The Inference Report

Projected quantum kernels (PQKs) have emerged as a notable approach to circumvent the hardness of machine learning tasks arising from the exponential dimensionality of the quantum Hilbert space. However, recent PQK studies often rely heavily on extensive classical hyperparameter tuning of the radial basis function (RBF) kernel parameter and the support vector machine regularization parameter. The extensive tuning can mask the true representational power of the underlying PQKs induced by quantum feature maps, which has not been explored in detail. Thus, this work aims to expose the structural capabilities of PQKs by isolating and evaluating their native inductive bias through comparisons between untuned and tuned PQKs against the RBF baseline. Furthermore, we propose novel quantum feature maps that leverage two-qubit entanglement to capture multivariate correlations in IoT data. The results show that extensive tuning can lead to competitive performance architectures, while our proposed entanglement topologies exhibit a significantly stronger native inductive bias. This reveals that superior quantum architectural design can yield structurally better PQKs with improvements arising from quantum-mechanical properties rather than from classical hyperparameter tuning.

Quantum error-correcting code (QECC) implementations are hybrid software-control systems: measured syndromes drive decoder dispatch, recovery actions, and logical checks. Existing QECC verification techniques can prove formal obligations, and general quantum testing can expose final failures, but developers still lack a scalable testing workflow that generates concrete faults and explains where a QECC repair path first diverges. This paper presents ConQEC, to our knowledge the first concolic testing framework for QECC implementations. By combining concrete (Pauli) fault replay with symbolic repair-path constraints, ConQEC generates tests that expose not only final logical failures but also fault--syndrome--decoder--recovery (FSDR) diagnostics: the injected fault, observed syndrome, decoder decision, recovery action, oracle result, and earliest divergent stage. Its symbolic encoding of Pauli faults, syndrome predicates, decoder and recovery relations, and oracle checks enables this diagnostic workflow to scale beyond exponentially increasing amplitude-level quantum-state reasoning. We implemented ConQEC and evaluated it on generated source-level QECC families and public QECC artifacts with up to thousands of qubits. ConQEC detects the seeded bug in every experimental case and reports a replay-valid, fault-localizing FSDR witness for each.

As quantum computing moves from the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era toward early fault-tolerant quantum computing (EFTQC), quantum-enhanced AI is shifting from a conceptual idea to experimental research. Quantum components are expected to extend the capabilities of existing AI systems, yet it remains unclear how such components will help within large multimodal models. In this study, we try to answer that question for vision-language models (VLMs) using classically simulated quantum layers. With LLaVA-OneVision as the backbone, we evaluate 4- and 8-qubit basic-ring and strongly entangling circuits at four insertion and four replacement locations. Insertion adds quantum layers to the classical model, while replacement substitutes them for classical components. Using the same setup, we compare performance and computational cost between classical and quantum-classical hybrid models. On the Visual Spatial Reasoning dataset, inserting a quantum layer after the visual projector reaches 80.7% development accuracy, 2.28 percentage-points above classical full fine-tuning. Replacing the final decoder feed-forward sublayer retains 79.22% accuracy with 13.07 million fewer trainable parameters. Quantum insertion can thus improve accuracy, and selective replacement can reduce parameters. These benefits depend strongly on where the quantum layer is inserted or which classical component it replaces: earlier replacements lower accuracy, and fewer parameters do not reliably shorten training or reduce computation. To assess potential security benefits, we evaluated the robustness of quantum-classical hybrid models under six attack settings. Overall, our study maps where quantum layers help and hurt within VLMs, offering a starting point for hybrid VLM design; whether these gains generalize remains open. The code is available at https://github.com/TITANS-Lab-Artifacts/QuantumVLM.

Selecting an effective quantum compiler configuration requires coordinated decisions over both hardware targets and compiler settings, with the ultimate goal of improving circuit execution fidelity. Existing SOTA approaches typically decompose this problem into two sequential stages: a device is chosen first, after which compiler options are tuned on that device through RL-based search. This bottom-up strategy can be fundamentally limited by its initial device decision, since a poorly matched backend may constrain the best fidelity achievable regardless of how effectively later compiler options are optimized. In contrast to classical compiler tuning, where the search space is often prohibitively large, the configuration space of quantum compilers remains manageable enough to support exhaustive search. Consequently, rather than repeatedly searching from candidate configurations, one can derive reusable configuration knowledge from offline oracle results and apply it directly to new circuits. In this paper, we introduce a top-down configuration-selection paradigm and build QuOPTBench, an exhaustively searched benchmark containing oracle configurations for 268 quantum circuits. We first study whether LLMs can directly infer suitable configurations and evaluate ten representative LLMs. The results reveal that vanilla LLMs remain far from the oracle. We then employ an LLM to extract transferable rules from sampled circuits governing configuration selection. Using these rules together with predictors trained on the enumerated configuration data of the sampled circuits, we design QuTOP, a rule-guided ML framework that performs fast configuration selection without iterative online search. Across our evaluation, the distilled rules consistently strengthen LLM-based selection, while QuTOP provides the strongest overall balance between solution quality and selection latency among the baselines.

Cloud-accessible quantum computing has made heterogeneous Quantum Processing Units (QPUs) available through provider platforms that differ in qubit technology, calibration state, queueing behavior, and pricing model. This heterogeneity makes execution management a quantum-engineering concern: a quantum circuit may be executable on several backends, but the resulting cost, latency, fidelity, and reproducibility depend on backend selection and on how measurement shots are allocated. This paper presents the Quantum Broker, an open-source and provider-agnostic framework for Quality-of-Service-aware quantum execution management. The framework operationalizes shot-wise distribution by exploiting the statistical independence of quantum measurement shots to dispatch a single circuit across multiple heterogeneous QPUs according to user-defined constraints and optimization objectives. It combines a modular execution architecture, interchangeable backend-profiling strategies, and the Quantum QoS Specification Language (QQSpec), a declarative language for expressing QoS requirements. Dispatch planning is supported by two solver backends: a mixed-integer linear-programming (MILP) solver, and a nonlinear dual-annealing solver. Experiments on benchmark quantum circuits and noisy simulator backends show that the Quantum Broker can produce feasible QoS-aware dispatch plans under heterogeneous backend conditions and can improve QoS satisfaction with respect to single-backend and naive multi-backend baselines. The results also expose a practical trade-off between planning time and dispatch quality, with the nonlinear solver producing higher-quality allocations at increased computational cost. Overall, the Quantum Broker provides an extensible execution-management layer for engineering portable, reproducible, and QoS-aware quantum software over fragmented quantum cloud infrastructures.

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and its variants are leading algorithms to help solve challenging combinatorial optimization problems. QAOA maps these problems to Ising Hamiltonians such that their ground state is the desired solution. Candidate solutions are then drawn from a variational quantum circuit. The performance of QAOA hinges on a set of variational angles. However, finding good angles is an instance-specific and computationally expensive non-convex classical optimization task. Here, we learn the mapping from the problem instance to high-quality QAOA angles. Our learned models replace the per-instance optimization, that we call the solver, with a single forward pass that is several orders of magnitude faster than the solver with a near identical quality. Our models further generalize to unseen topologies such as Barabási-Albert and 2D grid graphs. Experiments on quantum hardware confirm that QAOA samples with angles produced by our open-source models are indistinguishable from solver angles. Crucially, models sensitive to the topology of the problem instance increase the quality of the QAOA angles. Our work amortizes a major bottleneck in QAOA by an up-front data generation and training cost. Importantly, this cost can be amortized over time in settings where many similar problems are optimized on a regular basis, as is often the case in applications for industry.