The Inference Report

July 18, 2026

The SWE-rebench rankings show no movement from previous results, with OpenAI gpt-5.5-2026-04-23-xhighModel holding 62.7% at the top, followed by JunieJunieAgent at 61.6% and OpenAI CodexAgent at 60.4%, all within their reported confidence intervals. The Artificial Analysis benchmark, however, reveals substantial reordering across its 408-model field: Claude Fable 5 now leads at 59.9 (previously #1 Claude Fable 5), GPT-5.6 Sol ranks #2 at 58.9 (up from #2 GPT-5.6 Sol), and Kimi K3 holds #3 at 57.1 (unchanged), while deeper in the list models like Mistral Medium 3.1 and Mistral Small 3.1 swapped positions at #181 and #182 with identical 14.7 scores, and QwQ 32B and Qwen3 235B A22B shifted between #198 and #199 at 13.4. These minor reorderings within the Artificial Analysis benchmark reflect typical variance at lower score ranges where models cluster closely, though the methodology for this benchmark remains opaque compared to SWE-rebench's explicit task-based evaluation. The SWE-rebench stability across all 24 models tested suggests either genuine performance plateau or insufficient evaluation frequency to detect meaningful drift in agent-based coding tasks. Without prior Artificial Analysis snapshots provided, the significance of its reordering cannot be assessed against historical patterns.

Cole Brennan

Daily rankings from SWE-rebench, a benchmark designed to fairly compare LLM capabilities on real-world software engineering tasks. Unlike other evaluations, it uses a standardized scaffolding for all models, continuously updates its dataset to prevent contamination, and runs each model five times to account for stochastic variance.

#ModelScore
1OpenAIgpt-5.5-2026-04-23-xhighModel62.7%± 0.91%
2JunieJunieAgent61.6%± 0.64%
3OpenAICodexAgent60.4%± 1.37%
4AnthropicClaude CodeAgent59.6%± 1.98%
5OpenAIgpt-5.5-2026-04-23-mediumModel58.9%± 0.78%
6AnthropicClaude Opus 4.8-xhighModel56.5%± 1.20%
7OpenAIgpt-5.4-2026-03-05-mediumModel54.9%± 1.02%
8AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7-highModel53.1%± 1.45%
9CursorCursorAgent53.0%± 0.53%
10AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6Model51.3%± 0.55%

Artificial Analysis composite index across coding, math, and reasoning benchmarks.

#ModelScoretok/s$/1M
1Claude Fable 559.957$20.00
2GPT-5.6 Sol58.966$11.25
3Kimi K357.159$6.00
4Claude Opus 4.855.753$10.00
5GPT-5.6 Terra55137$5.63
6GPT-5.554.866$11.25
7Grok 4.553.878$3.00
8Claude Opus 4.753.548$10.00
9Claude Sonnet 553.478$4.00
10GPT-5.451.4150$5.63

Output tokens per second — higher is faster. Minimum intelligence score of 40.

#Modeltok/s
1Gemini 3.5 Flash229
2Qwen3.7 Max198
3GPT-5.6 Luna178
4GPT-5.4 mini175
5GLM-5.2165
6GPT-5.4150
7Nex-N2-Pro145
8GPT-5.2 Codex144
9GPT-5.6 Terra137
10Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview126

Blended cost per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) — lower is cheaper. Minimum intelligence score of 40.

#Model$/1M
1DeepSeek V4 Flash$0.175
2MiniMax-M3$0.525
3DeepSeek V4 Pro$0.544
4MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.544
5Nex-N2-Pro$1.00
6GPT-5.4 mini$1.69
7Kimi K2.6$1.71
8Kimi K2.7 Code$1.71
9Muse Spark 1.1$2.00
10GLM-5.2$2.15