The Inference Report

LLM-based chatbots are increasingly used as everyday confidants. Because they are designed to maximize user satisfaction, they can respond with excessive empathy and affirmation, which may reinforce mistaken beliefs and foster dependence on AI. While the psychological effects of chatbots on individual users have begun to be studied, how the psychological states and relationships of many users evolve when they keep consulting an AI is hard to observe in real settings. We build a virtual classroom simulation in which 20 student agents interact and, when stressed, consult either a friend or a counselor AI (Gemini 2.5 Flash). Each agent carries five state variables (stress, happiness, self-reliance, AI dependence, sociability), and each day has four phases (morning, noon, after school, night). The counselor is given six response styles via system prompts (affirming, listening, solution-oriented, reality-redirecting, inciting, blaming); a second LLM call acts as an evaluator that turns each consultation into parameter updates without seeing the style prompt. We compare the seven conditions, including a no-AI control, over 15 days in three classrooms, over 50 days, and under a lowered consultation threshold. In this simulation the solution-oriented style kept AI dependence low while raising self-reliance and maintaining happiness; the affirming and inciting styles markedly increased AI dependence, and the inciting style also increased stress and school non-attendance; the listening style did not relieve accumulated stress. The results describe the simulated system, not measured effects on humans. We give a complete specification of the agent dynamics, identify built-in mechanisms that shape the outcomes, and discuss the limitations of LLM-based evaluation and the validation steps (repeated runs, sensitivity analyses, human data) needed before psychological conclusions can be drawn.

Diffusion TV is an interactive AI art installation that offers a tangible and embodied experience of diffusion models through a modified CRT TV. By physically manipulating the TV's antenna, audiences control the clarity of AI-generated images and sounds, metaphorically enacting the denoising process that underlies diffusion-based generation. Using the tuning knob, participants switch between three channels featuring AI-generated animals from the Past (extinct species), Present (endangered species), and Future (speculative creatures), situating the interaction within a temporal and ecological narrative. Through continuous audiovisual feedback and physical interaction, Diffusion TV foregrounds the generative process over final outputs, allowing audiences to explore intermediate states as experiential material. Rather than providing explicit technical explanation, the work presents an alternative, embodied mode of explainable AI that invites exploratory engagement with and reflection on generative technologies.

Existing Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) literature has focused on identifying and structuring errors, failures, conflicts, and knowledge issues (called in this work as contradictions) in domain-specific dialogue-based interactions. However, there is still lack of a formal computational framework to represent and define these contradictions, interoperable and usable across HRI and human-agent interaction (HAI) domains. Thus, this research project aims to capture, represent, and evaluate the notion of (1) dialogue-based collaborative interaction and (2) related contradictions in a foundational ontology. METHONTOLOGY, a systematic approach to build domain-independent ontologies was applied. In the conceptualisation stage of the presented ontology, concepts and models from Activity Theory were used. Preliminary results presented in this short article are: (i) Natural language definitions of dialogues and related contradictions in HRI, (ii) Set Theoretic definitions of dialogues and contradictions, and (iii) First Order Logic (FoL) formulation of the contradiction concepts and three novel principles guiding dialogue-based interactions between humans and robots. In summary, we report on ongoing work to develop a foundational ontology based on Activity Theory called Activity Theory-based foundational ontology (ATFOt) to capture and represent the notion of contradictions in HRI.

Target-centered gaze interaction requires more than suppressing frame-to-frame fluctuations: target acquisition produces task-aligned changes in gaze-head dynamics, while a gaze trace may retain a persistent target-relative residual direction. We formulate gaze correction as online target-centered gaze-trajectory forecasting and stabilization and introduce GazeFS, which maps a variable-length gaze-head history to the next target-center direction and a short-horizon Search/Focus estimate without target information at inference. Across 7,960 acquisition episodes from 30 participants, Search-Focus differences remain stable under quality control, onset exclusion, and duration matching. History windows improve phase decoding over the current endpoint, but explicit task progress remains a strong control. Under the 30-participant, five-fold grouped out-of-fold protocol across three seeds, the reductions relative to raw hold in Focus episode bias, within-episode dispersion, and P90 target error are 0.182 degrees, 0.257 degrees, and 0.400 degrees, with participant-bootstrap 95% confidence intervals excluding zero. Endpoint-free replay from empty history preserves the Focus advantage and yields raw-network phase balanced accuracy/AUPRC of 0.925/0.993; coordinate controls further show that recent history contributes beyond explicit progress metadata. GazeFS therefore improves Focus target centering and empirical residual contraction while leaving temporal smoothness as a separate objective.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in organizational work, yet their errors often pass human review. Prior research locates such failures in users' capability to review LLM output or their engagement in doing so. We develop an alternative, retrieval-based account of human oversight and posit that error detection is more effective when oversight-relevant information is accessible to users at the moment of review. Across two randomized lab-in-the-field experiments with 640 customer-facing employees, we show that self-generated explanations improve error detection and strengthen recall of verification-relevant reasoning, while cues that reactivate such reasoning help sustain detection under repeated LLM use. Theoretically, we identify information retrievability as a distinct precondition for effective oversight and specify generative encoding and cue-supported reactivation as mechanisms that build and sustain it. Practically, lightweight onboarding self-explanations and daily retrieval cues can make human oversight more resilient as LLM use becomes routine.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly evolving from conversational assistants into agents capable of operating external digital environments. Graphical user interface (GUI) agents play an important role in this transition, as many real-world workflows remain accessible only through user-facing software interfaces. However, despite recent progress on general computer-use benchmarks, domain-specific professional standard operating procedures (SOPs) remain challenging for GUI agents because they often involve implicit domain knowledge, software-specific conventions, and task-level verification requirements. We introduce OmegaUse-SOP, a human-in-the-loop SOP Engineering system for transforming human demonstrations of professional computer use into reusable SOP skills for GUI agents. Analogous to prompt engineering, SOP Engineering iteratively refines demonstrations, execution rules, and domain knowledge to convert professional SOPs into reusable GUI-agent skills. OmegaUse-SOP consists of four modules: Observe, Reason, Configure, and Execute. Together, these modules record expert operations as multimodal GUI traces, abstract low-level events into semantic step-level instructions, incorporate domain rules and task-specific parameters, and execute the resulting skills in live GUI environments through step-wise grounding, action generation, and verification. To demonstrate its effectiveness, we collaborate with a power-sector client and test OmegaUse-SOP on photovoltaic simulation workflows in PVsyst 7.2. The results suggest that OmegaUse-SOP can improve GUI-agent reliability on professional SOP tasks, highlighting a practical path toward deploying GUI agents in domain-specific professional software environments.