies temporal KGQG as a constraint-preserving graph-to-question problem and proposes ChronoSynth, a memory-augmented and constraint-aware generation framework. ChronoSynth first constructs a Temporal Intent State to make the intended question semantics explicit. It then retrieves compatible typed question patterns from an indexed pattern memory, adapts them to the input graph, and validates the generated question. Validation feedback guides revisions when a supported inconsistency is detected. Experiments on CRONQUESTIONS and MultiTQ demonstrate state-of-the-art generation performance, with ablations supporting the contributions of its components.

Policy Central is a deployed system that helps police departments find relationships between sections of their written policy: whether two sections conflict, are redundant, are merely similar, or are different. We describe the system and compare two architectures. Retrieve-Judge, a retrieve-then-classify pipeline, runs as a cheap library-wide health signal; Screen-Confirm, a screen-then-confirm cascade, is a selective audit of the documents a reviewer chooses, checking them exhaustively against one another. On a 302-pair benchmark drawn from one department's ~84 real policy documents, given each pair Screen-Confirm reaches 0.795 aggregate recall and 0.885 on Conflict, so current models judge well. Finding the pair is the hard part: Retrieve-Judge's composed recall falls to 0.457, and Screen-Confirm recovers 0.472 (0.615 on Conflict). Today these pairs are found by reading the whole library, nearly 20,000 sections, checked against one another and re-checked after every revision. A scan that returns half of them in minutes, at low cost, and can be re-run on demand changes the economics of policy review even before recall improves.

Coding agents are increasingly capable of fixing real-world bugs, yet they still struggle with large systems codebases such as the Linux kernel. To understand why, we test how agents reason about execution in these codebases through crash reasoning: predicting from source code whether a given input crashes the system. A correct prediction alone, however, does not establish this ability, since it may come from merely spotting suspicious code. In this paper, we propose source interventions: we pair source trees that differ by a single commit, so that the same input crashes only one of them, and test whether agents predict crashes more often on the crashing tree. Experiments with four coding agents on SysRB, our dataset of 934 such pairs from Linux and OSS-Fuzz projects, yield three main findings. First, agents are biased toward predicting no crash: they rarely raise false alarms but miss many real crashes, and even the best agent misses over a quarter of them. Second, locating the code that determines the crash outcome is not enough: agents often misjudge its effect, especially when the crash occurs far from that code. Third, testing only on crashing code is misleading: agents that merely notice suspicious code predict crashes on both source trees, which would look like correct reasoning on the crashing tree alone. Together, these findings indicate that current coding agents cannot yet reliably reason about execution in complex systems codebases, and that paired evaluation is necessary to measure this ability.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied across the scientific discovery pipeline, from synthesizing literature to generating hypotheses to informing experimental design. A unifying principle behind these tasks is the need to continuously update beliefs as evidence accumulates, for which Bayesian inference provides a natural framework. However, existing work assumes that LLMs cannot carry out principled Bayesian belief updating in context, instead relying on simplifications and heuristics. To challenge this assumption, we present a principled evaluation of Bayesian reasoning capabilities in LLMs, analyzing both the model's internal consistency as well as its ability to recover an externally determined posterior. Specifically, we build an evaluation framework spanning qualitative epistemological examples to probe probabilistic coherence, quantitative benchmarks of Bayesian inference capabilities, and analyses of the impact of non-Bayesian updates on downstream task performance. Across different scenarios, we find that LLMs generally violate Bayes' rule when updating their beliefs in context. However, when equipped with modern reasoning abilities and code execution capabilities, their performance drastically improves, enabling even the close approximation of analytically intractable posteriors. Our evaluation shows that current LLMs with access to appropriate tools could already be used to make complex belief updates in scientific discovery, enabling rapid acceleration of the efficiency and scale of AI-powered scientific discovery.

How do LLM agents' strategies differ, and how much can instructions to adopt a persona change their behavior over a game? We study these questions with AgentMonopoly, an environment where agents communicate, buy and trade properties, and make decisions that affect later turns. We compare models from four families, each at two sizes, in games with identical models, different sizes of the same family, or different families. We also assign one agent a persona, a description of how it should behave, intended to change a tendency observed in games without that persona. The tested models differ in how often they trade, waive rent, and manage cash and properties. Larger models do not consistently win more games. Persona instructions change the words agents use and some of their actions, but the changes do not always match the role across all decisions. These results show why persona following should be assessed through actions and outcomes as well as language. As our findings are conditional on the tested checkpoints, prompts, and five seeds per configuration, the open-source nature of AgentMonopoly provides the experimental infrastructure for further extending these comparisons. Our code is available at https://github.com/SuELS-Group/Agent_Monopoly.

As LLM agents interact in the wild and shape each other's decisions, understanding how they converge toward agreement becomes important. We study this in multi-turn conversations where two LLMs discuss subjective matters, can agree or disagree, and may change their stances. Using a linear classifier on individual conversation activations, we identify an internal representation of agreement. We find that it varies substantially across turns and conversations and does not reliably track external agreement at the individual conversation level. We therefore move beyond the representation of agreement in individual conversations, by aggregating the agreement representation across conversations. Externally, this aggregate view reveals a simple structure: when pooled across conversations, agreement can be predicted well with a Markov process, with agreement at each turn being a direct function of agreement at the previous turn. Similarly, when internal agreement is aggregated, it couples with the external Markov agreement through a power-law mapping, exposing Markovian dynamics in internal representations. Additionally, we find that after a change of stance, models express agreement externally before their internal representations reflect the same shift. These results reveal a joint structure between internal and external agreement that emerges only when internal features are aggregated across conversations. Code available at https://github.com/technion-cs-nlp/SeeingTheForestForTheTrees.

Unlike question answering, where a query specifies a perceptual target, open-ended detailed captioning must determine what evidence to acquire and how to integrate it into a coherent global description. We propose Observation-Adaptive Video Captioner (OACap), a caption-centered agent that turns unsupported or missing information into targeted observation requests, uses spatiotemporal tools to acquire evidence, and iteratively verifies and revises the caption. OACap captions consistently improve performance across general video-understanding benchmarks using a fixed text-only reader. To better diagnose the information they preserve, we introduce Factual-Semantic Captioning Bench (FSCap-Bench). Its Core-Support Factuality Score (CSFS) combines claim precision with importance-aware fact coverage and responds as expected to four controlled perturbation types on 93.0-98.3% of valid caption pairs. Its Cross-Modal Semantic Round-Trip Score (CSRS) measures semantic preservation through a video-caption-video-caption round trip by matching atomic facts from source and recovered captions. Together, they connect downstream textual-memory utility with factual and semantic preservation.

User-facing LLM agents must identify which behavioral policies apply at each turn, but evaluating every policy with an LLM is costly. We introduce Signals and Queries (S&Q), a lightweight first-stage relevance filter developed for Parlant 4.0 that removes at least 30% of candidate policies before downstream evaluation while preserving high recall. For each policy, an LLM generates activating examples and hard negatives offline. An independent logistic classifier trained on their embeddings then predicts relevance using embeddings and vector dot products, with no per-turn LLM calls. This shifts expensive relevance evaluation to a smaller candidate set, while allowing each policy's classifier to be updated independently. Evaluated against 9,144 LLM-judge relevance labels covering 254 $τ^2$-bench conversation prefixes and 36 airline policies, S&Q achieves higher precision than top-K and cosine-threshold retrieval at every evaluated recall level, with consistent results across two embedding providers. These findings support inexpensive, per-policy classification as a practical first stage for reducing downstream evaluation workload in customer-facing agents.

Accurate localization of neonatal hypoxic--ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) lesions on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images is clinically important but is limited by scarce expert annotations and substantial variation in lesion appearance. We propose OpenMAP-HIE, a pathology-informed score-based diffusion model for unsupervised HIE lesion localization without voxel-wise lesion supervision. A denoising diffusion model learns the healthy neonatal ADC distribution, while a ControlNet-based conditional branch preserves patient-specific anatomy. At inference, anomaly evidence is derived directly from differences between conditional and unconditioned noise predictions at independently evaluated diffusion noise levels, avoiding dependence on a final pseudo-healthy reconstruction or sequential reverse-diffusion chain. Based on the characteristic ADC reduction associated with acute HIE, only discrepancies consistent with the expected pathological direction are retained and aggregated across noise levels using a geometric mean. Spatial mean filtering further suppresses isolated responses. The framework was evaluated on the BONBID-HIE dataset. The ADC-only method achieved a Dice score of $0.283\pm0.244$, average precision of $0.505$, Hausdorff distance of $25.45\pm15.63$ mm, mean average surface distance of $9.40\pm8.49$ mm, and normalized surface distance of $0.355\pm0.236$, providing the best overlap and surface-distance performance among the evaluated unsupervised methods and Dice performance comparable to supervised ADC-only models. Optional population-derived ADC $Z$-map refinement further increased Dice to $0.602\pm0.269$. These findings support pathology-informed score discrepancies as a useful signal for neonatal HIE lesion localization, while highlighting remaining challenges in detecting small and low-contrast lesions.

Recent electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models increasingly emphasize model scale, potentially limiting their deployment on resource-constrained devices and in everyday environments. We argue that transferable EEG features can instead be learned with a compact architecture and introduce BrainCodes, a lightweight foundation model pretrained through self-supervised learning on more than 800 hours of recordings from over 1,000 participants. Our architecture combines a quantization-based neural tokenizer with a spatiotemporal encoder that supports arbitrary electrode configurations. The pretraining objective explicitly encourages representations that capture spatial connectivity through channel positional encoding, and sensitivity to narrowband neural oscillations through an auxiliary training objective. Our model matches or surpasses the state of the art across diverse neurophysiological monitoring tasks, including sleep staging, attention assessment, and cognitive load estimation. BrainCodes transfers effectively to low-resource wearable devices while using up to 97% fewer trainable parameters than comparable architectures. Beyond predictive accuracy, our evaluation framework characterizes the geometry and invariances of learned EEG representations across measurable spatial, temporal, and spectral signal properties.

Meeting notetakers are increasingly deployed in settings where longitudinal context is available including calendar metadata, prior meetings, emails, slides, and speaker enrollments; however, meeting corpora remain limited in terms of size, domain coverage, and available context. We present OSynth, a large-scale synthetic dataset of simulated organizations comprising 570 hours of meeting audio together with associated artifacts and a latent ground-truth state. In a pairwise comparison, human raters distinguish OSynth meetings from real meeting transcripts with only 56% accuracy based on excerpts of 150-300 words. Across state-of-the-art LLMs, additional context yields significant gains on several entity-sensitive dimensions, demonstrating limitations of contemporary approaches and the potential usefulness of OSynth in developing better-contextualized meeting-understanding systems.

Vision-language models are now routinely tested on theory of mind: whether they can work out what another person sees, knows, and means. A common design asks the model to report that perspective and then to act for the person, and reads a correct report beside a wrong action as a failure to use the perspective. That reading rests on a quiet assumption: that asking for the report leaves the action unchanged. We show that it does not. In a rendered Director Task, a partition hides the largest block from a director who asks for "the largest block". Asking first which blocks the director can see raises the share of replies that choose this hidden block by 12 to 88 percentage points on six GPT models and by 17 on Qwen3.8-27B, even though the models mostly report correctly which blocks the director sees. Reasoning traces and prompt rewordings suggest why: the question shifts how the request is read, from the director's view toward the model's own. When the prompt states what the director knows and refers to, fewer than 1% of replies pair a correct report with a hidden-block choice. Any evaluation that elicits a perspective report before the action it scores needs a baseline without the question, and we deliver one: paired prompts that differ only in that question, a design any perspective-taking benchmark can adopt.

Spatial reasoning requires more than access to geometric tools: a reasoner must decide when direct observation is sufficient and when to reconstruct, measure, or change reference frames. We present SpatialBrain, a framework that retains experience about these decisions while keeping its vision-language backbone fixed. The key distinction is between evidence about a scene and experience about how to reason with that evidence. 3DFusionMemory fuses current-scene observations into queryable spatial relations. A Spatial Skill Library provides reusable tool procedures, and Spatial Cognition associates task conditions with experience about when and how to use memory and skills. Completed trajectories are abstracted into process records and consolidated between task blocks, allowing later decisions to draw on earlier execution without transferring scene coordinates or reference answers. Across five spatial-reasoning benchmarks, SpatialBrain improves on direct answers from the same backbone on four and ties on the fifth. Component comparisons, experience-coverage curves, and traced resource decisions characterize how the framework accumulates and uses these resources.

Dynamic local community detection tracks the evolving community of designated seed nodes across graph snapshots. However, it faces two critical challenges: temporal supervision uncertainty, where sparse and outdated labels fail to provide seed-specific guidance under topology changes, and unbounded error cascades, where sequential policy transfer accumulates exploration errors over long horizons. To address these challenges, we propose DISRL, a Dual-scale Incremental Semi-supervised Reinforcement Learning framework. DISRL introduces a supervision construction module that dynamically generates seed-specific guidance from sparse known communities, and a dual-scale community exploration module that stabilizes policy evolution by decoupling short-term adaptation within temporal windows from long-term parameter consolidation across windows. Furthermore, we construct a dynamic graph benchmark with diverse community evolution scenarios. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DISRL consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines under various dynamic settings.

Multimodal ocean modeling remains challenging due to substantial heterogeneity in data structures, physical semantics, and spatiotemporal characteristics across satellite imagery, gridded oceanographic fields, and buoy observations. Existing approaches largely focus on task-specific ocean modeling, while learning transferable representations from heterogeneous observations remains an open problem. To address this challenge, we propose YingLan, a multimodal ocean foundation model that integrates physics-attribute-conditioned dynamic encoding, Spatiotemporal Increment Coupling (STIC), and ocean-state evolution-aware pretraining. Specifically, the dynamic encoding mechanism generates adaptive input projections conditioned on physical semantics and observation characteristics, enabling flexible representation of heterogeneous ocean variables. STIC models multiscale spatiotemporal dependencies through cross-scale interactions of latent temporal increments. The pretraining strategy further combines masked observation reconstruction with temporal evolution objectives to facilitate the learning of coherent ocean-state representations across different prediction horizons. YingLan is implemented using MindSpore and trained on Huawei Ascend 910B NPUs, demonstrating its compatibility with domestic AI computing infrastructure. In a seven-day sea surface salinity (SSS) forecasting task conducted in the Shenzhen coastal waters, YingLan achieves an average RMSE of 0.687508 PSU, corresponding to relative error reductions of 0.58%, 5.31%, and 12.42% compared with LangYa, XiHe, and GloNet2, respectively. These results provide initial evidence of the model's effectiveness in regional ocean forecasting, while broader cross-task and cross-regional evaluations remain necessary to assess its generalization capabilities.

Cutting planes (cuts) remove fractional solutions from mixed-integer linear programs (MILPs) without excluding any feasible integer solutions, making them a key ingredient in modern MILP solvers. Current state-of-the-art solvers rely on fine-tuned handcrafted cut strategies, which, despite their effectiveness, remain inherently static and can be suboptimal. More recently, learning-based approaches have been proposed to design adaptive cut strategies; however, most of these methods are based on neural networks, offering limited interpretability and providing no guarantees of convergence. In this paper, we propose \emph{Genetic Programming and Statistics-based Cut Selection} (GPSCS), the first learning-based framework that explicitly generalizes handcrafted cut selection heuristics into a fully interpretable policy. First, a genetic programming model evolves a symbolic scoring function that ranks candidate cuts using features derived from the cuts and the solving context. Second, a lightweight statistics-based mechanism adaptively determines the number of top-ranked cuts to add at each separation round by detecting significant score dropouts. We evaluate GPSCS within the SCIP solver on seven classes of synthetic and real-world benchmark instances, with a strong emphasis on generalization: evaluation instances are on average 41 times harder than those used for training. Experimental results show that GPSCS improves average solving time by $6\%$ compared to SCIP's default cut selection strategy and achieves a two-fold speedup over both a recent neural-network-based approach and a no-cut baseline, demonstrating strong robustness and generalization across heterogeneous MILP families.

Dynamic scheduling requires dispatching online arrivals while anticipating future jobs, as poor decisions can compound downstream costs under nonlinear tardiness objectives. We show that a pretrained large language model (LLM) can serve as the exogenous component of a structured world model, forecasting uncertain future job arrivals. Specifically, we exploit an afterstate decomposition, which separates known deterministic shop transitions from uncertain exogenous job arrivals, enabling the LLM to forecast only the latter through a compact belief representation. Building on this, we develop Afterstate World-Model Planning (AWMP), which combines an evolved, belief-conditioned dispatching strategy with short scenario-based rollouts. A surprise-triggered refresh mechanism queries the LLM only when newly observed arrivals deviate sufficiently from previous forecast, and online residual self-calibration further conditions the LLM on its recent forecast errors to handle nonstationary arrivals. Across diverse arrival distributions, AWMP reduces weighted tardiness by 6-21% on dynamic job-shop and 22-46% on flexible job-shop benchmarks, relative to the best of eight classical priority-dispatching rules.

Short-range hindcasts of measured wave spectra are evaluated using a recurrent model initialized by one hourly buoy spectrum and supplied with local wind, fetch and depth. Measurements from three Baltic Sea stations are combined for training in 2017--2020, validation in 2021 and testing in 2022. ERA5 reanalysis supplies winds throughout the twelve-hour prediction interval. The comparison examines supervision of spectral variance, peak frequency and peak amplitude, followed by empirical wind-sea bounds and a local relaxation constraint. Variance and peak-frequency supervision gives the lowest spectral error within the data-driven comparison, whereas additional peak-amplitude supervision gives the lowest wave-height error. In the matched physical comparison, relaxation reduces height RMSE by 5.01\% to \PhPtwoHs{}~cm. Extending this constraint through hours 13--24, without spectral targets at those hours, reduces primary spectral RMSE by 2.31\% to \PhPthreeSpec{}~$\unitE$. Upper-bound constraints increase errors. Wind-condition comparisons show spectral gains from extended relaxation in increasing, decreasing and steady strong winds, with little change in steady weak winds. The results support modest, objective-dependent benefits from local physical guidance. Wave-height scores concern the retained frequency band, and operational forecasting and transfer to independent stations remain to be evaluated.

Evolutionary coding agents such as AlphaEvolve are one of the notable successes in using Large Language Models (LLMs) to build AI Scientists. These agents tackle open-ended scientific problems by iteratively improving and evolving programs, leveraging the prior knowledge and reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Despite their success, mutations over programs are mostly low-level upon surface heuristics, without a persistent unit of control. In contrast, science compounds through ideas. In this work, we propose ExpEvolve, which injects idea-level extraction and control into evolution: it discovers and leverages the high-level factors from programs that explain scoring differences among different programs. We characterize theoretical conditions on when discovery with idea factors improves sample efficiency. We also build a practical framework to show that the extracted high-level idea factors are helpful for guiding exploitation from experience and exploration when discovery comes to a plateau. Across 11 open-ended mathematical tasks, ExpEvolve significantly improves the final performance and sample efficiency up to 5.0x. The improvements also transfer to 4 other LLMs and to 6 machine learning tasks from MLS-Bench. Analysis shows that ExpEvolve can discover idea-level factors to provide better exploration and exploitation for evolutionary discovery.

Language models are being explored as the interface through which space robots interpret operator commands and select among verified skills. Running them onboard calls for low-bit compression, and flight use adds requirements that generic post-training quantization leaves implicit: a fixed memory budget and storage format, a static artifact under configuration control, and behavior close to the full-precision model validated on the ground. We treat compression as a ground-segment step and study QSelect, which composes one static low-bit model from compatible AWQ, GPTQ, and AutoRound checkpoints by assigning each linear module to one quantizer family and scoring every substitution at the final next-token distribution. The default fidelity mode needs no labels or tuned thresholds and accepts a substitution only when the forward KL divergence from the BF16 reference decreases; an optional target-adapted mode adds answer likelihood on a small labeled set. On DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B, Llama-3.1-8B, and Llama-3.2-3B at 3 and 4 bits, composed models reach lower mean held-out perplexity than every single-family model in all six settings, and the fidelity mode lowers perplexity and KL further. In a matched scaffold, final-output scoring gives lower held-out KL than representation-similarity scoring in all 12 paired runs. With labels from training or development splits of the evaluated task families, the target-adapted mode raises 3-bit pooled accuracy on the two Llama models by 4.3 and 4.5 points over the best single-family model. At 3 bits, unquantized embedding and output layers make up 43-46% of the packed artifact. All evaluations use general-domain benchmarks on a ground GPU; space-domain tasks and flight hardware are left to future work.

Heuristic solvers for general-sum extensive-form games produce a stream of iterates, and practice reports the NashGap of the returned profile. We ask what a solver can know about its own iterates from the regret accumulators and the terminal-distribution accumulators its updates already maintain. In two-player games the NashGap of a weighted average strategy equals, at the maximizing player, the weighted external regret plus a signed value correction. Bounding the regret by the running counterfactual-regret accumulator gives an online certificate whose cost per checkpoint is linear in the number of terminal histories. The certificate stays sound under alternating updates and in games with three or more players. The mismatch between what alternation evaluates and what the averages record enters as one signed comparator term, maximized in a single backward pass per player whose comparator weight is nonzero. The bound is read off the regret state, with no best response against the average. Run a portfolio of training-free regret-matching solvers, output the iterate with the smallest certificate, and verify that iterate once. On the benchmark's biased Leduc family a pool of sixteen training-free solvers, seven original and nine recent variants, solves $89\%$ of the $64$ instances at threshold $10^{-5}$ this way, matching the trajectory-minimum union of the solvers. The same protocol solves $92\%$ of the $64$ pre-registered held-out instances and $89\%$ again on a third set of $64$ instances that no earlier stage used. The zero-best-response certificate certifies all $57$ in-sample solves and all $57$ fresh ones, and $58$ of the $59$ held-out ones. Its exact-comparator refinement certifies every solve in the three sets. The certificate states both and attributes its bound. Code is available at https://github.com/lbn187/CertNE.

Finding K most similar elements for a query in a large gallery of neural network (NN) embeddings is essential in various areas of computer science and industrial applications of artificial intelligence. This paper proposes search algorithms for structured latent spaces (LS) of NNs which allow to speed up top K item retrieval owing to O(1) complexity small candidate gallery subset search. ArcFace-pretrained IResNet50 models are finetuned using Latent Space Configuration (LSC) methodology to obtain new distribution of embeddings with desired geometric properties. Applying the proposed algorithms to embeddings obtained from finetuned models leads to several times speed-up over baseline exhaustive search. Specifically, we report up to 3 times speed-up on GPU and 40% speed-up on CPU compared to the baseline method GPU speed. These results are obtained for the original and reduced numbers of LS dimensions. The results show that LS dimensionality reduction allows to further accelerate the search and even improve rank-N metrics.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to support consequential decisions, yet their reliability under equivalent representations of uncertainty remains unclear. Existing work has documented prompt sensitivity, cognitive biases, and confidence miscalibration, but it is still unknown whether high-stakes advice changes when the same probability is expressed through complementary gain and loss frames. We introduce FrameBench-HPS, a controlled benchmark of 2,880 prompts derived from 240 high-stakes scenarios across healthcare, finance, education/career, and legal/consumer-rights domains. Across seven LLMs, gain-loss framing changes the recommendation category in 32.4% of complete groups, with most changes involving uncertainty rather than direct reversals. Human evaluation confirms corresponding shifts in perceived risk and directiveness. Robustness experiments show that framing effects persist under conversational paraphrases and exceed ordinary repeated-generation variability. Probability canonicalization substantially reduces framing sensitivity, identifying probability representation as a practical target for improving consistency in high-stakes LLM decision support.

An LLM multi-agent system (MAS) is only as good as the agents it chooses to trust: its accuracy and cost hinge on its topology, meaning which agents are included and how they communicate. A single task score, however, does not reveal which agents help or hinder performance. We propose Contrastive Attribution Topology Search (CATS), which searches for compact teams within a fixed supergraph of specialized agents. An LLM attributer compares execution traces across candidate topologies and assigns credit to individual agents. CATS uses these credits to update supergraph edges while progressively pruning weak edges and agents, yielding a small team for deployment. With small open-weight models and matched candidate evaluations, CATS improves mean accuracy on BigCodeBench by 5.3 percentage points over score-only heuristic search while using 54\% fewer deployment tokens. On MBPP, CATS matches the strongest baselines with fewer tokens than the other searches. In a HotpotQA prompt-poisoning stress test, CATS excludes all adversarially prompted agents in all three runs, whereas random search retains some at comparable accuracy. Per-agent credit thus supports both team optimization and the pruning of potentially harmful agents.

Why large language models trained via log-loss minimization over massive and diverse datasets exhibit broad capabilities and generalizable skills is not yet fully understood. Grau-Moya et al. (ICML 2024) offer a conceptual explanation through the lens of meta-learning: if sequence-generating environments $ν$ are drawn from a prior $w_ν$, minimizing population log-loss recovers the corresponding Bayesian mixture predictor $ξ=\sum_νw_νν$. In the idealized limit in which $w$ is a universal prior, the optimal predictor corresponds to Solomonoff universal induction. Practical machine learning algorithms, however, generally produce only \emph{approximately} optimal predictors. This raises a natural question: \emph{Does the prediction performance remain robust under approximation}? In this paper, we first provide a tight bound on the worst-case effect of approximation on prediction error. We show any predictor $ρ$ satisfying $D_{KL}(ξ\|ρ)\leq η$ retains bounded cumulative-expected-squared prediction error. However, while the Bayesian mixture predictor $ξ$ has error $O(\log(1/w_μ))$ in an environment $μ$, we establish a tight $Θ(η/w_μ)$ bound on the excess error of $ρ$ relative to $ξ$. Thus, approximation can substantially degrade performance in environments assigned small prior probability. In sharp contrast, when environments are averaged according to prior $w$, we prove that the excess prediction error is only $O(η)$. Furthermore, we establish a distribution-shift theorem for dominated shifts from a training prior $w$ to a test prior $w'$, interpolating our average-case and worst-case guarantees. Finally, we extend our robustness analysis to a finite-sampling setting relevant to learning universal predictors with neural networks and Transformers, where $D_{KL}(ξ\|ρ)$ could be unbounded. [For the full abstract, see the paper.]

Managed and wild bees sustain roughly a third of the global food products, yet colonies face mounting stress from climate-change including extreme weather patterns, altered parasite and disease patterns. Timely assessment of colony condition such as understanding colony strength, brood area, honey and pollen storage, comb usage, is essential to adaptive management. However, manual hive frame inspection is slow, costly, and quality depends on scarce expertise. We present an artificial targeted intelligent system framework focusing on edge deployable pipeline that turns hive frame photographs into interpretable and action-oriented inspection report. The pipeline includes an object detector to detect biologically-meaningful comb-cell classes; detections are distilled into structured fact schema; facts are converted into constrained factual text; the text triggers a grounded knowledge-base for interpretations and recommendations. Knowledge-base entries are required to be triggerable by evidence expressed in the fact schema. We built our system based on open source FAIRHiveFrames-1K dataset and favour reproducible, edge-deployable models over large general purpose frontier models. We additionally release FAIRHiveText-1K dataset that turns FAIRHiveFrames-1K dataset into interchangeable facts and text interpretation of the facts, making it easy for further LLM-based research into this area. We also propose a pathway to develop the grounded knowledge-base that will be helpful in providing interpretable and actionable reports from the facts.

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), particularly through group-relative policy optimization (GRPO), has emerged as a central paradigm for the post-training of large language models (LLMs). While RLVR is highly effective at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of LLMs, it commonly induces \textit{distribution sharpening}, whereby the policy distribution becomes excessively peaked and rare-yet-correct trajectories are progressively suppressed, thus diminishing sample diversity. To this end, we promote flat-reward optima in RLVR to smooth the policy distribution. We theoretically link flat reward RLVR to reduced distribution sharpening, and empirically show improved sample diversity while maintaining single-attempt accuracy. Our method, called \texttt{Flat}-RLVR, searches for flat reward regions via sharpness-aware minimization during LLM post-training, combining this with GRPO variants to achieve better trade-offs between sampling efficiency and reasoning capacity.

Designing effective multi-agent systems (MAS) remains a challenging and resource-intensive task. We propose a Bayesian Evolutionary Optimization framework for automatically discovering task-specific MAS topologies. The approach combines evolutionary operators to generate diverse workflow graphs with Bayesian optimization to focus cost intensive evaluations on promising candidates. In contrast to LLM-based candidate selection, our approach uses a graph-aware Gaussian Process and Expected Improvement to provide an explicit selection criterion during evolutionary search. We evaluate the method on BigCodeBench for code generation and on a tabular preprocessing benchmark using TabPFN. On BigCodeBench, evolved architectures achieve the highest overall performance among the evaluated agent systems. On temporal tabular datasets, optimized MAS preprocessing improves over the default TabPFN model on several tasks, while remaining competitive on IID datasets. Overall, the results demonstrate the potential of Bayesian selection for guiding evolutionary MAS search under expensive evaluation budgets.

Analogical reasoning is widely considered a fundamental component of human intelligence. Few benchmarks are designed to explicitly test far analogical reasoning - reasoning between domains that are superficially dissimilar yet share deep relational or structural similarities. In this work, we introduce an analogical reasoning benchmark called Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus of ANAlogy (ARCANA). The tasks of ARCANA require performing far analogical mappings from real-world objects or physical phenomena to abstract grid-based transformations, different from the well-known ARC-AGI benchmark which primarily emphasized innate human priors. We validate ARCANA through a human study, demonstrating that humans solve these tasks reliably. In contrast, evaluations across a range of large language models show a distinct performance gap compared to humans, revealing systematic failure modes that remain challenging for current models. To address this gap, we propose ConceptSIR, a reasoning framework based on concept slippage, introspection, and reflection. Experiments demonstrate that ConceptSIR enables standard LLMs to solve several challenging ARCANA tasks that were unsolved by direct prompting in our evaluation. Overall, our results suggest that far analogical reasoning remains an open problem for contemporary LLMs. All the materials are available at sites.google.com/view/arcanacogtest. The complete codebase, including benchmark, and ConceptSIR, is publicly available at https://github.com/density-11/arcana-test. All ARCANA data and task instances can be accessed and explored at https://arcanacogtest.org/.

The main challenge in applying deep neural networks to real-world scenarios lies in distributional discrepancies between training and test datasets, often caused by variations in data acquisition conditions. Assessing the performance of pre-trained models without labels is crucial for safety, but this is complicated by deep models' overly optimistic probabilistic outputs, often exacerbated by class imbalances, leading to unreliable predictions. To address these issues, we introduce MOVAL, a novel MOdel eVALuation tool that estimates performance using unlabeled test data. MOVAL incorporates class-wise confidence calibration to adjust model outputs, allowing for the estimation of metrics beyond accuracy and mitigating the detrimental effects of class imbalance on confidence calibration. Additionally, we propose an ensemble approach that combines multiple calibrated confidence scores for a more robust solution. We validate MOVAL on natural and medical image datasets with various acquisition shifts, covering tasks from classification to segmentation. It achieves state-of-the-art results across evaluation metrics such as accuracy, F1-Score, AUC, and more. Furthermore, we demonstrate that MOVAL provides accurate performance estimations at the class, instance, and pixel levels, ensuring the transparent and safe deployment of machine learning models. We provide MOVAL as a deployment tool for monitoring and estimating performance under a range of domain shifts.

We study group distributionally robust optimization (GDRO) over decentralized networks, where workers collaborate to learn robust models by minimizing the maximum local risk. Existing methods optimize only dual-regularized surrogates and establish guarantees for a globally averaged model that is not available to workers. In this paper, we directly optimize the original GDRO objective and establish guarantees for local models in semi-decentralized (SemiDec) and fully decentralized (Dec) settings. A key difficulty is that applying the primal-dual decomposition from centralized GDRO yields worker-dependent losses whose evaluation requires unavailable cross-worker information. To address this challenge, we develop a novel error decomposition that recasts decentralized GDRO as (i) a decentralized online convex optimization (D-OCO) problem and a prediction-with-expert-advice problem in SemiDec, and as (ii) two coupled D-OCO problems in Dec, with discrepancy terms capturing inconsistencies among local decisions. By isolating consensus errors in analysis, we develop modular frameworks that support different consensus routines. We then establish the \emph{first} per-worker convergence guarantees for optimizing the original GDRO objective over decentralized networks. Instantiations with accelerated gossip and Choco-gossip achieve an $O(\sqrt{(\log m)/T})$ convergence rate over $T$ update rounds, while experiments demonstrate improved worst-worker performance over baselines.

As-built BIM reconstruction from point clouds demands semantic, volumetric, parametric, and editable building components, beyond 2D layouts or planar abstractions. Yet existing scan-to-BIM pipelines often rely on handcrafted rules, heuristic optimization, or manual correction, while learning-based methods fall short of recovering wall thickness, opening geometry, and component-level BIM structure. We introduce CRAB, a BIM-ready cuboid reconstruction framework that encodes walls, doors, windows, beams, and columns as compact architectural cuboids with IFC-compatible semantics and parameters. CRAB bridges point clouds and editable BIM by combining ProposalNet, which predicts coarse component cuboids, with AssemblyNet, a relation-aware Flow Matching model that refines geometry, predicts structural relationships, and enables automatic structural correction and human-guided editing. To address limited cuboid-level supervision, we extend Structured3D with component-wise cuboid annotations and construct cuboid-based procedural scenes. Experiments show CRAB surpasses floor plan and plane-based alternatives in component completeness, geometric accuracy, and generalization. For interior wall thickness estimation, CRAB achieves a mean error of 2.80 cm, with 79.50% of matched walls within 3 cm. The project page is available at https://vcc.tech/research/2026/CRAB.

Large audio-language models (LALMs) understand music, yet struggle to locate a described moment in time. We ask whether this reflects missing temporal information or a bottleneck in how the time span is extracted. Using a paired-query probe built from Slakh2100 stem activations, we attach a state query (e.g., ``only piano and bass are playing'') and a change query (e.g., ``the guitar drops out, leaving piano and bass'') to the same span and vary how much preceding audio the model is shown. Across frozen LALMs, three ways of extracting the span ask different questions: full-track prompting asking whether the model can say when; windowed yes/no scoring asking whether it verifies the moment when handed the segment, and whether it needs what came before; attention asking whether it can find the moment on its own. State queries score above baseline without context, while change queries improve with preceding context in most short-segment models; 30s padded encoders show no comparable recovery. Prompting and attention expose almost none of this. Prompting failures thus understate what LALMs can verify, though not what they can locate, by an amount set by query type and encoder.

Masked diffusion language models have emerged as an alternative to autoregressive models, enabling parallel token generation. However, standard masked diffusion language models use a shared noise schedule across positions without explicitly encoding which positions should be resolved first. Many tasks exhibit a natural priority among positions: document titles and section headings can guide the generation of body text, while Sudoku cells determined directly from the initial clues can help resolve more difficult cells. To incorporate this notion of priority (or hierarchy) among token positions, we introduce the Hierarchical Masked Diffusion Language Model (HMDLM), which augments each token position with a hierarchy level available as part of the training data, and requires zero or minimal additional annotations. It factors generation into two passes: the first predicts a hierarchy distribution over masked positions, the second predicts token distributions conditioned on it. Giving each hierarchy level its own noise schedule induces a soft, controllable preference for revealing higher-priority positions earlier while keeping decoding fully parallel. Our formulation is mathematically grounded, and we re-derive the forward and reverse processes and the NELBO for this factorization. Our evaluation shows that for the task of language generation on LM1B, HMDLM reduces perplexity by more than 1.5 points over Anchored Diffusion Language Model (ADLM), a recently proposed strong diffusion baseline; on WikiHow, we see a drop in perplexity of up to 4.4 pts on ADLM and up to 7 pts against MDLM. An LLM judge on WikiHow prefers HMDLM generations (the two variants combined) more than $2\times$ as often as the baseline. On the task of solving Sudoku puzzles requiring multi-step reasoning, it improves solution accuracy by up to $8.6\%$ absolute points over existing diffusion baselines.

People share and understand others' experiences differently based on their social identities; often, people empathize more when the other person belongs to their ingroup compared to an outgroup. While this intergroup empathy gap is well-studied in social psychology, it remains unclear how it manifests in naturally occurring online social interactions. To this end, we measure how commenters express social judgments, as an indirect outcome of their understanding towards the posters, and empathy in text, based on whether commenters share the poster's gender or are of similar ages. We focus on posts where the poster self-reports these demographics, and analyze 126,716 comments associated with 36,163 posts from 18,111 commenters in r/AmItheAsshole, while controlling for commenter and poster group identities, post features (topic, length, and score), and both commenter- and post-level variance. Our results show that when commenters and posters are ingroup, in either gender or age, commenters are more likely to provide a Not the Asshole verdict and show greater text-based understanding as measured by LLMs. We also observe that older commenters behave differently from younger ones. Furthermore, in a subset of posts where the gender and age of the other party in the conflict are explicitly mentioned, we find that commenter-poster ingroup effects are moderated by the group relationships between the poster and the other party when commenters make social judgments. Our work highlights the importance of intergroup context and social group nuances in understanding online discourse.

Federated learning (FL) keeps data at its source, but locality alone does not make a federation trustworthy. Without sufficient observability, an aggregator cannot determine whether the client service was healthy, the local data pipeline was trustworthy, or contractual constraints were properly monitored during training. We take the position that trustworthy FL needs an evidence plane in addition to its model-update process. Each participant continuously summarizes local infrastructure, data into minimal, signed trust evidence associated with each FL round, while raw data, logs remain local. A local TinyLLM may assist in interpreting observability signals, deriving contextual evidence, and providing natural-language explanations to operators. We instantiate this vision through FAIR-O, an observability extension of FAIR principle. Rather than benchmarking FL accuracy, a three-level trust model has been proposed and a two-participant Python prototype demonstrates evidence generation and trust assessment. We further discuss future integration of FAIR-O Trust Evidence into participant selection, evidence weighting, and federated aggregation.

Agentic search depends on the interface through which a language-model agent accesses and explores a corpus. Existing interface designs are fixed by hand and applied unchanged to every corpus, although effective designs may depend on the corpus. We introduce SearchWeaver, a framework for automatic search interface optimization guided by downstream search performance. A proposer uses execution trajectories and task rewards to jointly revise corpus artifacts, executable tools, and usage instructions. This pro cess optimizes what information is prepared in advance, which operations tools perform, and which decisions remain with the search agent. With GPT-5.4-nano, the optimized interfaces improve answer accuracy from 71.6% to 78.4% on BrowseComp-Plus and average nDCG@10 from 45.7 to 55.0 across four BRIGHT subsets over Direct Corpus Interaction. These findings highlight the value of jointly optimizing corpus artifacts, executable tools, and usage instructions to develop effective search interfaces.

Omni-modal assistants must remember not only what users say, but also what they show and convey. Existing long-term memory benchmarks are mostly text-and-image or report a single end-to-end score, so they cannot locate whether evidence is lost when it is represented, retrieved, delivered, or read. We introduce MOSAIC, a benchmark of 923 questions over persona-grounded histories of 11-24 sessions spanning text, image, video, and audio. MOSAIC constructs targeted spatial, temporal, and prosodic signals rather than decorative media, with the strongest causal validation for spatial information and selector-level validation for annotated prosody, and pairs them with a matched diagnostic protocol that freezes the question, reader, prompt, and budget while intervening on representation, retrieval, and delivery. Matched decomposition shows that representation loss is modality-dependent, residual reading dominates even under gold evidence, and abstention remains weak on these controls: strong answerable scores coexist with failures to refuse. MOSAIC thus turns omni-modal memory evaluation from a leaderboard into a diagnosis of write, retrieve, deliver, and read failures.

Language-model agents are increasingly asked to run experiments, yet benchmarks rarely measure whether those experiments improve the decisions they are meant to inform. We introduce CrashGym, a deterministic, replayable limit-order-book simulator in which an agent must choose between a deleveraging intervention and a liquidity backstop for a market about to suffer a shock-triggered crash. Before committing, the agent may query intervention experiments in a laboratory realization of the market. Its choice is then scored on an independently seeded target realization in which the simulator executes every feasible intervention, so regret relative to the best intervention is computed by directly simulating every alternative on the same target repeats, with no human or model-based judging. The simulator implements each amplification channel---persistent price impact, liquidity withdrawal, margin-driven liquidation, and an evolving strategy mix---as an explicit mechanism that can be switched on in stages. In a prospectively specified study on 24 newly sampled worlds, laboratory access reduces the mean regret of the one deployment with a complete record (Luna) from 8.878 to 3.785, a paired reduction of 5.092 utility units (nominal 95% world-bootstrap interval: 1.028--9.507), or 57.4% of the OBSERVE-ONLY mean. Prospective comparisons for two further deployments are incomplete; in a separate exploratory study, mean regret is lower with laboratory access for all four deployments evaluated. A laboratory whose strategy mix evolves endogenously yields no established advantage over one with a fixed mix. CrashGym thus measures the value of experimentation as avoided decision loss and lets simulator detail be judged by the decisions it supports.

Multi-agent inverse reinforcement learning offers a powerful framework not only for imitation learning but also for understanding the neural computations supporting social interactions and decision-making. Inferring rewards from interacting agents is challenging because observed choices reflect both personal preferences and expectations about others. Existing methods often require additional environment interaction, repeated policy optimization as an inner loop, or restrictive assumptions about environment dynamics and action spaces, limiting their applicability to fixed behavioral datasets. We introduce Multi-Agent Unilateral Inverse Temporal Difference Learning (MA-UITD), an offline method for inferring explicit agent-specific rewards from joint demonstrations in continuous-state environments with either discrete or bounded continuous actions. Its core idea is to represent the long-term consequences of each agent's own actions through belief-conditioned successor features that average over other agents' behavior. Shared reward features and agent-specific preference vectors connect these unilateral values to the target reward function, while inverse temporal-difference consistency and noise-contrastive behavioral learning enable inference without known dynamics or an inner policy-optimization loop. Across simulated cooperative, competitive, and general-sum tasks, MA-UITD outperforms baselines in discrete-action settings and infers behaviorally compatible reward profiles in continuous-action settings. When applied to experimentally collected social-foraging trajectories, MA-UITD inferred distinct spatial and interaction-dependent reward structures for leaders and followers, providing a quantitative characterization of latent behavioral objectives that may be relevant for understanding the neural computations underlying social behavior.

Streaming video understanding (SVU) requires video-LLMs to process incoming video continuously while answering user queries with low latency. Recent methods reduce query-time cost by prefilling frames into KV caches during idle time and reusing the cached KVs at query time. To bound per-frame computation over unbounded video streams, these methods restrict the context available during prefill. This creates a fundamental context mismatch: the restricted context may omit information needed to properly contextualize video tokens, yet, still contain information irrelevant to the eventual query, which is unknown during prefill. We propose FrameBlend, a simple yet effective plug-and-play method to address this mismatch through selective KV recomputation, without requiring any additional training. At query time, FrameBlend re-prefills selected video tokens using query-relevant context and replaces their cached KVs with recomputed ones. Crucially, this recomputation enables shorter attention windows during idle-time prefill, substantially reducing prefill cost while improving accuracy. Experiments across three SVU frameworks and five streaming and offline benchmarks demonstrate accuracy gains of up to 3.9 pp. On RVS-Ego, FrameBlend reduces per-frame prefill FLOPs by over 20% and total processing time by 14-59% for retrieval-based frameworks, including the cost of query-time recomputation. These results demonstrate that a simple change in how contextualization is distributed between idle time and query time can improve the accuracy-efficiency trade-off for SVU.

Recent generative medication recommendation systems ultimately produce sets of drugs, but drug--drug interaction (DDI) constraints depend on the set as a whole. A natural post-hoc approach is to first predict medications and then locally repair interacting pairs by removing one drug at a time. We ask whether this local repair step itself introduces avoidable error. Using fixed medication scores from FLAME's frozen classifier on MIMIC-III, we compare increasingly strong local repair strategies with an exact global decoder while holding the scores, output size, and DDI constraint fixed. The global decoder jointly selects the highest-scoring feasible medication set using mixed-integer linear programming. Across validation and test splits, global decoding consistently achieves higher Jaccard similarity than greedy repair, degree-aware repair, and degree-aware repair strengthened with exhaustive 1-swap local search. Its advantage is small under loose DDI constraints and becomes larger as the constraint tightens; on the test split it reaches +0.0064 Jaccard over the strongest local baseline at the strict DDI operating point. The finding also holds across a fine accuracy--DDI sweep at matched realized DDI exposure and under three score representations. At the strict setting, global decoding retains more true-positive medications while removing more false positives. These results show that medication recommendation is not only a representation-learning problem: even with a frozen clinical model, how its scores are converted into a constrained medication set can materially affect the final prediction.

Barycenter models, based on stochastic and deterministic optimal transport bridges between probability measures, have proven to be useful for supervised and unsupervised learning for (probability) measure-valued data. In this paper, we utilize the directional asymmetry and dual drift-diffusion control arising in the recently proposed Schrödinger-Bass Bridge (SBB) between two measures, and propose \textit{SBB-encoder}, \textit{SBB-decoder}, \textit{SBB-symmetric}, and \textit{SBB-Markovian} barycenter models. For each of these novel models, our first theoretical result establishes the existence of the SBB-barycenter under mild assumptions. Our second theoretical result characterizes the decoder SBB-barycenter of Gaussians where we show that for Gaussian input measures, the decoder formulation admits a Gaussian minimizer, reducing barycenter computation to a finite-dimensional optimization and yielding a compact algorithm. For general input measures, we derive a hybrid Wasserstein gradient particle descent scheme for all four formulations using the SBB dual representation. Finally, we utilize these algorithms for solving distributional-inverse/interpolation problems arising in the context of spatial images and single-cell RNA sequencing data, where we show that the SBB-decoder and Markovian barycenter allow us to interpolate between successive time points. Results show that our method outperforms existing barycenter models for measure interpolation and inference.

Current LLM safety benchmarks predominantly rely on binary safe or unsafe labels, lacking explanatory depth and suffering from low consistency across automated judges. To address this, we introduce DiagSafe, a diagnostic evaluation framework that moves beyond binary classification by employing prompt-level rubrics. Grounded in globally applicable AI safety policies, each rubric provides explicit criteria along two dimensions: safety, which targets concrete harms with specific exemptions to suppress false positives, and usefulness, which independently evaluates instruction fulfillment. To ensure a robust and realistic evaluation, we construct a bilingual (English-Chinese) benchmark grounded in a comprehensive 84-label safety taxonomy, consisting of two subsets: DiagBase, which covers single- and multi-turn prompts with direct harmful queries and template-based jailbreaks, and DiagAttack, which embeds harmful intents into complex instruction-following tasks to form challenging instruction attacks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DiagSafe significantly enhances the reliability of LLM-as-a-judge evaluation, achieving 95.34% agreement with human annotations -- substantially higher than the 69%-87% achieved by the baselines -- and high inter-judge consistency (Cohen's $κ$ = 0.864). Furthermore, applying our framework reveals that leading LLMs differ markedly in their unsafe rates, and each model also exhibits unique vulnerabilities along different dimensions. In addition, we observe that models are particularly susceptible in Chinese and multi-turn contexts. Ultimately, DiagSafe provides a reliable and explainable tool for auditing and optimizing LLM alignment.

Retrieval-augmented generation can expose unwanted concepts through retrieved evidence even when the generator is moderated. We study query-side concept suppression with a fixed encoder and document index. Compositional Concept Unlearning (C$^2$U) routes a profile-derived direction through an augmented atom bank, adding only a bounded edited-minus-original delta to the raw query. Across five datasets, four encoders, and three seeds, the validation-selected configuration reduces pooled binary target Hit@5 by 4.25 percentage points with non-positive control degradation and target-exposure changes. Under the evaluated query transforms, it suppresses target density without increasing budgeted control-query exposure. Separately, ArXiv four-concept composition improves over an averaged-direction comparator after independent validation gates and first-use test evaluation.

Quality prediction in multistage manufacturing is challenging when inter-stage lags vary over time, as measurements taken at the same timestamp may reflect different process states. Existing approaches often preserve production order but fuse timestamp-aligned features or model delayed dependencies implicitly, without identifying the upstream history relevant to each downstream observation. We propose Delay-Guided Attention for Multi-stage Forecasting (DAMF), which explicitly estimates inter-stage lag distributions and uses them to guide cross-stage information transfer for final quality prediction. For each adjacent stage pair, a lag predictor compares the current downstream representation with candidate lagged upstream representations. An occurrence-magnitude factorization separately estimates the probability of a positive lag and its conditional magnitude, yielding a sample- and stage-pair-specific distribution over discrete lag states without requiring plant-specified delays at inference. DelayAlignment incorporates this soft distribution as a temporal prior into differentiable cross-stage attention, while gated residual fusion regulates information propagation across production stages. For interpretation, segment-wise Viterbi decoding converts pointwise lag distributions into temporally coherent lag paths, whereas forecasting retains the soft distributions for alignment. On the real-world LiquidSugar dataset, DAMF improves final quality prediction over the compared baselines. Evaluations on two controlled-delay benchmarks show more accurate and stable lag recovery, and ablation studies support the contributions of lag prediction, delay-guided attention, and structured temporal decoding.

Personalized reward models require user-specific preference comparisons, but collecting such feedback is costly and provides only limited supervision for each user. At the same time, large pools of responses can be generated without user identities or preference labels, yet existing personalized reward models leave this data unused. Directly learning from these responses is difficult because pairwise objectives constrain relative scores within a prompt, whereas pseudo-labeling individual responses requires scores that are comparable across prompts for the same user. We propose \textbf{PerSPL} (Personalized Semi-supervised Preference Learning), a backbone-agnostic framework that uses pair-mean score centering to stabilize this cross-prompt score coordinate and iteratively turns unlabeled responses into user-specific training signals. Against seven representative baselines across four benchmarks---PersonalLLM, HelpSteer2, Reddit TLDR, and Chatbot Arena---PerSPL achieves the highest reported mean accuracy among the evaluated methods for both seen and unseen users. The two latter benchmarks provide real-user preference comparisons in summarization and open-domain chatbot interaction, respectively. These results indicate that unlabeled responses can provide additional supervision for personalized reward modeling when per-user preference labels are scarce.

Decision models return normalized probability distributions over candidate choices, which downstream applications can use to select among choices. Although their providers emphasize the reliability of these probabilities, calibration on tasks with a single correct choice does not establish their reliability when multiple choices are correct. We evaluate three decision models (Jev, Liquid d1, and GPT-6 Luna Decisions) on three diverse datasets (MetaTool, HotpotQA, and ECtHR) to study probability allocation and thresholding. Even when models rank every correct choice above every distractor, in 28% to 50% of those lists, at least one correct choice receives a probability below the uniform probability of 1/n, where n is the number of choices. We also present each model with five identical copies of a correct choice and observe probability disparities, with mean gaps ranging from 17 to 79 percentage points. We further show how these allocation disparities affect the recovery of multiple correct choices under probability thresholding. Decision-model probabilities can rank correct choices, but a probability threshold does not identify the set of correct choices.

Personalized shopping benchmarks ask which item fits the user; we ask how far an agent may commit on that item, and pose learning the individual's auto-purchase line as a task. The boundary is evidence-conditioned and three-valued: whether committing is appropriate depends on the sufficiency of product information (warrant), reversibility, price against the user's norm, and urgency, not only on fit; and the natural output is don't buy, confirm first, or buy automatically. Across sixteen instruction-tuned models, autonomous commitment is misaligned with a human authorization reference in which fifteen annotators, role-playing the delegating principal from a given profile, choose the furthest action they would allow without confirmation: models commit even when fit is low and when their own evidence flag reports the warrant missing. This is overreach. The line is individual: these raters disagree, yet the disagreement is structured and partly predictable from a person's own other labels. A shallow learner on a few dozen of a person's own labels predicts their held-out auto-purchase line at a median of 0.79 by 30-40 labels, outperforming every evaluated prompt$\times$model configuration, including a per-annotator oracle over 80 configurations; the learned boundary does not transfer across domains. We release the counterfactual benchmark, human authorization reference, and annotation protocol after acceptance.

Satellite precipitation products face a persistent trade-off: real-time estimates are timely but less accurate, whereas the most reliable products are often released months after observation. This delay keeps high-quality precipitation information outside the decision window for flood warning and disaster response. Here we report Huayu-Global, a cross-constellation deep-learning system that combines three geostationary sensor streams from five satellites through a common retrieval framework and generates coherent quasi-global precipitation fields every thirty minutes. Across more than a million independent station records from two periods outside the training years, Huayu-Global improves event detection and precipitation-amount estimation relative to the real-time products evaluated and reaches delayed-product-level skill in key metrics. Huayu-Global therefore turns operational geostationary observations into a timely, high-skill precipitation layer for flood forecasting, water management and disaster response. Its cross-constellation design also provides a scalable foundation for incorporating future geostationary missions into hydrological and weather-prediction systems.

We prove that for every open $ U \subseteq \mathbb R^n $ the spherical projection of every gradient trajectory $θ(t)$, $t \geq 0$, of a definable $C^1$-potential $F \colon U \to \mathbb R$ has finite length and, in particular, converges (directional convergence). In other words, every gradient trajectory of a definable $C^1$-potential has finite total angular motion. Here, definable means definable in an arbitrary o-minimal structure expanding the real field. Notably, the gradient trajectory in this result is an arbitrary solution of the gradient flow differential equation (whose solutions may not be unique) with no further assumptions: The gradient trajectory may be unbounded and diverge to infinity or it may be convergent. The established theorem therefore provides affirmative answers to both the gradient conjecture at infinity for definable potentials and the definable Thom gradient conjecture. We apply our theorem to the training of deep neural networks (DNNs) to conclude that, in the case of definable and continuously differentiable activation and loss functions, the spherical projection of the DNN training flow must always converge (directional convergence).

Speculative decoding uses a target model to verify a tree of draft tokens in parallel. We study whether the resulting next-token distributions can help select the next tree. For unrestricted target models, we show that guaranteed exact reuse requires a distribution computed at the next round's complete context. We characterize when retaining this distribution requires sacrificing accepted tokens and establish conditions under which this loss persists across decoding rounds. Across six targets, we find that reranking first-token branches with a separately computed distribution at the current context improves expected acceptance over draft ranking, especially with small tree budgets. Drawing the first token from this distribution before allocating the tree further improves expected acceptance over pruning a preselected tree, even at equal mean tree size. In our experiments, both selection rules also decode faster than draft ranking when the separate target pass overlaps standalone drafting. Our findings show that making target probabilities available before tree allocation can improve the efficiency of speculative decoding. Our code is available at https://github.com/js-lee-AI/TargetRows.

norregel asks language models for numeric values in Norwegian statutes, regulations and parliamentary decisions (NOK amounts, percentages, multiples of the National Insurance basic amount (G) and age limits), each at a stated date. The 916 items were extracted mechanically from Lovdata's open data, and each carries the dated history of its provision, so an answer can be classed as correct, outdated, wrong or uninterpretable. We report a first and a second preregistered run on the same items. In the first run (five models, listed publicly only after local analysis), H1, that outdated answers are more frequent for values that took effect after a model's cutoff, could not be tested in substance, and H2 and H3 were inconclusive; Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 4.6 answered 46.7% and 40.2% of the 880 primary items correctly. The second run was preregistered and published before any of its calls, and eight models were analysed. Its pooled primary test supported H1 under the preregistered decision rule (d = 17.8 percentage points, 95% interval [7.7, 28.9], p = 0.0001). In the preregistered sensitivity analysis S8, which counts as outdated only the most recent value that differs from the key, d was 3.9 [-3.6, 12.7] (p = 0.1754), an interval that contains 0. H1 was supported in every other preregistered sensitivity analysis, but S8 is the only one that gives both groups one target value, so we do not regard the support for H1 as robust. The share of outdated answers equal to that most recent value (H2) was 56.1% [46.6, 65.0], an interval that contains 0.5, and the pooled test of a lower share correct in Nynorsk than in Bokmål (H3) was inconclusive. Several models, among them Haiku 4.5, gave mostly uninterpretable answers. Items and keys are withheld; item IDs, per-answer classes, code and results are on Zenodo.

Neural network models are increasingly constructed from synapse-resolution connectomes, and the same circuit is now available in reconstructions from other animals and pipelines. We do not know whether such models are dependent on the reconstruction they are built from, and whether connectome differences are biological or measurement errors. We studied the Drosophila head-direction circuit in nine versions: four flies (male CNS, hemibrain, Fly Wire, BANC) and five variants of the same fly varying only by thresholds, proofreading or synapse detection. Using wiring-based correspondences validated by anatomical labels, we place all differences on one scale. A change of synapse detection within one fly changed the circuit more than halfway to the smallest inter-fly difference on four distances; proofreading differences were smaller but depended on the metric, and left and right halves of one fly differed no more than a random half. Networks trained on each wiring to hold a cued heading developed near-perfect ring attractors, but their error increased from below 1 degree to 10-28 degrees when all weights changed by 1%. Training on each wiring did not transfer to any other connectome, including other versions of the same fly; refitting thirty cell-type gains, we repaired filtering-level differences but remaining error depended on wiring distance. Training with noise lowered precision and enhanced transfer. Imaging data indicate compasses drift smoothly and do not break; they function despite differences comparable to those of this study.Therefore, connectome-constrained models need to reflect the reconstruction they stem from and the robustness normal circuits exhibit and models lack.

Research on why people contribute to open source software (OSS) and related open collaboration platforms spans more than two decades, but its findings conflict, and studies often treat the work people contribute and their intention to keep contributing as interchangeable. Drawing on self-determination theory and motivation crowding theory, we meta-analyze 41 studies. The main analysis pools 178 correlations of eight antecedents with contribution effort and continuance intention from 29 independent samples (N = 9,632). Seven antecedents relate positively to effort, all eight relate positively to intention, and each relates at least as strongly to intention as to effort. Contrary to a common assumption, intrinsic motivation is not more strongly related to effort than extrinsic motivation, but its gap between intention and effort is larger. Reputation relates to effort mainly on platforms with a reputation system, and we find no sign that monetary rewards crowd out enjoyment. The findings inform how platforms can turn contributors' intentions into work.

Recent advancements in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) enable end-to-end visual grounding via language prompts and generative decoding, demonstrating largely improved zero-shot and open-vocabulary detection capabilities. As a result, VLMs are rapidly being deployed at the edge in safety-critical real-world systems. However, the physical adversarial robustness of edge VLMs has not been systematically studied, and the fundamental differences in output with modern object detectors create methodological challenges for fair evaluation. To compare the two families directly, we evaluate every selected representative model on one outcome: whether an adversarial patch worn on a person evades detection of the model. We report this by introducing a unified metric, conditional attack success rate (cASR), counted only on images the model still localizes under a matched gray occluder, and partition every failure into omission (no box), substitution (a box on the patch), and displacement (a box on neither). We benchmark the physical adversarial vulnerability of compact grounding VLMs against a range of object detectors, and find that the VLMs can be as vulnerable as the detectors. We disclose that failure mode is largely associated with the output format of a model rather than its architecture family. Of the three, only omission is visible to a downstream system; displacement and substitution return confident, well-formed boxes, making them potentially more dangerous failures. Further, we find that, under distribution shift, VLMs that primarily failed by omission instead shift to failing more by displacement/substitution. Thus, a grounding VLM can inherit the detector's vulnerability while showing the possibility to adopt more dangerous failure modes. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/ericliang1/physical-adversarial-robustness.

Random-Forest wrapper feature selection can use out-of-bag (OOB) predictions as a built-in validation signal, but the criteria that decide each forward step accumulate OOB estimation noise. We propose TOP-Gain (Truncated Out-of-bag Probability Gain), which scores a candidate feature by the mean sample-level increase in the OOB probability of the true class, with decreases truncated at zero. Under a simple noise model, truncation removes about two-thirds of the noise variance contributed by unaffected samples while preserving the signal, and it makes the ranking of candidate features markedly more reproducible. In a pre-registered benchmark on 26 OpenML-CC18 datasets, TOP-Gain achieved the best mean rank in area under the ROC curve (ROC-AUC), accuracy and Macro-F1 among 15 methods; it was significantly better than 13 of 14 baselines and matched the accuracy of VSURF with 21 times less single-core computation. Within an identical wrapper, it selected significantly more stable feature sets than net-gain, Brier, log-loss and accuracy criteria without loss of accuracy. A confirmatory study on 24 further datasets replicated the advantage over all baselines. The accuracy gains were broad rather than tied to specific dataset characteristics, and, as pre-registered, the stability gain grew as relevant features became sparser

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) has established itself as a widely used method for training deep neural networks. Despite its popularity, existing convergence guarantees for SAM-type methods require smoothness, a restrictive assumption. Generalized smoothness conditions have recently been proposed in the analysis of gradient methods but remain underexplored for SAM. To analyze the effect of SAM's perturbation under generalized smoothness, we use relative gradient distortion to quantify how the sharpness-aware direction departs from the original gradient. Under $(L_0,L_1)$-smoothness, we show that this distortion can become unbounded near stationarity for SAM and at large gradients for its unnormalized variant (USAM), with examples where SAM cycles and USAM diverges. We then establish a necessary condition for uniform distortion control among perturbations along the gradient whose nonnegative multipliers depend only on its norm. Motivated by this condition, we propose Curvature-Scaled SAM (CS-SAM), which scales both the perturbation and the descent step by suitable curvature upper bounds, and prove that it uniformly bounds the distortion. Under both $(L_0,L_1)$- and $(H_0,H_1)$-smoothness, we establish deterministic $\mathcal{O}(1/T)$ rates for the best squared gradient norm on nonconvex objectives, last-iterate $\mathcal{O}(1/T)$ rates for the function gap on convex objectives with a minimizer, and linear convergence under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz condition. With zero perturbation, our guarantees recover the rates for gradient descent with $(L_0,L_1)$- or $(H_0,H_1)$-based step-sizes. Minibatch experiments on computer vision tasks demonstrate competitive performance for both variants, with the $(H_0,H_1)$ variant achieving the highest mean best-test accuracy in all four settings against tuned SAM and USAM with constant and cosine annealing schedules.

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive emergent reasoning capabilities, yet they remain constrained by fixed model parameters and finite context windows. Even when augmented with static retrieval, they can produce statements that are unsupported by, or even contradictory to, retrieved evidence. This leads to hallucinations, difficulty incorporating up-to-date information, and failures to correctly interpret or reconcile sources. Recent work addresses these limitations by tightly coupling step-by-step reasoning with interactive search, treating retrieval as an action within an iterative agentic loop rather than a one-shot preprocessing step. This study reviews frameworks that implement such reasoning-search loops by interleaving planning, querying, retrieval, integration, verification, and stopping. We analyze these systems through four architectural axes: retrieval coupling, controller design, knowledge source, and grounding strictness. We separately treat the learning signal as a cross-cutting dimension because prompting, supervision, preference optimization, and reinforcement learning can instantiate the same architecture while producing materially different search, stopping, and grounding behavior. We further distinguish benchmark difficulty from RSA-loop demand and synthesize controlled within-study ablations and quality-cost deltas, avoiding invalid pooling across heterogeneous model backbones, retrievers, corpora, and evaluation protocols. Our goal is to clarify the landscape of reasoning-search-augmented LLMs and outline a unified perspective on the design choices shaping future research.

Tables in real-world documents, including scientific papers, financial reports, and statistical summaries, frequently use merged cells, multi-level headers, and sectioned layouts. Yet the lightweight formats LLMs handle best (Markdown, CSV) cannot express these structures, while expressive formats (HTML, LaTeX) impose excessive token cost and parsing complexity. To enable systematic analysis of this trade-off, we introduce a taxonomy decomposing table structure into six atomic features (F1-F6) and corresponding complexity levels (L1-L6), and construct STB (Synthetic Table Benchmark), a controlled benchmark with 1,089 tables systematically distributed across complexity levels. Using this framework, we propose LTEM (LLM-friendly Table-Enhanced Markdown), a formally specified, minimal extension of Markdown that explicitly encodes spans and hierarchical headers. Experiments across five state-of-the-art LLMs show that LTEM achieves accuracy comparable to HTML, offers a favorable accuracy-token trade-off relative to HTML and LaTeX, and produces substantially fewer invalid responses than LaTeX; for table generation, LTEM is comparable to MultiMarkdown though HTML is best. We release our taxonomy, benchmark, and format specification to support future research on LLM-table interaction.

Motivated by ten years of Learning-Based Control Invited Sessions at the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), this tutorial paper reviews key advances at the intersection of machine learning and control. We focus on methods that combine the flexibility of machine learning techniques with the structure and theoretical foundations of control to design autonomous systems that are capable, reliable, and safe. We first introduce core notions for establishing stability and safety guarantees, then review approaches that learn dynamics models to improve control under uncertainty, and finally discuss data-driven methods that directly synthesize or learn policies, including reinforcement learning, imitation learning, and Bayesian optimization. We further discuss representative applications and open challenges. The goal is to provide an accessible entry point to the field and to support continued progress toward reliable learning-based control in real-world systems. To support learning and practical exploration, we share implementations and illustrative examples along with our discussion, together with additional resources on our website: https://learning-based-control.github.io/tutorial/.

Root cause analysis (RCA) and mitigation prediction are essential for incident management, enabling the identification of underlying causes of failures and ensuring the reliability of complex cloud-based systems. With rising incident volume and system complexity, incident reports have become a valuable resource for these tasks. Recent studies have shown promising results using Large Language Models (LLMs) to predict root causes and mitigation actions from textual descriptions in incident reports. Despite these advances, further progress is hindered by the lack of publicly available datasets; existing work relies on private data, which limits transparency, reproducibility, and generalization. To address this gap, we introduce CloudIR-Bench, the first publicly available benchmark providing a dataset and evaluation framework for incident report-based RCA and mitigation prediction. Curated from incident reports across five leading cloud-based systems, CloudIR-Bench captures a diverse range of real-world production scenarios representing authentic failures and engineers' reasoning. We also release an open-source evaluation framework that includes eight recent LLM-based approaches. Our comprehensive evaluation includes zero-shot and in-context learning experiments, along with a qualitative analysis to identify where and why LLMs fail. Benchmarking results reveal the capabilities and limitations of existing LLMs in this domain. The benchmark, including the dataset, framework and supplementary materials, is available at https://github.com/hoangtnm/CloudIR-Bench.

Executing vision-language models (VLMs) aboard low-Earth orbit satellites enables flexible processing of observation data without first downlinking it to the ground. On commercial off-the-shelf payloads, however, a request may span multiple execution windows: power and thermal constraints, fault-triggered reboots, and competing payload demands can interrupt inference before it completes. Each shutdown discards volatile activations and KV caches, forcing an unprotected request to repeat work after restart. We present OrbitWeaver, a framework that preserves VLM inference progress across onboard interruptions through coordinated checkpointing and recovery. Its phase-aware checkpointing selects recovery boundaries according to the state lifetimes and computational characteristics of vision encoding, language-model prefill, and decoding, balancing storage traffic against recomputation. Its dependency-aware dynamic recovery schedules restoration from partially completed states across the layer and token-chunk dimensions. By overlapping checkpoint and weight reads with recomputation, it reduces restart latency; the recovery planner computes an optimal execution order under its scheduling model within 100 ms. Experiments on satellite payload hardware using on-orbit telemetry traces show up to a 4.07-fold end-to-end speedup and a 3.56-fold reduction in SSD write volume over the evaluated baselines. A 72-hour deployment on two low-Earth orbit satellites demonstrates that OrbitWeaver retains inference progress and resumes execution across repeated bus-enforced shutdowns.

Before an AI agent takes a consequential action, such as paying, messaging or changing code, several monitors check it. Their verdicts are combined by aggregating scores or by counting approvals, whatever inputs the monitors share. Monitors that share a base model or a poisoned input, however, may fail together. We borrow the fail-prone systems of distributed computing: lists of monitor sets that may fail together. A rule is safe if it executes no bad action and live if it blocks no good one. We measured twelve small open-weights monitors on payment approval under two pre-registered protocols. Without pre-registration, we also measured three closed frontier models (Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, Gemini 4 Argon) and the open DeepSeek-V3.2. Every reliable fooling of a monitor into approving a fraud came through an evidence source and reached only that source's readers. Fooling it into blocking a correct payment depended on injection resistance, a monitor's refusal to follow instructions planted in its data. Small models and DeepSeek obeyed such notes. The three closed models ignored them in all but one case, and Opus also resisted persuasion tailored to it. On new data, a rule that counts sources instead of votes blocked 0.9% of correct payments, against 7.4% for the best counting rule, at equal safety. The pre-registered worst-case test failed. One attack left the approvers on a single source, so no rule over the twelve language-model monitors survives every measured attack. Adding a rule engine, which cannot be persuaded, restored the condition for a safe and live rule on the measured attacks. Diversify the inputs, harden the monitors, count sources, not votes.

We propose a learning-based generative model for completing curvilinear features under occlusion by environmental obstacles. To this end, we adopt a flow matching-based approach that supports the inpainting of occluded regions with the appropriate curvilinear features. To eliminate the reliance on privileged information about the occlusion a priori, we also train a UNet-based mask prediction model, which can identify regions for inpainting given only the occluded observation. The components of our approach are validated via experiments using procedurally-generated test cases, and the complete pipeline is validated using large public datasets for curvilinear objects. Against off-the-shelf inpainting baselines, ROCOCO is the strongest method by a wide margin when no occlusion mask is given, and is competitive with mask-supervised inpainting when one is, achieving best on full-image error and second only to LaMa on the occluded region, while using a completer of $7.7$M parameters against LaMa's $51$M and Stable Diffusion's $860$M.

Conditional Flow Models (CFMs) are increasingly being used in place of deterministic predictors across machine learning, including for tasks that were classically formulated as regression. Given their success in such tasks, we ask the question: what useful information do the conditional distributions produced by CFMs carry beyond what a point predictor would provide? We identify a systematic phenomenon: in many natural regimes, CFM samples routinely have larger variance than the true conditional distribution, even in nearly deterministic regression problems. This effect is most pronounced where the model has not resolved the dependence on the conditioning variable, and thus the additional variance can be viewed as converting epistemic uncertainty in fitting the ground truth conditional distribution into apparent aleatoric variance in the generated samples. Through controlled synthetic and real-data experiments, and comparisons with explicit smoothing estimators, we show that the induced variance tracks model underfitting of complex or hard-to-fit targets, and decreases with additional training or data. We provide a theoretical account of the phenomenon in a simplified setting and demonstrate a consequent practical use-case of conditional flow-matching: designing high-coverage predictive sets that cover the ground-truth regression target.

We study how to improve training efficiency on Ascend NPUs. In the NPU training programs we study, framework-level compilation optimizations such as operator fusion are only partially applied, leaving fragmented computation and avoidable execution overheads. Profiling-guided tuning can address these inefficiencies, but it often requires costly trial and error. To make training on NPUs more efficient, we propose TrainBridge, an agentic approach for transferring GPU optimization guidance to NPU training. TrainBridge uses the highly optimized execution produced by mature GPU compilation stacks as a task-specific reference for NPU tuning. It extracts optimization intents from the GPU training execution to guide NPU program rewrites and further refines the rewritten program through iterative profiling. Our GPU-to-NPU migration experiments show that TrainBridge achieves an average 1.7x speedup across four workloads covering LLM pretraining, image classification, and vision-language training, and an average speedup of nearly 2.0x across 27 Modded-NanoGPT speedrun records with highly optimized GPU implementations.

Selecting an effective quantum compiler configuration requires coordinated decisions over both hardware targets and compiler settings, with the ultimate goal of improving circuit execution fidelity. Existing SOTA approaches typically decompose this problem into two sequential stages: a device is chosen first, after which compiler options are tuned on that device through RL-based search. This bottom-up strategy can be fundamentally limited by its initial device decision, since a poorly matched backend may constrain the best fidelity achievable regardless of how effectively later compiler options are optimized. In contrast to classical compiler tuning, where the search space is often prohibitively large, the configuration space of quantum compilers remains manageable enough to support exhaustive search. Consequently, rather than repeatedly searching from candidate configurations, one can derive reusable configuration knowledge from offline oracle results and apply it directly to new circuits. In this paper, we introduce a top-down configuration-selection paradigm and build QuOPTBench, an exhaustively searched benchmark containing oracle configurations for 268 quantum circuits. We first study whether LLMs can directly infer suitable configurations and evaluate ten representative LLMs. The results reveal that vanilla LLMs remain far from the oracle. We then employ an LLM to extract transferable rules from sampled circuits governing configuration selection. Using these rules together with predictors trained on the enumerated configuration data of the sampled circuits, we design QuTOP, a rule-guided ML framework that performs fast configuration selection without iterative online search. Across our evaluation, the distilled rules consistently strengthen LLM-based selection, while QuTOP provides the strongest overall balance between solution quality and selection latency among the baselines.

World action models (WAMs) are shown to substantially diverge under generalization performance based on their generative backbones. We investigate this gap through the representational geometry that WAMs inherit from their backbones and how policy training reorganizes it. Our central hypothesis is that a useful representational prior would structure geometry that separates nuisance information from the in-distribution manifold in advance of training as a policy. We quantify this with nuisance orthogonality; orthogonality of the feature under visual variation outside the empirical in-distribution manifold. Across various image and video backbones, we show that a higher orthogonality from the representational prior is associated with stronger robustness to visual variations after WAM training, enabling policy generalization measurable prospectively for world models. In addition, analyzing the resulting robust WAMs reveals nuisance suppression; relative suppression of feature displacement caused by such variations and robust action generation of the policy. Together, these findings provide a geometric perspective on how the representational prior of the world model shapes the generalization performance of WAMs.

On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) enables a language model to learn from a Teacher instantiated from the same model but given access to privileged information, such as a reference solution. We find that access to sufficient privileged information allows the Teacher to generate highly accurate trajectories; however, accuracy alone does not guarantee that these trajectories are suitable for Student learning. Direct access to a complete solution may encourage shortened, reference-conditioned derivations that omit the exploration, verification, and self-correction required to solve problems without privileged information. We introduce TeachBack, a bidirectional preference-learning framework for on-policy self-distillation that learns not only from the Teacher but also how the Teacher should teach. TeachBack shapes the Teacher's generation behavior by controlling the length of the reference-reasoning suffix injected into the prompt and by varying the prompt style. While maintaining comparable Teacher accuracy, it encourages the Teacher to explore and re-solve problems, thereby reducing its reliance on the reference solution. At each rollout refresh, the shared policy generates both a privileged Teacher trajectory and a problem-only Student trajectory. A pairwise preference objective uses privileged Teacher trajectories to improve Student learning, while the reversed preference uses the Student's behavior to shape future Teacher supervision under the privileged condition. Experiments on mathematical and logical reasoning tasks show that TeachBack consistently improves Student performance over existing OPSD methods and related baselines.

Organizing radiology reports into independently generated units offers a way to generate fine-grained clinical content and bind it to visual evidence. However, existing methods typically adopt generation-unit structures not directly specified in natural reports or their annotations, introducing additional modeling compromises. We propose RadCarve, which instead defines generation units directly from the anatomical region sets in existing statement-region correspondences, unifying unit formation with visual evidence selection. RadCarve's planner uses composition-specialized query banks to jointly predict unit existence and region composition from the image, iteratively refining both with regional evidence aggregated according to current membership predictions. The generator independently produces each unit's text conditioned on the joint visual evidence of its predicted region set. Compared with strong baselines, RadCarve improves CXRFEScore by 9.4% in unit generation given region sets and achieves 2.4 times the end-to-end binding F1. It also achieves leading report-generation results on Chest ImaGenome and PadChest-GR, using fewer than one-sixth as many parameters as large-scale baselines.

There is a widespread sense that AI-generated text has recently become harder to understand. In this study, we investigate a set of psycholinguistic features that are known to correlate with human processing difficulty (e.g., object relative clauses, long syntactic dependencies, low-frequency n-grams). Using a novel corpus of AI-generated text across diverse domains, we find that AI models use these difficult features more often than paraphrases generated by round-trip translation. Compared with human writing, all nine frontier and near-frontier models use more inanimate subjects with animate verbs and more low-frequency n-grams, and most also use longer dependencies, more stacked nouns, and more reduced object relatives in conversation; we also demonstrate substantial variation across model families. We propose and test a hypothesis as to why: while human language is optimized for successful communication, AI-generated text is increasingly optimized for other goals like math, code, and reasoning, in which there is a pressure for \textit{information density} rather than successful communication. We provide a proof-of-concept for this hypothesis by fine-tuning a language model under a length penalty, which leads to a divergence from human-like linguistic behavior. Our findings highlight the axes of misalignment between linguistic processing demands in humans and LLMs, and point toward possible remedies.

This paper explores the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enable end-to-end automotive design and software development for Software-Defined Vehicles (SDVs). Based on our contributions within the Central Car Server (CeCaS) and follow-up EU-funded projects, we present an AI-driven toolchain integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) to automate the transformation of natural-language requirements into system architectures, executable software, and validation artifacts. The approach emphasizes traceability, consistency, and compliance with safety-critical automotive development requirements. Validation is performed on a centralized vehicle computing platform supporting adaptive cruise control and emergency braking, tested in Hardware-in-the-Loop (HiL) and Software-in-the-Loop (SiL) environments. We discuss current capabilities, practical limitations, and future directions toward increasingly automated, reliable, and quality-assured automotive software development with minimal human intervention.

A generated chest radiograph can be useful as declared augmentation, but the same image becomes unsupported evidence when submitted as the record of a real examination. We study this problem by separating three questions: whether an image passes an automated quality check, whether an origin classifier flags it as generated, and whether a trusted record supports the claimed acquisition. In our experiments, Qwen selects up to 20 images from pools of 1,000 existing Cheff-identified or SynthCheX candidates. A receiver evaluates quality with MedGemma and predicted origin with a classifier on frozen DINOv3 features. Quality-based selection raises quality passes from 12 to 19 of 20 for Cheff-identified images and from 8 to 17 for SynthCheX. We find no evidence that selection improves passage through both checks: no selected Cheff-identified image passes both, while uniform, quality, and quality-constrained surrogate selection produce 2, 1, and 2 SynthCheX passes. On unprocessed test images, the origin classifier flags 4,677 of 5,000 SynthCheX images, but it also misclassify 110 of 2,297 NIH (real) images and 568 of 957 genuine images from another collection as fake. Our results further show that JPEG compression reduces SynthCheX-versus-NIH AUROC from 0.987 to 0.841. Even without processing, 152 SynthCheX images pass both pixel checks. These checks can filter submissions, but they cannot verify an acquisition claim. We strongly advocate that source and intended use must be recorded and checked separately for admission of chest radiographs in medical datasets.

Timbre similarity is a key evaluation target for generative speech systems, including voice conversion, speaker-cloning text-to-speech, and zero-shot speech models. When the generated voice does not match the target speaker, the problem often reflects imperfect separation of speaker-related timbre from content, making it important to identify where timbre information resides and which representations still carry it. Using speaker identity as a measurable proxy, we probe frequency bands, phase/magnitude structure, WORLD source/filter decomposition, voiced/unvoiced regions, self-supervised learning (SSL) layers, EnCodec/HuBERT tokens, and a 45-listener test across Mandarin, English, and Japanese speech/singing data. Speaker information is distributed: 1--8 kHz magnitude and vocal-tract spectral-envelope structure dominate perception, above-8 kHz bands remain machine-discriminative, shallow SSL layers expose compact speaker information, and token leakage depends on tokenizer/layer choice. These findings indicate where generation systems should condition on or transform speaker information, and where content, codec, and token pipelines should audit residual speaker leakage.

Learning safe policies that generalize to unseen environments is difficult under bounded actuation, where an unsafe decision may become unrecoverable. Conventional control barrier function (CBF) filters enforce only instantaneous safety and ignore future recoverability. We propose SAFTER (Safety-Aware Filtering Through Explicit Recoverability), which embeds a differentiable, closed-form backup-CBF filter into Soft Actor-Critic training. SAFTER unifies current safety, finite-horizon backup safety, terminal recoverability, and input admissibility into a single differentiable certificate. Its CBF condition yields an exact minimum-intervention projection without iterative online optimization. In quadruped navigation, SAFTER reaches 90% training success with 30.6% fewer transitions than Vanilla SAC and 34.1-35.1% fewer than current-state CBF-filtered SAC baselines. Across unseen simulated environments, SAFTER improves success by up to 42.4 and 61.4 percentage points over the state-of-the-art methods CBF-RL and SEA-Nav, respectively, and achieves 73.3% and 76.7% success on two real-world navigation maps. Ablations identify accurate differentiation through the safety filter as a key contributor to robustness, in which replacing the projection Jacobian with the identity approximation reduces success rate in a High-Shift environment from 61.4% to 6.2%. These results show that recoverability-aware filtering serves as both a runtime safety mechanism and a learning mechanism for sample-efficient, robust policies.

Deductive verification scales to large software systems through modular reasoning, where formal contracts summarize the behavior of individual functions and enable their independent verification. Its central bottleneck is specification synthesis: constructing the contracts required for modular verification. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled automated specification synthesis at unprecedented scale. However, existing approaches remain fundamentally bottom-up, requiring callees to be verified before their callers. This dependency limits parallelism and provides no principled mechanism for resolving interprocedural inconsistencies that propagate across call chains. We present VERDICT, a multi-agent framework for parallelizing modular deductive verification of large-scale programs. VERDICT is built on two key principles. First, assumption-based parallel specification synthesis assigns an agent to each function and allows it to proceed immediately using assumed contracts for its callees, enabling verification to proceed in parallel across the program. Second, bidirectional interprocedural conflict reconciliation resolves the inconsistencies introduced by these assumptions: when a synthesized contract contradicts an assumption, agents propagate the necessary revisions both up and down the call graph until the contracts converge. Experimental results on real-world C programs show that VERDICT synthesizes higher-quality specifications than existing approaches while substantially reducing verification time. In particular, VERDICT is the first approach that scales to the complete 20,000-line X.509 parser, ruling out nearly all the potential runtime errors within hours, whereas prior tools like PREGUSS fall far short even after days of execution.

Large language models increasingly automate optimization modeling from natural language problems, producing written mathematics, solver code and a returned report. Verifying one optimization problem across these artifacts requires semantic comparison: unequal models can attain the same objective, equivalent models can use different auxiliary variables, and mutually consistent artifacts can omit the same source requirement. ORSMT provides a typed semantic interface and exact SMT relation queries. It aligns observable decisions, projects auxiliary variables, proves or refutes feasible region and objective relations, localizes refutations to implicated rows or domains and links source texts when available. It then reconstructs one artifact from another, and each adopted candidate passes the required relation checks. Across 3,034 problems and six generator sizes, ORSMT improves the model-code match rate in all 72 benchmark and generator combinations before selection. Protected selection raises the aggregate rate from 43.2% to 88.2% and the share that are both correct and matched from 25.2% to 40.2%. On the 1,905 refuted outputs, certified voting under the shared fallback makes 50.9% of outputs correct and matched, compared with 44.8% for ReLoop and 49.4% for Opt-Verifier. A separate one-round source revision followed by exact reconstruction restores a model-code match for 84.4% of the refuted pairs.

Context: Reviewing a pull request requires verification evidence that addresses the proposed change. Coding agent benchmarks and studies of pull request outcomes do not directly assess this relationship. Objective: We test whether the V-Model's build and verify pairs can measure verification evidence in pull requests and support comparisons between agent-authored and human-authored changes. Method: VeeReview classifies four build and verify pairs using repository signals and a language-model judge. Three pairs use model judgements constrained by deterministic signals, and a rule over the diff and repository tree decides Module Design-Unit Test. We evaluated VeeReview against a 25-pull request reference set labelled by two raters and applied it to 1,454 matched pairs of agent and human pull requests from 741 repositories. Results: VeeReview assigned lower build-only rates to agent-authored pull requests on all four pairs, contrary to the preregistered hypothesis (mixed-effects odds ratios 0.52 to 0.86). Architecture-Integration was not significant. Standardization for linked issues, shipped tests and size reduced matched-rate differences by 34% to 60%, and the rule-decided pair's standardized interval included zero. The instrument did not meet its preregistered calibration criterion: agreement with adjudicated labels was 4% to 60% against a required 80%, and inter-rater agreement was weak (kappa = 0.154). Conclusions: The rule-decided pair shows that a process measure judged by a language model partly reflects how a pull request is presented rather than the verification work behind it. We report the cohort differences as observations made with this instrument, and we argue that such measures need a mechanically decided component and a validated human reference before they can support comparisons of verification practice.

Engineering graduates in India enter a technology sector that is being reshaped by generative AI, yet the route into that sector runs through examinations and campus placement screens that largely exclude AI. Institutions in India have an approved intake of nearly 2.9 million seats in engineering and technology for 2026-2027, but HCI research on how students prepare for AI-mediated work has drawn mostly on Western and East Asian settings. We interviewed 23 students and recent graduates of Indian engineering and computing programmes about how they used generative AI across coursework, examinations and placements, and how they judged their own readiness for work. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we report five themes, covering AI-first workplaces and AI-free placement screens, how participants prepared for placement, how they used AI in coursework, the role of faculty authority and enforcement, and participants' concerns about their readiness for work. Drawing on signaling theory, we discuss what grades and screen scores certify once AI can help produce them, and we offer recommendations for employers, institutions and AI tool designers.

Frontier black-box Large Language Model (LLM) agents are proficient at long-horizon reasoning and precise action generation. However, when it comes to a specific agentic task, they have no internalized knowledge of how that particular environment unfolds. A world model offers a natural remedy, providing the agent with environment specific knowledge by foreseeing how the environment will respond to the action it is about to take. Prior world models for LLM agents mainly predict next observations at each step, which is costly and often uninformative because individual observations provide limited task-relevant guidance and not every step requires call for foresight. This raises a key question: what a world model should predict and when should it be invoked for agentic tasks? Our pilot study suggests that world model guidance is most useful when it anticipates pitfalls within a bounded multi-step future. Motivated by this, we introduce Pitfall Anticipation World Model (PAWM), which selectively intervenes when a potential pitfall arises and predicts the impending failure to steer the agent away from it. PAWM is trained in two stages: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on synthetic data labeled with agent pitfalls, followed by GRPO co-training with a black-box LLM to further optimize it in the target environment. PAWM improves Claude Sonnet 4.5 performance by 24.3% on ScienceWorld and 7.7% on WebArena-Lite, outperforming a range of baselines. These results demonstrate that PAWM provides an effective form of world model guidance for black-box LLM agents.

Continuous diffusion language models generate a whole sequence in parallel, never drawing a single word at any intermediate step; only the final step turns embeddings into text. Models such as ELF now report autoregressive-level quality at a fraction of the sampling steps of discrete-token diffusion models, and this design principle -- no step-wise discretization -- is what their own ablations credit for the gain. We show that this same principle carries a hidden cost: a collapse of the lexical long tail. Measured against held-out human text, ELF's output matches the human rate on common words almost exactly, yet its rarest words appear at only 0.30x the human rate, a gap that does not close from 105M to 652M parameters and that no sampler setting these models expose can reach. A same-size GPT-2, in contrast, spans zero to above the human rate by its decoding rule alone. We trace the difference to what continuous diffusion models lack: with no step that ever draws a discrete word, every step is instead driven by an average over the candidates still in play, and averaging a rare candidate together with the common word competing for its slot lands on the common word. An autoregressive model avoids this because its decoding rule samples one candidate rather than averaging over all of them. We propose GRAFT, a training-free method that grafts this missing choice back onto a frozen model: while the model is still undecided, GRAFT commits the rare words the average would otherwise discard, then regenerates the sequence from scratch with those commitments held in place. Across three ELF scales and on LangFlow, an independent continuous dLLM, GRAFT restores the rare-word share of generated text from 0.42-0.77x the human rate to 0.82-1.10x, a relative gain of 34-109%, and moves the entire word-frequency profile closer to human on every model tested, by 2.7x on ELF-B and 12x on LangFlow.

A content-safe response can still promote priorities that conflict with its task: an assistant may demand compliance when asked to preserve autonomy. We study contextual value drift as a task-relative decoding problem with an explicit allowance for change. LaVGuard separates an authorized ten-dimensional profile from a frozen estimate of the values expressed in the visible prefix. A profile-relative density gate selects when to evaluate candidate continuations; their signed progress determines a logit tilt constrained by both changed-position and cumulative-KL budgets. We establish local surrogate improvement, pathwise budget feasibility, and a bound on response-distribution change. Profile conditioning raises boundary TPR at 5% FPR from .58 to .72. At the same .12 mean intervention ratio, the selection study reports risk-safety scores of .88 for LaVGuard and .72 for position-matched edits. The resulting interface makes task priorities actionable while keeping the extent of intervention explicit and bounded.

Full fine-tuning has achieved remarkable success on reasoning-intensive tasks, but it often requires substantial GPU resource consumption. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) provides a promising alternative for reducing this cost, yet we observe a substantial performance gap on reasoning-intensive tasks. In this paper, we present three key observations showing that this gap is closely associated with norm-related under-adaptation, where PEFT produces markedly smaller weight-update norms than full fine-tuning. Based on these observations, we propose Norm-Guided Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (NormTune), a simple yet effective strategy that adaptively strengthens insufficiently updated layers according to their weight-update norms. Extensive experiments show that NormTune consistently enhances multiple PEFT methods across challenging reasoning benchmarks. Specifically, when trained on S1K-1.1, integrating NormTune into rank-8 LoRA, Bone, and MoRA yields substantial average accuracy improvements of 24.24\%, 11.33\%, and 16.21\% , respectively, across AIME 2024, MATH 500, GPQA, and AIME 2025. Moreover, NormTune-enhanced rank-256 LoRA, Bone, and MoRA achieve performance comparable to S1 full fine-tuning, with respective average gains of 2.17\%, 0.93\%, and 3.00\% over this baseline.

Reward hacking is a major problem in current production machine learning systems, resulting in costly and dangerous failures. Here we study how to monitor for and mitigate reward hacking in realistic settings, including tool calls and long contexts. We apply a dynamic intervention to steering directions obtained by three different methods: difference-in-means vectors from labeled rollouts, gradient optimization-based vectors, and vectors extracted when models reference an anti-reward-hacking model spec. This dynamic intervention perturbs model representations less than uniform steering vector addition to the residual stream, allowing for more precise edits. We find that we are able to cheaply and significantly reduce reward hacking without correspondingly significant costs to model coherence or capability, and that steering vectors originally extracted from coding environments also generalize to reducing reward hacking in other domains. Our results pave the way towards latent space monitoring and control over realistic production systems.

Individual patient data are the gold standard for secondary analysis of time-to-event evidence, but they are rarely released, and reconstruction from a published Kaplan-Meier figure could help. Existing methods all claim high fidelity, each judged by whichever agreements it happens to achieve, and each returns a single dataset although the map from figure to data is not bijective. We define fidelity explicitly: a dataset is admissible when it reproduces the risk table exactly, follows the digitized curve to within the image resolution, and respects the printed median, interval and event count. We propose StochIKM, a stochastic algorithm that digitizes the figure with a vision-capable language model and uses the high-fidelity definition as constraints, returning an admissible set of individual patient datasets. A solution is guaranteed to exist whenever the figure has been read correctly, so a failure indicts either the published figure or its digitization. In simulation and in 79 arms from published oncology trials, StochIKM reproduces the published risk tables and medians more closely than LLM-improved IPDfromKM, a high-impact alternative.

A coding agent that rewrites its own scaffold has to choose which proposed edit to expand before that edit has been evaluated, and the search then has to return one agent. Each run fits one linear readout on the parent's steering-split solve rate and eight coordinates of the proposed diff, from 96 scaffold edits labeled by four evaluations of a 16-instance fit split, and then freezes the coefficients. HumanEval+ reserves 48 instances as the steering split and Polyglot reserves 64. That split scores parents and keeps an archive of four nodes. Huxley-Gödel Machine selection draws a parent by Thompson sampling on the steering counts of nodes that have already been evaluated, and it expands the child that parent proposes. Every method then returns the earliest evaluated node whose steering-split solve count is maximal. The tables report the held-out score of that node on the other 100 HumanEval+ instances and the other 145 Polyglot instances, next to the root scaffold and the calibration edit with the highest fit-split label. Twelve runs of GPT-4o return a node at 87.0% on held-out HumanEval+, against 84.2% for the parent-rate ablation. On that split Huxley-Gödel Machine selection returns 85.1%, the root is at 81.2%, and the calibration-best edit is at 82.8%. On the same split Claude Sonnet 4.5 returns 86.6%, beside 86.5% for Huxley-Gödel Machine selection, 85.3% for the parent-rate ablation, and 85.1% for the calibration-best edit.

Deployed tourism trip planners ingest travel times and ratings as exact numbers, although routing services return travel times that vary with the hour of departure and a platform rating may rest on a handful of reviews or on tens of thousands. We present an eco-friendly trip planner that represents both quantities as Z-numbers, which pair a fuzzy restriction on a value with a fuzzy reliability on the evidence behind it, and that constructs them directly from routing-service observations at six departure hours and from platform review counts rather than from linguistic elicitation. A hybrid loss combines score, carbon, travel-time, and reliability terms, and an adaptive large neighborhood search returns single-day itineraries with per-leg reliability annotations through a conversational front end. We compare the planner with a crisp-mean baseline under an identical optimizer in Baku, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Tashkent, and Istanbul, with fifteen points of interest and thirty seeds per city, and we evaluate the selected itineraries on their trip carbon and their total travel time. Pooled over 150 seed-paired runs, the planner lowers trip carbon from 3.24 to 2.61 kg (19.3%, Wilcoxon p = 0.017; city-clustered bootstrap interval 6.4% to 26.7%) and travel time from 123 to 109 minutes per trip (11.5%, p = 2.8e-10; interval 5.0% to 18.2%). The travel-time reductions survive a Holm correction in Baku, Istanbul, and Abu Dhabi, the carbon reduction is significant in Baku and large but uncertain in the dispersed catalogs of Dubai and Abu Dhabi, and neither metric changes in Tashkent. Review counts were measured for Baku and estimated for the other four cities, and the comparison involves a single baseline, so the results establish feasibility and direction rather than a general advantage. Code, routing caches, frozen routing tables, and per-seed results are openly released.

Weighted rectangular matrices record relations between two types of objects, such as occupations and industries, documents and terms, origins and destinations, or annotated classes and computed clusters. Their heatmaps become difficult to read when arbitrary row and column orders scatter related objects, while equal size cells hide large differences in row and column totals. We present MHeatmap (Mosaic Heatmap), which addresses these problems in two stages. Two-Walk spectral seriation first represents the matrix as a weighted bipartite graph. Ordinary bipartite ordering uses only observed row to column links. Two-Walk also uses length-two walks, so rows that share columns and columns that share rows receive explicit similarity links. Sorting a Fiedler vector of the resulting graph Laplacian gives coordinated row and column orders. The Mosaic layout then partitions a unit square so that row height is proportional to the row total and column width is proportional to the column total, while color represents the observed entry. We prove how the Two-Walk energy combines direct alignment with shared-neighbor smoothness, derive an exact matrix vector product that permits sparse computation, and formalize the tiling and area semantics of Mosaic. Across 300 synthetic matrices and seven real data sets, Two-Walk obtains the lowest normalized 2-SUM in all 15 synthetic regimes and the highest Band@10% in 14. The largest gains occur when shared neighborhoods express the latent relational structure.

Predicting molecular magnetism often requires electronic-structure calculations with spin-orbit coupling (SOC), which are costly to repeat across many molecules. The underlying electronic states can transform as spinors, yet equivariant surrogates typically use only integer-rank features. Inspired by the spinor nature of these electronic states, we develop eSpinor, an SU(2)-equivariant graph neural network that propagates spinor features. We initialize spinor features from eigenvectors of an approximate SOC Hamiltonian and use gauge-covariant message passing with a gauge-invariant readout to make predictions independent of the arbitrary eigenbasis choice. On cobalt single-molecule magnet candidates, eSpinor improves zero-field-splitting predictions relative to NequIP, including for unseen ligands. For a dysprosium magnetic resonance imaging probe, eSpinor improves real electron-spin correlations over a Hamiltonian-informed baseline despite similar static crystal-field errors and fewer parameters, while accurately predicting low-field nuclear relaxation in water and after transfer to methanol without retraining. Overall, these results demonstrate that SU(2)-equivariant spinor message passing is a useful inductive bias for molecular magnetism. We also find that similar static tensor errors can yield different dynamical errors, motivating model selection based on accuracy for the intended physical observables.

Merging different models into a single model is highly desirable for multi-task deployment, particularly in regulated domains like healthcare. In such settings, models are often locally fine-tuned due to strict data privacy policies, necessitating that aggregation operates exclusively on the fine-tuned weights. Existing methods apply a uniform merge across all tasks, ignoring the geometric relationships among their learned subspaces. When task updates occupy misaligned subspaces, projecting them onto a shared low-rank basis discards task-relevant directions, a failure mode named \emph{subspace interference}. Through this study, we show that the per-task projection error of a merged model is governed by the principal-angle alignment between each task and the shared subspace, so that grouping geometrically compatible tasks provably reduces this error within each group. Motivated by this observation, we propose \textbf{Group-wise Rank-Aware Model Merging (GRAM)}, which uses the principal-angle geometry of task vectors to decide which tasks should be merged together and then performs a standard SVD-based merge within each coalition; the pipeline requires only the fine-tuned weights at merge time. With only one additional model ($\nK{=}2$), GRAM significantly mitigates subspace interference and consistently outperforms prior merging methods across language understanding (GLUE with Flan-T5), 8-task CLIP vision, and medical instruction tuning (Qwen2-7B-Instruct with four English/Chinese medical LoRAs).

Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) synthesize photorealistic novel views from dense image collections, but degrade sharply when few views are available. We attribute a specific, measurable defect to the objective itself: the rendering loss is a sum over independent rays and contains no term comparing densities that different rays assign to the same region of space, so nearby 3D points can settle on contradictory densities while every training pixel is reproduced correctly. We make this quantity explicit by measuring cross-ray density disagreement directly during training, and show that it stays high in vanilla NeRF, falls only incidentally under frequency-based regularization, and moves together with held-out quality in the sparse regime. We then close the gap with DriftNeRF, a drop-in regularizer that instantiates the drifting-field template on density samples: a masked exponential kernel aggregates densities from nearby points on other rays into a stop-gradient consensus target, and the resulting drifting field penalizes unsupported disagreement while leaving agreed-upon boundaries intact. The regularizer reads only sampled positions, ray identifiers, and predicted densities, so it requires no pretrained model, external geometry, or additional images, and transfers across field parameterizations. On NeRF-Synthetic it reduces residual disagreement by an order of magnitude, and across NeRF-Synthetic, DTU, and LLFF it improves 3-view PSNR over the strongest MLP-NeRF baseline by 0.42-0.65 dB and remains competitive with sparse-view Gaussian pipelines under a matched protocol without their depth, flow, or covisibility preprocessing.

Sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) communicate through short click sequences called codas, whose structure includes the rhythmic pattern of inter-click intervals (ICI) and the spectral composition of the clicks. In this paper, we propose the Dual-Channel Contrastive Encoder (DCCE), which explicitly encodes rhythm and spectral information with separate encoders before fusing them. We evaluate DCCE on three coda-understanding tasks: social unit, coda type, and individual identification. We compare DCCE against strong baselines from literature under a common linear-probe protocol and analyze the role of each channel and training objective through ablations. On 1,383 codas, shared partitions and validation-only layer selection support three random splits and three recording-date-disjoint folds. DCCE with unit pairing and type supervision achieves mean random-split macro-F1 of 0.901/0.865/0.597 for unit/type/identity. Raw ICI remains strongest for type (0.987), and ICI plus temporal mel statistics is a strong identity reference (0.724). An auxiliary identity objective improves spectral-branch identity prediction but does not improve the mean fused-identity score in this configuration. Date-grouped evaluation and four year holdouts expose generalization limits. The results support task-dependent combinations of timing and spectral information, without establishing independent biological channels or general architectural superiority. Code, notebooks, and complete results are available at https://dcce-research-site.vercel.app.

One-shot landmark localization in volume scans with varying fields of view (FOVs) is challenging. While existing self-supervised learning methods have shown promising performance, they rely on contrastive learning built upon augmented views of the same image, which inherently limits their generalization in cross-modality scenarios. This motivates research on cross-modality embedding learning using paired multi-modality images. However, existing methods suffer from not only limited training data, but also the requirement of multi-stage iterative training. To address these limitations, we propose UNIVERS, an end-to-end trainable framework that learns UNIversal Voxel-wise Embedding via Randomized Synthesis. Our framework leverages diverse pseudo-data synthesized from organ shape templates, with randomization applied to semantic layout, visual appearance, FOV, and spatial pose. Coupled with cross-domain discriminative voxel-wise contrastive learning, this domain randomization strategy forces the network to disregard domain-specific biases and learn features that are robust against variations in imaging contrast, resolution, and spatial context. Consequently, the trained model enables one-shot landmark localization in multi-modality volume scans with arbitrary FOVs. In this study, the efficacy of the proposed method is demonstrated by applying it to the task of localizing the adrenal glands, which are paired, small, and irregular endocrine organs. In particular, comprehensive experiments are conducted on three challenging adrenal gland datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that UNIVERS consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art (SOTA) one-shot landmark localization approaches, with particularly prominent advantages in cross-modality scenarios. The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/Kendra9999/UNIVERS.

Task-oriented dialogue summarization aims to automatically extract key information to generate domain summaries to improve service efficiency and quality. Task-oriented dialogue is inherently logical and surrounds specific topic. How to effectively capture the dialogue topic and the most salient information becomes one of the major challenges of this task. In this paper, we propose a task-oriented dialogue summarization model utilizing a multi-level encoder with global topic (MLEGT). This model discovers temporal and spatial dependencies through a multi-level encoder, while simultaneously obtaining a simple yet effective global topic in the process of graph construction. It not only captures the crucial details but also breaks the long-range limit and discover the intrinsic structure across the dialogue. Then, a global topic guided pointer mechanism is added into the summrizer to capture ignored but important information, which is helpful to improve the accuracy of the summary. A comprehensive study of two public datasets, including a real-world large-scale Chinese police interrogation dataset and a medical reporting service dataset proves the superiority of our method on several strong baselines.

We introduce MixAgent, an agentic pipeline for music post-production that follows the workflow of audio engineers to build interpretable and editable mixing plans guided by a reference song. A grouping agent first routes related input tracks, such as drum recordings, into subgroups. A planning agent then uses retrieved examples to choose and order audio effects, such as volume control and reverb, for tracks, subgroups, and the full mix. To refine the mix, a detector identifies what needs correction, and a critic proposes numerical parameter adjustments from tracks to the full mix. In our experiments, prompting recent multimodal models to listen and revise often worsens the mix, making reliable correction a central challenge. We therefore build MixCritic, a dataset of 45,657 repair critiques derived from parameters fitted to professional mixes, and train the critic with supervised fine-tuning followed by preference optimization on rendered audio outcomes. On MedleyDB, learned refinement reduces error by 19% relative to the initial mix, with preference optimization reducing it by 8.4% over supervised training alone. Retrieved examples further improve effects selection, and a human listening test shows that MixAgent gets higher quality ratings than mixes produced by Qwen3-Omni, Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-4o-audio.

Multilingual large language models are increasingly deployed in settings where visible reasoning traces support verification, education, and safety auditing, yet standard evaluations typically measure only final-answer agreement or holistic response similarity. As a result, they establish outcome consistency without determining whether users across languages receive comparable supporting evidence. We introduce a trace-level divergence framework that compares visible reasoning traces as structured sequences, decomposing agreement into structural similarity, order consistency, and holistic similarity, with pair-specific calibration to enable comparison across languages. Across three reasoning benchmarks, seven languages, and six frontier LLMs, the natural baseline---embedding each whole response and comparing the two by cosine---systematically overstates agreement: $52.1\%$--$67.3\%$ of examples in the top quartile of holistic similarity are not in the top quartile of structural similarity. This dissociation is stable across sentence encoders and step segmentations, and blind bilingual annotation studies in two English-anchored language pairs show that human judgments align with structural similarity rather than with the holistic baseline. A same-language control shows that the level of divergence is language-specific: two English traces for paraphrases of the same question agree more closely than an English trace and its counterparts in other languages. Our results show that answer-level and holistic evaluations can substantially overestimate the consistency of multilingual explanatory artifacts, motivating trace-level evaluation for reliable multilingual deployment.

Objective.To distinguish the contributions of acquisition context and photoplethysmography (PPG) to session-calibrated blood pressure (BP) tracking.Approach. The original comparison used three repeats of five-fold participant-level cross-validation in 653 AuroraBP participants, excluding calibration-labelled prediction targets. Matched analyses separated context and PPG and removed elapsed-time terms. Later exploratory follow-ups retained PPG, accelerometer signals and three initial cuff readings. Separate studies evaluated pulse-rate fusion and an intraoperative VitalDB model. Main results.The original wearable-state model achieved participant-level mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 7.697/6.139 mmHg for systolic/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP). Added context reduced MAE by 0.436/0.126 mmHg (97.5% intervals 0.305-0.573/0.053-0.200). In the matched factorial without the external PPG prior, PPG improved on calibration, time and protocol-provided posture/activity by 0.214/0.135 mmHg; removing time left the DBP interval including zero. Standard PPG descriptors contributed, but additional nonlinear/attractor benefit was not established. In a separate follow-up series, a sensor-history ensemble achieved 7.299/5.445 mmHg versus its static-rich reference's 7.363/5.470, small gains of 0.064/0.025 mmHg. Larger DBP errors did not improve uniformly. Quality-weighted fusion reduced pulse-rate MAE from 3.985 to 3.690 beats per minute. VitalDB MAEs remained 15.375/8.833 mmHg despite small PPG gains. Significance. The contribution is a calibrated evaluation framework with explicit controls, reproducible feature-cache-to-results analyses and retained negative findings. The sensor-history gain is exploratory after repeated dataset reuse. Independently estimated wearable states, complete raw-signal reproduction of the supplied richer features, external transfer and clinical adequacy remain unestablished.

Abdominal organ segmentation is essential in modern medical applications. While existing deep learning approaches demonstrate promising performance, their heavy reliance on large-scale image data raises concerns over generalization capability and privacy risks. This motivates the development of generalizable segmentation training paradigms based on domain-randomized image synthesis, facilitating generalization across unseen real image domains. However, existing paradigms either suffer from limited segmentation performance when applied to abdominal organs, or require dataset-specific finetuning. To address these limitations, we propose ReSeg, a novel two-stage retraining-free framework for domain-agnostic zero-shot abdominal organ segmentation. At the first stage, our organ-agnostic synthetic data-driven pretraining approach exploits semantically and visually diverse synthetic images generated by a dedicated data engine to optimize a Generalizable Semantic Representation Network (GSRNet). The network is thereby capable of learning semantic features robust against variations in anatomical structure, imaging contrast, resolution and spatial context, which provide universal representation capabilities that serve as a foundation for segmentation learning. Subsequently, in the second stage, we continue to train an Organ-specific Encoder-decoder Segmentation Network (OESNet), whose encoder is initialized with the pretrained weights. This training process is facilitated by another dedicated data engine, which generates diversified visual images while strictly retaining the inherent spatial layout of abdominal organs. Comprehensive evaluation on seven abdominal organ segmentation datasets across three different modalities including CT, MRI, and PET demonstrates that ReSeg consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods while eliminating the need for real training images.

World models predict how embodied systems evolve under actions, but their accuracy can degrade when physical conditions move outside the training distribution. We study two components of causal modeling: which inputs a predictor may use, and how its mechanism computes their effects. In a synthetic benchmark with shortcut features, a frozen dependency mask derived from paired interventions reduces mean out-of-distribution (OOD) RMSE from 1.769 for a fully connected predictor to 0.697, close to the generator-oracle mask (0.694). For robot link-mass extrapolation in CausalWorld, with disjoint training and test mass ranges, we develop finger-local world models in which link masses enter inertia and dynamics-bias terms through explicit affine coefficients, actions act through either a learned torque network or the known PD controller, and learned residuals capture contact-related effects. Compared with a separately trained control whose mass inputs are fixed at training means, the known-PD model turns out-of-range masses into a consistent predictive gain: median time-averaged joint R2 over 150-step rollouts rises from 0.609 to 0.727, with improvement in all ten task-seed runs (exact two-sided sign test, p = 0.002). In a shared 100-step forecast, the learned-torque model is competitive with the strongest recurrent robotic world model (RWM) configuration (median joint R2 of 0.755 - 0.768 versus 0.752), whereas supplying out-of-range masses sharply degrades the MLP and recurrent predictors. These results indicate that how a physical parameter enters the dynamics mechanism determines whether its out-of-range value helps or harms prediction.

Reward guidance methods sample an exponential tilt of a base density using a diffusion model trained with only samples from the base distribution. Existing methods use what we call external guidance: additive terms in the drift or multiplicative terms on the transition probabilities. We propose internal guidance which leaves the output of the base denoiser unmodified and instead changes the point at which it is evaluated. For discrete distributions embedded in the hypercube $\{-1,1\}^{d}$, the denoiser of any linearly tilted density is exactly the base denoiser evaluated at a shifted and rescaled input. In practice the base denoiser is a neural network trained on noised samples of the base distribution. The required evaluation points for sampling the tilted density would be out-of-distribution for basic noising of the base distribution. We modify the training algorithm with random diagonal rescalings of the data, so that the denoiser network learns both in- and out-of-distribution evaluations of the denoiser relative to the base distribution. A single denoiser network samples binary reward tilts, class labels, and infilling with no fine-tuning and no external guidance term.

We aim to address the problem of Out-of-Distribution (OOD) Mode Averaging, a critical problem that emerges when distilling Flow Matching (FM) based behavior policies in offline Reinforcement Learning (RL): When learning over multi-modal datasets, standard distillation inadvertently forces the policy to interpolate across different behavioral modes, causing the generated actions to collapse into invalid, OOD regions. To resolve this, we propose Value-Rectified Distillation (VRD), a novel framework that reformulates offline policy distillation as a value-guided generative trajectory alignment problem. By employing a dynamic coupling mechanism, VRD actively rectifies flow dynamics to explicitly decouple distinct behavioral modes, cleanly isolating high-value actions. Specifically, we instantiate VRD through two complementary algorithms: VRD-Q, which utilizes value-quantile behavior distillation to statistically filter out low-value behaviors, and VRD-R, which reorganizes the latent space to geometrically isolate high-value generative trajectories from the FM-based behavior policy. Extensive empirical evaluations demonstrate that VRD improves existing generative baselines across diverse continuous control and planning tasks on the D4RL, OGBench, and Minari benchmarks, especially over those multi-modal, non-expert datasets.

This paper proposes Role-Enhanced Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought (RE-ZS-CoT), a prompting framework that systematically integrates domain-specific expert roles to enhance reasoning in large language models (LLMs) without task-specific examples. We assess two versions of our approach. In the first version, static role selection, we evaluate eight predefined expert roles across arithmetic, commonsense, and reading comprehension benchmarks to determine their impact on reasoning performance. In the second version, dynamic role selection, each model autonomously selects the single most suitable role for each benchmark, enabling adaptive task-role alignment without manual specification. Across 20 LLMs and seven benchmarks, RE-ZS-CoT frequently surpasses zero-shot and zero-shot-CoT baselines, achieving performance improvements of up to 44 percentage points. The results reveal a strong correspondence between static and dynamic versions; the benchmarks where static roles yielded improvements were almost always those where dynamic roles also outperformed baselines, though static selection achieved peak performance. Ablation studies further show that unconventional roles degrade performance, underscoring the necessity of task-role alignment. The framework's scalability is validated across model sizes (2b-14b parameters), with smaller models like Granite3.3-8b achieving remarkable proficiency in arithmetic reasoning. RE-ZS-CoT advances zero-shot prompting by unifying role specialization with chain-of-thought reasoning, offering a practical, resource-efficient solution for improving LLM capabilities across diverse domains.

A selective classifier may be claimed to satisfy a risk-coverage contract if some rule from a predeclared menu (a threshold or a union of $K$ score intervals) attains coverage at least $κ$ and error at most $α$. Refuting this existential claim requires ruling out every permitted rule. The intersection-union test (IUT) achieves validity without a multiplicity correction, but its sample cost can increase with menu richness. We characterize this cost and compare it with the optimal audit. For a fixed interior risk target $α$ and gap $γ$, the minimax sample size for K-interval menus at coverage floor $κ$ is $K(1-κ)/(κγ^2)$, up to logarithmic factors, in the stated small-gap, large-menu regime; exact IUT attains this rate. The lower bound holds even with a known score distribution, while the upper bound extends to menus of VC dimension $d$. Procedures that refuse to reject whenever any rule appears feasible on the audit sample can pay a linear $K$ cost even when a square-root rate is possible. Reference-free testing reaches a smaller scale under constant-risk alternatives, whereas unknown heterogeneous risks can make the linear cost unavoidable. In simulations with $K=4$, the raw menu cost varies 7.7-fold between $κ=.5$ and $κ=.95$; after theorem-motivated normalization the endpoint values differ by approximately 5%. Held-out experiments with three VLM judges show positive exact-hiding windows in all 60 split-specific confidence-gate families, with 28/30 contracts chosen on audit-A remaining hidden on untouched audit-B. On a cleaner multi-annotator target, hiding is weaker and transfers in 3/10 resplits. Frozen image and multimodal classifiers show boundary behavior consistent with the IUT guarantee and strong power relative to practical certificates.

Time series anomalies take diverse forms, and individual detectors encode different anomaly scoring principles that rarely cover all anomaly types. Recent unsupervised time-series anomaly detectors provide complementary scoring signals, yet deploying them as an ensemble preserves the inference and maintenance cost of every individual detector. We study whether heterogeneous teacher detectors can be distilled into a single lightweight detector in the unsupervised setting, where no anomaly labels are available to define a shared target. AnoMix addresses this by extracting weak pairwise supervision from the training-set anomaly scores of frozen teachers. It normalizes each teacher score sequence independently and trains the student with CoRank, a multi-teacher ranking-distillation objective that converts teacher score gaps into pairwise supervision through teacher consensus. Across seven benchmark datasets, AnoMix successfully integrates complementary teacher scoring principles into a single deployable model, improving over individual detectors and static score ensembles while using a compact student with under 80k parameters on the benchmark settings. A zero-shot variant further shows that the distilled ranking signal transfers to unseen datasets and can outperform large pretrained time-series foundation models for anomaly detection.

Amodal video segmentation asks for the complete mask of an object in every frame, including the parts hidden behind other objects. The best current methods generate these masks with fine-tuned video diffusion models, which need many denoising steps and an extra depth network, and give a different answer for every sample. Self-supervised video world models of the JEPA family are trained on a closely related task: predicting the representation of masked space-time regions from the visible ones. We therefore treat occlusion as masking. The tokens that the object's visible mask does not cover are dropped, the pre-trained V-JEPA 2.1 predictor fills them in, and a light head decodes the observed and predicted features into amodal masks. The resulting model, OccJEPA (Occlusion-as-masking JEPA), is deterministic and 33.5x faster than the diffusion-based state of the art, and more accurate on SAIL-VOS, on TAO-Amodal, including a held-out test split (+4.00 AP50) and visible masks tracked by SAM2, and on Kubric. Controlled experiments trace the gain to the predictor's pre-trained weights rather than to its capacity, for world models from 87M to 1.85B parameters. Code is available at https://github.com/zgp110/occjepa.

Users increasingly rely on large language models (LLMs) to analyse collections of independent inputs, such as product reviews or social media posts, and return a single aggregated answer. This setting requires multi-instance processing (MIP), where a model combines information from multiple instances into one prediction. We study a task in which the model must infer a binary label for each instance, and identify the most frequent label among the full instance set. The correct answer should be invariant to instance order. By evaluating fifteen LLMs across five datasets and seven instance order patterns, with each instance set held fixed across patterns, we find substantial order sensitivity. Accuracy can differ by about 90 percentage points between the best and worst order patterns, with models generally more accurate when majority-label instances appear at the start than when they appear in the middle or at the end. For subsets of models, available reasoning traces and gradient-based attribution reveal uneven emphasis across positions. Traces disproportionately mention early instances, while attribution scores are generally higher near the beginning and end than in the middle. These results show that instance order can systematically bias aggregated predictions, highlighting the need to evaluate MIP across different input arrangements.

A learner's present predictions do not fully determine how it will learn next. We study the dynamics of hidden learning structure through two related operations. Fiber Regulation Theory (FRT) describes protected repair of existing function and the learning responses left available after repair. Fiber Acquisition Theory (FAT) describes the formation and renewal of trainable structure, distinguishing neutral installation, access to a learning signal, and additional functional directions. The two operations also constrain one another. A repair obligation can force a change in a learning channel, while acquired features can make new protected repairs feasible or reduce the minimum coefficient cost of existing ones. We characterize joint admissibility and response reachability, and give a finite supervised-learning construction in which the two operations together produce a favorable response absent from either operation alone. We implement protected head repair and fixed-capacity LoRA renewal in Qwen2.5-32B with AdamW, under replay and output distillation. Across two training trajectories differing in seed and within-task example order, the coordinated policy achieves higher teacher-forced Exact than either separate policy in all four comparisons. It also has the lowest macro NLL under both learning rules on the second trajectory. The implementations realize structure-conditioned self-regulation within specified information and action constraints: accessible state readouts and arrived evidence guide repairs and structural renewals, and ordinary learning continues from the modified state.

Testing quantum software is challenging because quantum states cannot be directly inspected. Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) are a particularly important target as they are among the most promising approaches for near-term noisy quantum hardware. Many testing methods rely on classically computed results, which conflicts with the regime where quantum advantage is expected. Although prior studies mitigate this oracle problem, the core difficulty remains that existing approaches do not verify whether the execution deviates from the intended problem or whether the obtained solution is physically plausible. We propose a symmetry-oriented testing framework for VQAs that addresses this gap by using operators commuting with the target Hamiltonian as test specifications. The framework provides two complementary diagnostics: a commutator-based health check that monitors whether each execution step during optimization remains consistent with the symmetry of the target Hamiltonian, and a variance-based acceptance check that assesses the converged solution by examining whether the state is an eigenstate of the symmetry operators. Both diagnostics derive from the problem structure and do not require the exact solution. We evaluate the framework on representative user- and system-side faults, across multiple target systems, and under injected noise. Results show that the two diagnostics detect faulty behavior, provide informative signals of solution quality, and remain useful under noisy execution.

A typed decision maps evidence, a question and a fixed set of options to a probability for every option, computed in one forward pass, by reading a language model's logits or a small head over its hidden states, instead of generating and parsing text. The commercial system Jev popularised this System~1 interface, and open reproductions have followed. We report two uses of the pattern. \emph{Part I} describes an in-house System~1 judge that triages about 148K agentic coding session records for a training corpus. It replaces a frontier LLM judge that cost on the order of \$1,000 per pass and whose stored labels matched a fresh two-judge consensus on only 26.9\% of the sessions where the two judges agreed; a self-hosted frozen backbone with a rank-16 LoRA adapter and a pointer head answers three typed questions in one forward pass, judges 1,000 sessions in about three minutes of one GPU, about \$0.06 at a reference rate and roughly 1\% of the frontier judge's cost, and keeps every session inside the organisation. \emph{Part II} asks whether a readout that adds no parameters can be competitive and whether training one helps. Applying the public Eikos recipe and corpus of about 25K decisions to three further backbones (1B, 2B and 35B), we read the frozen output layer of a LoRA-adapted decoder. On the 111 public hard items of JevBench our single-seed 35B, developed with those items in view, scores 79.3\%, not significantly different from the commercial reference (73.0\%, unadjusted $p=0.12$) and ahead of five open systems after Holm--Bonferroni correction; our 2B is ahead of all four kev checkpoints on the leaderboard. A single-seed ablation finds no detectable benefit from training the 26 letter rows of the output layer, and a retrain on a later corpus release moves the 2B's hard-tier accuracy by 11.7 points, which shows how little small evaluations resolve.

Specular chains concentrate important transport in small regions of path space and the structure depends on chain topology. We introduce ART-MPG, a compact neural model that samples chain length, an autoregressive reflection/transmission (R/T) string, and a direction from a topology-conditioned four-component von Mises-Fisher (vMF) mixture. We extend the repeated trial weighting in Manifold Path Guiding (MPG) by conditioning retry sampling on both chain length and the sampled R/T string, accounting for its known mass outside the stochastic re-hit trials. For a fixed proposal and target chain, this preserves the ideal expectation while reducing the expected retry count and reciprocal-estimator variance compared with retries conditioned on chain length alone. We distinguish the formal unbiasedness result from the capped and clamped renderer used in experiments. We evaluate fourteen scenes across a range of samples per pixel (SPP) against existing online and offline rendering algorithms. Our method consistently produces lower mean squared error at equal SPP than the online and offline baselines, with lower standard deviation across runs.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown considerable promise in synthesizing formal specifications from source code. However, existing approaches primarily focus on functional contracts and loop invariants, while largely neglecting frame conditions, which specify the memory locations that may or may not be modified during execution and constitute an essential part of formal specifications. To address this limitation, we propose an LLM-based approach for synthesizing ACSL frame specifications alongside functional contracts from C code. Our approach analyzes code property graphs (CPGs) to extract frame-relevant information from the input code and leverages this information to guide the LLM in generating accurate frame conditions. The resulting specifications capture both region-separation constraints and data dependencies that govern variable modifications. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. On a benchmark of 84 ACSL-compliant functions from non-trivial real-world systems, our method successfully synthesizes error-free frame specifications for 92.9% of the functions, representing a 179% relative improvement over state-of-the-art techniques. On a second benchmark consisting of 51 functions, the success rate increases from 80.4% to 96.1%. Furthermore, when integrated as an auxiliary component into existing LLM-based ACSL-synthesis frameworks, our approach improves frame-specification generation performance by up to 61.9%.

We introduce HumanCentric-Scenes-AI, a human-curated dataset of 296 AI-generated stimuli that depict people across four contexts in which people encounter AI-generated media. The Surveillance subset contains 85 AI-generated CCTV-style images. The Occupations subset contains 128 AI-generated occupational portraits in a balanced paired design covering 64 occupations with one female and one male version of each. The AI-edited subset contains 27 real photographs in which a region was altered or replaced by a generative model. The Video subset contains 56 AI-generated short videos. We curated the images and videos manually over multiple rounds to make them as photorealistic as possible. For each stimulus we release the file, the generation prompt where recorded, and per-stimulus metadata. We report depicted-gender distributions from an initial set of 134 generations without a specified gender and compare them with U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics occupational gender shares. We report edit-region size and its association with zero-shot detection difficulty for the AI-edited subset. We report image-quality distributions for the Surveillance subset and subject-category coverage for the Video subset. HumanCentric-Scenes-AI is intended first for human-perception research, and also for calibration of AI-detection classifiers and bias analysis of generative models.

Explaining a time-series model requires both locating the evidence and extracting meaningful knowledge from it. Yet a single timestep is not a semantic unit: the meaningful patterns live across many samples, not in any one of them. Per-timestep saliency is therefore noisy, high-dimensional, and unstable. Existing methods address this by introducing fixed-size windows and treating them as independent players in a cooperative game. Evaluating a coalition of such players requires defining a ``baseline'' region, which prior work tackles with fixed counterfactuals (e.g., a flat line, noise, or a spectral surrogate). This choice frequently dominates the resulting explanation, obscuring the model's true decisions. To address these issues, we propose GRAIL, a region-based time-series explanation framework that uses domain-specific intervals, such as the P-wave and the QRS complex of an electrocardiogram (ECG) beat, as players. We describe each region with human-readable features and generate counterfactual baselines with an on-manifold conditional generator. Such a choice of players also admits non-temporal features: static covariates enter as singleton players attributed with the temporal regions on one scale, so a patient's tabular evidence (e.g., age, sex) is weighed directly against the signal. We attribute the predictions to the features via Owen values with common-random-number variance reduction. Experimental results on both synthetic and real data show that the proposed framework produces faithful and robust explanations, evaluated under matched on- and off-manifold operators, offering meaningful knowledge to domain experts.

Dropout and zoneout are routinely added to long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) networks, but, to our knowledge, their placements have not been crossed with gate initialisation in a factorial design, and it is not known whether early gradient propagation tells which runs will learn long dependencies. We trained one-layer LSTMs and GRUs on the adding problem and on delayed recall in a factorial grid of 720 runs, crossing conventional and chrono gate initialisation with up to six recurrent regulariser placements at one rate each, with pre-specified follow-ups, and recorded how sensitive the final hidden state was to the input at every lag. Because both tasks supply fresh or exhaustive training data, the study measures the regularisers' effects on optimisation and does not assess generalisation from a finite training set. At lengths chosen to make conventional initialisation difficult, all 360 chrono-initialised runs reached the validation criterion within 5000 updates, as did 119 of 120 unregularised runs with a horizon about four times too short or too long, whereas conventionally initialised networks learned slowly or did not reach the criterion within the budget at the longer lengths. Under conventional initialisation, dropout generally delayed learning and zoneout helped only in some conditions. The early input sensitivity added little to predicting which conditions learn once the early validation loss was modelled per task, architecture and initialisation. Within conditions, a flatter early decay went with the seeds that learned, but in a pre-specified test the association was modest (concordance 0.61), condition-dependent and not robust to resampling seeds. The results support chrono initialisation, even with a rough horizon, on such tasks.

Currently, dexterous humanoid robot hands are widely considered the final hardware bottleneck that hampers generalist robots from physically assisting people at home and work. As conventional tendon-driven designs suffer from high cost, demanding maintenance, poor reliability, and short durability, alternative linkage-driven designs have increasingly gained attention. Despite their potential to avoid the weaknesses of tendon-driven hands, integrating multiple degrees of actuation (DOA) in a single digit with linkage drivetrains is a challenge for design and fabrication. Only a few studies have managed to present functional humanoid hands that are completely linkage-driven and have at least three DOAs per digit without compromising actuator placement and other design preferences. Our work introduces a new linkage-driven hand featuring a unique flexure hinge. Together with elastic drive rods made of spring steel, the linkage drivetrains are significantly simplified. Unlike other linkage-driven designs of similar dexterity, our design does not require many miniature moving parts. As a result, the hand can be fabricated easily with a budget 3D printer. This not only significantly lowers the barrier to entry for using and developing dexterous humanoid robot hand functions, but also allows the hands to be sized much closer to regular human hands. The design offers desirable kinematic advantages as well. A prototype is evaluated for grasping and object manipulation. In addition, this paper presents our latest findings on kinematics and control of the hand.

Verifier stacks increasingly sit inside post-training and test-time compute loops. We study a specific control loop: a component verifier is evaluated on fresh policy outputs against the full success label and refreshed when that aggregate score falls. For a conjunctive target $y = F \wedge M$, its on-policy AUC is $(1-q)A_{\mathrm{own}} + qA_{\mathrm{cross}}$, where $q = \Pr[F=1 \mid y=0]$. As the policy masters $F$, $q$ can rise toward one, removing weight from $F$-failures and rewarding information about $M$. We call this on-policy audit collapse. We derive a sharp identified set, a complete-erasure threshold, and the exact point at which the audit can prefer a worse component verifier; its population optimum is the full-outcome predictor, not the component oracle. An exact oracle exhibits the collapse, a natural multi-label text control shows inversion can select a head with lower canonical $F$-AUC at the observed failure mixture, and a prediction-registered ECG study shows that acting on the audit can reduce off-policy $F$-AUC, transfer the damage to an unseen generator, and increase downstream constraint violations. Preserving own-failure support prevents the damage. Matching label-complexity bounds and a controlled-mixture audit give the corresponding repair: audit the component on its own failures, and keep those failures in the refresh distribution.

Reinforcement learning for stochastic systems typically optimizes expected cumulative rewards, while reliable and repeatable behavior also depends on how the state distribution evolves over time. Optimizing expected return alone does not guarantee that this distribution converges to a desired target or remains stable. This paper develops a theoretical framework for learning policies that stabilize state distributions. We formulate the problem as a Dissimilarity-based Markov Decision Process (DMDP), in which the policy acts on the current state distribution and the objective measures its dissimilarity to a target distribution. We establish sufficient conditions under which the optimal policy makes the target distribution asymptotically stable. To support policy learning, we introduce a finite-dimensional representation of distributions and show how stability guarantees for its parameter dynamics extend to the underlying state distributions. We further develop certificates for the learned policies, including their deployment using estimated distribution parameters. These results quantify how learning and estimation errors affect the guarantees and identify conditions under which learned policies retain asymptotic stability. For practical implementation, we combine distribution estimates and target-dependent rewards with PPO and SAC. A computable example on a linear system illustrates the proposed theoretical certificates. Furthermore, experiments on a HalfCheetah task demonstrate the benefits of distribution feedback and explicit target matching for regulating the velocity distribution.

Large language model (LLM) agents are often improved by iterating until a fixed verifier is done. Once that verifier saturates, the loop has nothing left to climb. We instead score agents against the current population, and a frozen panel records whether anyone got better. The panel mean can rise inside the seeds by elimination alone. We therefore count a run as training only when its final mean beats the best generation-zero member. A merge is admitted only when the child moves toward the donor, past the child the same operator produces at zero dose, and the lower confidence bound on that movement reaches half the requested dose. That is the admission test. A detectable shortfall rejects the operator, and the test is otherwise undetermined. We keep realised fitness φas the selector and reference performance θas the unused ruler. Every measurement uses gemini-3.1-flash-lite on one negotiation task, and no fixed-oracle arm was run. In the open loop, tactic append grafts short donor rules and is admitted. Free rewrite moves only a third of the requested dose and is rejected. Template append pastes raw donor replies into the child. Its movement clears the bound on the first probe but not on the re-probe, and it is left undetermined. A held-out re-probe on the five situations the merge never saw confirms that both appends move, and it does not rescue free rewrite. Neither append rises with the dose. Constrained rewrite is admitted in the open loop and was not run in the closed loop, which changes only the operator. The population, the scores and the task stay fixed. No free-rewrite run beats the best generation-zero member. Every tactic-append run and every template-append run does. Sampled loop children keep that split. Free rewrite moves no further toward the donor, and both appends still clear the bound, by less than in the open loop.

Coding agents are rapidly advancing from single-file generation to long-horizon repository-scale engineering, yet the evaluation of their capabilities to author interactive extended reality (XR) applications remains an open challenge. Unlike traditional software, XR applications operate within dynamic 3D physical environments where runtime robustness depends jointly on continuous user motion, spatial input, and environmental sensing. We introduce GenXR-Bench, the first benchmark for the end-to-end evaluation of coding agents in XR software development. GenXR-Bench contains 112 expert-authored tasks spanning 24 feature implementations, 21 bug repairs, and 67 application generation tasks. Held-out tests combine scripted and adaptive interactions with programmatic and visual assertions to evaluate core functionality and runtime behavior. GenXR-Bench's testing suite achieves 96.5% accuracy against blinded expert judgments of 124 candidate applications executed on consumer XR hardware. Evaluating 10 models on GenXR-Bench, we find that the strongest configuration achieves only 50.9% overall Pass@1. Failure analysis identifies recurring misunderstandings in asynchronous sensor lifecycles, physical grounding, and embodied interaction semantics. GenXR-Bench establishes a reproducible testbed for evaluating coding agents in the interactive and physically situated conditions of spatial computing.

Speculative decoding accelerates large language models by verifying drafted tokens in parallel. New draft-training objectives are usually credited with the acceptance they add over cross-entropy on externally written responses, yet many pipelines let the target rewrite them. We ask how much of that gain survives. With a vision-language target and a block drafter, we train three objectives on four versions of one corpus: cross-entropy on corpus tokens, token-level distillation from the target, and distillation gated to positions that would survive verification. Distillation and the gate add large gains on external responses, but after greedy regeneration, distillation adds a smaller gain and the gate little or none. The shrinkage persists across data orders, position weights, verifiers, decoding temperatures and, for distillation, initializations and learning rates. Most of it remains at matched supervised length and at each objective's best measured training length. A second vision corpus shows the shrinkage, as does a text-only replication, for distillation also with an autoregressive drafter. Objective gains should therefore be measured against a target-regenerated baseline and across training lengths. Our code is available at https://github.com/js-lee-AI/TargetRegeneration.

Radiation treatment planning requires balancing competing objectives to satisfy clinical criteria while accommodating physicians' preferences. This study aims to develop an evidence-driven, multi-agent compound AI system that integrates DRL-based automated treatment planning with LLM-based conversational plan refinement for proton PBS therapy. A policy network trained using PPO first generates multiple plans without human intervention, from which one is selected as the target plan and the others serve as references for subsequent refinements. For challenging cases requiring further adjustments, an LLM-based multi-agent system enables plan refinement through natural language interactions. The system comprises a planning agent that recommends evidence-supported adjustments, a chatbot providing a unified conversational interface, and an evaluation agent that retrieves clinical metrics and identifies constraint violations. To enhance domain-specific reasoning, the planning agent based on Qwen3-14B is designed to justify its recommendations using evidence from previously generated plans and post-trained on task-specific data using SFT and GRPO. The framework was trained and evaluated using 21 patients with H&N cancers, with 5 PPO-generated plans per patient. Of these, 50 plans were selected for instruction-guided refinement. Compared with the base LLM, the post-trained Qwen3-14B demonstrated improved instruction-following, information retrieval and domain-specific reasoning capabilities. The resulting adjustments more effectively improved user-prioritized objectives while limiting deterioration in competing objectives, yielding more clinically appropriate trade-offs in patient-specific plan refinement. The proposed compound AI system provides a user-friendly planning platform, offering a promising approach to personalized proton PBS treatment planning.

We present a local and sparse kernel method for learning the solution operators of incompressible flows. It builds on our earlier property-preserving kernel method, whose global output reconstruction and dense operator regression scale poorly. Our method replaces the global output reconstruction by local divergence-free interpolants with divergence-free polynomials of any degree, solved in parallel on the GPU. These interpolants are divergence free, periodic on periodic domains, and, with a multiscale kernel, approach Kolmogorov statistics under refinement. A compactly supported kernel, positive semidefinite in any input dimension, makes the operator regression sparse. Its support radius, and hence the sparsity, is fitted to data, and optional affine polynomials in the input capture global trends. Operator Lagrange weights join the two. They cost one sparse solve per new input and act on the training fields before the output reconstruction, so their local coefficients are never formed. We show that, unlike direct evaluation, Lagrange evaluation does not amplify solve errors by the cancellation among spatial coefficients. On ten fluid benchmarks, validation selects sparse matrices nearly everywhere, with densities that mostly decrease as the training set grows, and affine augmentation lowers the error by more than an order of magnitude for forced isotropic turbulence. These sparse models are at least as accurate as our earlier dense method and more accurate than neural operators. Lagrange evaluation is as accurate as direct evaluation with local output reconstructions, and up to nearly three orders of magnitude more accurate with global ones. We also present GPU timings and storage.

In recent years, automated fruit classification systems have become a more critical component in precision agriculture for efficient yield estimation, quality control, and supply chain optimization. However, they still face significant challenges under varying quality, fruit maturity, illumination, texture degradation, morphological attributes, domain shift, and post-harvest handling conditions. In this study, we address the challenging issue of cross-grade banana variety classification. This is a real-world setting where models that have been trained on specific quality grades must generalize to unseen grades to handle significant domain shift. Under a rigorous Leave-One-Grade-Out evaluation protocol, we present a thorough comparative analysis of CNNs, ViTs, and dual-stream hybrid architectures using a large-scale dataset of 31,678 banana images with three varieties and three quality grades. Specifically, to address the drawbacks of single-paradigm frameworks, we present a dual-stream Swin ResNet hybrid framework enhanced with KL-divergence-based self-distillation to align probabilistic feature representations across the CNN and Transformer streams. Comprehensive experimental analyzes show that the presented hybrid framework with KL-divergence based self-distillation achieves better overall performance, i.e., it attains a mean accuracy of 81.25% and significantly surpasses CNN and Transformer baseline models. Qualitative analysis further confirms that the hybrid framework in this study improves discriminative feature transferability, improves attention localization, and stabilizes optimization.

We study a jump-modified Wasserstein gradient flow of the squared maximum mean discrepancy generated by the energy kernels $K(z)=-|z|^q$, $0<q<2$, in every dimension $d\ge2$ as well as the one-dimensional range $1\le q<2$. Under subcritical density and finite-moment assumptions, we prove global well-posedness. The added jumps transfer mass toward smaller values of the first variation and dissipate the same MMD energy as the transport term. Under our hypotheses on the target and jump rates, every Borel probability measure with finite MMD energy and zero jump dissipation is equal to the target. Combining this rigidity with compactness and a second-moment identity yields convergence to the target from finite-second-moment data, without additional uniform-in-time density or moment assumptions. We also construct a global collision-free particle process whose energy is nonincreasing along each path. A quantitative mean-field estimate applies to general initial empirical approximations, including deterministic configurations; propagation of chaos for exchangeable data and long-time target approximation follow as consequences.

A central obstacle to self-improving agents is the absence of a reliable fitness signal for realistic stateful tasks. We introduce \textsc{VeriEvolve}, an evaluator-first evolution framework that constructs this missing evaluation layer before optimizing the agent. From task instruction, VeriEvolve synthesizes instruction-grounded challenge states and an executable evaluator that checks them. During each round of workflow evolution, the evaluator is frozen and serves as the fitness signal. Between rounds, VeriEvolve revises the evaluator by converting the end states of strong and weak runs into a pair of counterfactual test cases. Across all 30 MCPMark Filesystem tasks, VeriEvolve constructs 30 evaluators with 141 challenge states, achieving 141/141 agreement on the generated suites and 113/122 agreement on held-out states produced by executor agents. Evaluator-guided evolution increases externally verified success from 6/30 to 18/30 for GLM-5.2 and from 27/30 to 30/30 for Claude; refinement removes all three false positives that the weak executor exposes. Cross-environment studies on PostgreSQL, Playwright, Notion, and GitHub further expose complementary limits from observability, state representation, and search/execution capacity. These results show that executable evaluators can be synthesized and used to guide search when task success is observable and an external verifier is available for calibration.

Long-horizon agentic reinforcement learning (RL) requires both efficient rollout generation and training on long sequences. However, the memory requirements and model-specific operators of Qwen3.8-Flash-Next make this difficult with existing open-source implementations. To resolve these limitations, we introduce FlashNext-RL, a model-specific RL training optimization framework based on prime-rl, with vLLM for software engineering (SWE) rollout generation. Our main focus is BF16 training of the full 48-layer model on a single 8xB200 node, with the first two layers, the n-gram table, the sparse-attention indexer and the multi-token prediction head frozen. We optimize host offload, gradient accumulation and the kernels for mixture-of-experts, sparse attention and the gated residual stream. In the full-model development study, non-padding training throughput increases from approximately 395 tokens/s/GPU in the initial 32K-token configuration to 4,438 tokens/s/GPU in the optimized 131K-token configuration, with hardware matmul throughput (aka without considering the cost of attention components) increasing from approximately 20 to 213 TFLOPs/GPU. A controlled cumulative study on an 8-layer model further quantifies the contributions of individual optimizations. Together with three inference nodes, the system supports a live SWE RL run with a target batch of 1,024 trainable rollouts and a 131,072-token context limit. Over steps 5-15, an iteration takes 22.4 minutes on average, with bounded entropy and trainer-sampler mismatch KL. These results highlight the importance of tailoring RL training to the model's architecture, memory layout and kernel requirements, rather than relying only on general-purpose RL infrastructure.

Tokenization that partitions time series into subsequences has become a foundational paradigm in modern time series modeling. However, we find that current tokenization strategies inherently introduce spectral distortions, forcing the learned representations to diverge from the true underlying patterns such as trend, periodicity, and seasonality, thereby impairing model performance. Through theoretical analysis from a frequency perspective, we derive the boundary conditions under which such distortions occur. To overcome this distortion, we propose TimeFT, a nearly distortion-free frequency-based tokenizer for time series data. TimeFT obtains tokens through frequency-domain partitioning, frequency shifting, and Nyquist sampling. The method is parameter-free, incurs negligible computational complexity, and can serve as a drop-in replacement for existing tokenizers. Our extensive experiments on diverse tasks such as forecasting, classification, and anomaly detection demonstrate that TimeFT consistently and significantly improves performance.

We address the Diverse Traveling Salesman Problem (D-TSP) that seeks a set of $k$ distinct TSP tours. Each selected tour must not exceed a prescribed multiple of the optimal tour length, while the maximum pairwise Jaccard similarity within the selected set is minimized. This formulation is important for applications requiring both solution quality and fault tolerance, such as logistics planning, robotics, and strategic patrolling. We propose a novel hybrid framework that decomposes D-TSP into a sampling stage and a selection stage. The selection stage is a max-min dispersion problem, for which any approximation better than a factor of two is NP-hard; we therefore focus on the sampling stage. Our contributions are both theoretical and empirical. Theoretically, we give two end-to-end guarantees for the optimal sampling distribution, from two perspectives: including an optimal set in the sampled pool, or having at least $k$ mutually distant tours in the pool. The second reduces the number of samples from exponential to linear in $k$, at the cost of weakening the benchmark from the best $k$ tours to the best $βk$ for some $β> 1$. For practical use, we prove that a pipeline that samples spanning trees and then converts to tours does not hurt the quality of the pool in principle. Empirically, both objectives are learnable, and our experiments not only validate the analysis but also outperform the baselines on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution instances, by a single trained model with no fine-tuning.

Although large language models (LLMs) encode language in highly distributed spaces, they remain vulnerable to focal disruptions---a phenomenon strikingly similar to how localized brain damage causes clinical aphasia in humans. To investigate this theoretical tension, we ask whether LLMs possess a functional structure analogous to the human language system, by introducing a novel mechanistic interpretability framework inspired by aphasia. Through two complementary approaches, classifier-guided lesioning and continuous activation steering, we systematically induce aphasia-like breakdowns in LLMs. We find that language functions can be successfully isolated to discrete structural circuits and continuous representational vectors, yet these functions remain densely entangled with significant circuit overlap and vector similarities across distinct aphasic profiles. Furthermore, while steering generalizes robustly across downstream tasks, structural lesioning remains asymmetrically constrained. By bridging neuropsychology and mechanistic interpretability, we demonstrate that LLMs, functionally analogous to biological brains, rely on a densely entangled architecture that can be systematically mapped through clinically-informed interventions.

Diffusion and flow models provide expressive policy classes for robotic and sequential decision-making systems. However, their action likelihoods are generally intractable, limiting the direct use of widely adopted policy optimization methods such as PPO and GRPO. We propose Doob Policy Optimization (DoobPO), a framework that leverages Doob's $h$-transform for likelihood-free reinforcement learning fine-tuning of generative policies. DoobPO separates policy improvement from generative policy learning. It first learns a lightweight ratio model that represents the desired policy update, and then distills the resulting ratio-tilted target policy into the generative policy via conditional drift matching. This formulation applies uniformly to both diffusion and flow policies and supports a broad family of policy improvement rules, including PPO and GRPO. We prove that the practical conditional drift matching objective is gradient-equivalent to the ideal Doob drift matching objective. We further show that the induced diffusion process solves an endpoint-constrained stochastic optimal control problem. This establishes that it achieves the minimum-energy modification required to realize the desired policy tilt. Across MuJoCo continuous-control benchmarks, DoobPO achieves strong performance against competitive diffusion- and flow-policy baselines, showing a principled and practical route to RL fine-tuning for generative policies.

Customized agent deployments define policies over tools, resources, and execution conditions. Providing these policies in the task agent's prompt does not reliably prevent violations. Training a guard requires examples of tool calls that comply with or violate those policies. We introduce AgentPolicyForge, a framework that uses executable environments to construct policy benchmarks and iteratively train policy guards. With this framework, we construct PolicyGym, a dataset across ten policy families using 698 scenarios for training data generation and 254 separate held-out scenarios for human-reviewed test sets. Tool calls are executed and their outcomes recorded to help determine whether they comply with the policy. Every violating case uses a permitted tool, requiring checks of arguments, resources, and context rather than tool identity alone. The case construction process supports iterative guard training: an attacker generates requests using retrieved strategies, and the guard is fine-tuned on balanced, environment-verified examples. Training improves policy enforcement even with a fixed archive. Updating the archive further reduces in-domain attack success compared with keeping it fixed. We compare policy-aware task agent self-regulation with a trained policy guard. On PolicyGym, the final guard-based configuration achieves a 40-44% relative reduction in attack success rate and fewer benign rejections than policy prompting alone.

Indirect prompt injection (IPI) attacks, in which adversarial instructions are embedded in external data processed by a language model, pose a significant threat to the integrity of deployed LLM agents. Attention Tracker (Hung et al., 2025) is a recently proposed white-box detection method that identifies prompt injection attacks by monitoring how a model's attention is distributed between user task tokens and data tokens, claiming dataset-agnostic detection via a scalar focus score threshold. In this paper, we provide the first evaluation of Attention Tracker in a realistic agentic IPI setting using the AgentDojo benchmark, finding that the dataset agnosticism claim does not hold. We find that in agentic environments, long structured tool outputs subvert the fundamental assumptions Attention Tracker makes about attention that the method depends on and produces near-chance detection on AgentDojo across most model families. We propose AttnDA, an extension replacing the scalar threshold with a Fisher Linear Discriminant Analysis classifier over the per-head focus score vector, and evaluate both methods in a cross-dataset setting spanning four benchmarks. AttnDA improves detection performance across agentic and tool-integrated benchmarks, though transfer to AgentDojo remains challenging regardless of classifier choice. A covariance ablation further shows that removing inter-head correlation structure substantially contributes to performance, with complex covariance assumptions causing significant degradation on cross-domain data. These results indicate that the attentional distraction signal underlying focus-score-based detection does not transfer reliably to agentic environments, and that learned linear classifiers over head-level attention features offer improved detection performance, provided training data from the target deployment domain is available.

Persistent memory is a largely undefended surface for injection and poisoning, and the same risk limits memory sharing among agents. We present PerMIT, a memory architecture with provable integrity guarantees under an explicit trust assumption: only user-typed inputs and values confirmed at a gate are trusted. PerMIT mediates the release and use of untrusted environment-derived values through a finite memory interface, while preserving agent-driven multi-turn planning and tool choice. Over this finite interface, we prove two integrity theorems that are also machine-checked in Lean 4, which together ensure that environment-derived memory reaches a sensitive action only if confirmed at the gate and influences the agent's behavior only through what the gate displays. Every attack in our threat model thereby reduces to a single auditable decision, which a human, an LLM verifier, or both can make in practice. On Trojan Hippo, PerMIT records zero observed attack success with self-verification and lightweight verifiers. Because each confirmation is a logged verdict on exact content, endorsements accumulate across users, and sufficiently endorsed items become community-confirmed with no further verification required. Under explicit assumptions, we prove and corroborate in simulation a co-scaling property: as the community grows, the risks of promoting poison and of wrongly evicting benign knowledge fall, while per-user verification effort does not rise. On $τ^2$-bench, communities of up to 90 autonomous agents use PerMIT to build shared knowledge bases with no direct memory injection promoted, and the resulting knowledge significantly improves new agents on held-out tasks, suggesting a path toward agents that safely self-improve at test time.

While large language models are increasingly deployed as tool-calling agents, their safety evaluations still focus primarily on their ability to refuse harmful requests in text. We investigate whether the refusal behavior in text transfers to tool use. We construct a benchmark of 2,304 prompts across four domains, consisting of matched triplets that present the same harmful or benign request in text-only, standard tool-enabled, and adversarially framed tool-enabled settings. We then assess tool-call safety using 20 predefined forbidden actions. Testing five models of varying sizes and families, we find that requests refused in text frequently result in unsafe tool calls. Under standard tool-enabled prompting, this divergence occurs for 10-52 percent of harmful requests refused in chat. To mechanistically investigate this gap, we identify a refusal-associated direction in the residual stream of each of the five models. We find that in tool-enabled contexts, the activations along this direction decrease in four of five models. Furthermore, lower activation predicts unsafe tool calls across all five models (AUC 0.76-0.86). However, restoring the signal to the respective text-only value through activation patching only prevents a subset of unsafe calls, primarily by suppressing tool use rather than by producing safer calls. Steering along the refusal direction nearly eliminates unsafe calls only at strengths that also suppress benign tool use or degrade the output quality. Our findings indicate that the identified refusal direction contributes to whether a model acts, but only partially explains the refusal divergence. Therefore, evaluating the safety of tool-calling agents requires directly examining their actions along with their textual responses.

Many problems in signal processing, machine learning, and neuroimaging provide several jointly observed measurements of one process, each mixing a component common to all of them with a component private to itself, and require the common component to be recovered without supervision. This problem has been studied in several communities, largely independently. Statisticians proposed canonical correlation analysis (CCA), introduced by Hotelling in 1936. Information theorists proposed two notions of common information, due to Gács and Körner and to Wyner. Engineers developed subspace methods for sensor arrays and multiuser communications to design multiview receivers. This tutorial presents the main results and tools each community developed for this problem in a single exposition, and explains the connections that emerge where they meet, distinguishing exact equivalences from special cases and analogies. We develop the information-theoretic foundation from first principles. We then introduce CCA and its extension to several views, followed by the engineering thread from blind multiuser detection to CCA as a blind receiver. Next, we turn to nonlinear CCA, covering kernel, deep, and probabilistic formulations, the conditions under which the common factor is identifiable, and connections to self-supervised learning. We conclude with a discussion of further extensions and open directions. The exposition is self-contained, so that readers from each of these communities can follow the parts developed by the others.

In-context reinforcement learning (ICRL) exploits the impressive in-context learning ability of large language models to zero-shot generalize to new, unseen tasks at inference time without any parameter updates. Among many approaches, the Decision-Pretrained Transformer (DPT) is particularly appealing for its theoretical grounding: under idealized assumptions such as a sufficiently expressive model and infinite pretraining data, DPT can perform Bayesian posterior sampling. Whether this characterization survives in practice remains open. Therefore, we ask: \textit{is ICRL, specifically DPT and our proposed DPT variants, a Bayesian posterior sampler in practice?} To approach this question, we establish two necessary conditions that a Bayesian posterior sampler must satisfy: \textit{sufficient-statistic invariance} and the \textit{martingale property}. We then construct statistical hypothesis tests to statistically assess if practically-trained ICRL models satisfy these conditions. Applying these tests in Gaussian, Bernoulli, and linear bandit settings, we find that both conditions are consistently violated, suggesting that ICRL may not behave as Bayesian posterior samplers in practice. Beyond this negative result, our tests provide a principled toolkit for testing the Bayesian behavior of ICRL.

Continuous glucose monitoring supports diabetes management but requires forecasting models that are accurate, interpretable, and efficient enough for real-time deployment. We present SSMCGM-Stream, a streaming state-space model that maintains a personalized hidden state updated with each incoming glucose reading to provide constant-time forecasting, physiologically structured counterfactual reasoning, and interpretable forecasts through hidden-state attribution. Built on this foundation, SSMCGM-Agent delivers risk-aware, natural-language decision support by translating forecasts, explanations, and counterfactuals into grounded recommendations through a guarded language-model interface. Evaluated on the T1DEXI cohort, SSMCGM-Stream achieves forecasting performance comparable to strong neural baselines while substantially reducing computational cost, enabling continuous on-device diabetes decision support.

Muon orthogonalizes a weight matrix's momentum before each step, and on neural networks this simple preconditioner beats AdamW in a wide range of tasks. Existing analyses explain Muon within general optimization frameworks or on a few specific models, and many of them view orthogonalization as a preconditioner. Since the Hessian is the optimal preconditioner under a quadratic approximation of the loss, these works leave a basic question open: what makes orthogonalization suited to the Hessian of a neural network? Prior work shows that the layer-wise Hessian of a neural network is row-block diagonally dominant, and Muon's implicit preconditioner, the Kronecker product $(\mathbf{V}\mathbf{V}^\top)^{1/2}\otimes\mathbf{I}$ with $\mathbf{V}$ the momentum, has the same row-block structure exactly when $\mathbf{V}\mathbf{V}^\top$ is diagonally dominant. Diagonal dominance of $\mathbf{V}\mathbf{V}^\top$ has been observed in language models, but why a neural network produces it has not been explained. This work provides a quantitative asymptotic theory for neural networks at initialization, and points out the intuition that the overparameterization of the weight matrices drives the diagonal dominance. We analyze $\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{G}\mathbf{G}^\top]$, which equals $\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{V}\mathbf{V}^\top]$ at initialization, in four canonical models: symmetric matrix factorization, deep linear networks, two-layer ReLU networks, and single-layer linear attention. In each case the diagonal entries outgrow the off-diagonal ones at explicit rates as the hidden dimensions grow; for the query, key and value weights of attention the off-diagonal vanishes altogether. Simulations of the four models and experiments on language models at initialization confirm the predicted scaling.

Enhanced Rock Weathering (ERW) is a carbon removal solution with the potential to remove gigatons of CO$_2$ per year, but quantifying that removal today requires dense soil sampling and laboratory analysis. We evaluate five weather Foundation Models (FMs) as frozen encoders feeding lightweight decoders, under a leave-one-field-out protocol on 5,192 chronosequences from 264 fields across Brazil and the US. To our knowledge, this is the first holistic evaluation of weather FMs for ERW and the largest evaluation on operational ERW data. We find that across weather FMs, representations transfer to ERW: our best model, TerraNova-ERW, built on Aurora 1.5, positively orders measurements within fields it has never seen. Zero-shot prediction of a new field's mean removal is not yet feasible, and we attribute this to data scale: the same architecture excels on $\sim$$10^5$ natural-weathering sequences, anchoring the scale we expect ERW data must reach. Few-shot prediction, blending the model with a few samples per field, is supported today: TerraNova-ERW recovers over 60% of the highest-removal fields with two samples per field, roughly halves the samples needed to estimate a field's mean removal, and can cut sampling on our densest fields by 28-98%.

Clinical registries and wearable sensors support early health-risk assessment, yet models trained on these records may leak sensitive information when released. Differential privacy (DP) bounds this leakage by injecting noise whose total magnitude grows with the number of trainable parameters, a cost especially severe for small health cohorts. This motivates parameter efficient models including quantum machine learning (QML), whose variational circuits can represent complex decision boundaries with few trainable parameters. It raises a question: at matched input dimensionality and privacy budget, does a quantum model retain more utility than a classical one? We investigate this question on three clinical cohorts and one wearable cohort, treating each clinical record or participant as a privacy unit. We compare capacity-matched quantum, multilayer perceptron, and logistic regression models across five privacy budgets and five seeds. The quantum model leads on three clinical cohorts by up to 0.104 ROC AUC averaged across budgets; however, trails on the wearable cohort, where the small number of participants requires substantial noise. No difference survives Holm correction across 24 tests, so these results indicate a trend rather than a quantum advantage. An analytic gradient bound shows that lower clipping thresholds can improve utility by reducing noise despite clipping bias. Finally, an experiment on IBM quantum computer (ibm_fez, a 156-qubit superconducting processor) using eight fixed test cases yields mean absolute probability errors of 0.046 (private) and 0.063 (non-private) relative to simulation, supporting the feasibility of inference on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/TITANS-Lab-Artifacts/DP-QML-Health.

Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in multi-agent systems (MAS) to accomplish complex tasks. Prior black-box red-teaming attacks mainly focus on single agents, but we find that these methods are far less effective in MAS, where multiple sub-agents may not directly interact with the user. Therefore, we introduce ReMAS, the first reinforcement learning-based red-teaming framework tailored to MASs, which fine-tunes attacker LLMs to generate effective adversarial prompts for system prompt extraction. The framework follows a two-step process: first, a rewrite stage refines base attack prompts to increase extraction success, and second, a template generation stage constructs attack templates that improve the likelihood of invoking specific sub-agents and thus revealing their system prompts. Extensive experiments show that our method substantially improves attack success rates compared to existing black-box attacks, with transferability across different backend LLMs and MAS structures. These results underscore the vulnerabilities of multi-agent systems and the importance of developing stronger defenses against adaptive black-box adversaries.

As quantum computing moves from the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era toward early fault-tolerant quantum computing (EFTQC), quantum-enhanced AI is shifting from a conceptual idea to experimental research. Quantum components are expected to extend the capabilities of existing AI systems, yet it remains unclear how such components will help within large multimodal models. In this study, we try to answer that question for vision-language models (VLMs) using classically simulated quantum layers. With LLaVA-OneVision as the backbone, we evaluate 4- and 8-qubit basic-ring and strongly entangling circuits at four insertion and four replacement locations. Insertion adds quantum layers to the classical model, while replacement substitutes them for classical components. Using the same setup, we compare performance and computational cost between classical and quantum-classical hybrid models. On the Visual Spatial Reasoning dataset, inserting a quantum layer after the visual projector reaches 80.7% development accuracy, 2.28 percentage-points above classical full fine-tuning. Replacing the final decoder feed-forward sublayer retains 79.22% accuracy with 13.07 million fewer trainable parameters. Quantum insertion can thus improve accuracy, and selective replacement can reduce parameters. These benefits depend strongly on where the quantum layer is inserted or which classical component it replaces: earlier replacements lower accuracy, and fewer parameters do not reliably shorten training or reduce computation. To assess potential security benefits, we evaluated the robustness of quantum-classical hybrid models under six attack settings. Overall, our study maps where quantum layers help and hurt within VLMs, offering a starting point for hybrid VLM design; whether these gains generalize remains open. The code is available at https://github.com/TITANS-Lab-Artifacts/QuantumVLM.

Transformers are deployed as a special model class. Neural processing units (NPU) add dedicated operators for attention and normalization, and quantization relies on Transformer-specific algorithms. We show the computation does not force this. Every Transformer block, with attention, LayerNorm and a GELU MLP, compiles exactly into a generic deep neural network built from fixed affine maps, routing and the square, sigmoid and inverse square root, plus GELU or its sigmoid approximation. Without activation-activation products, every transform-wise compilation adds at least $N^2$ scalar nonlinear evaluations per head for dense scores. Keeping that one operation type removes this cost; its elementwise form, present on every surveyed NPU, suffices with the sigmoid and inverse square root. For top-$k$ attention with exchangeable tail scores, we prove that exact or conditional-mean tail mass gives an unbiased, minimum-mean-square-error estimate of the attention distribution, while tail drop is conditionally biased. When queries or agents cluster, centroids choose the keys first, reducing the number of computed scores from $N^2$ to $Nk$ per head. On DeiT-Tiny, MambaIRv2-Light and Pythia-70M the compiled models match their references with all keys, standard post-training quantization applies, and the exact tail-mass estimate beats tail dropping with half as many keys on DeiT-Tiny and, for $k\le8$, on Pythia-70M.

Scanning every passage in a long document seems thorough, but does it preserve more useful evidence or produce better answers? We compare 11 retrieval configurations spanning lexical and dense search, hybrid reranking, and full-document scanning with Jev, OpenAI Decisions, and Cloudflare Clef. Our evaluation uses 396 QASPER questions and 80 questions from eight complete textbooks, with common passages, a five-passage limit, and a fixed answer generator. On books, Hybrid + Jev achieves the highest observed evidence coverage (94.1%), compared with 88.7% for Jev full scan and 81.3\% for OpenAI dense retrieval. Full scans examine every passage initially, yet later reduction steps can discard relevant evidence. Higher evidence coverage also does not consistently produce better answers: Hybrid + Decisions achieves the highest observed book Answer Accuracy among retrieval methods (0.892), despite recovering less reference evidence. Full scanning incurs substantially higher latency on books under the tested deployments, while reusable dense retrieval has lower projected API cost than paid decision-based methods as queries accumulate. Most QASPER articles already fit within the hybrid candidate pool, limiting the benefit of scanning. These results highlight evidence retention, answer quality, and reuse cost as complementary criteria for choosing a long-document retrieval strategy.

Safe robotic task planning requires planners that can reliably achieve task goals while satisfying safety constraints. Classical planners search over explicit symbolic task representations and can provide formal guarantees with respect to encoded safety constraints, but require rigid input formats. Their computational cost also increases rapidly with the search space. In contrast, large language models (LLMs) offer flexible task interfaces and strong generalization capabilities, but they are large, power-hungry, and pre-trained with little robot-specific safety data and knowledge. Thus, they can be difficult to deploy locally on robotic systems with limited resources. To address these limitations, we present SLoSa, a neuro-symbolic compression and fine-tuning framework for training foundation-model-based robotic task planners with Small size, Low power demand, and Safety awareness. The framework first constructs a safety-aware dataset using classical planners, an advanced teacher LLM, and formal verifiers, followed by two training stages: supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning (RL) fine-tuning guided by a verification-based reward machine to enforce safety alignment. We evaluate SLoSa across four Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) domains, two household simulation environments, local edge platforms, and a desktop robotic arm. Across the PDDL tasks, verifier-guided post-training raises the success rate of compact 4B-14B planners to 70.5-76.0%, while INT4 deployment on a Jetson Orin requires 17.85-26.41 W of average power. Results in household simulators and on the physical robot further demonstrate the applicability of SLoSa across diverse robotic task settings.

We present HyperDrone, an extremely fast quadrotor simulator focused on high-performance batch rendering that is more than 20x faster than existing state-of-the-art batch quadrotor simulators. HyperDrone combines highly optimized multirotor dynamics with HyperLux, a new ray-tracing engine that supports Nvidia OptiX, Vulkan, Apple Metal and WebGPU backends that takes full advantage of modern ray-tracing hardware, capable of running both components entirely on the GPU. HyperLux renders RGB, depth, semantic/instance segmentation, surface normals and optical flow observations at configurable levels of fidelity, including reflections, realistic lighting, motion blur, anti-aliasing, and Physically Based Rendering (PBR). Even in the highest-fidelity settings, HyperLux achieves millions of Frames Per Second (FPS) on consumer-grade GPUs while rendering realistic 3D scenes. We demonstrate the merits of HyperDrone by training a vision-based yaw-control policy purely in simulation and transferring it to a real small-scale quadrotor (Crazyflie) with a camera, running completely onboard.

Conventional wafer defect analysis relies on offline, closed-world classifiers that fail to detect novel, unseen defect signatures emerging during continuous semiconductor manufacturing. To address this, we propose WaferHDC, an online open-world wafer defect discovery framework based on hyperdimensional computing (HDC). The memory-centric architecture of WaferHDC enables rapid anomaly detection and grouping of recurring failures into compact hypervector representations. This allows the memory space to dynamically scale with new defect modes without retraining a static classifier or archiving entire raw wafer history. WaferHDC first models normal spatial distributions, then dynamically groups recurring failures into persistent defect memory without labels or predefined class counts. It outperforms the strongest online baseline by 13.3 p.p. in adjusted Rand index and 10.5 p.p. in normalized mutual information on the industry-standard WM-811K dataset. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of WaferHDC for continuous and open-world wafer defect analysis.

NVIDIA tensor cores have supported 2:4 semi-structured sparsity since Ampere, and the pattern composes with quantization. When the two are combined, the practical question is which step to take next: from a given precision, add 2:4 sparsity or drop to the next lower precision? We compare the two at equal bits, with sparsity metadata counted, and at equal nominal tensor-core tiers, over all six GEMM operands of a transformer layer, with kernels measured on three GPU generations and online pruning and quantization included. Our results show that as long as a lower precision is available, adding 2:4 is the worse step, both less accurate and slower, because the energy that 2:4 discards from each group of four along the hardware-forced axis does not shrink with bits, while quantization error does. Once quantization reaches the lowest precision the hardware supports, 2:4 still speeds up linear layers by 1.3--1.7\x{}, and on an H100 a retrained 2:4 model served in FP8 by vLLM reaches 27\% higher prefill throughput than the dense FP8 model, with GSM8K accuracy on par. Its quality has to be won back by retraining, however, which restores perplexity long before reasoning; on Blackwell, whose sparse FP4 uses a pairwise 4:8 pattern, the loss is larger and our retraining budget did not recover it.

Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly expected to interact with environments and improve their decisions during deployment. However, how anticipating future outcomes and drawing on accumulated interaction experience can jointly support decision-making remains underexplored. We propose a test-time framework, inspired by Model Predictive Path Integral (MPPI) control, that combines multi-branch predictive analysis with experience-based adaptation. At each step, the agent proposes multiple candidate actions and imagines their outcomes with a world model, so that alternatives can be compared without being executed in the environment. Since language environments provide neither explicit dynamics nor costs, the predicted outcomes are evaluated for task progress and risk, and MPPI-style weights over the resulting costs guide the final decision. A dual-branch experience memory enables self-improvement: the planner branch refines candidate generation and action selection, while the world model branch improves next-observation prediction. Experiments on ALFWorld and ScienceWorld across three backbones demonstrate the strong overall performance of our method and the effectiveness of experience-guided predictive control. Our code will be made publicly available.

Semantic leakage occurs when a concept in the prompt steers model generation about an entity, even though the concept is irrelevant to it (e.g., a person who likes yellow is said to work as a school bus driver). It has mostly been studied in settings where the concept is directly attributed to the entity the model is asked about. This leaves open whether leakage is a flawed heuristic, where the model builds a profile of that entity, or a much broader associative tendency, e.g., working across seemingly unrelated entities. We argue for the latter: even after removing the attribution of the concept to the specific entity, leakage persists. Next, we extend this idea to gender bias. While work on gender bias in LMs typically looks at cases where the stereotyped concept is attributed to an entity, our findings suggest that a concept may steer outputs with its mere presence in the scene. We show this using gendered concepts under two conditions: when the subject engages with the concept, and when the concept just sits in the scene. We find that both shift model generation toward the stereotype to a similar extent. Together, our results suggest that semantic leakage drives a form of bias that is overlooked by current evaluations.

Protein engineering often requires improving several properties simultaneously, motivating the search for high-performing sequences that represent useful fitness tradeoffs. Discovering these sequences is challenging because the design space is combinatorially large and experimental campaigns often permit only a few rounds of batched measurements. We introduce \textit{MODS}, a modular framework for multi-objective protein optimization via inference-time diffusion steering. For each proposal, MODS samples augmented Chebyshev scalarization weights and a fitness-surrogate ensemble member to define a scalar steering reward. Varying the weights directs generation toward different objective tradeoffs, while varying ensemble members diversifies the predictions used for guidance. Because MODS expresses multi-objective acquisition through scalar rewards, it can be paired with different diffusion models and compatible steering procedures. After each evaluation batch, MODS updates the surrogates without retraining the generative model. We evaluate MODS on six protein optimization tasks using predictive oracles trained on experimental assay data, with two diffusion models and two steering procedures. MODS achieves competitive final hypervolume across all six tasks with both diffusion models, and substantially outperforms the best evaluated baseline on several tasks. Our results demonstrate a flexible and effective approach to multi-objective protein optimization with limited feedback.

Voice style conversion (VSC) aims to transform a source utterance to match the timbre, accent, and emotion of a target voice while preserving linguistic content. StyleStream 1.0 introduced the first streamable zero-shot VSC system with state-of-the-art conversion quality, but remained limited in two ways: approximately 1s end-to-end latency on consumer hardware, and the lack of a text-based interface for designing or editing target voices. We present StyleStream 2.0, a fast and controllable streaming VSC framework that addresses these limitations. To reduce latency, we train a few-step pixel MeanFlow model and further fine-tune it with autoregressive feedback inspired by Self Forcing, improving robustness under streaming inference. This reduces end-to-end latency to 520~ms on a consumer GPU, a 2x speedup over StyleStream 1.0, while maintaining conversion quality. To enable controllable style manipulation, we remove the mel-spectrogram context and instead route target style information through a compact style embedding. In this embedding space, we train a unified text-conditioned flow matching model that supports both text-based voice design, which maps natural language prompts to voice styles, and instruction-based voice editing, which modifies a specific attribute of a source utterance while preserving the rest. Experiments show that StyleStream 2.0 achieves the strongest target style fidelity on VSC, voice design, and voice editing, while remaining competitive on intelligibility and non-edited attribute preservation.

Conformal prediction (CP) for language models is typically evaluated under a matched protocol, in which calibration and deployment use the same post-training inference configuration, such as quantization mode and inference temperature. In deployment, these choices often differ from those used at calibration to meet memory or throughput constraints or serving policies. We argue that this exposes a limitation in current CP evaluation protocols for language models. We formalize the underlying phenomenon as inference-time model shift: a change in the conformal score distribution induced by inference configuration rather than by the input--label distribution, and theoretically characterize how it breaks split-conformal exchangeability even when the task distribution and trained model are unchanged. We then evaluate its consequences across 8 language models, 4 finite-label benchmarks, and 12 inference configurations. We find that matched evaluation can substantially overstate deployment-time coverage, and that the effect is heterogeneous across models and datasets. We argue that inference configuration should be reported as a first-class experimental axis in CP evaluations for language-model systems.

Coding agents now complete tasks autonomously, modifying real-world state such as artifacts, software environments, and configurations along the way. Yet they show limited backup awareness: recognizing that an action will modify state that may later be needed, and preserving it beforehand. To evaluate backup awareness, we introduce RegretBench, a benchmark of 205 executable tasks grounded in regret moments reported on platforms such as X.com, GitHub, and Stack Overflow, where users explicitly regretted not preserving state they later needed. Across six frontier models, agents complete 86.1% of tasks on average yet back up before these moments in only 15.2%, showing that task completion ability does not imply backup awareness. Because it is hard to predict which changes will be regretted, we propose BackUpper, a harness plug-in backup layer that checks every tool call and preserves affected state before modification. It combines rule-based strategies for common operations with a lightweight subagent for complex cases, and its rule table can expand with subagent decisions over time. On RegretBench, BackUpper covers every regret moment action and restores states with 92.2% average similarity to the original. Achieving this costs only $0.014 per task, with 7x fewer tokens than the main-agent self-backup baseline. When users have preferences on what to back up, BackUpper can also narrow its scope accordingly, matching human annotations on whether an action is worth preserving with an 84.5% F1 score. These results suggest that agents can keep actions reversible at low cost while respecting users' preferences.

In data-rich enterprises the hard question is not whether a candidate dataset is good in isolation, but whether it adds information beyond what the organization already holds, and whether that increment is worth its price. We present the Data Differentiator Framework (DDF), a composite scoring method for candidate data assets that combines (i) a mutual-information-based redundancy penalty against the existing portfolio, (ii) a cost-normalized, significance-gated marginal utility score derived from an ablation study, and (iii) explicit governance inputs (trust, identity resolution quality, strategic weights) set by the business. The framework is executed by a staged pipeline, the Strategic Data Sourcing Agent Ecosystem (SDSAE), that short-circuits expensive model-retraining steps for assets failing governance or redundancy gates. Conceptually, the DDF extends the relevance-minus-redundancy principle of mRMR feature selection from the feature level to the asset level, and adds cost normalization, a statistical significance gate, and governance terms that per-sample valuation methods such as Data Shapley do not model. We validate the framework on the public credit-card fraud benchmark (284,807 transactions) with five constructed candidate assets spanning the redundancy spectrum. Only the genuinely differentiated asset passes the significance gate ($Δ$AUC = +0.0029, DeLong $p = 1.4\times 10^{-9}$, Holm-corrected $p = 7.2\times 10^{-9}$) and receives an acquire recommendation (DDS = +0.663); the fully redundant asset scores lowest (DDS = -0.135). The recommendation is stable across 19 of 22 admissible strategic-weight configurations and across all decision thresholds in [0.15, 0.66]. We state clearly which quantities in the case study are computed from data and which are simulated governance inputs, and we discuss the design limits of a single-dataset evaluation.

Modern robotic agents are increasingly expected to support steerable control, where a single policy can adjust its behavioral style at runtime under changing user preferences. Preference-conditioned reinforcement learning provides this interface, but conditioning alone does not ensure that a requested behavior change is strong, does not leak into unrelated behaviors, and does not compromise task performance. Our evaluation combines Preference Reward Responsiveness (PRR) with coverage and utility metrics. We use these measures to compare reward-level, advantage-level, loss-level, and PCGrad-based aggregation across two humanoid-control frameworks. No aggregation level performs best across all environments and criteria. Experiments show that aggregating objectives early produces a wider range of behavioral responses but greater unintended changes in other objectives, while aggregating them later improves control precision at some cost to responsiveness.

Language generation in the limit studies whether a learner observing an enumeration of an unknown target language can eventually generate only valid, previously unseen elements. We study stability, introduced by Kalavasis, Mehrotra, and Velegkas (2025), which requires the generator's infinite output set to eventually remain unchanged, and introduce the stronger notion of certifiability, which requires the generator to determine from its observations that its current output is valid. Drawing on teaching sets in learning theory, we introduce a hierarchy of teaching dimensions for generation under three increasingly strict success criteria: correctness, stability, and certifiability. These dimensions measure the minimum number of selected examples whose appearance guarantees the corresponding success condition. We also study stability and certifiability in the membership-query model of Charikar and Pabbaraju (2025). We characterize stable and certifiable generation, both with and without query feedback, and establish their relationships with uniform generation and identification in the limit. In particular, we give a finite-witness characterization of stable generation, analogous to Angluin's tell-tale characterization of identification, resolving a gap left open by Kalavasis, Mehrotra, and Velegkas (2025). We further compare these generation notions with identification in the limit and contrast their teaching requirements on well-studied language families, including regular and erasing pattern languages.

In this paper, we study continuous-time reinforcement learning, where the state follows an unknown stochastic differential equation but only a fixed off-policy batch of discrete-time transitions is available. Standard discrete-time Q-learning becomes problematic as the sampling interval shrinks, because differences between action values vanish. Continuous-time alternatives, such as Deep Advantage Updating and martingale q-learning, preserve the action signal but jointly learn a value function and an action-dependent critic. Building on the PhiBE-Q formulation (arXiv:2606.21925), we develop a model-free PhiBE policy iteration (PhiBE-PI) framework that uses a single state-action critic while preserving the continuous-time action-ranking scale. At each iteration, the framework learns the critic directly from sampled increments and uses it to improve the policy. The same batch is reused throughout, without explicitly estimating the drift or diffusion. We further develop an implementation under linear function approximation and establish a local end-to-end suboptimality guarantee for the learned policy. Our analysis quantifies how errors from time discretization, function approximation, and finite-sample policy evaluation propagate through policy iteration. It accounts for the dependence of successive policies on the reused data, so the guarantee does not require a fresh batch at each iteration. Moreover, we identify a bias-variance trade-off: smaller sampling intervals improve the approximation to the continuous-time problem but can increase statistical error at a fixed sample size. Thus, finer time discretization does not necessarily lead to better policy performance.

Frontier language-model agents excel at complex tasks, but high inference costs make transferring their capabilities to smaller models essential. Traditional knowledge distillation achieves this through parameter updates, requiring access to the student's weights and additional training compute while encoding the transferred knowledge implicitly in the parameters. We introduce D-Skill, a framework that treats the teacher as a black box and distills its behavioral advantage into an interpretable natural-language skill by analyzing paired rollouts and identifying behavioral divergences and agreements. The resulting lessons are consolidated offline, with any compatible skill-update backend, into a skill document that is provided to the student at inference time. D-Skill constructs the skill entirely offline from fixed trajectories, without labels, further environment interaction, or weight updates after rollout collection. Across SpreadsheetBench-Verified, ALFWorld, and chess puzzles spanning multiple teacher-student pairs, D-Skill closes 75%-95% of the teacher-student gap without touching model weights. After a single offline pass over the paired traces, D-Skill outperforms one-epoch SFT baselines and remains competitive with multi-epoch SFT. Under the same model family, the resulting student also incurs 5.7x-8.3x lower inference cost per task than the teacher. Our results demonstrate that natural-language skill distillation offers a performant, interpretable, and efficient alternative to weight-based capability transfer.

This paper charts the evolution of the Prolog textbook Simply Logical -- Intelligent Reasoning by Example from print with runnable programmes on a 3.5-inch diskette published in 1994, via various intermediate online versions, to the fully interactive online edition available today. Our aim is to investigate -- from both the writer's and the reader's perspectives -- the potential impact of technology on educational materials. The three authors of this paper present three distinct and complementary points of view, which come together to shape an interactive online book that offers an immersive learning experience. Peter describes the philosophy behind the original book and experiences teaching from it. Jan demonstrates how contemporary web programming has enabled a fully interactive realisation of the book's philosophy. Kacper reports how different technologies can be adopted to build a versatile authoring toolkit that underpins the interactive online edition of the book. Collating these distinct yet coherent perspectives allows us to reflect on future opportunities for interactive Prolog teaching materials arising from the continuous development of web technologies. The insights we offer should be of interest to teachers of Prolog as well as those wanting to find out about the latest educational technologies.

Natural direct and indirect effects are defined through cross-world interventional counterfactuals. We propose an alternative construction based on backtracking counterfactuals. Rather than intervening on the treatment or mediator, we use a backtracking conditional distribution to construct an alternative exogenous state satisfying a desired treatment-mediator constraint. This yields the backtracking direct and indirect effects, and also the backtracking total effect. Likewise, we adapt the population intervention effects.

Deep research systems iteratively plan, gather evidence, synthesize, and revise, making end-to-end latency a key bottleneck for interactive use. Almost all production systems are built on autoregressive (AR) language models and inherit left-to-right decoding in planning and long-form writing. We present DiffResearch, an open multi-agent deep research framework that places a diffusion language model (dLLM) at the core of every stage, and measure how a diffusion backbone changes latency and report quality. Holding the agentic scaffold, retrieval code, prompts, and evaluation fixed, we swap the backbone between an open diffusion model and a comparable AR model. Across 100 Deep Research Bench tasks, the diffusion backbone is roughly 6 times faster end-to-end, driven by order-of-magnitude reductions in planning and writing. We further introduce dFast, a decomposition mode that reads intermediate denoising states and extracts subqueries before generation finishes, providing a 1.99 times median speedup for decomposition in isolation with no loss of report quality. On the benchmark's RACE rubric, dFast obtains the best overall score among the three configurations. Finally, in a public system-level leaderboard snapshot, an instance built on a stronger diffusion model ranks above several commercial systems. We release DiffResearch under an Apache-2.0 license.

Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) offers a principled way of populating simulated economies with many heterogeneous decision makers. Its adoption, pioneered in finance, has nonetheless been slow in macroeconomics because of two main limitations: the lack of a shared frame of reference connecting MARL systems to dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models the profession already trusts, and the very long training times. The first limitation was recently addressed by the Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Business Cycle (MARL-BC), which places deep RL households in a real business cycle economy and reduces to classic DSGE models in specific limits. Here we address the second limitation. We present JaxMARL-BC, a JAX-accelerated simulator that trains MARL-BC economies in seconds (between 75x and 724x faster than the reference implementation), and scales to 200,000 independent learning households. We verify its correctness against the known DSGE limits, characterise its scaling through a simple cost law, and demonstrate its value by a proof-of-concept calibration of an extended model with heterogeneous returns on capital, in a two-hour experiment that would previously have taken over a month. We release JaxMARL-BC as open source.

Diffusion language models form answers through a sequence of revisable continuous states, but multi-agent systems usually discard those states and make agents communicate only after decoding text. We ask whether one independent diffusion trajectory can pass a compact hidden message into another and, crucially, whether the receiver uses what that message means. In Hidden Messages, a sender compresses its denoising state into four signed dense vectors; the receiver consumes them while retaining its own context, canvas, and trajectory. Removing a message tests whether the channel matters; replacing it with a message from another example tests whether its content matters. Across controlled tasks, derangement removes a +63.6-point advantage on Tiny-A2D and a +100.0-point advantage on Dream-7B, while targeted substitutions steer the receiver toward the substituted fact. On QASC with the two supporting facts split across agents, matched communication reaches 80.8%, but a wrong-example message lowers accuracy to 46.8%, a content effect of +34.0 points. The surprising result is temporal: one late transfer reaches 87.8%, exceeding four recurrent exchanges by +7.0 points. These experiments provide causal evidence for continuous hidden communication between diffusion-LM agents and show that when information is transferred can matter more than how many times agents exchange it.

Artificial intelligence (AI) weather models now forecast weather events skillfully, but how they represent these events internally remains unknown. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) provide sparse features for probing hidden states, but how information about multiple physical attributes of an event is organized across them remains unclear. Using tropical cyclones in GraphCast as a test case, we analyze 2,115 six-hourly timesteps from 205 cyclones, relating SAE activations to position, intensity, and pressure structure across five Layer-8 decompositions and 16 processor layers. Each attribute relates to multiple features; position and pressure-structure relations overlap in a smaller subset. This organization recurs across independent SAEs and layers without feature alignment. In deeper layers, the leading position feature aligns better with position and pressure structure six hours ahead than at present. These results suggest that the organization of physical-attribute relations provides a reproducible level of description for interpreting cyclone-related information in GraphCast.

Flow matching learns a generative velocity field by regression, but under distribution drift a field must be deployed before the current data arrive. We study this predictive problem for a fixed, possibly nonconvex, neural class, with dynamic regret against the best represented field of each round. We propose DyProd-FM, which refits flow matching on dyadic historical prefixes and selects among the fits with a sleeping Prod master. Without knowing any drift budget, it attains regret $\widetilde{O}(\min\{N_ω+1,1+\sqrt{TΩ}\})$ in the relative velocity risk variation $Ω$ and $\widetilde{O}(\min\{N_μ+1,1+T^{1/3}V_μ^{2/3}\})$ in the target-law variation $V_μ=\sum_t W_2(μ_{t+1},μ_t)$, up to approximation and fitting costs. Matching lower bounds for fixed classes show that both rates are optimal in $T$ and in the budgets up to logarithmic factors. Prior optimal dynamic-regret guarantees rely on a convex decision set with strongly convex or exp-concave losses, whereas our class may be nonconvex and no curvature in its parameters is assumed. The target-law rate rests on a second-order link between the two variations, which the base noise of flow matching provides.

Refusal directions have been shown to transfer cross-lingually with near-perfect effectiveness across safety-aligned languages (Wang et al., 2025), reportedly regardless of resource level. However, the only truly low-resourced language evaluated is Yoruba, which is strongly misaligned and shows limited transfer, leaving open how refusal directions behave for other low-resourced languages. We extend PolyRefuse to three additional low-resourced languages (Belarusian, Bashkir, and Tajik) and replicate the pipeline of (Wang et al., 2025) on Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct. We find that universality is graded rather than binary: directions from safety-aligned and partially-aligned languages transfer broadly, while those from strongly misaligned languages fail to reliably modulate refusal behavior on any target tested, including other misaligned languages, once ceiling effects are accounted for. Geometric alignment and behavioral transfer are further shown to be partially dissociated. These findings complicate the universality claim and suggest that users of the least-resourced, most strongly misaligned languages may face weaker safety guarantees.

Cross-tokenizer logits distillation enables knowledge transfer across model families, allowing students to learn from stronger or more specialized teachers. However, differences in vocabulary and segmentation make teacher and student next-token distributions difficult to align. Existing logits-based methods are easy to integrate into standard distillation pipelines, but often rely on restrictive heuristics or tokenizer-pair-specific choices. They may restrict supervision to shared vocabulary subsets, require manually selecting different objectives for different tokenizer pairs, or match only the observed chunk and its complement rather than individual alternative continuations. We introduce Common-Support Distillation (CSD), a unified logits-based framework that constructs a shared support between the teacher and student at each aligned input chunk and matches the induced distributions with a single objective. For one-to-one alignments, CSD uses explicit common-token pairs as the shared support. For other alignments, it constructs a virtual support whose probabilities are computed using the autoregressive chain rule. A residual event captures probability mass outside the explicit support, ensuring that both induced distributions remain normalized. Across four teacher-student settings comprising Llama-3.2-1B and Gemma3-1B-PT students with Qwen and Phi teachers, CSD consistently achieves the highest average performance among the evaluated cross-tokenizer methods, outperforming the strongest alternative by up to 1.8 points and surpassing both continued pretraining and same-tokenizer distillation. For Llama-3.1-8B, CSD improves average accuracy over the strongest evaluated baseline by up to 4.2 points for the base student and 1.6 points for the instruction-tuned student.

Adapting language models to new domains during post-training risks degrading previously acquired capabilities, a phenomenon commonly known as catastrophic forgetting. Existing mitigation methods largely treat forgetting as a consequence of excessive model drift. They therefore constrain updates by preserving old outputs, replaying old data, or regularizing changes to parameters and representations so that the updated model remains close to its previous state. We take a different view: Rather than pulling the updated model back toward its old state, we translate the new domain into the model's pre-existing knowledge space, making unfamiliar knowledge learnable through familiar procedures. Therefore, we propose Skill Schema Transport (SST), a post-training framework that transports new knowledge into the model's existing skill space. SST abstracts each example type into a skill schema, preserving its essential operations, dependencies, and verification steps while removing domain-specific surface forms. By recasting new examples as instances of reusable procedures, SST turns knowledge update from trajectory memorization into procedural reuse. In continual domain adaptation settings, SST consistently reduces forgetting while improving generalization to related tasks. Across two 3B instruction-tuned backbones, SST improves average final performance on streamed domains by 2.53 to 5.75 points over sequential post-training. It also lowers max-drop forgetting in all evaluated settings, with the largest reduction from 42.41 to 7.10 points on the Qwen-3B MATH stream, while substantially recovering the OOD degradation induced by sequential updates.

Many social evaluations for multiagent systems study behaviors as they emerge from environments instead of systematically intervening in the environment to elicit such behaviors. We introduce Fig (Finding Interactions in Games), an agentic system that performs targeted elicitation interventions on game environments. It takes a natural language behavior description, decomposes it into sub-behaviors, generates new social games or selects existing ones, and executes single or combined interventions to the games' engine, opponents, instructions, and context. To evaluate model behavior, it combines built-in mechanical checks and synthetic rubric judgments. We validate the interventions, generated games, and evaluation mechanisms via human review. Models attempt the target behavior in 45.2% of episodes on average for valid scenarios generated by Fig for six test behaviors -- cooperation, exploitation, deception, covert coordination, betrayal, and sabotage. For game-behavior pairs with available controls, Fig's interventions increase attempt rates by 10.9% on average compared to matched control games. Fig shows that multiagent environments can serve as programmable test beds for intentional, controllable, and reproducible behavior evaluation. Code is available at https://github.com/fleet-ai/fig.

Autonomous agents can increasingly propose ideas, modify code, and run experiments, creating an opportunity to accelerate scientific discovery using teams of collaborative AI researchers. To escape local minima in the discovery, we propose to encourage orthogonal exploration by constructing the team using agents with varying expertise. However, realizing this design requires more than diverse backgrounds. When experiments are costly, a team can test only a limited number of ideas, thereby creating the need to balance exploration and exploitation when selecting a subset of researchers to propose and execute new experiments. Furthermore, each result should shape what the team tries next. We therefore ask how AI researchers with different scientific backgrounds can build on one another's findings and sustain progress under a limited experimental budget. To address these challenges, we build a team of persistent AI researchers, each grounded in a different discipline, who keep private research histories, share experimental evidence, and receive research opportunities through adaptive allocation. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this design by deploying the team to search for linear attention architectures, where it outperforms GDN2 at 1.3B scale on language modeling, common-sense reasoning, and synthetic and real-world retrieval tasks. In controlled comparisons, removing any single organizational component from our design yields markedly weaker discoveries: without disciplinary backgrounds, the search plateaus early; without private histories, researchers make less progress despite identical shared evidence; and uniform selection falls short of adaptive allocation within the same budget. These results suggest that sustained autonomous discovery depends not only on stronger agents, but also on who explores, what they remember, and how research effort is allocated.

LLM judges increasingly mediate benchmark evaluation, model selection, data curation, and training. Their decisions are useful only when each judge responds reliably to changes affecting its scoring criterion. Existing methods for reliability testing perturb inputs with known expected effects on judge scores. Prominent LLM-judge testing harnesses combine human-authored perturbation recipes with synthetic test generation, leaving scorer-specific recipe ideation outside the automated pipeline. This limits their use to fixed perturbations and pre-assumed scorer types. We introduce SANE, an agent-based framework that encodes behavioral requirements for stochastic evaluators as reusable agent instructions. Given a scorer specification, implementation, and representative inputs, the pipeline first identifies scorer-specific capabilities, then automatically derives perturbation recipes and expected score relations for each. SANE also defines a scorer-independent validation framework for generated judge tests. It determines whether each recipe agrees with scorer intent and whether each instantiated case realizes the recipe and supports its expected relation. Because SANE generates a recipe inventory tailored to each scorer, the number of aligned recipes grows as scorers are added. Across five domains, SANE produces 3.7 times as many validated test families as the Judge Reliability Harness (JRH) at comparable end-to-end validity and detects scorer deficiencies in every domain, including professionalism and toxicity, where JRH detects none. On faithfulness, SANE achieves strong human alignment in judge ranking: its test-suite scores rank 11 judge models consistently with human-labeled FaithBench performance (Spearman rho = 0.852), while JRH does not (rho = 0.100).

Online reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved significant success in decision-making tasks, but modern online RL remains highly sensitive to the quality of training experience. Understanding the contribution of individual training instances is therefore central to data-centric RL, with applications ranging from experience selection to policy interpretation. Existing data attribution methods for online RL primarily focus on local influence within a single training round, overlooking the non-local data influence across multiple training rounds. In this work, we formalize data attribution in online RL through a trajectory-level leave-one-out quantity, RL-LOO, which measures how one training sample influences a downstream target after subsequent online updates have taken place. We then derive RL-IF, a first-order estimator that propagates data influence through both optimization effects and policy-induced sampling effects, and provide theoretical guarantees on its approximation accuracy under smoothness assumptions. Our analysis further disentangles these two effects and shows both theoretically and empirically that the full RL-IF estimator can often be well approximated using the optimization effect alone. Building on this observation, we develop RINSE, a practical data filtering method for online RL. Experiments on standard control benchmarks and an RLHF-style toxicity-mitigation setting show that RINSE improves training efficiency and final performance over standard PPO and local attribution baselines. These results suggest that RL-IF provides a practical and principled framework for understanding and improving online RL.

Long-horizon robotic operation requires memory that scales with essential information rather than execution time. We present a parameter-space memory framework where each episode is stored as a separable object. A neural implicit representation is fitted to episode video from a shared, meta-learned initialization; the resulting weight delta constitutes the memory. Crucially, this delta remains a fixed size regardless of whether the episode spans a hundred or a hundred thousand frames. A learned projector maps the weight delta into token embeddings, conditioning a language model for question answering and a decoder for joint command regression, without frame retrieval at query time. On RoboMME, the language model exceeds chance across all question types, and the decoder achieves a mean $R^2$ of 0.51. Replacing the delta with matched noise drops performance by 11.4 points, while random-origin weights are non-decodable, proving the meta-learned initialization is essential for embedding episode content. By representing individual experiences as fixed-size weight deltas in a common parameter space, this approach decouples memory cost from time horizon and provides a basis for scalable streaming memory.

We show that every class of distributions that is learnable up to arbitrarily small target error in total variation distance with finitely many samples is also learnable under ($\varepsilon, δ$)-differential privacy up to arbitrarily small target error with finitely many samples. This proves a conjecture of Ashtiani. Previous work by Bun, Kamath, Mouzakis, and Singhal [arXiv:2402.00267] gave a weak refutation of this conjecture, showing that this implication is not true when learnability is defined with respect to a fixed target error. In contrast, we show that, under the standard definition of learnability, the conjecture is true.

Large language models increasingly take part in extended conversations where they can both shape and be shaped by another party's views, yet most persuasion research measures only one side of that exchange. We introduce a controlled LLM-LLM debate framework in which two language-model roles repeatedly discuss a contested topic (climate-change attribution): one is given an assigned stance and, in some conditions, an explicit instruction to persuade, while the other receives no assigned position. Across four ordered model combinations involving GPT-6 Luna and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, we track both each role's explicitly reported position and a separate measure of its turn-by-turn behavior inside the conversation. Opinion dynamics differ substantially across model combinations: same-model interactions narrow the opinion gap on average, clearly for only one of the two models, while cross-model interactions widen it. Explicit reports and in-dialogue behavior capture distinct aspects of opinion dynamics, and a blanket instruction to persuade does not reliably increase influence. These findings suggest that conversational influence depends not only on assigned roles and initial positions but also on the participating models, with implications for how opinion change is measured in extended LLM interactions.

The weights of a trained network do not have uniform sensitivity to model accuracy: the 1% most sensitive weights carry about a fifth of the damage a bit flip can do. This distribution decides the bit-flip tolerance of a model, the fraction of weights a code must cover and the bits each weight needs; existing schemes work with the distribution training leaves. We show that we can systematically modulate or alter the weight sensitivity distribution of a trained model, thereby shifting weights from one sensitivity bin to another. The sensitivity of a stored weight is the product of its gradient and the step a flip takes in the storage format, and LEAN adds a composite regularizer on both factors, a range term that bounds the flip step and a tail term that lowers the gradient of the most sensitive weights, with one coefficient λ setting how far the distribution moves. Ten epochs with the term, as a fine-tune or as the last epochs of training, shrink the sensitive tail 5 to 13 times on nine vision models (ResNet-18, ResNet-50, VGG-16 on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, ImageNet) within 0.5 points of accuracy; real flips confirm that the reshaped weights do less damage, a plain gradient-norm penalty does not reproduce the effect, and a preliminary extension to three small language models shows the same tail shaping. With a BCH code over 1% of the weights the model then survives 300 progressive bit-search flips in every training seed and 500 in two of three, where three of four published defenses with the same code fail by 300 and WCAT falls to 75% at 500. The reshaped distribution also cuts the parity for a fixed guarantee 3.7 times and makes a sensitivity-ordered 8/6/4/3-bit format affordable, which stores ImageNet ResNet-50 at a 3.29-bit weight payload, 2.4 times smaller than INT8, above the accuracy of LSQ at 3 bits.

Looped transformers reuse one block of layers many times and are often trained by backpropagating through only the last k loops. We measure how much of the weight gradient this throws away, exactly and for every k from one backward pass, on nine looped language models, and report three findings. First, on a trained model this lost gradient is set near the output: once the loop count is well above k, it barely changes with the loop count (within about 0.03 from 32 to 64 loops on the three models we tested, as a pre-registered test predicted for Parcae). Where the backward signal shrinks, $ρ^k$, with $ρ$ the signal's fitted shrink per loop, approximates it at moderate loop counts but overstates it at long ones, because the fitted $ρ$ drifts up as the fit takes in more loops. On Ouro the signal grows, and keeping two of four loops still loses 81% of the final output's gradient. Second, the lost gradient falls during fine-tuning, by 0.07-0.22 within 300 steps on three of four models, on held-out problems too. The fall is not just the read-out's share of the gradient; training only the layers outside the loop reproduced up to half of it, and it also falls under truncated training. So a trained model's value overstates what truncation removes later. Third, we could not show that it predicts the training cost of truncation better than rules that need no measurement: on two new models it tied Parcae's cost at the same k, in a test too small to separate them.

A systematic understanding of the global structure of neural-network loss landscapes remains challenging due to their high dimensionality. Symmetries arising from network architectures and learning objectives provide a way to investigate aspects of this structure. Although a growing number of studies have drawn attention to these symmetries, a systematic characterization of them, as well as of the critical orbits they give rise to, remains incomplete. To address this gap, in this work we establish a topological symmetry index, based on the methodologies from the family of equivariant degree theories, to decode these symmetries. The frameworks apply to arbitrary network architectures and include methods applicable to degenerate critical orbits. The index detects the isotropy of the critical points and quantifies the corresponding net topological contributions. Several examples, including softplus MLPs, Transformers, and equivariant neural networks, are presented to illustrate the computations.

Jednym z najważniejszych wyzwań związanych z implementacją sieci Open RAN o architekturze zorientowanej na użytkownika jest odpowiednie formowanie tzw. klastrów obsługujących. Problem ten może być efektywnie rozwiązany za pomocą zaproponowanego Agenta AI bazującego na modelu językowym. Wyniki symulacji pokazały, że zaproponowane rozwiązanie pozwala na ponad 2-krotne zwiększenie mediany rozkładu przepływności użytkowników względem standardowej architektury zorientowanej na sieć.

Distilled diffusion models generate high-quality images in a few sampling steps, but aligning them with task requirements and human preferences is difficult. Methods developed for multi-step diffusion models rely on differentiable rewards, or on score fields and stochastic trajectories that distilled generators may lack. We ask whether a few-step generator can be adapted using only external reward evaluations and reference samples, and show that two binary classifiers suffice. Our method, DualHeads, implements them as lightweight heads on a frozen diffusion backbone. The reward head learns which samples of the same prompt score higher, the reference head separates reference images from generated ones, and the generator maximizes a weighted sum of their logits. When the heads are optimal, this objective is KL-regularized maximization of the learned reward, and the ratio of head weights sets the regularization strength. Empirically, with both rule-based and model-based rewards, a few-step DualHeads generator reaches task rewards close to those of 40-step reinforcement learning methods while preserving image quality, at no extra inference cost. We hope that this simple and elegant dual-head formulation will help advance few-step reward-tilted generation.

Progress on foundation model pretraining is gated by who can afford a trial, and relational pretraining is no exception. Recipes are developed inside individual labs, reported under private protocols, and do not accumulate. Speedrun leaderboards remove that barrier by decentralizing the search rather than the training run. The problem is fixed, the stack is open, entries are ranked by wall-clock time to a quality target, and one GPU is enough to hold the record. We introduce modded-nanoRT, the first such leaderboard for Relational Transformers. Which database to hold out decides whether the benchmark can resolve improvements at all, so we fix it by calibration, ranking six candidates by how sharply a 45-minute learning curve separates improvement from seed noise. We open the leaderboard with typed trilinear attention, a relational operator that conditions attention scores and values on the foreign key traversed, together with Muon and SIGReg. The recipe reaches the target in 305.63 seconds on one NVIDIA H200, 8.11x faster than the reference implementation, and wins 13 of 15 pairs outside the development database. We will release the benchmark, its frozen artifacts, and the record runs. Our code is available at https://github.com/kunumi/nanoRT.

Low-fidelity (LF) optimization models are widely used in large-scale operations because they can be solved efficiently and reliably, but they often exhibit systematic errors relative to high-fidelity (HF) formulations that better capture physical and operational constraints. Existing learning-based approaches typically rely on supervised or semi-supervised training with HF solutions, which are expensive to compute and may not align with HF operational objectives. We propose a self-supervised framework that parameterizes LF optimization models directly from HF feedback. The low-fidelity problem is embedded as a differentiable optimization layer and trained end-to-end, while a HF correction problem evaluates its solution and provides gradient information through its dual variables, without requiring HF solution labels. We evaluate the framework on optimal power flow, optimal gas flow, and pooling problems, spanning different sources of low- and high-fidelity mismatch. Across all three applications, the self-supervised approach improves objective quality and feasibility over untuned LF models and generally outperforms semi-supervised training. The learned parameterizations also generalize to unseen operating conditions and, for network applications with up to 30,000 nodes, to systems not encountered during training.

Latent diffusion models almost universally place a Gaussian prior on the VAE latent space. For base generation this default is unproblematic; under reinforcement-learning fine-tuning, however, it carries a structural limitation. The standard VAE's KL term does not merely ignore mode structure - it actively taxes separation and tightness. When data are multimodal, the ELBO optimum compresses distinct modes into an overlapping latent. RL fine-tuning amplifies this overlap: the score network is under-resolved on the saddle region between modes, dynamic-to-variational amplification rises sharply, and the collapse boundary beta_c is pushed far above its variational scale. On the real alanine-dipeptide Boltzmann distribution, a Gaussian-prior VAE collapses at beta_c = 0.224 while a mode-tracked Gaussian-mixture prior collapses at 0.00316, a 71x gap from the same pipeline. We trace this gap to a single geometric mediator, d_min/(2 sigma_0), and verify the causal chain through controlled interventions: moving geometry at fixed prior, and switching prior at matched geometry (full mediation; prior-label coefficient 0.995x, 95% CI [0.79, 1.25]). A three-source decomposition localises the amplification to the learned policy (zero ODE-solver contribution, bounded anchor mismatch); the coverage plateau is an unconditional benefit of mode-separating priors that no amount of RL capacity recovers. The remedy is conditional: a non-Gaussian prior is necessary precisely when the latent geometry would fall into overlap and the task is coverage-sensitive. A machine-checked theory skeleton supports the KL pricing structure - a divergent compactness tax under a Gaussian prior versus a finite assignment fee under a mixture - and the position-versus-plateau distinction delimits what is finite-resource from what requires changing the prior.

Visual question answering requires models to assign attributes and relations to the correct objects, a problem known as visual binding. Structured prompts make these assignments explicit through labeled fields. Yet an improvement from the full prompt does not reveal which labels help or how they interact. First, we isolate field-label effects across ten models and six tasks by holding the image and claim fixed. These comparisons reveal differences that overall accuracy can hide. With a relation label present, adding object-role labels helps Qwen3 but hurts Qwen2 on Spatial. Second, we compare auxiliary hints that preserve or swap the question's role assignments against a no-hint baseline. Across two image sets, Qwen3's advantage with preserving hints mainly reflects errors caused by swapped hints. Preserving hints remain near baseline. Field order further affects the harm. Third, we test clearer hint wording and direct selection of the relation shown in the image. Clearer hints improve text matching but do not consistently improve visual judgments. In contrast, relation selection partly reduces errors for some hints in Qwen3 and GPT-4.1-mini.

Early-grade reading screening is critical for identifying children at risk of reading difficulty. Existing AI-based screeners are often limited in the scope of their analyses and evaluation metrics, or are proprietary systems that lack transparent model specifications and evaluation. We present KIRA, a dual-pathway screening system that pairs word-level fluency scoring with detailed phoneme-level error detection. We adapt pretrained word and phoneme recognizers to children's speech, reducing word error rate from 13.88% to 8.84% and phoneme error rate from 41.66% to 23.00%. Powered by these child-adapted models, we implement Word Reading (WRE) and Oral Reading Fluency (ORF), two foundational tasks in K-2 screening. The system integrates these recognizers with a web-based teacher-facing interface presenting fluency scores alongside phoneme feedback for potential targeted intervention. KIRA brings modern child-speech recognition into a full-stack, deployable, classroom-ready reading screener.

High-quality human-translated parallel corpora can improve cross-lingual transfer, but are typically too small for large-scale pretraining. Machine-translated web corpora help overcome this limitation, making parallel data available at pretraining scale. Standard multilingual pretraining, however, samples source documents and their translations independently, without explicitly using their parallel structure. We investigate how to use the parallel structure of the data to improve multilingual pretraining by concatenating each document with its translation in the same training sequence. We compare this parallel pretraining (PPT) approach with standard pretraining (SPT), training models from scratch at matched token budgets. Surprisingly, despite the benefits of parallel data reported in prior cross-lingual work, PPT alone does not consistently improve language understanding over SPT. Our further analysis suggests that although PPT builds a strong cross-lingual foundation, as shown by its better use of shared information across languages, the mismatch between parallel training contexts and single-language task inputs limits its gains in general language understanding. This finding motivates a two-stage approach following the pretraining-fine-tuning paradigm: we first use PPT to build a cross-lingual foundation, then continue with SPT to adapt it to standard language modeling. In both high-resource and low-resource settings, the two-stage approach consistently improves general language understanding and cross-lingual task performance over standard pretraining alone at matched training budgets.

This study proposes a sketch-to-simulation system to solve handwritten circuit diagrams. The system converts raw images into a Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis (SPICE)-compatible netlist and automatically calculates the circuit's nodal voltages and currents. Another objective is to propose a holistic framework that benefits students and educators by enhancing the teaching and learning experience of electric circuits and expediting engineering design reviews. This article presents a multistage pipeline that converts raw photographs of handwritten electric circuits into executable SPICE-like netlists, providing a solution. A dataset of 1,000 hand-drawn Resistor-Inductor-Capacitor (RLC) circuits was curated and annotated for components, text regions, and character recognition. The proposed system decomposes a circuit diagram into three stages: (i) dual You Only Look Once (YOLO)-based detectors for components and text regions, (ii) a Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network (CRNN) with Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) and Optical Character Recognition (OCR)-based domain-aware symbol value extraction, and (iii) image processing with thresholding, skeletonization, and Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) to automatically identify nodes and map them with corresponding components. The proposed system produces the netlist and solves the circuit. The qualitative and quantitative ablation studies on modular stages, as well as end-to-end tests, demonstrate robust performance across various handwriting styles, lighting conditions, and clutter.This study serves as an interactive learning aid and practical tool for professionals, providing a comprehensive user interface (UI), enabling rapid digitization of circuit sketches for study, design, prototyping, or troubleshooting.

Inference-time scaling is often treated as a token-budget problem, but a failed coding agent can seek qualitatively different resources: computation, information, or feedback. We introduce Banzhaf Resource Attribution (BRA), a controlled factorial framework that measures each resource's marginal contribution to repair and its interactions while holding the failed state and revision protocol fixed. We evaluate six models on 194 function-level failures from MBPP+ and HumanEval+ and 126 repository-level failures from SWE-bench Verified. Task-relevant specifications consistently improve repair, whereas public-test feedback provides small gains and retrieved code little to none. The value of additional computation declines with model capability, while information remains useful; resource channels largely exhibit diminishing returns, although complementary information can reinforce itself. Yet three of four frontier models select feedback in 95-100% of cases and obtain lower gains than uniform random resource selection. BRA thus exposes a gap between the resources agents prefer and those that measurably improve repair.

Automated judges of clinical artificial intelligence (AI) outputs are necessary, but large language model (LLM) judges are costly and slow at scale. We compared Jev, a decision language model that returns structured judgments, with frontier and open-weight LLM judges in four use cases. On 118 pediatric answers, Jev's agreement with physicians' ordinal quality ratings (Gwet's AC2 0.50; expected score 0.53) matched or exceeded that of seven of 12 LLM judges, including frontier models, Claude Opus 5.5 (0.49) and GPT-6 (0.38). On physician-graded binary HealthBench criteria, Jev matched or exceeded four of six LLM judges. On MedHELM's open-ended tasks, Jev's agreement with a three-LLM jury approached or exceeded the jurors' internal agreement. On HealthBench Professional, Jev matched the benchmark's reference judge, GPT-5.4, on 91% of criteria (other judges, 91-93%). Frontier judges cost 73-294 times more than Jev and took 7-57 times longer. Jev may enable efficient clinical AI evaluation at scale.

Dependency parsing resource development for Arabic has largely focused on Modern Standard Arabic, leaving dialectal Arabic comparatively under-resourced. We introduce MADARTB, the first large-scale parallel dependency treebank spanning five city dialects: Beirut, Cairo, Doha, Rabat and Tunis, and extending an existing parallel MSA version. In total MADARTB consists of 5,000 sentences annotated using the CATiB dependency scheme. We analyze syntactic similarity across all city dialects and MSA. Although global construction profiles exhibit high similarity across varieties, local syntactic structures frequently diverge, revealing substantial structural variation across dialects. We further establish a cross-dialect dependency parsing comparison using a supervised parser and four LLMs. The supervised parser achieves 87.5% LAS, while the best LLM setup trails at 85.7% LAS across all six varieties on the test set. We release our annotations and models publicly.

Common instruction following (IF) benchmarks, such as IFEval, evaluate the ability of language models (LMs) to follow simple constraints that can easily be verified programmatically. These same constraints, in turn, are used as reward signals for reinforcement learning. This design may lead to reward hacking of constraints, pushing models away from the main task. Recent attempts to address this resulted in benchmarks with richer constraints, but required expert labor, remained closed-access, and cannot be easily extended. We present Lift-Bench, an IF benchmark that asks a model to draft a document given a topic and a structured outline. Constraints are scoped to certain document sections, providing finer control over constraint density. Lift-Bench includes both verifiable and judged constraints, as well as a training counterpart, Lift-Train. Importantly, Lift-Bench provides both main task and instruction-following constraints, mitigating shallow reward hacking. On experiments with multiple models, we find that frontier models struggle with the harder subsets of our benchmark and analyze model performance along multiple axes. We also find that training on Lift-Train is much less susceptible to reward hacking than training on the common IFTrain. Lift-Bench and Lift-Train are publicly available, as well as the data generating pipeline.

As systems engineering (SE) shifts from monolithic systems to Systems of Systems, Mission Engineering (ME) has emerged as a new line of thinking in SE. Mission environments are uncertain and dynamic, and outcomes depend on how mission assets interact with them, rendering static architectures brittle and calling for flexible yet analytically rigorous ME approaches. We propose an intelligent mission coordination methodology integrating high-fidelity digital mission models with Reinforcement Learning (RL) for adaptive task allocation. Using a Digital Engineering (DE) infrastructure comprising a digital mission model and agent-based simulation, we formulate mission tactics management as a Markov Decision Process and train an RL coordinator with Proximal Policy Optimization to map mission states to tactical actions from realized outcomes. An aerial firefighting mission with three scenarios demonstrates the approach. First, all trained coordinators significantly outperform random and heuristic baselines. Second, single-scenario coordinators can be brittle: the coordinator trained on the more forgiving scenario degrades to random tactics performance in more demanding scenarios, whereas the demanding-scenario coordinator retains most of its advantage when transferred. Third, within the same training budget, a coordinator trained on both scenarios concurrently matches the scenario-specific coordinators in their own scenarios and significantly outperforms every other policy. Sensitivity analyses on ignition location, weather, scenario, and training curricula show that the variability represented during training shapes post-deployment performance. This proof of concept shows DE-enabled mission simulations combined with RL offer a reusable methodology for improving ME practice, which can be extended to fleet design and selection from a mission-first perspective.

Agentic harness evolution optimizes an agent's instructions, tools, and control flow by using its task execution experiences as evolving evidence. While more evolution tasks should intuitively improve performance, our preliminary study reveals a paradoxical failure mode: the performance of existing methods degrades as the task pool expands. Our further analysis demonstrates that this degradation stems from suboptimal evidence selection during optimization, as different evidence combinations lead to substantially different evolution outcomes. To address this issue, we propose Successive Scale Racing (SSR), a framework that adaptively searches for optimal evidence combinations in each evolution round. SSR constructs diverse evidence combinations based on the corresponding task quality and coverage, and efficiently races the resulting candidate harnesses under a small compute budget. Empirically, across three distinct benchmarks, SSR achieves state-of-the-art results in all six configurations. Notably, as the task pool grows from 40 to 200, SSR steadily improves the pass rate from 64.3% to 68.3%, while the baselines' performances all drop. Furthermore, its racing mechanism identifies near-optimal candidates while reducing validation executions by 60%.

Agentic systems have demonstrated strong capabilities on complex tasks by enabling multiple interacting large language model (LLM)-based agents to collaborate and execute subtasks in parallel. However, this collaborative structure introduces new challenges for reliably evaluating and diagnosing system failures, particularly failure attribution: tracing a system's execution to identify the agent step responsible for an incorrect final outcome. Because manually performing this task is time- and labor-intensive, recent work has turned to LLMs as judges to automate the process, referred to as automated failure attribution (AFA). These approaches assume that a sufficiently capable model can infer the failing step directly from an interaction transcript. In practice, however, direct prompting often performs poorly, which motivates follow-up work that explores various ways to improve AFA performance, including alternative prompting strategies and inference-time interventions. In this paper, we examine a more fundamental question: whether this weak behavioral performance reflects a genuine capability limitation. Using linear probes applied to internal activations, we uncover a significant \emph{knows-but-won't-say gap:} models encode sufficient information to attribute a failure correctly but fail to explicitly output the responsible step. Building on this finding, we propose \emph{grafting}, a simple manual intervention that exploits knowledge already encoded in the model to improve AFA performance without requiring ground-truth labels at inference time. Extensive evaluations across multiple LLMs and benchmark settings demonstrate that grafting consistently outperforms direct-prompting approaches, underscoring the potential of leveraging latent model knowledge for more reliable failure attribution. Our code is available at https://github.com/wendyzheng22/mi4afa.

The widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence in recent years has brought a parallel rise in prompt injection and jailbreak attacks. By embedding malicious instructions, these exploits manipulate language models to bypass intended behavior and operational boundaries. In traditional chatbots, such attacks are confined to a single session because state memory is not preserved across conversations. However, persistent memory features in modern conversational interfaces enable cross-session attack propagation, establishing a threat vector known as memory injection. This work explores this emerging vulnerability in leading LLM-as-a-service platforms, highlighting its real-world severity and the need for countermeasures. While existing literature focuses on violations tailored to specific platform features, we present a general threat model. We demonstrate that all NIST attack goals are collectively achievable across ChatGPT Instant 5.3, Claude Sonnet 4.6, and Gemini 3 Flash under this model. We also show that memory injections can exploit multiple attack vectors, including personal memories, projects, skills, organization instructions, and Model Context Protocol (MCP)-connected resources. Our findings reveal that all evaluated services can be manipulated to persistently spread disinformation, generate harmful content, or simulate offline unresponsiveness, even in fresh sessions. In the particular case of Claude, shared-memory features allow an attacker to compromise multiple users within an organization and also exfiltrate user prompts. To address these vulnerabilities, we derive defense mechanisms from our proposed threat model and foundational cybersecurity principles. Our analysis indicates that nearly half of these mitigations remain unimplemented across the target services. Datasets and attack artifacts are available at https://github.com/PedroBarcha/Memory-injection.

While statistical learning has made remarkable progress in recent decades, driven by large datasets and data-driven protocols that have transformed scientific practice, it still faces a key limitation: it struggles to generalize beyond the data it has seen, often failing under distribution shift. Causality offers a promising solution: causal models focus on the underlying mechanisms of change rather than surface-level associations, enabling robust reasoning under external interventions. This allows systems not only to learn from data, but also to reason about hypothetical scenarios, adapt to new environments, and inform better decisions. This thesis explores how these approaches can inform each other, in two parts. The first part examines algorithmic recourse, that is, identifying which changes an individual can make to overturn an unfavorable decision. We propose an alternative perspective to the established framework, arguing for a more realistic cost function, a reformulation of the problem in causal terms, and the inclusion of a temporal dimension in policy evaluation. The second part focuses on dynamical systems, extending the notions of causal interventions and effects to discrete and continuous stochastic processes. We show that the equilibria of these processes, and how they change following an intervention, can be linked to Structural Causal Models (SCMs), viewed as compressed representations of the underlying temporal dynamics. We argue for the relevance of such temporal causal models, since in real-world scenarios actions take time to produce their effects. The common goal of both parts is practical: the utility, robustness, and trustworthiness of these models depend critically on their ability to realistically represent the underlying phenomena.

How much does an agent harness affect vulnerability discovery, and does its value depend on the model? We study 24 model-runner configurations using an open-source harness on a production codebase whose vulnerabilities were non-public at scan time. The pipeline combines static screening, LLM investigation, model self-revalidation, root-cause mapping, independent source review, and isolated proof-of-concept confirmation. Across 265 confirmed security root causes, the largest two-run configuration covers 60.4%, while 14.3% are found by exactly one model. No single configuration covers all observed findings. In a four-model context experiment, moving from a minimal prompt to an engineered prompt with a CodeQL-derived call graph raises criticality-weighted yield by 20-86% for smaller and mid-tier models, compared with 2% for the frontier model. This comparison changes both prompt and context. Separating those effects shows that the engineered prompt improves yield for all four models, while adding CodeQL context beyond that prompt improves yield only for the smallest model. A held-out CyberGym subset shows the same direction of target-recall improvement for the combined treatment. Frontier models achieve low false-report rates but do not consistently achieve the highest yield. Strong lower-cost models can deliver similar performance at an order of magnitude lower cost. These results support matching models, prompts, and context to the task, and combining configurations for broader coverage.

We revisit the problem of depth separation for neural networks, as studied by Eldan and Shamir, Daniely, and others. Specifically, we consider the natural setting of $L^2$ approximation of radial functions under the standard Gaussian measure in $d$ dimensions. We show that there is a radial function in $L^2$ under the standard Gaussian measure that can be approximated to a fixed sufficiently small $L^2$ error by a depth-3 ReLU neural network of polynomial size in $d$ but can only be approximated by depth-2 networks with subexponentially bounded weights if their size is at least exponential in $d$. For that, we prove a general result showing that if a radial function has substantial mass in the high frequencies of its Hermite expansion, then it cannot be well approximated by a depth-2 neural network with small width and bounded weights. All theorems, lemmas, propositions, and corollaries are verified in Lean~4.

In case-based legal reasoning, legal professionals identify legally significant fact patterns in a new dispute and compare them with those of decided cases. In AI & Law, HYPO dimensions and CATO factors represent these patterns symbolically, organizing expert knowledge distilled from case narratives as explicit, structured, interpretable, and auditable legal concepts and relations that support case comparison, legal argument, and precedent-based reasoning. Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for legal tasks, yet their internal organization of legal knowledge remains difficult to trace. We investigate whether LLMs form internal representations corresponding to all 26 CATO factors. Two research questions examine linear decodability and sparse localization with sparse autoencoders. Experiments cover three open models, Qwen3-1.7B, Qwen3-8B, and Gemma-2 2B, supported by cross-model comparison and human audit of controlled natural-language passages. Results show that all 26 factors are linearly decodable in all three models. Single-feature sparse readouts cover the complete factor catalog, with best-layer test AUCs ranging from 0.86 to 1.00. Five selected features approach full-vector readout performance. We report 78 model-specific layer-feature coordinates, one for each factor in each model. Together, these results show that information corresponding to expert-defined legal factors can be read from the internal activations of LLMs processing legal narratives. By locating these readouts, our study connects legal language and the symbolic abstractions of HYPO and CATO to learned internal representations.

Iterative ML agents develop models by editing code, running experiments, reading a validation score, and choosing what to try next. In current harnesses this loop is served by an exact validation score returned after every attempt, which leaves the validation split open to adaptive selection. In this work, we introduce an explicit feedback contract for ML-agent harnesses, which specifies what an agent may observe, when iteration should stop, and when the test split may be touched. The contract releases a validation score only when a submission clears a noise threshold computed from the paired standard error, so no margin has to be tuned. We ran experiments on click-through-rate prediction, learning to rank, and a control task with no signal to find. The control is the sharpest case, because the true gain there is zero by construction: an agent reading exact scores ended by reporting a gain of 0.0157, while under the contract it reported 0.0033. On both real tasks the contract narrows the validation-test gap, and test performance is slightly higher rather than lower. The largest difference is in when the agents stop. Exact feedback used its entire budget of thirty submissions on two of the three tasks, including the one where nothing can be learned, while the contract halted after four to twelve. A run that exhausts its budget is usually read as diligence. It is better read as a symptom: when the feedback channel is unbounded, noise keeps supplying improvements to chase.

We introduce CALLIOPE, a top-down framework for discovering topic hierarchies in large corpora of unstructured data (e.g., LLM conversations), while supporting differential privacy (DP). Unlike traditional and even recent LLM-augmented approaches that ultimately rely on clustering vector embeddings, our framework leverages LLM capabilities directly for the entire pipeline. Experiments demonstrate that this approach provides better utility over existing (embedding-based) methods in the DP setting, especially in the high privacy regime. We evaluate the quality of CALLIOPE outputs using a variety of traditionally studied clustering metrics, as well as some novel utility metrics that we introduce.

Software supply chain attacks continue to be on the rise, exploiting the trust that helps open source ecosystems thrive. Recent incidents like the Shai-Hulud worm and the Axios compromise demonstrate that a single malicious package can have wide reaching and devastating impacts overnight. These high profile attacks can be traced back to the same culprit: package registries. Although they are a useful convenience to pull prebuilt packages from, is such a commonly exploited component of the software supply chain worth the risk? In this paper, we investigate whether removing the registry from the developer workflow by building packages directly from source can serve as a malware prevention strategy - effectively removing an entire attack surface. Our hypothesis is that malicious packages avoid attributing a source to minimize visibility, while benign packages seek exposure and therefore link to their repositories. We evaluate this through three research questions: how effective is building from source at avoiding malware, how feasible is it to build from source in the current state of the supply chain, and how the building from source strategy compares to state-of-the-art security scanners. To do so, we (1) construct an aggregate dataset of 47,066 malicious packages from four academic and one industry malicious datasets source across npm and PyPI ecosystems, (2) build a snapshot index of all 3.9 million npm and 764 thousand PyPI packages, and (3) analyze all malicious samples alongside a statistically significant sample of 16,569 packages from each registry, totaling 33,138 packages. We find that simply checking for a source has a success rate between 87.7 and 99.9 percent of preventing malware, depending on the level of source vetting. Consequently, there is a significant lack of transparency within benign packages, with only 47.4 percent attributing a source an end user could build from.

Flow-matching policies adjust inference cost through the number of solver steps, but reinforcement learning at a single fixed solver budget can hide degradation at cheaper deployment budgets and even erase useful one-step behavior present in a pretrained policy. We introduce Action-Ratio-Clip Flow (ArcFlow), a deployment-aware algorithm for training one flow policy across a specified range of solver budgets. ArcFlow combines action-aligned supervision, budget exposure, and worst-budget checkpoint selection. For reconstruction objectives, its bridge aggregates temporal probes into one surrogate ratio and one PPO-style clip per action, with a boundary residual exactly equal to deployed one-step reconstruction error. Cycling exposes the shared field to the deployment range, and selection optimizes its performance floor. For native velocity objectives, multi-budget endpoint supervision applies the same principle without replacing the native update. Both realizations preserve the architecture and deployment-time cost. Across DM Control, manipulation, and locomotion, ArcFlow attains the highest mean one-step return among five flow-policy baselines on 25 of 30 tasks under each method's reported training settings. Component studies identify complementary improvements from boundary supervision, the fixed-grid bridge, budget exposure, and deployment selection. These results establish deployment-budget-aware training as an effective route to strong low-step control with one policy serving multiple inference costs.

Evaluations of large language model (LLM) agents report that pricing agents collude at others' expense. Yet collusion is defined by enforcement: a cartel, in which competitors share monopoly profits, holds only if a member who cheats is punished. We introduce an audit that tests enforcement by forcing a member to cheat in counterfactual copies of a market, and use it to study what reinforcement learning (RL) teaches agents in pricing and trading. Small LLMs trained by RL learn what their training rivals reward, but only what they readily try. In self-play, they learn fixed rules ignoring their rivals; against a punishing rival, to be deterred; against a cheating rival, to match its cuts, never the costly price war that would deter it, which they rarely try. A war forced into training is learned, but mostly only where it was forced. Against their own copies, deterred and matching agents can earn the same cartel profits, but only matching ones can enforce them, and then thinly: as a by-product and only against large cuts. Q-learners enforce collusion only in pricing. Prompted LLMs reach cartel-like outcomes mostly through rules that ignore the market. Outcome measures cannot tell these cases apart; the audit can.

Training tool-using language models requires costly interaction, yet identical rewards within a rollout group provide no group-relative learning signal. We use reward disagreement to guide harness evaluation and the allocation of rollouts for policy training in Model Context Protocol (MCP) environments. We first introduce Discord, which tests harness edits using exact paired inference and decision-preserving early stopping: only disagreeing paired outcomes favor one harness over another. This insight motivates prospective allocation in BRACE (Bank-calibrated Rollout Allocation under Correlated Episodes). BRACE combines historical task evidence, uncertainty in task success rates, and a correlated reward model to forecast mixed-reward groups before allocating generation budget. Controlled harness experiments favor Discord, while live MCP experiments expose a retention-cost trade-off. At three Qwen3-VL model scales, BRACE exceeds the strongest plotted baseline peaks with fewer new training rollouts; historical-bank collection is counted separately. It also leads the compared methods on BFCL and NESTFUL without further training. Ablations probe the bank, estimator, and allocation score; prospective evaluation checks forecast calibration. These results support forecasting reward contrast before generation.

Aggressive low-state weight quantization can substantially reduce neural-network representational flexibility, making predictive performance difficult to preserve when only a few discrete weight states are available. We investigate this regime for Transformer-based electricity-load forecasting using 3-, 5-, 7-, and 16-state weight quantization across feed-forward-only and attention-plus-feed-forward quantization. Two tasks predict either the next hour or the next 24 hours from the preceding 48 hours across two co-primary electricity-consumption datasets. Direct post-training quantization (PTQ) increased mean normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) relative to full precision by 6.25 and 7.04 percentage points in Datasets A and B, whereas quantization-aware fine-tuning (QAT-FT) recovered approximately 90.2% and 94.5% of these penalties. Quantization-aware training from random initialization (Scratch-QAT) also produced competitive low-state solutions, with particularly favorable behavior at three states. We further introduce accumulated-update thresholding, which accumulates optimizer-proposed weight changes before commitment. Relative to paired Scratch-QAT controls, this reduced committed shadow-weight updates by approximately 99.7% and discrete state transitions by approximately 77--80%, while mean NRMSE changed by only +0.042 and +0.197 percentage points. These results show that useful Transformer forecasting can be retained under highly discrete weight representations while strongly suppressing target-state activity, supporting a prospective route toward compact, low-activity edge forecasting using multilevel synaptic devices.

World models let agents compare imagined outcomes before acting, but an agent must still decide which alternatives to explore and when a proposed plan should replace its learned policy. We introduce SDI (Sibling Disagreement in Imagination), which connects these decisions through a shared actor-based reference. SDI compares action sequences imagined from the same model state, using repeated rollouts of the actor's own sequence to measure variation under fixed behavior. This reference scales both the spread across candidate returns, which provides an exploration signal, and a proposed plan's predicted advantage, which governs action acceptance. The agent executes a planned action when its advantage exceeds the reference variability by a fixed factor; otherwise, it follows the actor. SDI reuses the base agent's world model, actor, and critic without requiring an additional disagreement ensemble. Exploration and planning guide training data collection, while evaluation uses the learned actor alone. Across Meta-World, Adroit, and DM-Control, SDI achieves a higher observed task-average score than every compared baseline in each suite and matches or exceeds the strongest baseline's performance on 15 of 18 tasks. Component ablations and robustness analyses further examine the roles of exploration, planning exposure, and action acceptance. Paired evaluations from identical simulator states show that the gate improves both recovery from actor failures and preservation of successful behavior relative to ungated planning, while substantially reducing return degradation. Together, these results support comparing imagined alternatives against a shared actor reference as a unified approach to exploring and planning with world models.

Non-uniform allocation can improve post-training pruning of large language models, yet quality can still degrade sharply at high sparsity. To control degradation as sparsity increases, we introduce LADDER (Layer-Wise Allocation via Damage-Driven Evaluation and Refinement), which allocates sparsity incrementally. At each step, it evaluates pruning an additional fraction of weights from each eligible layer and commits the layer update that causes the least end-to-end degradation per removed parameter. This process produces non-uniform sparsity profiles and exactly nested masks across multiple budgets. We evaluate LADDER on five OPT, Llama, and Qwen models across 10-90% sparsity, using SparseGPT as its candidate-generation backend and comparing against uniform and adaptive allocation baselines. Results reveal a clear operating-regime trade-off: LADDER is comparable or slightly weaker at benign sparsity but becomes substantially more robust from 70% onward. This high-sparsity advantage largely persists after posterior distillation across four of five models and translates into improved retention of aggregate zero-shot accuracy.

Psychotherapy fidelity assessment measures how faithfully a therapist adheres to a treatment protocol, a critical determinant of positive patient outcomes. However, fidelity assessment is bottlenecked by manual expert review, rendering the process labor-intensive and unscalable. To scale therapy supervision and support clinician self-learning, we present an integrated application of large language models (LLMs) that automates psychotherapy fidelity workflows and generates actionable supervisory feedback from authentic, long-form clinical transcripts. We evaluate three open-weight models across multiple task decomposition configurations and reasoning strategies, demonstrating that evidence-first reasoning improves fidelity estimation. Furthermore, we establish the framework's external construct validity on an independent randomized controlled trial (RCT), where it reliably distinguishes Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) from non-CBT sessions across core therapeutic skills. Through a user study that evaluates the generated feedback, mental health experts indicate that the pipeline synthesizes actionable clinical feedback. Ultimately, our work offers a practical, scalable solution toward bridging the community mental health supervision gap.

Objects move, cameras pan, and weather drifts with the wind: much of what changes in sequential data is motion. Motion changes where things are, not what they are, and is therefore a symmetry of the data. Yet standard recurrent networks are not equivariant to it: their memory stays put while the input moves on. Flow equivariant recurrent networks first brought this symmetry into sequence models, for motions of constant velocity, or flows, by enumerating a bank of velocities. We extend this idea in three directions: from simple recurrent networks to convolutional LSTMs, from flows to motions whose velocity changes in time, and from enumerating velocities to estimating them. Treating a sequence as a field over time, we show that motion becomes a gauge symmetry: a global symmetry made local in time. Built on this view, our motion equivariant convolutional LSTM (MELSTM) uses its velocity model as the gauge field and is provably equivariant to every motion. Across future-frame prediction, classification of digits visible only through their motion, and action recognition under camera shake, MELSTM outperforms a convolutional LSTM and its flow equivariant counterpart with the same number of parameters: it is more accurate, generalizes to longer horizons and to unseen motions, and carries a fraction of the flow equivariant model's state.

RLVR improves language-model reasoning, but commonly relies on independent stochastic rollouts for exploration, which can repeatedly sample similar failed strategies. Prior work has seen success with approaches that guide exploration by introducing dependence into the sampling process by including incorrect solutions in the context for subsequent attempts. Still, these methods introduce the additional question of how to assign credit to each attempt. We propose to view the credit assignment through the lens of Stochastic Shortest Paths, a framework in classical reinforcement learning that seeks to minimize the expected cumulative cost to reach a terminal state (in our case, a verified successful response). We show that, under suitable simplifying assumptions, this perspective naturally leads to a simple modification to GRPO, which we call Retry-Aware Policy Optimization (ReAPO). ReAPO allocates additional generation to failed trajectories, allowing successful retries to be reinforced without rewarding preceding failures, and assigns credit in a theoretically principled way to each attempt. Across Qwen3 and OLMo-2 models from 0.6B to 4B and eight mathematical and scientific reasoning benchmarks, ReAPO improves first-attempt performance over GRPO as well as natural recent baseline algorithms, while additional ablations demonstrate the utility of both serial sampling and ReAPO's credit assignment. On Qwen3-0.6B, ReAPO also outperforms GRPO with twice the group size or twice the training steps, reaching their peak accuracy with 39% and 31% fewer generated tokens, respectively. Taken together, our results suggest that ReAPO is a simple yet effective approach for improving LM reasoning performance through improved exploration and retry-aware credit assignment.

Current evaluation of LLMs on benchmarks typically aggregates performance over individual examples into a single scalar score. This approach is overly coarse and ignores the diverse scope of skills covered by benchmark datasets. To address this limitation and better exploit benchmark data, we propose SkillEval, a new evaluation framework that performs cross-model, skill-level analysis. The framework integrates advances from two areas: (1) it leverages the meta-cognitive capabilities of LLMs to automatically discover interpretable skills from questions, and (2) it applies cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) from psychometrics to estimate per-skill abilities of LLMs. We conduct experiments on 3,811 LLMs evaluated on 9,523 items across five benchmarks spanning diverse domains (MATH, BBH, GPQA, MuSR, IFEval). Compared to the traditional average-based evaluation paradigm, SkillEval produces reliable, more calibrated and informative yet concise model profiles that more accurately predict model behavior on unseen items. We also demonstrate the utility of SkillEval in two downstream tasks: (1) LLM routing, which dynamically assigns each query to a capable but efficient model, reducing inference cost by over 60% while achieving improved performance, and (2) Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT), where an unseen model can be efficiently evaluated using a trained CDM. Furthermore, we show that these skill profiles provide useful insights, for example, how benchmarks share skills and how instruction-tuned models differ from their base models.

Frontier coding agents are increasingly framed as end-to-end automated researchers, and ML for science offers a demanding test of that promise: improving a scientific model often requires domain insight beyond routine ML engineering. We introduce Agent4Sci, a long-horizon testbed for measuring how far today's agents can improve the published best models on scientific ML benchmarks, spanning 20 benchmarks across 11 domains. Rather than ranking agents on a leaderboard, Agent4Sci asks what kinds of progress agents can make on these tasks under in-the-wild conditions, and where they fall short. Empirically, today's frontier agents advance the published best on every benchmark, with Claude Opus reaching 10.4% mean relative improvement and no run flagged for academic misconduct. These gains, however, come almost entirely from a bag of ML-engineering tricks rather than research-level insight. Trajectory analysis surfaces three recurring limitations in this setting: novelty miscalibration, resource under-utilization, and rapid collapse into local engineering sweeps. Lightweight plug-in skills for research ideation, experiment management, and scheduled checklists raise Claude Opus from 10.4% to 20.1% and Codex from 4.4% to 8.1%, while yielding more diverse, domain-relevant interventions. Agent4Sci gives the community a way to track and push frontier agents from ML engineering toward domain insight on real-world ML-for-science problems. Code and data are available on GitHub (https://github.com/maszhongming/agent4sci) and Hugging Face (https://huggingface.co/datasets/MingZhong/agent4sci).

The Gabriel graph is a proximity graph widely used in computational geometry and geometric machine learning, underlying large-margin classifiers and, as we show in this work, density-aware clustering methods. Its construction, however, has cubic time complexity $O(N^3)$ in the naive formulation, which severely limits its use on datasets beyond a few thousand samples. This paper presents a set of GPU parallelization strategies, implemented in CUDA, that make Gabriel graph construction practical at scale. We introduce (i) an implicit closed-form mapping from a linear thread index to the corresponding vertex pair $(i,j)$, which removes the need for an explicit $O(N^2)$ adjacency structure and lets every thread locate its pair in constant time and constant memory; (ii) a two-pass, bitmask-based, atomically-compacted edge-list construction that produces a dense edge array proportional only to the number of edges actually found; and (iii) a thread-coarsening strategy in which each thread evaluates several candidate pairs, trading launch and scheduling overhead against load balance. We evaluate these strategies on the acceleration of a Gabriel-graph-based large-margin classifier (NN-clas) and on a novel Gabriel-graph clustering algorithm that identifies connected components on a residual graph and performs GPU-parallel Union-Find with hierarchical edge-based merging. On 14 public benchmark datasets, the GPU implementation reduces Gabriel graph construction time by two to nearly four orders of magnitude relative to a sequential CPU baseline (up to 8484x), without loss of classification accuracy, and the proposed clustering method is statistically competitive with DBSCAN on the topological validity index Dunn while eliminating the need for an explicit density radius parameter.

Autoregressive foundation models offer state-of-the-art capabilities to simulate the market by generating the message flow of limit order books (LOBs). Yet, without understanding their inner workings, research directions are hard to narrow and practical use in real-world trading environments remains uncertain. This study therefore asks what these models actually learn about market microstructure. We find that, similarly to games where sequence models build an internal representation of the board, an 8.2M-parameter Mamba-3 state-space model trained autoregressively on the tokenized message stream of eight large-cap US equities learns an internal representation of the market and its dynamics. In particular, order-flow imbalance, a central driver of short-horizon price moves, is decodable at $R^2 \approx 0.59$, far above controls and baselines. This representation extends to unseen stocks, suggesting that these models learn general representations rather than ticker-specific patterns. The model also generalizes across metrics beyond order-flow imbalance: results hold across traded volume and volatility. Additionally, the representation is causally steerable: pushing the state along a feature's axis shifts the model's next-message beliefs as that feature implies, monotonically in dose, consistent with the emergence of a world model.

Gold's theorem shows that no learner can identify an arbitrary language in a superfinite class from positive presentations alone. We prove a positive result of a different shape. Fix an innate \emph{recursive contrast operator} $R$ mapping any string to a finite set of structurally bounded perturbations of it, and a discriminative scorer of bounded capacity trained by InfoNCE-style contrastive estimation \citep{vandenoord2018,macollins2018} on self-generated perturbations. Under a faithfulness condition relating operator, scorer, and target, the trained scorer achieves \emph{PAC conditional identification} from positive data alone: with high probability it ranks all but an $\varepsilon$-fraction of positives above every out-of-language perturbation in their own orbit, with sample complexity polynomial in the capacity, the orbit size, the score bound, and $1/\varepsilon$. The negatives are constructed by the learner, not supplied by an oracle, and no global normalizing constant over strings is ever computed. The misranking bound follows from the geometry of the contrastive loss---per-example loss floors plus a definite loss increment under misranking---yielding an $\varepsilon^{-2}$ rate, together with an explicit approximation gap that quantifies the cost of in-language (``colliding'') perturbations and vanishes for orbit-pure operators. The ranking guarantee lifts to a global membership classifier under a margin condition, and the same operator composed with the learned scorer is a normalization-free Metropolis--Hastings generator. We instantiate the hypotheses for substitutable context-free languages \citep{clarkeyraud2007} and the subregular classes \citep{heinz2010,hayashikamigaito2025}, and state an open conjecture locating the construction in the mildly context-sensitive hierarchy.

Planning under uncertain control execution noise requires reliable feedback policies across diverse environments. We introduce Planning Under Noise (PUN), a neural operator that learns noise-aware value fields for planning in unseen geometries. Building on an established screened-Poisson formulation of stochastic optimal control, we address two challenges: specifying boundary conditions that support navigation across varying geometries and efficiently computing fields with reliable gradients. Zero-Dirichlet obstacle boundaries terminate sampled paths at walls, weakening the goal signal along long routes and making it harder to estimate reliably. We instead impose reflecting Neumann conditions on obstacles and a Dirichlet condition at the goal, allowing sampled paths to continue exploring free space until they reach the target. To solve the resulting PDE without a configuration-space mesh, we extend a Monte Carlo (MC) solver, Walk on Stars (WoSt), to higher dimensions. However, local MC fluctuations can reverse estimated gradient directions and cause planning failures, making direct planning require costly sampling. PUN amortizes this computation by learning geometry-to-field mappings from noisy, partially converged Monte Carlo labels, avoiding expensive convergence for every training example. At inference, test-time scaling uses bounded local search guided by the predicted global field. We evaluate PUN on planning tasks across dimensions. Across four noise levels, PUN matches or outperforms all compared planners, achieving 95-100% success on the 4D replanning benchmark while maintaining the lowest runtime. At the highest tested noise level in 4D, PUN achieves 10.7-60.6% relative gains in success rate over other methods while running 3.29-32.15 times faster.

Effective decision-making in human-centric environments such as Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) and clinical healthcare requires policies that are adaptive, data-efficient, and ethically deployable. Apprenticeship Learning (AL) infers policies directly from expert demonstrations by recovering the underlying reward structure, enabling strictly offline learning without environment interaction. This dissertation develops a progression of offline AL frameworks organized around two challenges: reward modeling and demonstration quality. For reward modeling, EM-EDM clusters demonstrations by latent reward functions and induces cluster-specific policies, and THEMES partitions trajectories into temporally coherent sub-trajectories guided by a hierarchically learned reward regulator; across one educational and three clinical datasets, THEMES outperforms flat and hierarchical AL baselines. For demonstration quality, HALIDE integrates continuous quality signals into hierarchical policy induction, enabling principled reuse of mixed-quality data under distribution shift. CCHAL further attributes quality to individual decisions via Bayesian credit assignment, dual-arm criticality scoring that contrasts expert and non-expert behavior, and a Bradley-Terry contrastive IRL objective over failure trajectories, outperforming baselines including HALIDE on three clinical EHR datasets and an ITS dataset. Finally, a real-world classroom evaluation of StuEDM, an EDM-induced policy that preserves student agency and intervenes only on disagreement, shows significant learning gains over an Expert baseline and a higher pretest-adjusted posttest score than a CQL policy trained on a far larger corpus, while overriding students less than half as often. Together, this work establishes offline AL as a practical, data-efficient, and ethically viable paradigm for human-centric environments.

LLM-based methods for node classification on text-attributed graphs (TAGs) routinely report state-of-the-art accuracy. We ask how these results compare with inexpensive baselines run on the same splits. On the splits of three recent studies, we tune four baseline representatives with validation-only selection and compare them with the highest mean that each paper reports for an LLM-based method in the matched setting. Correct & Smooth on TF-IDF features trails this reference by a median of 2.3 percentage points, and an MLP on frozen e5-large-v2 embeddings by 2.8 points. Correct & Smooth is within 3 points of the reference or better on 15 of 24 tasks, but the reference is significantly higher on 12 of 22 testable tasks, so several reported gains remain substantial. Reading released code next to the papers, we also document evaluation risks: selection of hyperparameters or checkpoints on the test set, labels of test-pool nodes used in training, baseline numbers reused without disclosure, and a text-label misalignment in a released Cora loader. Reports of the same method on the same split also differ by up to 12.5 points across papers whose configurations are not documented to match.

We present Qwen-Audio-3.1-ASR, a family of audio-language models that builds upon its predecesor Qwen-Audio-3.0-ASR with improved speech recognition and expanded capabilities in speaker-diarized transcription and general audio understanding. The family retains support for 30 languages and 16 Chinese dialects, together with instruction-controlled capabilities including historical-context conditioning, hierarchical hotword customization, and native transcription polishing. Speaker-diarized ASR produces structured outputs containing speaker labels, timestamps, and recognized text, maintaining consistent speaker labels across turns and the representation of overlapping speech. The general audio understanding capabilities cover audio-, speech-, and music-captioning, temporal grounding and sound event detection, as well as audio question answering and multiple-choice reasoning. These tasks broaden the application scope from recognizing spoken words to interpreting speakers, acoustic events, and their temporal relations. To accommodate different deployment requirements, the family includes variants for asynchronous file transcription, low-latency streaming, interactive voice input, and non-streaming recognition, with speaker-diarized transcription and general audio understanding available in certain variants. Evaluations span conventional ASR, multilingual and dialectal speech, speaker-diarized transcription, and general audio understanding, demonstrating the capabilities of the Qwen-Audio-3.1-ASR family across transcription and broader audio analysis tasks.

This chapter introduces data ethics for translation and discusses a number of ethical issues regarding data. These include issues of copyright, ownership and bias, which apply to all types of data, whereas there are further issues particular to minoritised language communities and those on either side of the digital divide, as data is implicated in power imbalances and dynamics. We close with a discussion of responsibility and regulation, and reflect on the growing attention on data ethics from translation studies researchers.

Evaluating the energy transmission ratio of an X-ray beam through a polymer composite is a challenging task in radiation shielding studies. The reference solution with Monte Carlo transport simulation is highly accurate but computationally expensive: each of our reference simulations is capped at $4\times10^9$ photon histories and a 20,000 s (over 5 hours) time limit, while closed-form analytical methods fail to represent such complex scenarios. We present an artificial neural network model that maps the unordered multi-set of molecular constituents, their mass fractions, and four bulk physical descriptors directly to the transmission ratio $I(t)/I_0$ in 1-3 milliseconds. The model is a Set Transformer, which makes it permutation invariant by construction and accepts mixtures of different sizes up to 11 constituents within a fixed-size padded set. Each constituent is embedded with a chemistry-pretrained transformer language model, ChemBERTa. In our proposed method, training data are produced by an automated PENELOPE/penEasy pipeline using the radiation source at 30, 80, 100, and 120 kV tube voltages over polyethylene-based shielding composite slabs of thicknesses spanning 0.15-2.5 mm. After preprocessing, the dataset contains $n = 4697$ simulated configurations on which a leakage-free, jointly stratified 10-fold cross-validation is performed, attaining mean squared error MSE = $(1.12 \pm 0.56)\times10^{-4}$, normalized-MSE percentage NMSE% = 0.0294% $\pm$ 0.0147%, and $R^2 = 0.9988$. The corresponding per-sample percentage errors give an alpha-trimmed ($α= 0.10$) absolute percentage error (APE) of 1.66% and a median APE of 1.15%. Our model's inference is several orders of magnitude faster than the underlying Monte Carlo simulation (sub-millisecond per query vs. several hours for the reference run) with effective accuracy in predicting $I(t)/I_0$.

Large retail chains must tailor assortment and pricing decisions to local customer preferences, yet even retailers with extensive sales records often have limited data for estimating demand at the store or local market level, particularly in product categories with short selling windows. Local estimation (fitting a demand model for each store on its own) can therefore be unreliable, while pooling data across stores improves estimation precision at the cost of ignoring local demand heterogeneity. We study how retailers can balance these competing effects through transfer learning under a multinomial logit (MNL) demand model. We propose a shrinkage estimator that combines store-specific demand estimates with information pooled from other stores. Unlike the linear or quadratic settings underlying much of the existing theoretical literature on information transfer in operations, the nonlinear MNL likelihood does not admit a straightforward bias-variance decomposition. By exploiting its self-concordant-like properties, we establish finite-sample performance guarantees that characterize when information transfer improves demand estimation and how the appropriate degree of shrinkage depends on local sample size, feature dimensionality, and cross-store heterogeneity. We further derive regret bounds for downstream assortment and pricing decisions. Numerical experiments demonstrate the operational benefits of shrinkage across different data environments. An empirical study using data from several hundred stores of a European apparel retailer shows that shrinkage improves out-of-sample product prioritization and revenue capture relative to both local estimation and full pooling. Our findings demonstrate how retailers can leverage information across their store networks to improve revenue management decisions while preserving local demand differences.