The Inference Report

July 14, 2026

The SWE-rebench leaderboard shows no movement since the previous update, with the same twenty-four models holding identical positions and scores, while the Artificial Analysis benchmark exhibits extensive shuffling across its four-hundred-plus entries. On the coding task benchmark, OpenAI's gpt-5.5-2026-04-23-xhighModel maintains 62.7% (±0.91%), Junie's agent holds 61.6% (±0.64%), and the top six models cluster between 56.5% and 62.7% with confidence intervals typically under two percentage points, suggesting stable measurement but limited differentiation in the high-performing tier. The Artificial Analysis data presents a different picture: Hy3 enters at position 26 with 41.2, KAT Coder Pro V2 drops from 35.4 to 33.7 and falls from rank 55 to 61, and models throughout the middle ranks shift by several positions without corresponding score changes, indicating the movements reflect reordering rather than performance updates. This pattern of rank reshuffling without score modification in Artificial Analysis suggests either a change in how ties are broken or a recomputation of model ordering logic, whereas the frozen SWE-rebench results offer no evidence of methodological change or new model evaluation since the previous brief. The confidence intervals on SWE-rebench remain tight enough to rule out noise, but the complete stasis across the leaderboard warrants clarification about whether these represent the same evaluation run or whether the benchmark itself has paused.

Cole Brennan

Daily rankings from SWE-rebench, a benchmark designed to fairly compare LLM capabilities on real-world software engineering tasks. Unlike other evaluations, it uses a standardized scaffolding for all models, continuously updates its dataset to prevent contamination, and runs each model five times to account for stochastic variance.

#ModelScore
1OpenAIgpt-5.5-2026-04-23-xhighModel62.7%± 0.91%
2JunieJunieAgent61.6%± 0.64%
3OpenAICodexAgent60.4%± 1.37%
4AnthropicClaude CodeAgent59.6%± 1.98%
5OpenAIgpt-5.5-2026-04-23-mediumModel58.9%± 0.78%
6AnthropicClaude Opus 4.8-xhighModel56.5%± 1.20%
7OpenAIgpt-5.4-2026-03-05-mediumModel54.9%± 1.02%
8AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7-highModel53.1%± 1.45%
9CursorCursorAgent53.0%± 0.53%
10AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6Model51.3%± 0.55%

Artificial Analysis composite index across coding, math, and reasoning benchmarks.

#ModelScoretok/s$/1M
1Claude Fable 559.968$20.00
2GPT-5.6 Sol58.980$11.25
3Claude Opus 4.855.758$10.00
4GPT-5.6 Terra55163$5.63
5GPT-5.554.883$11.25
6Grok 4.553.8121$3.00
7Claude Opus 4.753.553$10.00
8Claude Sonnet 553.482$4.00
9GPT-5.451.4171$5.63
10GPT-5.6 Luna51.2240$2.25

Output tokens per second — higher is faster. Minimum intelligence score of 40.

#Modeltok/s
1GPT-5.6 Luna240
2Gemini 3.5 Flash240
3GLM-5.2208
4Qwen3.7 Max197
5GPT-5.4171
6GPT-5.4 mini171
7GPT-5.6 Terra163
8GPT-5.2 Codex150
9Nex-N2-Pro140
10Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview138

Blended cost per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) — lower is cheaper. Minimum intelligence score of 40.

#Model$/1M
1DeepSeek V4 Flash$0.175
2MiniMax-M3$0.525
3DeepSeek V4 Pro$0.544
4MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.544
5Nex-N2-Pro$1.00
6GPT-5.4 mini$1.69
7Kimi K2.6$1.71
8Kimi K2.7 Code$1.71
9Muse Spark 1.1$2.00
10GLM-5.2$2.15