The Inference Report

We introduce HyCOP, a modular framework that learns parametric PDE solution operators by composing simple modules (advection, diffusion, learned closures, boundary handling) in a query-conditioned way. Rather than learning a monolithic map, HyCOP learns a policy over short programs - which module to apply and for how long - conditioned on regime features and state statistics. Modules may be numerical sub-solvers or learned components, enabling hybrid surrogates evaluated at arbitrary query times without autoregressive rollout. Across diverse PDE benchmarks, HyCOP produces interpretable programs, delivers order-of-magnitude OOD improvements over monolithic neural operators, and supports modular transfer through dictionary updates (e.g., boundary swaps, residual enrichment). Our theory characterizes expressivity and gives an error decomposition that separates composition error from module error and doubles as a process-level diagnostic.

Design Structure Matrix (DSM) modularization, the task of partitioning system elements into cohesive modules, is a fundamental combinatorial challenge in engineering design. Traditional methods treat modularization as a pure graph optimization, without access to the engineering context embedded in the system. Building on prior work on LLM-based combinatorial optimization for DSM sequencing, this paper extends the method to modularization across five cases and three backbone LLMs. Our method achieves near-reference quality within 30 iterations without requiring specialized optimization code. Counterintuitively, domain knowledge, beneficial in sequencing, consistently impairs performance on more complex DSMs. We attribute this to semantic misalignment between the LLM's functional priors and the purely structural optimization objective, and propose the semantic-alignment hypothesis as a testable condition governing knowledge effectiveness with LLMs. Ablation studies identify the most effective input representation, objective formulation, and solution pool design for practical deployment. These findings offer practical guidance for deploying LLMs in engineering design optimization.

Technology mapping is a critical yet challenging stage in logic synthesis. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have been applied to generate optimization scripts, their potential for core algorithm enhancement remains untapped. We introduce MappingEvolve, an open-source framework that pioneers the use of LLMs to directly evolve technology mapping code. Our method abstracts the mapping process into distinct optimization operators and employs a hierarchical agent-based architecture, comprising a Planner, Evolver, and Evaluator, to guide the evolutionary search. This structured approach enables strategic and effective code modifications. Experiments show our method significantly outperforms direct evolution and strong baselines, achieving 10.04\% area reduction versus ABC and 7.93\% versus mockturtle, with 46.6\%--96.0\% $S_{overall}$ improvement on EPFL benchmarks, while explicitly navigating the area--delay trade-off. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/Flians/MappingEvolve.

Gaussian basis functions provide an efficient and flexible alternative to spline activations in KANs. In this work, we introduce the partition-of-unity Gaussian KAN (PU-GKAN), a Shepard-type normalized Gaussian KAN in which the Gaussian basis values on each edge are divided by their local sum over fixed centers. This produces a partition-of-unity feature map with trainable coefficients, while preserving the standard edge-based KAN structure. The normalized construction gives exact constant reproduction at the edge level and admits an explicit finite-feature kernel interpretation. We formulate both the standard Gaussian KAN (GKAN) and PU-GKAN from a finite-feature and additive-kernel viewpoint, making the induced layer kernels and empirical feature matrices explicit. Using the first-layer feature matrix as the reference object, we adopt a practical scale-selection interval for \(ε\), with the lower endpoint determined by adjacent-center overlap and the upper endpoint determined by a conservative conditioning threshold. Numerical experiments show that PU-GKAN reduces sensitivity to \(ε\), improves validation accuracy for most smooth and moderately non-smooth targets, and gives more stable training behavior. The benefit persists across sample-size and center-number sweeps, higher-dimensional architectures, Matérn RBF bases, and physics-informed examples involving Helmholtz and wave equations. These results indicate that Shepard-type partition-of-unity normalization is a simple and effective stabilization mechanism for RBF-based KANs.

The Gaussian scale parameter \(ε\) is central to the behavior of Gaussian Kolmogorov--Arnold Networks (KANs), yet its role in deep edge-based architectures has not been studied systematically. In this paper, we investigate how \(ε\) affects Gaussian KANs through first-layer feature geometry, conditioning, and approximation behavior. Our central observation is that scale selection is governed primarily by the first layer, since it is the only layer constructed directly on the input domain and any loss of distinguishability introduced there cannot be recovered by later layers. From this viewpoint, we analyze the first-layer feature matrix and identify a practical operating interval, \[ ε\in \left[\frac{1}{G-1},\frac{2}{G-1}\right], \] where \(G\) denotes the number of Gaussian centers. For the standard shared-center Gaussian KAN used in current practice, we interpret this interval not as a universal optimality result, but as a stable and effective design rule, and validate it through brute-force sweeps over \(ε\) across function-approximation problems with different collocation densities, grid resolutions, network architectures, and input dimensions, as well as a physics-informed Helmholtz problem. We further show that this range is useful for fixed-scale selection, variable-scale constructions, constrained training of \(ε\), and efficient scale search using early training MSE. Finally, using a matched Chebyshev reference, we show that a properly scaled Gaussian KAN can already be competitive in accuracy relative to another standard KAN basis. In this way, the paper positions scale selection as a practical design principle for Gaussian KANs rather than as an ad hoc hyperparameter choice.

Financial institutions face tension between maximizing data utility and mitigating the re-identification risks inherent in traditional anonymization methods. This paper explores Differentially Private (DP) synthetic data as a robust "Privacy by Design" framework to resolve this conflict, ensuring output privacy while satisfying stringent regulatory obligations. We examine two distinct generative paradigms: Direct Tabular Synthesis, which reconstructs high-fidelity joint distributions from raw data, and DP-Seeded Agent-Based Modeling (ABM), which uses DP-protected aggregates to parameterize complex, stateful simulations. While tabular synthesis excels at reflecting static historical correlations for QA testing and business analytics, the DP-Seeded ABM offers a forward-looking "counterfactual laboratory" capable of modeling dynamic market behaviors and black swan events. By decoupling individual identities from data utility, these methodologies eliminate traditional data-clearing bottlenecks, enabling seamless cross-institutional research and compliant decision-making in an evolving regulatory landscape.