The Inference Report

Quantum software development is iterative and error-prone. Noisy hardware and repeated re-execution make experiment tracking, provenance, and reproducibility essential, yet these practices are hard to adopt because of tooling complexity and the specialized knowledge they demand. General-purpose language models can help but tend to hallucinate and lack grounding in domain-specific tooling. We present Qlippy, a retrieval-augmented GenAI assistant embedded in the development environment that grounds its responses in a curated corpus of quantum-software-engineering knowledge. Qlippy explains reproducibility and provenance concepts in context and augments existing Qiskit programs with MLflow-based experiment tracking aligned to the QProv schema. By separating knowledge from model parameters, grounding gives explicit control over the scope and provenance of the assistant's responses and reduces reliance on model scale, which points toward low-cost, privacy-preserving local deployment.

As quantum hardware scales to larger devices, the classical software layers that interface with it must evolve in step. Postprocessing routines developed and tested primarily in simulator settings can encode assumptions that no longer hold on utility-scale devices, leading to data loss that can be difficult to detect from high-level model outputs alone. We present a case study of \texttt{SamplerQNN}, the sampling-based quantum neural network class in the Qiskit Machine Learning library. Here, the postprocessing method applies a filter that assumes measurement bit-strings are in virtual qubit space. On our quantum hardware runs, where bit-strings span over 100 physical qubits, this filter led to the loss of 85 to 99.6\% of valid measurement shots, depending on the transpiler's qubit placement. The resulting probability vector is unnormalised, allowing distorted prediction and loss values to propagate through the model without an API-level warning. We demonstrate the impact across five experiments on two IBM backends: for inference, accuracy drops from 0.94 to 0.39 on the same raw measurements; for training, the loss signal is compressed by 22 to 27$\times$, substantially reducing the sensitivity of the optimiser to the objective landscape. The behaviour arises in all released versions of the library (0.8.4 to 0.9.0). We implemented a layout-based marginalisation fix, merged into the GitHub codebase as Pull Request \#1041, that makes \texttt{SamplerQNN} postprocessing forward-compatible with current and upcoming hardware.

Formalizing mathematics in a proof assistant, where a machine checks every definition, statement and proof, has set a new standard of rigor. Large language models are now capable of formalizing autonomously, even at the scale of whole textbooks. We bring this standard of rigor to physics, where theoretical arguments carry idealizations that are rarely stated fully, and any logical gaps could have a cascading effect on interdependent results. Recognizing the need to evaluate autoformalization systems for physics, we release AxQM, 1,019 kernel-checkable proof-synthesis tasks over 479 items drawn from the textbook Quantum Computation and Quantum Information by Nielsen and Chuang. The tasks are stated in a custom Lean library of finite-dimensional quantum mechanics. By task count, it is the largest proof-synthesis benchmark in physics by a factor of four. AxQM is derived from a near-complete formalization of the formal portions of the textbook, so every task is guaranteed a solution, which we keep private. Grading of the benchmark is done deterministically by the Lean kernel, which checks that the proof compiles, that no sorry appears in it or in any declaration it depends on, and that it introduces no new axioms.

In this paper, we introduce a notion of abstract quantum data type within the framework of universal algebra. This notion provides an algebraic foundation for describing data abstraction in quantum programming. We formally define a quantisation of classical data types and show that their equational specifications can be soundly lifted to the quantum setting. Two standard quantisation methods for classical functions, namely the bit oracle and the phase oracle, arise as special cases of this general construction. We illustrate the framework with applications to quantum arrays and quantum error-correcting codes, showing how they can be understood through the lens of data-type quantisation. We further establish conditions under which quantisation preserves structural relationships and constructions of classical data types, including embeddings, isomorphisms, and products.

Parameterised graph theory studies how the complexity of graph-theoretic problems depends on structural parameters of the input graph. This perspective has proved useful in analysing tensor-network simulation (Markov and Shi, 2008). Its implications for tensor-network representations and tomography are less well understood. In particular, which graph parameters determine whether a tensor-network state (TNS) admits a tractable matrix product state (MPS) or tree tensor network (TTN) representation, and which control the complexity of learning the state? We address these questions using parameterised graph theory. First, we show that cutwidth and tree-cutwidth bound the bond dimension overhead required to represent a TNS as an MPS or TTN. In the TTN case, tree-cutwidth also bounds the local dimension of the grouped subsystems. The proofs are based on entanglement rerouting, a tensor-network analogue of rerouting information in a classical network. Second, we derive graph-dependent upper bounds on the sample and computational complexity of realisable TNS tomography, with exponents that depend on cutwidth, tree-cutwidth, and a new graph parameter, learning complexity, which we bound in terms of degree and treewidth. We obtain these results by extending the disentangling MPS learner of (Cramer et al., 2010), as analysed further in (Bakshi et al., 2025; Lin et al., 2025), to TTNs and to tensor networks on arbitrary known graphs. Finally, we extend the framework beyond the realisable setting. For an arbitrary input state, our agnostic learner outputs a pure state whose fidelity is within additive error $ε$ of the optimum over tensor-network states on the given graph with a given bond dimension, with explicit graph-dependent bounds on sample and computational complexity.

Quantum generative models offer a promising framework for exploring whether quantum computation can enhance generative machine learning. Flow matching is a generative method in which samples are generated by transporting a simple, known distribution to the target data distribution with a learned velocity field. Its quantum counterpart, known as quantum flow matching (QFM), was introduced recently, and, like its classical counterpart, requires integrating an ordinary differential equation over many time steps during inference. As each step requires the output from the previous step, the circuit submission is sequential and a drawback on quantum computers as they have high input/output costs. To alleviate this problem, we introduce Quantum MeanFlow (QMF), the quantum analogue of the MeanFlow formulation, which allows single-step sample generation. While the QFM learns an instantaneous velocity field at each time step, QMF learns the average velocity over a time interval. We use a parameterized quantum circuit to learn these velocity fields and benchmark the two methods on the MNIST dataset. We show that while single-step QMF has lower image quality compared to multi-step QFM, it performs better than the single-step QFM sampling at every shot count. Both of our models are executed on IBM quantum computers and best-of-N rejection sampling recovers most of the accuracy lost to device noise without modifying the circuit. This is especially advantageous for QMF which has only one circuit evaluation per image. Here, We establish QMF as a viable method for single-step quantum generative sampling, saving on quantum circuit evaluations per generated sample.