The Inference Report

Reliability evaluation of deep neural networks under hardware faults commonly relies on fault injection, but exhaustive campaigns are intractable for modern models and datasets. Statistical fault injection reduces this cost, yet existing approaches still require large injection budgets because they do not explicitly exploit a key property of floating-point faults: the effect of a bit flip depends strongly on the value being corrupted. We propose TreeFI, a value-aware statistical fault-injection methodology for FP32 single-bit faults in DNN activations and weights. TreeFI partitions each layer's value distribution into intervals with similar expected bit-flip behavior, learned using regression trees, and allocates injections across these intervals according to their relevance for failure-rate estimation. This stratified allocation preserves the target confidence and error margin while avoiding unnecessary injections in low-impact regions of the fault space. We validate TreeFI on CNN and Transformer models using CIFAR-10 and ImageNet. On ResNet8, where exhaustive activation fault injection is feasible, TreeFI provides more accurate estimates than state-of-the-art statistical FI baselines under the same campaign setting. Across the evaluated models, TreeFI reduces the required injection budget by up to 72.1x, with average reductions of 44.9x for activation faults and 11.2x for the executed weight campaigns.

As spaceborne computing systems increasingly rely on neural network (NN) accelerators, the opacity of commercial, black-box architectures severely restricts the development of verifiable radiation mitigation strategies. Open-source, register-transfer level (RTL)-accessible accelerators resolve this limitation by enabling user-defined instrumentation, yet few have empirical radiation-response baselines. This work establishes a foundational system-level proton-irradiation baseline for an unmitigated open-source Tensil NN accelerator deployed on a Zynq UltraScale+ SoC executing ResNet-20 inference. Under 20 to 58 MeV proton irradiation, we delivered $4.29 \times 10^{10}$ p/cm$^{2}$ within monitored operational windows. Seven workload interruptions required two restarts of the notebook process, four reboots or board resets, and one power-cycle sequence. Two output-corruption events returned incorrect CIFAR-10 classes without loss of service. In the longer event, the accelerator returned a class absent from the ten-image CIFAR-10 pool for 39 consecutive inputs at normal cadence. The process remained alive, while the kernel log, limited memory test, and sampled power showed no anomaly. Observation of the stuck-class sequence ended with scheduled bitstream reconfiguration. All nine onsets occurred under the nominal 4 cm beam, which exposed the SoC, LPDDR4, and additional board circuitry; none occurred under the 2 cm SoC-centered field. This pattern shows a field association but does not establish LPDDR4 as the cause because field size was confounded with run order and dose. Linux-managed accelerators require end-to-end content checks and recovery that reaches the state in which corruption can persist. This baseline documents availability loss and silent output corruption, supporting future software hardening of COTS FPGA-SoCs for neural-network inference in space systems.

As integrated circuit technology scales into the nanometer regime, the traditional disconnect between logic synthesis and physical design has led to significant PPA (Power, Performance, and Area) degradation and prolonged design closure cycles. Traditional logic synthesis relies on non-physical Wire Load Models (WLMs), while recent spectral-based placement predictors often neglect the inherent hierarchical logic depth and signal flow of netlists, which leads to low-fidelity spatial estimations. To bridge this gap, we propose LevelSyn, a novel physical-aware logic synthesis framework that integrates hierarchical representation learning with a wirelength-driven optimization engine. At its core, LevelSyn leverages a level-asynchronous Graph Neural Network (GNN) to predict high-fidelity gate coordinates by capturing the structural and directional semantics of And-Inverter Graphs (AIGs). To handle industrial-scale designs, a level-aligned subgraph partitioning strategy is introduced to eliminate memory bottlenecks while preserving local logical dependencies. These spatial insights are seamlessly integrated into a newly developed physical-informed synthesis engine within the Berkeley ABC framework. Experimental results on the EPFL benchmark suite demonstrate that LevelSyn significantly outperforms state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods, achieving an average power reduction of 6.89\% and a timing delay improvement of 27.48\%. Furthermore, post-place-and-route validation shows a 99.59\% reduction in design rule check (DRC) violations, highlighting its effectiveness in accelerating design convergence.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models enable efficient scaling of large language model (LLM) inference but suffer from substantial data-movement overhead when deployed on neural processing unit (NPU)-based systems. Near-Data Processing (NDP) provides a promising way to mitigate this bottleneck via cooperative NPU-NDP execution. However, existing NPU-NDP MoE systems do not fully account for hardware heterogeneity, dynamic expert-level concurrency, and temporal expert reuse during batched inference. This paper presents DynaNDE, a dynamic near-data expert scheduling framework that exploits NPU-NDP collaboration to accelerate batched MoE inference. DynaNDE introduces an analytical performance model that captures hardware heterogeneity, data-movement costs, and communication-computation overlap in cooperative NPU-NDP execution. Guided by this model, DynaNDE determines per-layer expert scheduling across the NPU and NDP while accounting for expert-level concurrency. DynaNDE also incorporates a reuse-aware runtime that avoids redundant parameter movement when experts reside in NPU memory. Experimental results show that DynaNDE achieves substantial throughput improvements over the state-of-the-art NPU-NDP MoE serving framework, with average speedups of 2.6$\times$ and 2.2$\times$ for the prefill and decoding stages, respectively.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in software development, but their use in complex hardware design remains limited. This gap stems from both the scarcity of public hardware training data and the fundamentally different methodologies used in hardware design. In particular, applying LLMs to hardware requires more than direct RTL generation: the model must understand module boundaries, inter-module connections, and verification requirements. In this paper, we present an LLM-based hardware development framework with hierarchical intermediate representations (IRs) and an end-to-end multi-agent workflow. The core idea is to provide an abstraction of hardware design to LLMs through two structured IRs: Architectural Sketch, which captures module topology and interconnection, and Operational Specification, which defines per-module functionality and interfaces. Our framework uses these IRs to decompose a complex design into sub-modules, specify the per-block functionality, and derive how each module should be tested and verified. We incorporate a multi-agent debug loop in the framework, allowing agents to get the error feedback and control the debug details such as the signals to be probed for simulation. We evaluate our framework on Verilog-Eval benchmark, achieving a pass@5 rate of 95.5%, which surpasses current state-of-the-art LLM generation frameworks. To better assess performance on complex, realistic designs, we introduce a new case study spanning applications from general-purpose processors to digital signal processing systems. Experimental results indicate that such complex designs exceed the capabilities of existing approaches, whereas our framework is the only one capable of producing functional end-to-end design. Our generated RTL follows all industry-standard design rules, is lint-clean, functionally correct and fully synthesizable.

FPGA-GPP heterogeneous systems combine software flexibility with the performance and energy efficiency of reconfigurable hardware. However, determining which application tasks should execute on the GPP or FPGA requires extensive expertise and design-space exploration, particularly when user objectives vary across latency, communication, resource utilisation, and power. This paper proposes Gen-TAS, a knowledge-grounded LLM framework for user-specific FPGA-GPP task allocation. By combining task-graph analysis with RAG, Gen-TAS grounds LLM reasoning in historical implementation knowledge and generates multiple explainable strategies tailored to the specified objectives. Human-in-the-loop selection and a deterministic backend connect LLM-generated decisions to reproducible FPGA SoC implementations. Experiments on CNN and SDR workloads across multiple LLMs demonstrate stable, requirement-driven allocation. Under latency-oriented objectives, implementations following the selected strategies achieve speedups of up to 2.45$\times$ and 92.53$\times$, respectively, relative to the corresponding all-GPP baselines while other objectives select strategies that trade some acceleration performance for FPGA-GPP communication, resource utilisation, or FPGA power.