The SWE-rebench and Artificial Analysis benchmarks show minimal movement at the top tier, with Claude Code holding 52.9% on SWE-rebench while the next five models cluster within 0.8 percentage points, a pattern that has held steady. At Artificial Analysis, GPT-5.4 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview both score 57.2%, with the third-place GPT-5.3 Codex at 54, but the rankings below position 10 reveal more volatility: Kimi K2 Thinking jumped from position 30 to 13 on SWE-rebench with a 2.9-point gain to 43.8%, while Claude Opus 4.5 dropped from position 8 to 12 on SWE-rebench, losing 5.9 points to 43.8%, and GLM-5 fell from position 7 to 15 on SWE-rebench, declining 7.7 points to 42.1%. On Artificial Analysis, most entries shifted by single positions rather than substantial score changes, with new entries like MiniMax-M2.7 (49.6), GPT-5.4 mini (48.1), and GPT-5.4 nano (44.4) appearing in the upper rankings and Sarvam 105B (18.2) and Sarvam 30B (12.4) entering further down. The SWE-rebench benchmark's methodology remains unclear from the data provided, limiting assessment of whether these movements reflect genuine capability differences or testing variance; the compression of scores in the 40-52% range on SWE-rebench suggests either a ceiling effect or a narrowing gap between frontier models, while Artificial Analysis's broader distribution and deeper ranking list indicate different evaluation criteria or model coverage.
Cole Brennan
Daily rankings from SWE-rebench, a benchmark designed to fairly compare LLM capabilities on real-world software engineering tasks. Unlike other evaluations, it uses a standardized scaffolding for all models, continuously updates its dataset to prevent contamination, and runs each model five times to account for stochastic variance.
| # | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Code | 52.9% |
| 2 | Junie | 52.1% |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 51.7% |
| 4 | gpt-5.2-2025-12-11-xhigh | 51.7% |
| 5 | gpt-5.2-2025-12-11-medium | 51.0% |
| 6 | gpt-5.1-codex-max | 48.5% |
| 7 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 47.1% |
| 8 | Gemini 3 Pro Preview | 46.7% |
| 9 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | 46.7% |
| 10 | gpt-5.2-codex | 45.0% |
Artificial Analysis composite index across coding, math, and reasoning benchmarks.
| # | Model | Score | tok/s | $/1M |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.4 | 57.2 | 71 | $5.63 |
| 2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 57.2 | 112 | $4.50 |
| 3 | GPT-5.3 Codex | 54 | 66 | $4.81 |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 53 | 51 | $10.00 |
| 5 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 51.7 | 56 | $6.00 |
| 6 | GPT-5.2 | 51.3 | 66 | $4.81 |
| 7 | GLM-5 | 49.8 | 65 | $1.55 |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 49.7 | 56 | $10.00 |
| 9 | MiniMax-M2.7 | 49.6 | 43 | $0.525 |
| 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro | 49.2 | 0 | $0.00 |
Output tokens per second — higher is faster. Minimum intelligence score of 40.
| # | Model | tok/s |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.4 mini | 246 |
| 2 | GPT-5.4 nano | 231 |
| 3 | Grok 4.20 Beta 0309 | 197 |
| 4 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | 179 |
| 5 | GPT-5 Codex | 166 |
| 6 | MiMo-V2-Flash | 131 |
| 7 | Qwen3.5 122B A10B | 121 |
| 8 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 112 |
| 9 | Gemini 3 Pro Preview | 108 |
| 10 | GPT-5.1 Codex | 95 |
Blended cost per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) — lower is cheaper. Minimum intelligence score of 40.
| # | Model | $/1M |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | MiMo-V2-Flash | $0.15 |
| 2 | DeepSeek V3.2 | $0.315 |
| 3 | GPT-5.4 nano | $0.463 |
| 4 | MiniMax-M2.7 | $0.525 |
| 5 | MiniMax-M2.5 | $0.525 |
| 6 | GPT-5 mini | $0.688 |
| 7 | Qwen3.5 27B | $0.825 |
| 8 | GLM-4.7 | $1.00 |
| 9 | Kimi K2 Thinking | $1.07 |
| 10 | Qwen3.5 122B A10B | $1.10 |